Kripto Para Madenciliği ve Çevresel Sürdürülebilirlik Üzerine Bibliyometrik Analiz

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 20, 19 - 35, 11.07.2024

Gözde Elbir Mermer Ayşegül Kurtulgan

https://doi.org/10.54709/jobesam.1408410

Öz

Küresel olarak yaygınlaşan ve bilgisayar ağları üzerinden yürütülen kripto para madenciliği, yüksek enerji tüketimi gerektiren bir süreç olarak tanımlanabilir. Tek bir bitcoin işlemi için tüketilen enerji miktarı, bir ailenin bir ay boyunca kullanacağı ortalama elektrik miktarına eşdeğerdir. Kripto para işlemlerin yapılabilmesi için kullanılan teknoloji, karbon salınımını arttırarak çevresel sorunlara neden olmaktadır. Çeşitli araştırmalar, kripto para madenciliğinin enerji tüketimi konusunu ele almıştır ve detaylı bir şekilde incelemiştir. Bu nedenle günümüzde, kripto para ve sürdürülebilirlik konuları, çalışılmakta olan en önemli konular olarak ele alınmaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, kripto para ve sürdürülebilirlik konularının Web of Science (WoS) ve Scopus veri tabanlarında yer alan 2017-2022 yılları arasındaki makalelerin bibliyometrik olarak analiz edilmesidir. Web of Science veri tabanından “kripto para (cryptocurrency)” ve “sürdürülebilirlik (sustainability)” anahtar kelimeler yazılarak araştırma yapılmıştır. Yıllar bazında makalelerin yayın adetleri 2017 yılında 3, 2018 yılında 1, 2019 yılında 8, 2020 yılında 16, 2021 yılında 22, 2022 yılında 18 olmak üzere toplam 68 adettir. Scopus veri tabanında yayınlanan 45 makaleye ulaşılmıştır. Yıllara göre 2017 ve 2018 yıllarında 2’şer, 2019 yılında 4, 2020 yılında 9, 2022 ve 2021 yıllarında 14’er adettir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kripto para, Çevresel Sürdürülebilirlik, Bibliyometrik analiz

Bibliometric Analysis of The Articles Published On Cyripto-Currency And Environmental Sustainabilty

Öz

Cryptocurrency mining, which is globally prevalent and conducted over computer networks, can be described as a process that requires high energy consumption. The amount of energy consumed for a single Bitcoin transaction is equivalent to the average monthly electricity usage of a household. The technology used for cryptocurrency transactions contributes to environmental issues by increasing carbon emissions. Various studies address and extensively examine the energy consumption associated with cryptocurrency mining. Therefore, in today's context, cryptocurrency and sustainability are considered among the most crucial topics under investigation. The aim of this research is to bibliometrically analyze articles on cryptocurrency and sustainability in the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases between 2017 and 2022. A search is conducted in the Web of Science database using the keywords "cryptocurrency" and "sustainability." The publication counts of 68 articles by year are as follows: 3 in 2017, 1 in 2018, 8 in 2019, 16 in 2020, 22 in 2021, and 18 in 2022. 45 articles are found in the Scopus database, with 2 each in 2017 and 2018, 4 in 2019, 9 in 2020, and 14 each in 2021 and 2022.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Crypto-currency, Environmental sustainability, Bibliometric Analysis

Kaynakça

• Alsharıf, A. H., Salleh, N. O. R. Z. M. D., & Baharun, R. (2020). Bibliometric analysis. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 98(15), 2948-2962.
• Anwer, Z., Farid, S., Khan, A., & Benlagha, N. (2023). Cryptocurrencies versus environmentally sustainable assets: Does a perfect hedge exist?. International Review of Economics & Finance, 85, 418-431.
• Castro, G. D. R., Fernandez, M. C. G., & Colsa, Á. U. (2021). Unleashing the convergence amid digitalization and sustainability towards pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A holistic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 122204.
• Clark, C. E., & Greenley, H. L. (2019). Bitcoin, blockchain, and the energy sector. Congressional Research Service. 1-27.
• Dai, H. N., Zheng, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Blockchain for Internet of Things: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(5), 8076-8094.
• De Vries, A., Gallersdörfer, U., Klaaßen, L., & Stoll, C. (2022). Revisiting Bitcoin’s carbon footprint. Joule, 6(3), 498-502.
• Enescu, F. M., Bizon, N., Onu, A., Răboacă, M. S., Thounthong, P., Mazare, A. G., & Șerban, G. (2020). Implementing blockchain technology in irrigation systems that integrate photovoltaic energy generation systems. Sustainability, 12(4), 1540.
• Giungato, P., Rana, R., Tarabella, A., & Tricase, C. (2017). Current trends in sustainability of bitcoins and related blockchain technology. Sustainability, 9(12), 2214.
• Haq, I. U., Maneengam, A., Chupradit, S., & Huo, C. (2023). Are green bonds and sustainable cryptocurrencies truly sustainable? Evidence from a wavelet coherence analysis. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 36(1), 807-826.
• Kavas, Y. B. (2023). Kripto Paraların Çevre Kirliliği, Makroekonomik Göstergeler ve Suç Üzerindeki Etkileri. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(3), 305-321.
• Kayikci, Y. (2018). Sustainability impact of digitization in logistics. Procedia manufacturing, 21, 782-789.
• Kim, M. S., & Chung, J. Y. (2018). Sustainable growth and token economy design: The case of steemit. Sustainability, 11(1), 167.
• Krause, M. J., & Tolaymat, T. (2018). Quantification of energy and carbon costs for mining cryptocurrencies. Nature Sustainability, 1(11), 711-718.
• Kristoufek, L. (2020). Bitcoin and its mining on the equilibrium path. Energy Economics, 85, 104588.
• Majeed, U., Khan, L. U., Yaqoob, I., Kazmi, S. A., Salah, K., & Hong, C. S. (2021). Blockchain for IoT-based smart cities: Recent advances, requirements, and future challenges. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 181, 103007.
• Malfuzi, A., Mehr, A. S., Rosen, M. A., Alharthi, M., & Kurilova, A. A. (2020). Economic viability of bitcoin mining using a renewable-based SOFC power system to supply the electrical power demand. Energy, 203, 117843.
• Náñez Alonso, S.L.; Jorge-Vázquez, J.; Echarte Fernández, M.Á.; Reier Forradellas, R.F. (2021). Cryptocurrency Mining from an Economic and Environmental Perspective. Analysis of the Most and Least Sustainable Countries. Energies, 14, 1-22.
• Nisa, M., Shah, J. H., Kanwal, S., Raza, M., Khan, M. A., Damaševičius, R., & Blažauskas, T. (2020). Hybrid malware classification method using segmentation-based fractal texture analysis and deep convolution neural network features. Applied Sciences, 10(14), 4966.
• Nuryyev, G., Wang, Y. P., Achyldurdyyeva, J., Jaw, B. S., Yeh, Y. S., Lin, H. T., & Wu, L. F. (2020). Blockchain technology adoption behavior and sustainability of the business in tourism and hospitality SMEs: An empirical study. Sustainability, 12(3), 1256.
• Okorie, D. I. (2021). A network analysis of electricity demand and the cryptocurrency markets. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2), 3093-3108.
• Olawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. (2018). A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustainable development. Journal of cleaner production, 183, 231-250.
• Rana, R. L., Giungato, P., Tarabella, A., & Tricase, C. (2019). Blockchain applications and sustainability issues. Amfiteatru Economic, 21(13), 861-870.
• Seele, P., & Lock, I. (2017). The game-changing potential of digitalization for sustainability: possibilities, perils, and pathways. Sustainability Science, 12(2), 183-185.
• Soto, E. A., Bosman, L. B., Wollega, E., & Leon-Salas, W. D. (2021). Peer-to-peer energy trading: A review of the literature. Applied Energy, 283, 116268.
• Stuermer, M., Abu-Tayeh, G., & Myrach, T. (2017). Digital sustainability: basic conditions for sustainable digital artifacts and their ecosystems. Sustainability science, 12(2), 247-262.
• Tham, A., & Sigala, M. (2020). Road block (chain): Bit (coin) s for tourism sustainable development goals?. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology.
• Truby, J. (2018). Decarbonizing Bitcoin: Law and policy choices for reducing the energy consumption of Blockchain technologies and digital currencies. Energy research & social science, 44, 399-410.
• Vranken, H. (2017). Sustainability of bitcoin and blockchains. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 28, 1-9.
• Yılmaz, M.K. & Kaplan, A. (2022). Kriptopara Madenciliğinin Çevresel Sürdürülebilirlik Üzerine Etkileri. M. Bulut ve C. Korkut (Eds). Döngüsel Ekonomi ve Sürdürülebilir Hayat (143-174). Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Yayınları.
• Wu, Z., Shen, S., Zhou, H., Li, H., Lu, C., & Zou, D. (2021). An effective approach for the protection of user commodity viewing privacy in e-commerce website. Knowledge-Based Systems, 220, 106952.