THE FIRST TURKISH SOCIOLOGIST TO PROPOSE PRIVATE ENTERPRISE: PRINCE SABAHATTIN

Yıl 2017, , 245 - 260, 29.08.2017

Sezen Özek , Serdar Yener , Candaş Can

https://doi.org/10.22139/jobs.306443

Öz

The purpose of this research is to reveal the
relation between Prince Sabahattin’s private enterprise idea and today’s
studies on the sociology of entrepreneurship. Prince Sabahattin, who was a
Young - Turk, is accepted as the first person to realize that social and
economic changes are fulfilled by the entrepreneurs in the Ottoman Empire. Contrary
to the many other intellectuals, Prince Sabahattin thinks that the role of
institutional transformation is not enough in for social and economic development.
His key concept explaining this transformation is private enterprise [teşebbüs-i şahsi]. In short, he emphasizes
the role of social values and norms on entrepreneurial activities and the
negative effects of restrictions on individual freedom in terms transformation of
society. Finally, it is suggested that the starting point of studies about
sociology of entrepreneurship in Turkey should be based on Prince Sabahattin’s
private enterprise and decentralization thought. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Entrepreneurship, sociology of entrepreneurship, prince sabahattin, private enterprise, decentralization

THE FIRST TURKISH SOCIOLOGIST TO PROPOSE PRIVATE ENTERPRISE: PRINCE SABAHATTIN

Öz

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to reveal the relation between
Prince Sabahattin’s private enterprise idea and today’s studies on the
sociology of entrepreneurship.
Method: Data and other information were gathered through literature
review.
Findings: Prince Sabahattin, who was a Young - Turk, is accepted as the
first person to realize that social and economic changes are fulfilled by the
entrepreneurs in the Ottoman Empire. Contrary to the many other
intellectuals, Prince Sabahattin thinks that the role of institutional
transformation is not enough in for social and economic development. His
key concept explaining this transformation is private enterprise [teşebbüs-i
şahsi]. In short, he emphasizes the role of social values and norms on
entrepreneurial activities and the negative effects of restrictions on
individual freedom in terms transformation of society.
Results: Finally, it is suggested that the starting point of studies about
sociology of entrepreneurship in Turkey should be based on Prince
Sabahattin’s private enterprise and decentralization thought

Anahtar Kelimeler

girişimcilik, girişimcilik sosyolojisi, prens sabahattin, teşebbüs-i şahsi, adem-i merkeziyetçilik

Kaynakça

• Akşin, Sina. (2013). Düşünce ve Bilim Tarihi (1839-1908). Türkiye Tarihi III. İstanbul: Cem Tarih. Aytaç, Ömer, & İlhan, Süleyman (2007). “Girişimcilik ve Girişimci Kültür: Sosyolojik Bir Perspektif”. Selcuk University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 18, s. 101-120. Bayraktar, Bayram (1997). ‘’Günümüzde Yeniden Değerlendirilmesi Gereken Bir Düşünür: Prens Sabahattin Bey’’. Ankara Üniversitesi Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18 (29).51-61. Berber, Şarika. G. (2011). “Osmanlı Devletinin Son Döneminden Cumhuriyetin İlk Yıllarına Liberalizm-Devletçilik Tartışması”. Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Dergisi(80). Bruton, Garry D., Ahlstrom, David. and Obloj, Kryzstof. (2008). Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies: Where Are We Today and Where Should the Research Go in the Future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, January : 1-14. Bula, H. O. (2012). Evolution and Theories of Entrepreneurship: A Critical Review on the Kenyan Perspective. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 1(11), s. 81-96. Çetindamar, Dilek (2003). Türkiye'de Girişimcilik. TÜSİAD. Drucker, Peter (2015). Yönetimin Sınırları. (İ. Gülfidan, Çev.) İstanbul. Optimist Yayım Dağıtım. Ege, Nezehat. N. (1977). Prens Sabahattin: Hayatı ve İlmi Müdafaaları. İstanbul: Güneş Neşriyat. Ergün, Mustafa (2008). Prens Sabahattin Bey’in Eğitim Üzerine Düşünceleri. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim. 1 (2), ss. 1-9. Eser, G., & Yıldız, Müge L. (2015). Türkiye Girişimcilik Araştırmalarının Odağı Nedir?: Yazın Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Marmara Üniversitesi Öneri Dergisi, 11(43), s. 91-117. Goktan, Banu & Gunay, Gonca (2011). “Is Entrepreneurial Cognition Culturally Bound? A Comparative Study Conducted in Turkey and The United States. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 4 (24), s. 455-470. Güler, Birgül A. (2000). Yerel Yönetimleri Güçlendirmek mi? Adem-i Merkeziyetçilik mi?. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler. ss. 14-30. 9 (2). Hofstede, Geert (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values. Beverly Hils,CA: Sage Publications. İlhan, Süleyman (2003). Sosyo Ekonomik Bir Fenomen Olarak Girişimciliğin Oluşumunu Etkileyen Faktörler. Muğla Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, Güz-11, s. 61-79. Kılıç, Murat (2010). Türk Siyasal Hayatında Muhalif Bir İsim ve Hareket: Prens Sabahattin ve Meslek-i İçtima. SDÜ SBE Dergisi. 12 (2). ss. 1-9. Koçak, Yüksel., Çiçek, Atıl C. & Yolcu, T. (2012). Türk Kamu Yönetiminde Değişim: Ahmet Rıza'dan Prens Sabahattin'e Prens Sabahattin'den Nereye? II. Bölgesel Sorunlar ve Türkiye Sempozyumu: Yönetim-Ticaret-Siyaset. Kahramanmaraş: Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi. ss. 430-436. Kritikos, Aleandre S. (2014). Entrepreneurs and their impact on jobs and economic growth. IZA World of Labor 2014: 8 doi: 10.15185/izawol.8 Lussier, Robert N., & Corman, Joel. (1995). There are Few Diffenrences Between Succesful and Failed Small Businesses. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 6(1), s. 21-33. McMullen Jeffery S. and Warnick, Benjamin (2011). Delineating the domain of development entrepreneurship: A market‐based approach to facilitating inclusive economic growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, ss. 185-93. Meek, William. R., Desiree, Pacheco., & York, Jefferey. G. (2010). The İmpact of Social Norms on Entrepreneurial Action: Evidence from the Environmental Entrepreneurship Context. Journal of Business Venturing (25), ss. 493-409. Mirze, S. Kadri. (2010). İşletme. İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık. Reynolds, P. D. (1991). Sociology and Entrepreneurship: Concepts and Contributions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), ss. 47-70. Ruef, Michael., & Lounsbury, Martin (2007). Introduction: The Sociology of Entrepreneurship. M. Ruef, & M. Lounsbury (ed.), The Sociology of Entrepreneurship (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 25) (s. 1-29). Elsevier Limited. Sabahattin, Prens. (2007). Türkiye Nasıl Kurtarılabilir? M. Ö. Alkan (Dü.) içinde, Gönüllü Sürgünden Zorunlu Sürgüne: Prens Sabahattin'in Tüm Eserleri. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları. Sezer, Baykan. (1997), Batı Dünya Egemenliği ve Endüstri Devrimi, İstanbul, İ.Ü Edebiyat Fakültesi Yayınları. Simpeh, Kwabena. N. (2011). Entrepreneurship theories and Empirical research: A Summary Review of the Literature. European Journal of Business and Management. 3 (6). Thornton, Patricia H. (1999). The Sociology of Entrepreneurship. Annu. Rev. Social., 25, s. 19-46. Thornton, Patricia, Riberio-Soriano, Domingo & Urbano, David (2011). Socio-cultural Factors and Entrepreneurial Activity: An Overview. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), ss. 105-118. Ünal, Feyzullah & Kavuncuoğlu Soner (2015). Prens Sabahattin ve Adem-I Merkeziyetçilik Anlayışı. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi. ss. 118-130. 45. Van Dijk, Ta (1990). Social cognition and discourse , in H. Giles and R. P. Robinson (edit.), Handbook of Social Psychology and Language (Chichester, Sussex: Wiley, 1990), ss. 163-83. Weber, Max (2011). Protestan Ahlakı ve Kapitalizmin Ruhu. (G. Solmaz, Çev.) İstanbul, Alter Yayıncılık. Zurcher, Erik Jan (2004). Modernleşen Türkiye'nin Tarihi. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.