Doğu Trakya Bölgesi’nde Yeraltı Suyu Kalitesinin Araştırılması Amacıyla Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemi Yardımı ile Su Kalite İndeksi Uygulaması

Öz

Su kalitesi değerlendirmesi, çevresel yönetim planlarının daima önemli bir parçası olmuştur. Bu çalışmada, Doğu Trakya Bölgesi’ndeki yeraltı sularının içme ve sulama amaçlı kalitesi değerlendirilmiş ve sonuçların mekânsal dağılımı haritalanmıştır. Çalışma alanındaki 18 adet derin su kuyusundan alınan örneklerin su kalitesinin değerlendirilmesi amacıyla hidrokimyasal özellikleri saptanmıştır. İnsani tüketim amaçlı su kalitesi değerlendirmesi için Su Kalite İndeksi (SKİ) hesaplanmıştır. SKİ değerleri, yeraltısularının % 52’sinin tarımsal ilaçlamadan dolayı “kötü” ve “çok kötü” sınıfında olduğunu göstermiştir. Bununla beraber, sulama amaçlı olarak yeraltı sularının büyük kısmının, sodyum absorbsiyon oranı (SAR), artık sodyum bicarbonat (RSC), sodyum yüzdesi (Na%) ve magnezyum tehlikesi (MH) açısından uygun olduğu görülmüştür. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri,Yeraltısuyu,Trakya,Su Kalite İndeksi

Application of Water Quality Index with the Aid of Geographic Information System in Eastern Thrace to Assess Groundwater Quality

Öz

Water quality assessment has always been a major part of environmental management plans. In this study, the groundwater quality and spatial distribution in the eastern Thrace region was assessed and mapped for agricultural and drinking purposes. Groundwater samples (n = 18) were collected from deep wells in the study area and analyzed for hydrochemical properties for the water quality assessment. The Water Quality Index (WQI) was calculated for the quantification of water quality for human consumption. The WQI values showed that 52 % of the groundwater samples fall in the “poor” and “very poor” category due to agricultural impact. Nevertheless, the majority of the groundwater were suitable for irrigation in terms of sodium absorption ratio (SAR), residual sodium carbonate (RSC), sodium ratio (Na%) and magnesium hazard (MH).

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Geographical Information System,Groundwater,Thrace,Water Quality Index

Kaynakça

1. Abbasi, T., Abbasi, S. A., 2012. Water quality indices, Great Britain, Elsevier, 384 p.
2. Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J. H., Petty, R. J., Hackett, G., 1987. DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeological settings. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, EPA-600/ 2-87-035, National Water Well Association, Dublin, Ohio.
3. American Public Health Association (APHA), 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water; 18th ed., Washington, MWWA&WPCF.
4. Arkoc, O., 2011. Assessment of water quality of east part of the Ergene basin, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 11 (4), 1644-1655.
5. Arkoç, O., 2013. Assessment of scaling properties of groundwater with elevated sulfate concentration: a case study from Ergene Basin, Turkey. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6 (11), 4377-4385.
6. Avvannavar, S. M., Shrihari, S., 2008. Evaluation of water quality index for drinking purposes for river Netravathi, Mangalore, South India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 143, 279–290.
7. Ayers, R. S., Westcot, D. W., 1985. Water quality for agriculture; FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev. 1, U. N. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
8. Baba, A., Tayfur, G., 2011. Groundwater contamination and its effect on health in Turkey.

9. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 183 (1-4), 77-94.
10. Bairu, A., Tadesse, N., Amare, S., 2013. Use of geographic information system and water quality index to assess suitability of groundwater quality for drinking purposes in Hewane areas, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 6 (2),110-123.
11. Beltrán, J. M., 1999. Irrigation with saline water: benefits and environmental impact. Agricultural Water Management, 40 (2),183-194.
12. Boyacioglu, H., 2010. Utilization of the water quality index method as a classification tool.
13. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 167 (1-4), 115-124.
14. Caglayan, M. A, Yurtsever, A., 1998. Series of 1:100.000 scaled Geological map of Turkey, No: 20,21, 22, 23, General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara (in Turkish).
15. DSİ, 2003. Hydrogeological report of Ergene Basin. The 11th District Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, Edirne (in Turkish).
16. Eaton, F. M., 1950. Significance of carbonate in irrigation water. Soil Science, 69 (2),123–133.
17. Fytianos, K., Christophoridis, C., 2004. Nitrate, arsenic and chloride pollution of drinking water in Northern Greece. Elaboration by applying GIS. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 93 (1-3), 55-67.
18. Gazzaz, N. M., Yusoff, M. K., Aris, A. Z., Juahir, H., Ramli, M. F., 2012. Artificial neural network
19. modeling of the water quality index for Kinta River (Malaysia) using water quality variables as predictors. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 64 (11), 2409-2420.
20. Iticescu, C., Georgescu, L. P., Topa, C. M., 2013. Assessing the Danube water quality index in the city of Galati, Romania. Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 8 (4), 155-164.