Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation Scale: Validity and Reliability Study

Öz

This study aims to adapt the Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation (IEO) Scale into Turkish and evaluate its psychometric properties within a sample of international students studying in Türkiye. To this end, linguistic validity, construct validity, and internal consistency analyses were conducted. The findings confirmed that the Turkish version of the IEO Scale is both valid and reliable for use in academic research. Furthermore, the study examined the mean levels of students’ entrepreneurial orientation and investigated whether the dimensions of risk-taking, innovativeness, and proactiveness significantly differed based on variables such as gender, academic year and program type, work experience, presence of an entrepreneur in the family, and prior exposure to entrepreneurship education. In addition to empirical analyses, the study offers a comprehensive literature review on the theoretical foundations of individual entrepreneurial orientation. The research concludes with a discussion of its contributions to existing literature and provides implications for future research and practical applications in the field of entrepreneurship.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Entrepreneurship
• Entrepreneurial Orientation
• Scale Validity
• International Student

Bireysel Girişimcilik Yönelimi Ölçeği: Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Bolton ve Lane (2012) tarafından geliştirilen Bireysel Girişimcilik Yönelimi Ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanmasına yönelik bir araştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Türkiye'de öğrenim gören uluslararası öğrenciler örnekleminde, ölçeğin dil geçerliliği, yapı geçerliliği ve iç tutarlılığı analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda, Türkçede kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir bireysel girişimcilik yönelimi ölçeği uyarlanmıştır. Bunun yanı sıra, öğrencilerin bireysel girişimcilik yönelimi ortalama değerleri belirlenmiş ve risk alma, yenilikçilik ile proaktiflik boyutlarının; cinsiyet, öğrenim görülen sınıf ve program türü, iş deneyimi, ailede girişimci bulunması ve girişimcilik dersi alma durumuna göre anlamlı farklılık gösterip göstermediği incelenmiştir. Çalışmada ayrıca bireysel girişimcilik yönelimi kavramına ilişkin teorik çerçeve sunulmuş ve alanyazındaki önceki araştırmalar doğrultusunda kapsamlı bir literatür taraması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın literatüre sağladığı katkılar tartışılmış ve gelecekteki araştırmacılar ile iş dünyasındaki uygulayıcılara yönelik çeşitli önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Girişimcilik
• Girişimcilik Yönelimi
• Ölçek Geçerliliği
• Uluslararası Öğrenci

Kaynakça

1. Agolli, L., Horoz, M., & Sivuk, D. (2024). Entrepreneurial intentions concerning gender variable: The case of university students. Uluslararası Liderlik Çalışmaları Dergisi: Kuram ve Uygulama, 7(3), 198-211. https://doi.org/10.52848/ijls.1581922
2. Ahmad, N., & Seymour, R. G. (2008). Defining entrepreneurial activity. Definitions supporting frameworks for data collection. OECD Statistics Working Papers, 1, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1787/243164686763
3. Akarsu, O., & Döven, M. S. (2022). Girişimcilik yönelimini etkileyen faktörler: Teknoparklarda bir araştırma. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(1), 143-164 DOI: 10.17494/ogusbd.1093800
4. Al-Kwifi, O. S., Petrovska, I., Parast, M., & Safari, A. (2022). Individual entrepreneurial orientation, self-efficacy, and managerial skills for project performance: An integrated structural approach and analysis. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 15(6), 1634-1657. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-09-2021-0355
5. Armağan, A. (2013). Girişimcilik ve otonomi (özerklik) ilişkisi: Ege Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi öğrencileri üzerinde bir araştırma. Journal of Turkish Studies, 8(12), 49-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.6037
6. Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 77-85.
7. Basso, O., Fayolle, A., & Bouchard, V. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation: The making of a concept. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 10(4), 313-321. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000009790012327
8. Baş, H., & Eti, S. (2020). Türkiye’de uluslararası öğrencilerin istihdamı: Hukuki boyut ve koşullara dair bir araştırma. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 20(46), 105-132. https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.v20i54504.538022

9. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
10. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D.C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
11. Bilal, A. R., Fatima, T., Iqbal, S, & Imran, M. K. (2022). I can see the opportunity that you cannot! A nexus between individual entrepreneurial orientation, alertness, and access to finance. European Business Review, 34(4), 556-577. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-08-2021-0186
12. Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 1-18. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
13. Bolton, D. L. (2012). Individual entrepreneurial orientation: Further investigation of a measurement instrument. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 18(1), 91-98.
14. Bolton, D. L., & Lane, M. D. (2012). Individual entrepreneurial orientation: Development of a measurement instrument. Education + Training, 54(2), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911211210314
15. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
16. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research (Methodology in the Social Sciences). Guilford Publications, Incorporated.
17. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Carlsson, B., Braunerhjelm, P., McKelvey, M., Olofsson, C., Persson, L., & Ylinenpää, H. (2013). The evolving domain of entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 913-930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9503-y
19. Covin, J. G., Rigtering, J. P. C., Hughes, M., Kraus, S., Cheng, C.-F., & Bouncken, R. B. (2020). Individual and team entrepreneurial orientation: Scale development and configurations for success. Journal of Business Research, 112, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.023
20. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Pscychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
21. Cuervo, A. (2005). Individual and environmental determinants of entrepreneurship. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(3), 293-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-005-2591-7
22. Davidsson, P., Delmar, F., & Wiklund, J. (2006). Entrepreneurship as growth; growth as entrepreneurship. P. Davidsson, F. Delmar ve J. Wiklund (Ed.), Entrepreneurship and the Growth of Firms içinde (21-38). Edward Elgar Publisher.
23. Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-461.
24. Ercan, İ., & Kan, İ. (2004). Ölçeklerde güvenirlik ve geçerlik. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(3), 211-216.
25. Ercan, S., & Yıldıran, C. (2021). Bireysel girişimcilik yönelimi ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 16(1), 91-105.
26. Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 4th Edition. SAGE.
27. Forcadell, F. J., & Úbeda, F. (2022). Individual entrepreneurial orientation and performance: the mediating role of international entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18, 875-900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00693-8
28. Garcia, M. D. M., Menenes, J. M. M., & Sandoval, K. M. (2022). Theoretical review ofentrepreneur and social entrepreneurship concepts. Journal of Administrative Science, 3(6), 19-26.
29. Gartner, W. B. (1990). What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(90)90023-M
30. Georgescu, M.-A., & Herman, E. (2020). The impact of the family background on students’ entrepreneurial intentions: An empirical analysis. Sustainability, 12, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114775
31. Gençay, E. & Döven, M. S. (2019). Girişimci kişilik özelliklerinin girişimcilik niyetine etkisi: Mersin Üniversitesi'nde bir araştırma. Stratejik Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 89-123.
32. Gnyawali, D. R., & Fogel, D. S. (1994). Environments for entrepreneurship development: Key dimensions and research implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(4), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401800403
33. Güney, S. (2015). Girişimcilik temel kavramlar ve bazı güncel konular. Siyasal Kitabevi.
34. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson. R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson New International Edition (7th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
35. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
36. Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
37. Hughes, M., & Morgan, R. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(5), 651-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.04.003
38. Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400115
39. Kavurmacı, A. (2021). Uluslararası öğrencilerin çalışma deneyimleri: Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 19(4), 312-334. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1026651
40. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press.
41. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3rd Ed.). Guilford Press.
42. Kollmann, T., Christofor, J., & Kuckertz, A. (2007). Explaining individual entrepreneurial orientation: Conceptualization of a cross-cultural research framework. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 4(3), 325-340. Köpke, U., & Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2025). Why more males? Differences in entrepreneurial intentions of male and female university students and graduates. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 15(23), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-025-00439-2
43. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
44. Landstrom, H. (2014). A history of entrepreneurship research. A. Fayolle (Ed.), Handbook of research on entrepreneurship: What we know and what we need to know içinde. (23-62). Edward Elgar.
45. Lechner, C., & Gudmundsson, S. V. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation, firm strategy and small firm performance. International Small Business Journal, 32(1), 36-60. DOI: 10.1177/0266242612455034 Liu, Y., Li, M., Li, X., & Zeng, J. (2022). Entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention: The moderating role of personality and family economic status. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.978480
46. Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. https://doi.org/10.2307/258632
47. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M.W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-49. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
48. Macko, A., & Tyszka, T. (2009). Entrepeneurship and risk taking. Applied Psychology, 58(3), 363-507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00402.x
49. Marsh, H. W., & Grayson, D. (1995). Latent variable models of multitrait-multimethod data. R. Hoyle (Ed.)., Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications içinde (177-198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770-791.
51. Morgado, F. F. R., Meireles, J. F. F., Neves, C.M., Amaral, A. C. S., & Ferreira, M. E. C. (2017). Scale development: Ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices. Psicologia Reflexao e Critica, 30(3), 1-20. DOI: 10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1
52. Musara, M., & Nieuwenhuizen, C. (2020). Informal sector entrepreneurship, individual entrepreneurial orientation and the emergence of entrepreneurial leadership. Africa Journal of Management, 6(3), 194-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322373.2020.1777817
53. Nguyen, C. (2018). Demographic factors, family background and prior self-employment on entrepreneurial intention - Vietnamese business students are different: Why? Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 8(10), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-018-0097-3
54. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
55. Özkan, G., & Acar Güvendir, M. (2015). Uluslararası öğrencilerin yaşam durumları: Kırklareli ve Trakya Üniversiteleri örneği. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 174-190. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2015.15.1-5000128601
56. Piva, E. (2018). Time allocation behaviours of entrepreneurs: The impact of individual entrepreneurial orientation. Economia e Politica Industriale, 45, 493-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-018-0105-1
57. Prince, S., Chapman, S., & Cassey, P. (2021). The definition of entrepreneurship: Is it less complex than we think? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(9), 26-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2019-0634
58. Ratten, V. (2010). Sport-based entrepreneurship: Towards a new theory of entrepreneurship and sport management. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(1), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-010-0138-z
59. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761-787. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x
60. Repke, L., Birkenmaier, L., & Lechner, C. M. (2024). Validity in survey research from research design to measurement ınstruments. Mannheim, GESIS – Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences (GESIS – Survey Guidelines), 1-22. DOI: 10.15465/gesis-sg_en_048
61. Ritala, P., Baiyere, A., Hughes, M., & Kraus, S. (2021). Digital strategy implementation: The role of individual entrepreneurial orientation and relational capital. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 171, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120961
62. Rudnák, I., Kollár, K., & Wu, J. (2025). Factors influencing entrepreneurial intentions of international and local students in Hungary. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-025-00490-z
63. Scarborough, N. M., & Cornwall, J. R. (2019). Entrepreneurship and effective small business management (9th Edition). Pearson.
64. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
65. Streiner, D. L. (1994). Figuring out factors: The use and misuse of factor analysis. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39(3), 135-140.
66. Süygün, M. S., & Kaplan, F. (2021). Uluslararası öğrencilerle uluslararası ticaret. Gümrük ve Ticaret Dergisi, 8(25), 25-35.
67. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research ınstruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
68. Topal, F., & Tauscher, S. (2020). Uluslararası öğrencilerin akademik ve sosyal yaşamlarında karşılaştıkları sorunlar üzerine inceleme. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 15(1), 309-344. https://doi.org/10.17550/akademikincelemeler.624380
69. Topaloğlu, M., & Döven, M. S. (2024). Girişimcilik kavramının tarihsel gelişimi: 18. yüzyıl ve sonrası. Yönetim ve Örgüt Tarihi Dergisi, 3(1), 63-82. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14570813
70. Türel, M. T. (2021). Uluslararası öğrencilerin sosyokültürel uyumu. Avrasya Beşeri Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.7596/abbad.31122021.003
71. Venkatraman, N. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 35, 942-962. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.942
72. Wang, L., Ali, M., Kim, H. J., Lee, S., & Hernández Perlines, F. (2021). Individual entrepreneurial orientation, value congruence, and individual outcomes: Does the institutional entrepreneurial environment matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 2293-2312. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2747
73. Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8(1), 84-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/270754
74. Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 74-85.
75. Yılmaz, G., & Güçlü, N. (2021). Türkiye’de uluslararası öğrenci hareketliliğinin görünümü. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 11(1), 244-256.
76. Yükseköğretim Kurulu. “Yükseköğretim Bilgi Yönetim Sistemi.” Kasım, 10, 2023. istatistik.yok.gov.tr.