An Investigation into Best Practices in Strategic Procurement Witnessing Supply Chain Disruptions in the UK

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 19, 175 - 209, 16.01.2024

Jıger Shah , Ömer Öztürkoğlu

https://doi.org/10.54709/jobesam.1351540

Öz

This study aims to identify best practices in strategic procurement to alleviate the impact of supply chain disruptions around the world. The UK and similar countries rely significantly on global procurement, and the disruptions caused by events like the COVID-19 outbreak and Brexit have severe impacts. The study is conducted in two phases, including a literature review and actual research with an apt methodology. The primary findings of this research are the identification of best practices and looking at the procurement function as a strategic function integrated with supply chain management to make supply chain resilient organizations. This study contributes to the expanding literature concentrating on evaluating the best practices for a sourcing organization to become supply chain resilient during significant supply chain disruptions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Procurement and strategic procurement, procurement governance, supply chain disruptions, supply chain management, transportation and logistics

Destekleyen Kurum

Birmingham City University

Birleşik Krallık'ta tedarik zinciri kesintilerine tanıklık eden stratejik satın almadaki en iyi uygulamalara ilişkin bir araştırma

Öz

Bu çalışma, dünya çapında tedarik zinciri kesintilerinin etkisini azaltmak üzere kullanılan stratejik satın alma alanındaki en iyi uygulamaları belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Birleşik Krallık ve benzeri ülkeler, önemli ölçüde küresel tedarikten faydalanmaktadır ve COVID-19 salgını ile birlikte Brexit gibi olaylar nedeniyle tedarik zinciri süreçlerinde zorlu kesintilerle başa çıkmaya çalışmışlardır. Bu çalışma, literatür taraması ve uygun bir metodoloji ile gerçek araştırmayı içeren iki aşamada gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu araştırmanın temel bulguları, en iyi uygulamaların belirlenmesi ve tedarik işlevinin tedarik zinciri yönetimi ile entegre bir stratejik fonksiyon olarak ele alınarak, tedarik zinciri dayanıklı organizasyonlar oluşturmanın önemine vurgulamaktadır. Bu çalışma, tedarik zinciri kesintileri sırasında organizasyonların tedarik zinciri süreçlerinde dayanıklı hale gelmesi için en iyi uygulamaların değerlendirilmesine odaklanan genişleyen literatüre katkıda bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Satın alma ve stratejik satın alma, satın alma yönetişimi, tedarik zinciri aksaklıkları, tedarik zinciri yönetimi, ulaştırma ve lojistik

Kaynakça

• Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J. and Grawe, S., 2015. Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination. Journal of operations management, 33, pp.111-122.
• Berndt, A. E. (2020) Sampling Methods. Journal of human lactation. [Online] 36 (2), 224–226.
• Bienhaus, F. and Haddud, A. (2018) Procurement 4.0: factors influencing the digitisation of procurement and supply chains. Business process management journal. [Online] 24 (4), 965–984.
• Blackhurst, J., Dunn, K.S. and Craighead, C.W., 2011. An empirically derived framework of global supply resiliency. Journal of business logistics, 32(4), pp.374-391.
• Bode, C. and Macdonald, J.R., 2017. Stages of supply chain disruption response: Direct, constraining, and mediating factors for impact mitigation. Decision Sciences, 48(5), pp.836-874.
• Carroll, A, 2008. Research methods a brief introduction.
• Chaokromthong, K., Sintao, N., and Uakarn, C., 2021. Sample Size Estimation using Yamane and Cochran and Krejcie and Morgan and Green Formulas and Cohen Statistical Power Analysis by G* Power and Comparisions. Apheit International Journal, 10(2), pp.76-86.
• Chen, D.Q., Preston, D.S. and Swink, M., 2015. How the use of big data analytics affects value creation in supply chain management. Journal of management information systems, 32(4), pp.4-39.
• Chenini, A., Iqbal, J., Qurrahtulain, K., Husain Mahmood, M.A. and Aldehayyat, J.S., 2021. Strategic procurement, supplier integration, and speed‐to‐market: The mediating role of procurement lead‐time performance and manufacturing performance. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(3), p.e2248.
• Chowdhury, P., Paul, S.K., Kaisar, S. and Moktadir, M.A., 2021. COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 148, p.102271.
• Christopher, M., 2016. Logistics and supply chain management. Pearson UK.
• Cochran, W.G., 1977. Sampling techniques. John Wiley and Sons.
• Demsey, H., Giles, C. and Riordan, P., 2021. Shipping bottlenecks set to prolong supply chain turmoil. FT.com,.
• DuHadway, S., Carnovale, S. and Hazen, B., 2019. Understanding risk management for intentional supply chain disruptions: Risk detection, risk mitigation, and risk recovery. Annals of Operations Research, 283, pp.179-198.
• Duong, L.N.K. and Chong, J., 2020. Supply chain collaboration in the presence of disruptions: a literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 58(11), pp.3488-3507.
• Eichhorn, J., 2021. Survey research and sampling. Los Angeles: SAGE.
• EIU, 2021. The business costs of supply chain disruption. [online]. Available at: https://impact.economist.com/projects/the-cost-plus-world-of-supply-chains/img/the_business_costs_of_supply_chain_disruption_gep.pdf. Accessed on [01 January 2023]. Elliott, R., Thomas, C. and Muhammad, K., 2021. Supply Chain Resilience Report 2021. Business Continuity Institute, Reading.
• EY, 2022. 2022 Global EY Chief Procurement Officer Survey. Procurement in a post pandemic world. Available at: https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_uk/topics/supply-chain/ey-2022-global-ey-chief-procurement-officer-survey.pdf. Accessed on [01 January 2023].
• Faruquee, M., Paulraj, A. and Irawan, C.A., 2021. Strategic supplier relationships and supply chain resilience: Is digital transformation that precludes trust beneficial?. International Journal of Operations and Production Management.
• Fawcett, S.E., McCarter, M.W., Fawcett, A.M., Webb, G.S. and Magnan, G.M., 2015. Why supply chain collaboration fails: the socio-structural view of resistance to relational strategies. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(6), pp.648-663.
• Geoff, K., 2022. Available at https://socratic.org/questions/what-is-z-for-an-88-confidence-interval. Accessed on [01 January 2023].
• Global Standard for Procurement and Supply. 2021. The Chartered Institute of Procurement and Supply (CIPS).
• Green, W. and Donati, M., 2020. Half of firms may overhaul entire procurement strategy. The Chartered Institute of Procurement and Supply (CIPS).
• Guo, R., Lee, H.L. and Swinney, R., 2016. Responsible sourcing in supply chains. Management Science, 62(9), pp.2722-2744.
• Hahn, G.J., 2020. Industry 4.0: a supply chain innovation perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), pp.1425-1441.
• Hosseini, S., Ivanov, D. and Dolgui, A., 2019. Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 125, pp.285-307.
• Huong Tran, T.T., Childerhouse, P. and Deakins, E., 2016. Supply chain information sharing: challenges and risk mitigation strategies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 27(8), pp.1102-1126.
• Intellectus Statistics, 2022. [Online computer software] Intellectus Statistics. Available at: https://analyze.intellectusstatistics.com/. Accessed on [01 January 2023].
• Ivanov, D. and Dolgui, A., 2020. Viability of intertwined supply networks: extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), pp.2904-2915.
• Ivanov, D., 2018. Structural dynamics and resilience in supply chain risk management (Vol. 265). Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing.
• Katsaliaki, K. et. al. (2022) Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda. Annals of operations research. [Online] 319 (1), 965–1002.
• Kauppi, K., Longoni, A., Caniato, F. and Kuula, M., 2016. Managing country disruption risks and improving operational performance: risk management along integrated supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, pp.484-495.
• Kaur, H., and Singh, S.P., 2019. Flexible dynamic sustainable procurement model. Annals of Operations Research, 273(1), pp.651-691.
• Kim, M. and Chai, S., 2017. The impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on improving supply chain agility: Global supply chain perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, pp.42-52.
• Macdonald, J.R. and Corsi, T.M., 2013. Supply chain disruption management: Severe events, recovery, and performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(4), pp.270-288.
• Marucheck, A., Greis, N., Mena, C. and Cai, L., 2011. Product safety and security in the global supply chain: Issues, challenges and research opportunities. Journal of operations management, 29(7-8), pp.707-720.
• McHugh, M. L. (2013). The chi-square test of independence. Biochemia Medica, 23(2), 143-149. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.018.
• Mehta, C. R., and Patel, N. R. (1983). A network algorithm for performing Fisher's exact test in r×c contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78(382), 427-434.
• Namdar, J., Li, X., Sawhney, R. and Pradhan, N., 2018. Supply chain resilience for single and multiple sourcing in the presence of disruption risks. International Journal of Production Research, 56(6), pp.2339-2360.
• Oliveira, F.S., 2017. Strategic procurement in spot and forward markets considering regulation and capacity constraints. European Journal of Operational Research, 261(2), pp.540-548.
• Pandey, S., Singh, R.K., Gunasekaran, A. and Kaushik, A., 2020. Cyber security risks in globalized supply chains: conceptual framework. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 13(1), pp.103-128.
• Pettit, T.J., Croxton, K.L. and Fiksel, J., 2013. Ensuring supply chain resilience: development and implementation of an assessment tool. Journal of business logistics, 34(1), pp.46-76.
• Quarshie, A.M., Salmi, A. and Leuschner, R., 2016. Sustainability and corporate social responsibility in supply chains: The state of research in supply chain management and business ethics journals. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(2), pp.82-97.
• Roberta Pereira, C., Christopher, M. and Lago Da Silva, A., 2014. Achieving supply chain resilience: the role of procurement. Supply Chain Management: an international journal, 19(5/6), pp.626-642.
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., 2009. Research methods for business students. Pearson education.
• Scholten, K. and Schilder, S., 2015. The role of collaboration in supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(4), pp.471-484.
• Seyedghorban, Z., Samson, D. and Tahernejad, H., 2020. Digitalization opportunities for the procurement function: pathways to maturity. International Journal of Operations and Production Management.
• Singh, N.P. and Singh, S., 2019. Building supply chain risk resilience: Role of big data analytics in supply chain disruption mitigation. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(7), pp.2318-2342.
• SurveyCircle, 2022. Research website SurveyCircle. Published 2016. Available at https://www.surveycircle.com. Accessed on [28 November 2022]. Mannheim, Germany.
• Trent, R.J., 2018. Strategic supply management revisited: Competing in an Era of Rapid Change and Disruption. J. Ross Publishing.
• Villena, V.H., 2019. The missing link? The strategic role of procurement in building sustainable supply networks. Production and Operations Management, 28(5), pp.1149-1172.
• Vyas, N., 2018. Four compass points for global supply chain management... revisited. Supply Chain Management Review.
• Waters, D., 2011. Supply chain risk management: vulnerability and resilience in logistics. Kogan Page Publishers.
• Yamane, T., 1973. Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. London: John Weather Hill. Yoon, J., Talluri, S. and Rosales, C., 2020. Procurement decisions and information sharing under multi-tier disruption risk in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), pp.1362-1383.