Stereolitografi ve eriyik yığma modellemesi eklemeli imalat yöntemleriyle üretilen numunelerin mekanik özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması

Öz

Eklemeli üretim (AM) teknolojisi, çeşitli uygulamalar için 3 boyutlu parçaların hızlı imalatıyla büyük ilgi gördü. Bu teknolojideki en popüler iki teknik olan Erimiş Biriktirme Modelleme (FDM) ve Stereolitografi (SLA), karmaşık şekillere sahip fonksiyonel parçaların hızlı ve ucuz bir şekilde üretilmesini mümkün kılar. Bu yöntemlerle üretilen parçaların mekanik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi ilgili alanlarda verimli çalışma açısından önemlidir. Bu çalışmada SLA ve FDM tipi 3D yazıcılarda üç farklı polimer malzeme (UVR, PLA ve ABS) kullanılarak çekme, basma ve 3 noktalı bükme testleri dahil olmak üzere kırk beş test numunesi üretildi. Numuneler ASTM standartlarına göre %75 doluluk oranında yazdırılır. Numunelerin mekanik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla deneysel çalışmalar yapılmıştır. Numuneler arasında en yüksek dayanım değerleri UVR malzemeden yapılan çekme, basma ve eğme test numunelerinde sırasıyla 60,39 MPa, 127,74 MPa ve 118,35 MPa oldu. Numunelerin yüzey pürüzlülüğünü, yüzey topoğrafyasını ve kompozisyonunu incelemek için mekanik özelliklere ek olarak sertlik ve SEM analizleri yapıldı.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eklemeli imalat
• Sıkıştırma testi
• Erimiş biriktirme modellemesi
• Stereolitografi
• Çekme testi
• 3 Nokta Eğme Testi

Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Samples Fabricated by Stereolithography and Fused Deposition Modelling

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) technology has attracted significant attention with the rapid fabri-cation of 3D parts for various applications. With fused deposition modeling (FDM) and stereo-lithography (SLA), the most used methods in this technology, it is possible to produce functional parts with complex shapes quickly and cheaply. Determining the mechanical properties of the parts produced by these methods is important in terms of efficient operation in the relevant fields. This study, 45 test specimens were fabricated using three different polymer materials (UVR, PLA, and ABS) in SLA and FDM type 3D printers, including tensile, compression, and 3-point bending tests. Samples are printed at a 75% fill rate according to ASTM standards. Experimental studies were carried out to determine the mechanical properties of the samples. Among the samples, the highest strength values in tensile, compression and bending test samples made of UVR material were 60.39 MPa, 127.74 MPa and 118.35 MPa, respectively. In addition to mechanical properties, hardness, and SEM analyses were performed to examine the surface roughness, surface topography, and composition of the samples. As a result, the effects on the mechanical properties of the samples fabricated by the UVR-based SLA method and the PLA-ABS-based FDM method were examined and compared.

Keywords

• Additive manufacturing
• Stereolithography
• Fused deposition modelling
• Tensile test
• Compression test
• 3-point bending test

Kaynakça

1. Aloyaydi B. A., Sivasankaran S., Low-velocity impact characteristics of 3D-printed poly-lactic acid thermoplastic processed by fused deposition modeling. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals 73, 1669-1677, 2020.
2. Atakok G., Kam, M., Koc H.B., Tensile, three-point bending and impact strength of 3D printed parts using PLA and recycled PLA filaments: A statistical investigation. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 18, 1542-1554, 2022.
3. Ble-Bail A., Maniglia B.C., Le-Bail P., Recent advances and future perspective in additive manufacturing of foods based on 3D printing. Current Opinion in Food Science 35, 54-64, 2020.
4. Böckin D., Tillman A.M., Environmental assessment of additive manufacturing in the automotive industry. Journal of cleaner production, 226, 977-987, 2019.
5. Camargo J.C., Machado Á.R., Almeida E.C., Silva E.F.M.S., Mechanical properties of PLA-graphene filament for FDM 3D printing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 103, 2423-2443, 2019.
6. Chacón J.M., Caminero M.A., García-Plaza E., Núnez P.J., Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Materials & Design 124, 143-157.
7. Chaudhary R., Fabbri P., Leoni E., Mazzanti F., Akbari R., Antonini C., Additive manufacturing by digital light processing: a review. Progress in Additive Manufacturing 8, 331-351, 2023.
8. Cheng B., Shrestha S., Chou, K., Stress and deformation evaluations of scanning strategy effect in selective laser melting. Additive Manufacturing 12, 240-251, 2016.

9. Chesser P., Post B., Roschli A., Carnal C., Lind R., Borish M., Love L., Extrusion control for high quality printing on Big Area Additive Manufacturing (BAAM) systems. Additive Manufacturing 28, 445-455, 2019.
10. Chohan J.S., Singh R., Pre and post processing techniques to improve surface characteristics of FDM parts: a state of art review and future applications. Rapid Prototyping Journal 23, 495-513, 2017.
11. De León A.S., Domínguez-Calvo A., Molina S.I., Materials with enhanced adhesive properties based on acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS)/thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) blends for fused filament fabrication (FFF). Materials & Design 182, 108044, 2019.
12. Dehurtevent M., Robberecht L., Hornez J.C., Thuault A., Deveaux E., Béhin P., Stereolithography: A new method for processing dental ceramics by additive computer-aided manufacturing. Dental materials 33, 477-485, 2017.
13. Du Plessis A., Yadroitsava I., Yadroitsev I., Effects of defects on mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing: A review focusing on X-ray tomography insights 2020, Materials & Design 187, 108385, 2020.
14. Duman B., Özsoy K., A deep learning-based approach for defect detection in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing using transfer learning. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University 37, 361-375, 2022.
15. Ertugrul I., Ulkir O., Ersoy S., Ragulskis M., Additive Manufactured Strain Sensor Using Stereolithography Method with Photo-polymer Material. Polymers 15, 991, 2023.
16. Galati M., Iuliano L., A literature review of powder-based electron beam melting focusing on numerical simulations. Additive Manufacturing 19, 1-20, 2018.
17. Grabowik C., Kalinowski K., Ćwikła G., Paprocka I., Kogut P., Tensile tests of specimens made of selected group of the filament materials manufactured with FDM method. In MATEC Web of Conferences 112, 04017, 2017.
18. Haleem A., Javaid M., Additive manufacturing applications in industry 4.0: a review. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management 4, 1930001, 2019.
19. Heidari-Rarani M., Rafiee-Afarani M., Zahedi A.M., Mechanical characterization of FDM 3D printing of continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. Composites Part B: Engineering 175, 107147, 2019.
20. Ishak M. R., Leman Z., Sapuan S. M., Edeerozey A. M. M., Othman I. S., Mechanical properties of kenaf bast and core fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 11 (1), 012006, 2010.
21. Kafle A., Luis E., Silwal R., Pan H.M., Shrestha P.L., Bastola A.K., 3D/4D Printing of polymers: Fused deposition modelling (FDM), selective laser sintering (SLS), and stereolithography (SLA). Polymers 13, 3101, 2021.
22. Kawalkar R., Dubey H.K., Lokhande S.P., A review for advancements in standardization for additive manufacturing. Materials Today: Proceedings 50, 1983-1990, 2022.
23. Kempin W., Franz C., Koster L.C., Schneider F., Bogdahn M., Weitschies W., Seidlitz A., Assessment of different polymers and drug loads for fused deposition modeling of drug loaded implants. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 115, 84-93, 2017.
24. Kholil A., Asyaefudin E., Pinto N., Syaripuddin S., Compression Strength Characteristics of ABS and PLA Materials Affected by Layer Thickness on FDM. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2377, 012008, 2022.
25. Kim Y., Choi E. S., Kwak W., Shin Y., Analysis of the thermal distribution by using laser-beam irradiation. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 51, 503-508, 2007.
26. Laureto J. J., Pearce J. M., Anisotropic mechanical property variance between ASTM D638-14 type i and type iv fused filament fabricated specimens. Polymer Testing, 68, 294-301, 2018.
27. Li W., Mille L.S., Robledo J.A., Uribe T., Huerta V., Zhang Y.S., Recent advances in formulating and processing biomaterial inks for vat polymerization‐based 3D printing. Advanced healthcare materials 9, 2000156, 2020.
28. Marșavina L., Vălean C., Mărghitaș M., Linul E., Razavi N., Berto F., Brighenti R., Effect of the manufacturing parameters on the tensile and fracture properties of FDM 3D-printed PLA specimens. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 274, 108766, 2022.
29. Mercado-Colmenero J.M., La Rubia M.D., Mata-Garcia E., Rodriguez-Santiago M., Martin-Doñate C., Experimental and numerical analysis for the mechanical characterization of petg polymers manufactured with FDM technology under pure uniaxial compression stress states for architectural applications. Polymers 12, 2202, 2020.
30. Miedzińska D., Gielet R., Małek E., Experimental study of strength properties of SLA resins under low and high strain rates. Mechanics of Materials 141, 103245, 2020.
31. Morão A., De Bie, F., Life cycle impact assessment of polylactic acid (PLA) produced from sugarcane in Thailand. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 27(11), 2523-2539, 2019.
32. Mukhtarkhanov M., Perveen A., Talamona D., Application of stereolithography based 3D printing technology in investment casting. Micromachines 11, 946, 2020.
33. Nguyen A.K., Narayan, R.J., Two-photon polymerization for biological applications. Materials Today 20, 314-322, 2017.
34. Özsoy K., Aksoy B., Bayrakçı H.C., Optimization of thermal modeling using machine learning techniques in fused deposition modeling 3-D printing. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 50, 613-628, 2022.
35. Özsoy K., Erçetin A., Çevik Z.A., Comparison of mechanical properties of PLA and ABS based structures fabricated by fused deposition modelling additive manufacturing. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 27, 802-809, 2021.
36. Patpatiy P., Chaudhary K., Shastri A., Sharma S., A review on polyjet 3D printing of polymers and multi-material structures. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 236, 7899-7926, 2022.
37. Prabhakar M.M., Saravanan A.K., Lenin A.H., Mayandi K., Ramalingam P.S., A short review on 3D printing methods, process parameters and materials. Materials Today: Proceedings 45, 6108-6114, 2021.
38. Salman S. D., Hassimb W. W., Leman Z, Experimental comparison between two types of hybrid composite materials in compression test. Carbon, 3, 119-23, 2015.
39. Shassere B., Nycz A., Noakes M.W., Masuo C., Sridharan N., Correlation of microstructure and mechanical properties of metal big area additive manufacturing. Applied Sciences 9, 787, 2019.
40. Shi K., Salvage J.P., Maniruzzaman M., Nokhodchi A., Role of release modifiers to modulate drug release from fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printed tablets. International journal of pharmaceutics 597, 120315, 2021.
41. Singh S., Ramakrishna S., Singh R., Material issues in additive manufacturing: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 25, 185-200, 2017.
42. Turan S. R., Ülkir O., Kuncan M., Buldu A., Stereolithografi eklemeli imalat yöntemiyle farklı doluluk oranlarında üretilen numunelerin mekanik özelliklerinin incelenmesi. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry 6(3), 399-407.
43. Uludag M., Ulkir O., Ertugrul, I., Kaplanoglu E., Design, fabrication, and experiments of a soft pneumatic gripper with closed-loop position control. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 51, 2023.
44. Yadav D., Chhabra D., Garg R.K., Ahlawat A., Phogat A., Optimization of FDM 3D printing process parameters for multi-material using artificial neural network. Materials Today: Proceedings 21, 1583-1591, 2020.
45. Yadav D.K., Srivastava R., Dev S., Design & fabrication of ABS part by FDM for automobile application. Materials Today: Proceedings 26, 2089-2093, 2020.
46. Yang Y., Li L., Zhao J., Mechanical property modeling of photosensitive liquid resin in stereolithography additive manufacturing: Bridging degree of cure with tensile strength and hardness. Materials & Design 162, 418-428, 2019.
47. Zhao Y., Chen Y., Zhou Y., Novel mechanical models of tensile strength and elastic property of FDM AM PLA materials: Experimental and theoretical analyses. Materials & Design 181, 108089, 2019.