First-generation students and business education: mechanisms behind unequal study success

Öz

Higher education is often presented as a pathway to social mobility, yet persistent inequalities remain between first-generation students and their continuing-generation peers. This paper explores how differences in social and cultural capital shape the experiences of first-generation students in higher education, with a particular focus on business and economic programs. Drawing on existing research and survey data from a university of applied sciences in Flanders, we show that differences in retention and graduation cannot be explained by financial constraints alone. Instead, a lasting cultural mismatch requires first-generation students to engage in higher levels of cultural adaptation work, contributing to unequal educational outcomes. The paper concludes by discussing institutional practices that may help create more inclusive forms of business education.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• first-generation students
• cultural capital
• business education
• higher education

Kaynakça

1. Abdul-Rahaman, N., Terentev, E., & Arkorful, V. E. (2023). The tertiary experience: Of social integration, retention and persistence–A review. Public Organization Review, 23(1), 133-147.
2. Ahn, M. Y., & Davis, H. H. (2023). Students’ sense of belonging and their socio-economic status in higher education: a quantitative approach. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(1), 136-149.
3. Batruch, A., Sommet, N., & Autin, F. (2025). Advancing the psychology of social class with large-scale replications in four countries. Nature Human Behaviour, 1-22.
4. Beattie, I. R. (2018). Sociological perspectives on first-generation college students. In Handbook of the sociology of education in the 21st century (pp. 171-191). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
5. Beşpınar, F. U., Cılızoğlu, M. D., & Yurtseven, İ. (2025). Comparison of parental aspirations, success pathways and strategies in lower and upper-middle class families in Türkiye. Journal of Family Studies, 1-33.
6. Cataldi, E. F., Bennett, C. T., & Chen, X. (2018). First-Generation Students: College Access, Persistence, and Postbachelor's Outcomes. Stats in Brief. NCES 2018-421. National center for education statistics.
7. Dekker, I., de Coninck, L., Biwer, F., Wenzel, N., van Herpen, S., Janssen, T., & Zijlstra, B. (2025). Comparing a sociological and psychological approach to summer bridge programs: a field experiment. Higher Education, 1-25.
8. De Schepper, A., Kyndt, E., & Clycq, N. (2024). Developing an understanding of the labour market: The value of social, cultural and identity capital according to first-and continuing-generation graduates. Journal of Education and Work, 37(1-4), 48-66.

9. Dong, H., Wang, Y., Li, W., & Dindin, J. (2023). Socioeconomic disparities and inequality of mass sports participation: analysis from Chinese general social survey 2010–2018. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1072944.
10. Elkin, G. A., Zabel, L. A., & Van Bunder, D. (2024). Staff Perceptions of First-in-Family Students in Higher Education: A Case Study of a Belgian College. Journal of First-generation Student Success, 4(1), 63-79.
11. Eten Angyagre, S., Yemini, M., & Khavenson, T. (2025). Upper-Class Youth Activism: A Systematic Mapping Review of the Literature. Sociological Focus, 58(4), 558-577.
12. European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture, (2022). Education and training monitor 2022 : comparative report, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/11741.
13. Gerhards, J., Hans, S., & Mutz, M. (2013). Social class and cultural consumption: the impact of modernisation in a comparative European perspective. Comparative Sociology, 12(2), 160-183.
14. Jack, A. A. (2014). Culture shock revisited: The social and cultural contingencies to class marginality. Sociological Forum, Vol. 29(2), 453-475.
15. Keppens, G., Boone, S., Consuegra, E., Laurijssen, I., Spruyt, B., & Droogenbroeck, F. V. (2023). First-generation college students’ motives to start university education: An investment in self-development, one’s economic prospects or to become a role model?, Young, 31(2), 142-160.
16. Kraus, M. W., Park, J. W., & Tan, J. J. (2017). Signs of social class: The experience of economic inequality in everyday life. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(3), 422-435.
17. López, M. J., Santelices, M. V., & Taveras, C. M. (2023). Academic performance and adjustment of first-generation students to higher education: A systematic review. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2209484
18. Phillips, L. T., Stephens, N. M., Townsend, S. S., & Goudeau, S. (2020). Access is not enough: Cultural mismatch persists to limit first-generation students’ opportunities for achievement throughout college. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(5), 1112.
19. Phommasa, M., Dominguez-Whitehead, Y., Caudillo, A., & Weber, K. (2022). Faculty mentoring dinners: Facilitating high-impact practices. In Developing and Implementing Promising Practices and Programs for First-Generation College Students (pp. 113-126). Routledge.
20. Sennett, R., & Cobb, J. (2023). The hidden injuries of class, Verso Books.
21. Simon, N., Hornung, R., & Dugan, K. (2022). Summer bridge program: Helping underserved students develop social and cultural capital. Journal of interdisciplinary studies in education, 11(1), 126-148.
22. Van Bunder, D., & Adam, E. (2025), Sociale mobiliteit en onderwijs: Grenswerk. Drempels en krachten van aspirant-pioniersstudenten op weg naar het hoger onderwijs, HOGENT, https://www.hogent.be/sites/hogent/assets/File/Onderzoeksrapport_Sociale_Mobiliteit_en_Onderwijs_Grenswerk_SMOG.pdf
23. Troy, C., Jackson, K., Pearce, B., & Rowe, D. (Eds.). (2022). Developing and implementing promising practices and programs for first-generation college students. Routledge.
24. Wright, A. L., Roscigno, V. J., & Quadlin, N. (2023). First-generation students, college majors, and gendered pathways. The Sociological Quarterly, 64(1), 67-90.