THE EFFECTS OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP STYLE AND LEADER – MEMBER EXCHANGE ON INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOUR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Öz

Innovation isn’t only a success factor for an organization’s but also an important driving force for economic development. Today, all organizasyion to survive and develop should have a stronger innovative capacity and force for change. Innovation is the internal power of economic development, and also the core part of the optimization of industrial structure. Therefore, all organizations should develop and strengthen innovative working behavior to create a new model of development and a new economic growth point. The main purpose of the research is to deal with the studies investigating the effect of the transformational leadership style, which is the most associated with innovative work behavior among modern leadership styles, and the leader-member exchange theory, which is seen as the main part of this process, on the innovative work behavior of employees, to contribute to the literature for further research by drawing a general framework with a systematic review. Scopus (n=6), Web of Science (n=65), Emerald Insight (n=5), EBSCOhost (n=4), Google Scholar (n=26), ULAKBİM (n=5), 111 studies reached, including after removing the duplicates, 80 articles were limited within the framework of the determined criteria. The remaining 10 articles were systematically reviewed and findings were summarized. Systematic review show that the transformational leadership style and leader-member exchange directly affect innovative work behavior, while the leader-member exchange mediates this relationship.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Transformational Leader
• Leader Member Exchange
• Innovative Work Behaviour
• Systematic Review

DÖNÜŞÜMCÜ LİDERLİK TARZI VE LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN İNOVATİF ÇALIŞMA DAVRANIŞINA ETKİSİ: SİSTEMATİK BİR DERLEME ÇALIŞMASI

Öz

İnovasyon, bir örgütün yalnızca rekabet avantajı için sadece bir başarı faktörü değil, aynı zamanda ekonomik kalkınma içinde önemli bir itici güçtür. Bugün tüm örgütlerin hayatta kalması ve gelişmesi için daha güçlü bir inovasyon kapasitesine ve değişim gücüne sahip olması gerekmektedir. İnovasyon, ekonomik kalkınmanın içsel gücü ve aynı zamanda endüstriyel yapının optimizasyonunun da temel parçasıdır. Bu nedenle tüm örgütler yeni bir kalkınma modeli ve ekonomik büyüme noktası yaratmak için inovatif çalışma davranışını geliştirmeli ve güçlendirmelidir. Araştırmanın temel çıkış noktası modern liderlik tarzları içinde inovatif çalışma davranışı ile en fazla ilişkilendirilen dönüşümcü liderlik tarzının ve bu sürecin temel yapıtaşı olarak görülen lider-üye etkileşim teorisinin çalışanların inovatif çalışma davranışına etkisini araştıran çalışmaları ele alarak, sistematik derleme ile genel bir çerçeve çizerek sonraki araştırmalar için yazına katkı sağlamaktır. Scopus (n=6), Web of Science (n=65), Emerald Insight (n=5), EBSCOhost (n=4), Google Scholar (n=26), ULAKBİM (n=5) olmak üzere ulaşılan 111 çalışma, kopyalar (duplikasyonlar) kaldırıldıktan sonra toplam 80 makale belirlenen kriterler çerçevesinde sınırlandırılıp kalan 10 makale sistematik olarak incelenerek, bulguları özetlenmiştir. Sistematik derleme için seçilen makaleler dönüşümcü liderlik tarzı ve lider üye etkileşiminin inovatif çalışma davranışını doğrudan etkilediğini, lider-üye etkileşim teorisinin ise bu ilişkiye aracılık ettiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dönüşümcü Lider
• Lider Üye Etkileşimi
• İnovatif Çalışma Davranışı
• Sistematik Derleme

Kaynakça

1. Abdullatif, T. N. ve Jaleel, E. M. (2021). The Influence Of Transformational Leadership On Innovative Work Behavior Among Academicians In Iraq. Humanitarian and Natural Sciences Journal. 2(4): 480-491.
2. Afsar, B. ve Umrani, W. A. (2020). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of motivation to learn, task complexity and innovation climate. European Journal of Innovation Management. 23(3):402-428.
3. Afsar, B., Badir, Y. F. ve Saeed, B. B. (2014). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Industrial Management and Data Systems. 114(8): 1270-1300.
4. Afsar, B., Masood, M. ve Umrani, W. A. (2019). The role of job crafting and knowledge sharing on the effect of transformational leadership on innovative work behavior. Personnel Review. 48(5): 1186-1208.
5. Agarwal, U. A., Datta, S., Blake‐Beard, S. ve Bhargava, S. (2012). Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work engagement. Career development international. 17(3): 208-230
6. Alsughayir, A. (2017). The effect of leader-member exchange on innovative work behavior in the Saudi hospitality. International Journal of Business and Management. 12(6): 189-195.
7. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior. 10: 123-167.
8. Anand, S., Hu, J., Liden, R. C. ve Vidyarthi, P. R. (2011). Leader-member exchange: Recent research findings and prospects for the future. The Sage handbook of leadership, 311-325.

9. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K. ve Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of management. 40(5): 1297-1333.
10. Anthony, S. G. ve Antony, J. (2022). Academic Leadership and Lean Six Sigma: A Novel Approach to Systematic Literature Review Using Design of Experiments. Lean Six Sigma in Higher Education Institutions. 23-44.
11. Ariyani, N. ve Hidayati, S. (2018). Influence of transformational leadership and work engagement on innovative behavior. Etikonomi. 17(2):275-284.
12. Arslan, F. ve Çakmak, A. F. (2019). Yiyecek-içecek çalışanlarının yenilikçi iş davranışı ile ilişkisinde dönüşümcü lider ve demografik bazı değişkenlere göre farklılığının incelenmesi. Türk Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi. 3(3):220-235.
13. Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F.O., Zhou, Q. ve Hartnell, C.A. (2012). Transformational leadership, innovative behaviour, and task performance: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Human Performance. 25(1):1-25.
14. Aslan, A. (2018). Sistematik derleme ve meta-analizi. Acta Medica Alanya. 2(2):62-63. Atwater, L. ve Carmeli, A.(2009).LMX, feelings of energy, involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly. 20(3): 264-275.
15. Avcı, U. ve Turunç, Ö. (2012). Dönüşümcü Liderlik ve Örgüte Güvenin Kariyer Memnuniyetine Etkisi: Lider-Üye Etkileşiminin Aracılık Rolü [The Impact of Transformational Leadership and Organizational Trust on Career Satisfaction: Mediating Role of Leader Member Exchange Quality]. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 4(2): 45-55.
16. Avolio, B. J. (2005). Leadership development in balance: Made/born. Psychology Press. Avolio, B. J. ve Bass, B. M. (2002). Developing potential across a full range of leadership. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
17. Avolio, B. J., Waldman, D. ve Einstein, W. O. (1988). Transformational Leadership in a Management Game Simulation: Impacting the bottom line. Group and Organization Management. 13:59-80.
18. Aydın, E. ve Erkılıç, E. (2020). Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: The mediating role of knowledge sharing. Tourism and Recreation. 2(2): 106-117.
19. Ayhün, S. E. ve Celep, O. (2019). Dönüşümsel ve etkileşimsel liderlik tarzlarının sosyal sermaye ve lider-üye etkileşimine etkisi: Otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi. 14(2):133-152.
20. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership: Good, better, best. Organizational Dynamics. 13(3): 26-40.
21. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics. 18: 19-31.
22. Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European journal of work and organizational psychology. 8(1):9-32.
23. Bass, B. M. ve Avolio, B. J. (1995). Full range leadership development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Mindgarden.
24. Bass, B. M. ve Avolio, B. J.. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire (TM). Mind Garden, Inc. Menlo Park, CA.
25. Bass, B. M., Waldman, D. A., Avolio, B. J. ve Bebb, M. (1987). Transformational leadership and the falling dominoes effect. Group and Organization Studies. 12(1): 73-87.
26. Basu, R., ve Green, S. G. (1997). Leader‐member exchange and transformational leadership: An empirical examination of innovative behaviors in leader‐member dyads. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 27(6):477-499.
27. Bednall, T.C., Rafferty, A.E., Shipton, H., Sanders, K. ve Jackson, C.J. (2018). Innovative behaviour: how much transformational leadership do you need? British Journal of Management. 29(4): 796-816.
28. Bibi, A. ve Afsar, B. (2018). Leader-member exchange and innovative work behavior: The role of intrinsic motivation, psychological empowerment, and creative process engagement. Perspectives of Innovations. Economics and Business. 18(1):25-43.
29. Bin Saeed, B., Afsar, B., Shahjeha, A. ve Imad Shah, S. (2019). Does transformational leadership foster innovative work behavior? The roles of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja. 32(1): 254-281.
30. Boer, D., Deinert, A., Homan, A. C. ve Voelpel, S. C. (2016). Revisiting the mediating role of LMX in transformational leadership: the differential impact model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 25(6): 883-899.
31. Bukhari, S. ve Bhutto, N. A. (2021). Role of Trust in Leader-Member Exchange and Innovative Work Behavior Relationship. Indian Journal of Economics and Business. 20(2):1175-1189.
32. Burns, J.M. (1978), Leadership, Harper and Row, New York, NY.67-79.
33. Chen, G., Farh, J., Campbell-Bush, E. M., Wu, Z. ve Wu, X. (2013). Teams as innovative systems: Multilevel motivational antecedents of innovation in R&D teams. Journal of Applied Psychology. 98(6)
34. Chi-Tung Tsai (2006). Leader Member Exchange and Employee Innovative Behavior: The Mediation Effects of Organizational Justice and Moderation Effects of Organizational Characteristics. Journal of Management.
35. Choi, S. B., Kim, K., Ullah, S. M. E. ve Kang, S. W. (2016). How transformational leadership facilitates innovative behavior of Korean workers Examining mediating and moderating processes. Personnel Review. 45(3): 459–479.
36. Church, A. H. ve Waclawski, J. (1998). The relationship between individual personality orientation and executive leadership behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 71(2): 99-125.
37. Cogliser, C. C. ve Schriesheim, C. A. (2000). Exploring work unit context and LMX: a multilevel perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 21(5):487-511.
38. Çalışkan, A. ve Arıkan, Ö. U. (2017). Sağlık sektörü çalışanlarında dönüşümcü liderliğin yenilikçi davranışa etkisi örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarının bu etkideki aracılık rolü üzerine bir araştırma, Mersin ili örneği. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 3(2): 17-38.
39. Çelik, M. Turunç, Ö. ve Bilgin, N. (2014). Lider-üye etkileşimi ve kariyer memnuniyetinin yenilikçi davranışa etkisinde etiğin düzenleyici rolüne yönelik deneysel bir araştırma. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 11(25): 491-508.
40. Çetin, Ş., Korkmaz, M. ve Çakmakçı, C. (2012). Dönüşümsel ve etkileşimsel liderlik ile lider-üye etkileşiminin öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. 1(1):7-36.
41. Çınar, N. (2021). İyi Bir Sistematik Derleme Nasıl Yazılmalı? Online Türk Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 6(2): 310-314.
42. Dansereau, F., Graen, G. ve Haga, W. (1975). A Vertical Dyadic Linkage Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 13: 46-70.
43. Day, D. V., ve Harrison, M. M. (2007). A multilevel, identity-based approach to leadership development. Human Resource Management Review. 17(4): 360-373.
44. De Jong, J.P.J. ve Den Hartog, D.N. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management. 10(1): 41-64.
45. De Jong, J.P.J. ve Den Hartog, D.N. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management. 19(1): 23-36.
46. DeGroot, T., Kiker, D.S. ve Cross, T.C. (2000) A meta-analysis to review organizational outcomes related to charismatic leadership. Can. J. Adm. Sci./Rev. Can. Des Sci. De L’administration. 17: 356–372.
47. Deluga, R. J. (1992). The relationship of leader-member exchanges with laissez-faire, transactional, and transformational leadership in naval environments. In K. E. Clark, M. B. Clark, & D. R. Campbell (Eds.), Impact of leadership (pp. 237-247). Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership
48. Deng, P. (2012). The internationalization of Chinese firms: a critical review and future research. International Journal of Management Reviews. 14(4):408-427.
49. Dhar, R. L. (2016). Ethical leadership and its impact on service innovative behavior: The role of LMX and job autonomy. Tourism Management. 57: 139-148.
50. Dienesch, R. M. ve Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review. 11(3):618-634.
51. Downton, J. V. (1973). Rebel leadership: Commitment and charisma in the revolutionary process. Free Press. Eisenbeiß, S. A. ve Boerner, S. (2010). Transformational leadership and R&D innovation: Taking a curvilinear approach. Creativity and Innovation Management. 19(4): 364-372.
52. Eisenbeiss, S. A., D. van Knippenberg ve S. Boerner (2008). Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles. Journal of Applied Psychology. 93: 1438– 1446.
53. Fay, D., Shipton, H., West, M. A. ve Patterson, M. (2015). Teamwork and organizational innovation: The moderating role of the HRM context. Creativity and Innovation Management. 24(2): 261-277.
54. Feng, C., Huang, X. ve Zhang, L. (2016). A multilevel study of transformational leadership, dual organizational change and innovative behavior in groups. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 29(6):855-877.
55. Graen, G. (1976). Role-making processes within complex organizations. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, (pp. 1201-- 1245). Chicago: Rand McNally
56. Graen, G. B. ve Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior. 9: 175–208.
57. Graen, G. B., Liden, R. C. ve Hoel, W. (1982). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. Journal of applied psychology. 67(6):868.
58. Graen, G.B. ve Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly. 6(2): 219-247.
59. Grošelj, M., Černe, M., Penger, S. ve Grah, B. (2021). Authentic and transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: the moderating role of psychological empowerment. European Journal of Innovation Management. 24(3): 677-706.
60. Gün, G. (2022) Dönüşümcü Liderlik Yenilikçi İş Davranışı Grup Uyumu. Ekev Akademi Dergisi. (90): 225-246.
61. Hasib, F. F., Eliyana, A., Arief, Z. ve Pratiwi, A. A. (2020). The effect of transformational leadership on employee performance mediated by leader-member exchange (LMX). Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy. 11(11).
62. House, J. S. (1977). The three faces of social psychology. Sociometry, 161-177.
63. Howell, J. M. ve Hall-Merenda, K. E. (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of applied psychology. 84(5): 680-694
64. Howell, J. M., Shea, C. M. ve Higgins, C. A. (2005). Champions of product innovations: Defining, developing, and validating a measure of champion behavior. Journal of Business Venturing. 20(5):641-661.
65. Howell, J.M. ve Avolio, B.J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 78:891-902.
66. Hunt, T. J. (2014). Leader-member exchange relationships in health information management. Perspectives in health information management. 11 (Online)
67. Hür, G. (2021). PRISMA Kontrol Listesi 2020 Güncellemesi. Online Türk Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 6(4):603-605.
68. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness, and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 73(3): 287-302.
69. Janssen, O. (2005). The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behaviour. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology. 78(4): 573-579.
70. Jaussi, K. S. ve S. D. Dionne (2003). Leading for creativity: the role of unconventional leader behavior. Leadership Quarterly. 14: 475– 498.
71. Javed, B., Khan, A. K. ve Quratulain, S. (2018). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: examination of LMX perspective in small capitalized textile firms. The Journal of psychology. 152(8): 594-612.
72. Jung, D. I., C. Chow ve A. Wu (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organisational innovation: hypotheses and some preliminary findings. Leadership Quarterly. 14: 525– 544.
73. Jung, H. S., Kim, Y. M. ve Kim, Y. M. (2003). Comparative study on the perceived risk and impulse purchase between internet shopping and TV home shopping. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science. 2003:525-543.
74. Jung, T. ve K. A. S. Wickrama (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2:302– 317.
75. Jyoti, J. ve Bhau, S. (2015). Empirical investigation of moderating and mediating variables in between transformational leadership and related outcomes: A study of higher education sector in North India. International Journal of Educational Management. 30(6): 1123-1149
76. Kahai, S. S., J. J. Sosik ve B. J. Avolio (2003). Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards on creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context. Leadership Quarterly. 14: 499– 524
77. Kanter, R.M. (1988). Three tiers for innovation research. Communication Research. 15(5): 509-523.
78. Karaçam Z. (2013). Sistematik derleme metodolojisi: Sistematik derleme hazırlamak için bir rehber. DEUHFED. 6(1):26-33
79. Karip, E. (1998). Dönüşümcü liderlik. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. 16(16): 443-465.
80. Kessel, M., Kratzer, J. ve Schultz, C. (2012). Psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and creative performance in healthcare teams. Creativity and innovation management, 21(2): 147-157.
81. Khan, M. J., Aslam, N., ve Riaz, M. N. (2012). Leadership styles as predictors of innovative work behavior. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 9(2):17-22.
82. Kheng, Y. K., June, S. ve Mahmood, R. (2013). The determinants of innovative work behavior in the knowledge intensive business services sector in Malaysia. AsianSocial Science. 9(15): 47-59.
83. Knezović, E., ve Drkić, A. (2021). Innovative work behavior in SMEs: the role of transformational leadership. Employee Relations: The International Journal. 43(2): 398-415.
84. Krishnan V.R. (2005) Leader-Member Exchange, Transformational Leadership, and Value System. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies. 10 (1): 14-21.
85. Kuhnert, K. W. ve Lewis, P. (1987). Transactional and transformational leadership: A constructive/developmental analysis. Academy of Management review. 12(4): 648-657.
86. Lee, J. (2005). Effects of leadership and leader-member exchange on commitment. Leadership and Organization Development Journal. 26(8): 655–672.
87. Li, H., Sajjad, N., Wang, Q., Muhammad Ali, A., Khaqan, Z. ve Amina, S. (2019). Influence of transformational leadership on employees’ innovative work behavior in sustainable organizations: test of mediation and moderation processes. Sustainability. 11(6):1106-1594
88. Liden, R. C. ve Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management. 24(1):43-72.
89. Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T. ve Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. Research in Personal and Human Resources Management. 15:47-119.
90. Liden, R.C. ve Maslyn, J.M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management. 24(1):43-72.
91. Lisbona, A., Palaci, F., Salanova, M. ve Frese, M. (2018). The effects of work engagement and self-efficacy on personal initiative and performance. Psicothema. 30(1):89-96.
92. Macpherson, A. ve Holt, R. (2007). Knowledge, learning and small firm growth: a systematic review of the evidence. Research Policy. 36(2):172-192.
93. Majumdar, B. ve Ray, A. (2011). Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology. 37(1): 140-148.
94. Messmann, G. ve Mulder, R.H. (2012), Development of a measurement instrument for innovative work behaviour as a dynamic and context-bound construct. Human Resource Development International. 15(1): 43-59.
95. Mete, E. S., Sökmen, A., ve Sökmen, A. (2021). The relationship between leader-member exchange, innovative work behaviour and career satisfaction: A research in hotel enterprises. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies. 9(2). 638-659.
96. Muchiri, M. K., McMurray, A. J., Nkhoma, M. ve Pham, H. C. (2020). Mapping antecedents of innovative work behavior: A conceptual review. The Journal of Developing Areas. 54(4): 33-40.
97. Mulligan, R., Ramos, J., Martín, P. ve Zornoza, A. (2021). Inspiriting innovation: the effects of leader-member exchange (LMX) on innovative behavior as mediated by mindfulness and work engagement. Sustainability. 13(10): 1-18.
98. Nazir, S., Shafi, A., Asadullah, M.A., Qun, W. ve Khadim, S. (2020). Linking paternalistic leadership to follower's innovative work behavior: the influence of leader–member exchange and employee voice. European Journal of Innovation Management. 24(4): 1354-1378
99. Ng, T. W. (2017). Transformational leadership and performance outcomes: Analyses of multiple mediation pathways. The leadership quarterly. 28(3): 385-417.
100. Northouse, P. G. (2004). Leadership: theory and practice/Peter Northouse, Western Michigan University. Seventh Edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
101. Odumeru, J. A. ve Ogbonna, I. G. (2013). Transformational vs. transactional leadership theories: Evidence in literature. International review of management and business research. 2(2):355.
102. Örücü, E. ve Zeybek, F. (2022). Dönüşümcü Liderlik İle İnovatif Davranış Eğilimleri Arasındaki İlişki: Örgütsel Bağlılığın Aracılık Etkisi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 21(45): 962-981.
103. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... ve Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021:372 (71):1-9.
104. Petticrew, M. ve Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley and Sons.
105. Phung, V. D., Hawryszkiewycz, I. ve Chandran, D. (2019). How knowledge sharing leads to innovative work behaviour: A moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Systems and Information Technology. 21(3): 277-303.
106. Pieterse, A. N., Van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M. ve Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 31(4):609-623
107. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H. ve Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The leadership quarterly. 1(2): 107-142.
108. Pradhan, S. ve Jena, L.K. (2019). Does Meaningful Work Explains the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Innovative Work Behaviour? Vikalpa. 44(1): 30-40.
109. Purwanto, A., Purba, J. T., Sijabat, R., & Bernarto, I. (2021). The role of transformational leadership, organizational citizenship behaviour, innovative work behaviour, quality work life, digital transformation and leader member exchange on universities performance. Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, Innovative Work Behaviour, Quality Work Life, Digital Transformation and Leader Member Exchange on Universities Performance (December 17, 2021). LINGUISTICA ANTVERPIENSIA. 2:2908-2932.
110. Rahn, D. L., Jawahar, I. M., Scrimpshire, A. J. ve Stone, T. (2016). Are leaders defined by followers? Role of follower’s ILT and the mediating influence of LMX on follower outcomes. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance. 3(1): 43-69.
111. Reuvers, M., Van Engen, M. L., Vinkenburg, C. J. ve Wilson‐Evered, E. (2008). Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: Exploring the relevance of gender differences. Creativity and Innovation Management. 17(3): 227-244.
112. Sanders, K. ve Shipton, H. (2012). The relationship between transformational leadership and innovative behaviour in a healthcare context: a team learning versus a cohesion perspective. European Journal of International Management. 6(1): 83-100.
113. Savelsbergh, C., Gevers, J. M., Van der Heijden, B. I. ve Poell, R. F. (2012). Team role stress: Relationships with team learning and performance in project teams. Group and organization management. 37(1): 67-100.
114. Scandura, T. A. ve Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader–member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of applied psychology. 69(3): 428.
115. Schermuly, C.C., Meyer, B. ve Dämmer, L. (2013). Leader-member exchange and innovative behaviour. Journal of Personnel Psychology. 12(3): 132-142.
116. Scott, S. G. ve Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinates of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal. 37(3): 580- 607.
117. Sekerdil, R. ve Gunes, E. A Research On The Role Of Leader Member Exchange In The Relatıonshıp Of Employee Voıce And Innovatıve Work Behavıor. Journal Of Management Marketing And Logistics. 9(1):1-15.
118. Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal. 38(2): 483-503.
119. Sharif, S., Tongkachok, K., Akbar, M., Iqbal, K. ve Lodhi, R. N. (2021). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior in three-star hotels: mediating role of leader-member exchange, knowledge sharing and voice behavior. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. 2059-5891
120. Sharifirad, M. S. (2013). Transformational leadership, innovative work behavior, and employee well-being. Global Business Perspectives. 1:198-225.
121. Shunlong, X., ve Weiming, Z. (2012). The relationships between transformational leadership, lmx, and employee innovative behavior. Journal of Applied Business and Economics. 13(5):87-96.
122. Somech, A. ve Khalaili, A. (2014). Team boundary activity: Its mediating role in the relationship between structural conditions and team innovation. Group and Organization Management. 39(3), 274-299. Sparrowe, R. T. ve Liden, R.C. (1997). Process and structure in leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Review. 22: 522-552.
123. Stanescu, D. F., Zbuchea, A. ve Pinzaru, F. (2021). Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Kybernetes. 50(5): 1041-1057.
124. Sudibjo, N. ve Prameswari, R. K. (2021). The effects of knowledge sharing and person–organization fit on the relationship between transformational leadership on innovative work behavior. Heliyon. 7(6):07334.
125. Suhaimi, I. W. ve Panatik, S. A. (2016). A literature review on relationship between leader-member exchange and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Global Business and Social Entrepreneurship. 1(2): 32-41.
126. Suhana, S., Udin, U., Suharnomo, S. ve Mas' ud, F. (2019). Transformational Leadership and Innovative Behavior: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing in Indonesian Private University. International Journal of Higher Education. 8(6):15-25.
127. Sürücü, L., Maşlakcı, A. ve Şeşen, H. (2021). The influence of transformational leadership on employees' innovative behaviour in the hospitality industry: The mediating role of leader member exchange. Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal. 69(1): 19-31.
128. Tan, A. B., Van Dun, D. H. ve Wilderom, C. P. (2021). Innovative work behavior in Singapore evoked by transformational leaders through innovation support and readiness. Creativity and innovation management. 30(4): 697-712.
129. Taştan, S. B. ve Davoudi, S. M. M. (2015). An examination of the relationship between leader-member exchange and innovative work behavior with the moderating role of trust in leader: A study in theTurkish context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 181: 23-32.
130. Tayal, R., Upadhyay, R. K. ve Singh, R. (2022). Transformational leadership: An antecedent for organizational effectiveness in Indian banks. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. 52(5): 718-739.
131. Tian, M., Deng, P., Zhang, Y., ve Salmador, M. P. (2018). How does culture influence innovation? A systematic literature review. Management Decision. 56(5):1088-1107.
132. Tierney, P., Farmer, S.M., ve Graen, G.B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Pers. Psychol. 52: 591–620.
133. Turunç, Ö. Çelik M., A.Tabak. ve M.Kabak. (2010) The Impact of Transformatıonal Leadership Contingent Reward Leadership Styles Innovative Behaviour: Mediatıng Role Of Leader Member Exchange Quality. İnternational Journal of Business and Management Studies. 2(1):69-79.
134. Udin, U. ve Shaikh, M. (2022). Transformational Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior: Testing the Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing and Work Passion. JDM (Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen). 13(1):146-160.
135. Vaishali, DKK ve Kumar, M. P. (2003). Transformational and Transactional Leadership Styles as Predictors of LMX: A Path Analytic Assessment of Organizational Commitment Leading to Job Burnout. Abhigyan. 21(3):9-19.
136. Van Breukelen, W., Schyns, B. ve Le Blanc, P. (2006). Leader-member exchange theory and research: Accomplishments and future challenges. Leadership. 2(3):295-316.
137. Vecchio, R. P. (1985). Predicting employee turnover from leader-member exchange: A failure to replicate. Academy of Management Journal. 28(2): 478-485.
138. Veenendaal, A. ve Bondarouk, T. (2015). Perceptions of HRM and their effect on dimensions of innovative work behaviour: Evidence from a manufacturing firm. Management Revue. 26(2): 138-160.
139. Vermeulen, M., Kreijns, K. ve Evers, A. T. (2022). Transformational leadership, leader–member exchange and school learning climate: Impact on teachers’ innovative behaviour in the Netherlands. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. 50(3): 491-510.
140. Waglay, M., Becker, J. R. ve Du Plessis, M. (2020). The role of emotional intelligence and autonomy in transformational leadership: A LMX perspective. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology. 46: 1–12.
141. Wang, H.; Law, K.S.; Hackett, R.D.; Wang, D. ve Chen, Z.X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal. 48(3): 420-432.
142. Weihrich, H., Cannice, M.V. ve Koontz, H. (2008) Management (12th ed.). New Delhi: Mc Graw Hill.
143. Weng, R. H., Huang, C. Y., Chen, L. M. ve Chang, L. Y. (2015). Exploring the impact of transformational leadership on nurse innovation behaviour: A cross‐sectional study. Journal of nursing management. 23(4): 427-439.
144. West, M. ve Farr, F. (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological&organizational strategies. NY: John Wiley and Sons.
145. Wong, S. I. ve Berntzen, M. N. (2019). Transformational leadership and leader–member exchange in distributed teams: The roles of electronic dependence and team task interdependence. Computers in Human Behavior. 92: 381-392.
146. Wu, J. ve Lu, Q. (2012). On the relationship of leadership behavior, team cohesion and team innovation performance. In Management of Technology (ISMOT), International Symposium on (pp. 33-37). IEEE.
147. Yammarino, F. J., Spangler, W. D. ve Bass, B. M. (1993). Transformational leadership and performance: A longitudinal investigation. The Leadership Quarterly. 4(1): 81-102.
148. Yılmaz, K. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde ve eğitim bilimlerinde sistematik derleme, meta değerlendirme ve bibliyometrik analizler. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. 10(2): 1457-1490.
149. Yuan, F. ve Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative Behavior In The Workplace: The Role Of PerformanceAnd Image Outcome Expectations. The Academy Of Management Journal. 53(2): 323–342.
150. Yusoff, A. M., Kumar, N. ve Harun, N. H. (2020). The Mediating Role of Leader-member Exchange on the Relationship between Perceived Transformational Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems.
151. Zacher, H. ve Wilden, R. G. (2014). A daily diary study on ambidextrous leadership and self-reported employee innovation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 87(4): 813–820.
152. Zaman, Q., Qureshi, F. A. ve Butt, M. (2020). Mediating effect of perceived organizational support on the relationship between leader-member exchange and the innovation work behavior of nursing employees: a social exchange perspective. Business Innovation and Entrepreneurship Journal. 2(1): 67-76.
153. Zhang, Q., Abdullah, A., Hossan, D. ve Hou, Z. (2021). The effect of transformational leadership on innovative work behavior with moderating role of internal locus of control and psychological empowerment. Management Science Letters. 11(4): 1267-1276.
154. Zhu, Y. ve Wang, Y. (2011). The relationship between entrepreneur psychological capital and employee’s innovative behavior: The strategic role of transformational leadership and knowledge sharing. Advanced Materials Research. 282–283:691–696.
155. Zuberi, M. A. ve Khattak, A. (2021). Impact of proactive personality and leader member exchange on innovative work behavior: a job design perspective. International Journal of Innovation Science. 13(5): 664-683.
156. Yükçü, S., Atağan, G. (2020). Some Actual Cases In Fraud, International Review of Economics and Management Journal, 8(1), 57-76.
157. Zotzmann, Y., van der Linden, D., Wyrwa, K. (2019). The Relation Between Country Differences, Cultural Values, Personality Dimensions, And Error Orientation: An Approach Across Three Continents–Asia, Europe, And North America, Safety Science, 120, 185-193.