Defining contexts of the Postcolonial, the post-Soviet, and the Peripheral – The Case of Georgia [Определение контекстов постколониального, постсоветского и периферийного — пример Грузии]

Öz

Defining contexts of the Postcolonial, the post-Soviet, and the Peripheral – The Case of Georgia [Postkolonyal, post-Sovyet ve periferik kavramlarının çerçevesi: Gürcistan Örneği]

Öz

In some approaches, the post-Soviet condition is comparable to postcolonial. Yet, another approach defines the post-Soviet as a general context and studies its’ peripheral conditions. Within the framework of this approach, post-Soviet represents context, and the periphery is an additional attestation to it. An internal center produces an internal periphery which is represented as a marginal, dependent, and less significant subject. This internal peripheralization and marginalization is represented as a specific construct and considered a post-Soviet, postcolonial occurrence. These specific constructs include the term peripheral as a secondary element. The present article is an attempt to avoid the hyper-definitions produced by the terms post-Soviet and postcolonial, by defining the term peripheral as a secondary component, which is always in bipolar antagonism with its’ center. The autonomous character of the term peripheral is shown in the case of Georgia, which is mainly studied under the general definition of post-Soviet and postcolonial.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Peripheral
• post-Soviet
• postcolonial
• Georgia

Defining contexts of the Postcolonial, the post-Soviet, and the Peripheral – The Case of Georgia [Postkolonyal, Post-Sovyet ve Periferik Kavramlarının Çerçevesi: Gürcistan Örneği]

Öz

Bu makale, periferik (peripheral) terimini, her zaman merkeziyle iki kutuplu bir karşıtlık içinde olan ikincil bir bileşen olarak tanımlayarak, post-Sovyet ve postkolonyal terimlerinin ürettiği tireli tanımlardan kaçınma girişimidir. Periferik teriminin özerk karakteri, postkolonyal ve post-Sovyet çalışmalarında gösterilmiştir. Esas olarak post-Sovyet ve postkolonyal genel bağlamsal tanımı altında incelenen Gürcistan örneği, muğlak bir şekilde tanımlanmış tikelliği temsil eder. Bazı yaklaşımlarda, post-Sovyet durumu postkolonyal durumla karşılaştırılabilir, yine başka bir yaklaşım post-Sovyet'i genel bir bağlam olarak tanımlar ve çevre koşullarını inceler. Makalede, ilgili terimlerin çeşitli tanımlarını ve bunların Sovyetler Birliği'nin dağılmasından sonra Gürcistan için kullanımlarını gözden geçiriyoruz. Sonuç olarak, bu makale postkolonyal, post-Sovyet ve periferik terimlerinin tanımlarını ve bunların Gürcistan bağlamındaki etkilerini gözden geçirmeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Periferik
• Post-Sovyet
• postkolonyal
• Gürcistan

Kaynakça

1. Anderson, Alistair R., et al. “Periphery? What Periphery? Marketing to a State of Mind.” Irish Marketing Review, vol. 14, no. 1, Dec. 2001, pp. 24–34.
2. Anderson, Richard D., et al. “Postcommunism and the Theory of Democracy.” Postcommunism and the Theory of Democracy, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1h9dgdb.
3. Angle, Stephen C. “The Minimal Definition and Methodology Of Comparative Philosophy: A Report from A Conference.” Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy, vol. 1, no. 1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.31979/2151-6014(2010).010109.
4. Åslund, Anders, et al. “How to Stabilize: Lessons from Post-Communist Countries.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. 1, 1996, https://doi.org/10.2307/2534649.
5. Bassin, Mark, and Catriona Kelly. “Soviet and Post-Soviet Identities.” Soviet and Post-Soviet Identities, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894732.
6. Batiashvili, Nutsa. “The Bivocal Nation: Memory and Identity on the Edge of Empire.” The Bivocal Nation: Memory and Identity on the Edge of Empire, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62286-6.
7. Becker, Charles M., et al. Russian Urbanization in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Eras. Nov. 2012, https://www.iied.org/10613iied.
8. Beissinger, Mark R., and Crawford Young. Beyond State Crisis? Postcolonial Africa and Post-Soviet Eurasia in Comparative Perspective. Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2002.

9. Bhabha, Homi K. “The Location of Culture.” The Location of Culture, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203820551.
10. Broers, Laurence. “‘David and Goliath’ and ‘Georgians in the Kremlin’: A Post-Colonial Perspective on Conflict in Post-Soviet Georgia.” Central Asian Survey, vol. 28, no. 2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1080/02634930903034096.
11. ---. “Post-Coloniality and the Politics of Language in Post-Soviet Georgia.” Annual Convention of the Association for the Study of Nationalities, Unpublished, 2005.
12. Buckler, Julie A. “What Comes After ‘Post-Soviet’ in Russian Studies?” PMLA, vol. 124, no. 1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2009.124.1.251.
13. Bunce, Valerie. “Comparing East and South.” The Politics of the Postcommunist World, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0045.
14. ---. “The Political Economy of Postsocialism.” Slavic Review, vol. 58, no. 4, 1999, https://doi.org/10.2307/2697198.
15. Chase-Dunn, Christopher, and Peter Grimes. “World Systems Analysis.” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 21, 1995, pp. 387–417.
16. Chelidze, Ana. “Ethno-Nationalistic and Religious-Nationalistic Components of Identity in Post-Soviet Georgia.” Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe, vol. 34, no. 2, 2014.
17. Chirot, D., and T. D. Hall. “World-System Theory.” Annual Review of Sociology. Volume 8, 1982, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.000501.
18. Chkhaidze, Irakli. “Post-Soviet Georgia: New Perspectives in Historical Research?” Civilization Researchers, vol. 9, 2012, pp. 43–47.
19. Collier, David, and James E. Mahon. “Conceptual ‘Stretching’ Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review, vol. 87, no. 4, 1993, https://doi.org/10.2307/2938818.
20. Collier, Stephen J., and Lucan Way. “Beyond the Deficit Model: Social Welfare in Post-Soviet Georgia.” Post-Soviet Affairs, vol. 20, no. 3, 2004, https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.20.3.258.
21. Coombs. “Entwining Tongues: Postcolonial Theory, Post-Soviet Literatures and Bilingualism in Chingiz Aitmatov’s ‘I Dol’she Veka Dlitsia Den’.” Journal of Modern Literature, vol. 34, no. 3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2979/jmodelite.34.3.47.
22. Darchiashvili, Davit. “National Society and Implications of Modern Security.” Identity Studies in the Caucasus and the Black Sea Region, vol. 1, 2009, pp. 102–15.
23. Dupuy, Alex, and Nancy Fraser. “Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition.” Contemporary Sociology, vol. 26, no. 6, 1997, https://doi.org/10.2307/2654616.
24. Ekiert, Grzegorz, et al. “Democracy in the Post-Communist World: An Unending Quest?” East European Politics and Societies, vol. 21, no. 1, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325406297170.
25. Etkind, Aleksander, and Mikhail Minakov. “Post-Soviet Ideological Creativity.” Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society, vol. 216, 2020.
26. Fanon, Frank. A Dying Colonialism. Grove Press, 1965.
27. Felcher, Anastasia. “Alexander Pushkin in Bessarabia: Literature and Identity Politics in the Periphery” National Identities, vol. 21, no. 4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2018.1490257.
28. Fischer-Tiné, Harald, and Maria Framke. “Routledge Handbook of the History of Colonialism in South Asia.” Routledge Handbook of the History of Colonialism in South Asia, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429431012.
29. Fluri, Philipp H., and Eden Cole. From Revolution to Reform: Georgia’s Struggle with Democratic Institution Building and Security Sector Reform. Edited by Philipp H. Fluri and Eden Cole, Bureau for Security Policy at the Austrian Ministry of Defence; National Defence Academy, Vienna and Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces in co-operation with PfP-Consortium of Defence Academies and Security Studies Institutes, 2005.
30. Gamsakhurdia, Zviad. Spiritual Mission of Georgia. Ganatleba, 1990. https://www.amsi.ge/istoria/zg/missia.html
31. Gille, Zsuzsa. “Is There a Global Postsocialist Condition?” Global Society, vol. 24, no. 1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820903431953.
32. Goldgeier, James M., and Michael McFaul. “A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era.” International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, 1992, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027788.
33. Gurchiani, Ketevan. “How Soviet Is the Religious Revival in Georgia: Tactics in Everyday Religiosity*.” Europe - Asia Studies, vol. 69, no. 3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2017.1323324.
34. Haddour, Azzedine. “Frantz Fanon, Postcolonialism and the Ethics of Difference.” Frantz Fanon, Postcolonialism and the Ethics of Difference, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526140814.
35. Holland, Edward C., and Matthew Derrick. Questioning Post-Soviet. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2016.
36. Imlay, Talbot C. “International Socialism and Decolonization during the 1950s: Competing Rights and the Postcolonial Order.” American Historical Review, vol. 118, no. 4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/118.4.1105.
37. Jacob, Elin K. “Classification and Categorization: A Difference That Makes a Difference.” Library Trends, vol. 52, no. 3, 2004.
38. Jarosz, Katarzyna. “National Narratives of ‘Occupation’ in Historical Museums of the Post-Soviet Landscape.” Visual Histories of Occupation, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350167513.ch-010.
39. Jones, Stephen F. Georgia: A Political History Since Independence. I.B. Tauris, 2012.
40. Kaganovsky, Lilya, and Masha Salazkina. “Sound, Speech, Music in Soviet and Post-Soviet Cinema.” Sound, Speech, Music in Soviet and Post-Soviet Cinema, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/17503132.2014.969955.
41. Kagarlitsky, Boris. “Empire of the Periphery: Russia and the World System.” Capital & Class, vol. 32, no. 3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt18fs32g
42. Kay, Rebecca, et al. “Rural Realities in the Post-Socialist Space.” Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 28, no. 2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.03.001.
43. Kazmina, Olga, and Olga Filippova. “Re-Imagination of Religion in Post-Soviet Society: Challenges and Responses (Russian and Ukrainian Case Studies).” Journal of the American Academy of Religion, vol. 73, no. 4, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfi114.
44. Khalvashi, Tamta. “Social and Political Aspects of Marginalization: Theory and Practice.” Peripheries of Shame, EMC, 2016, pp. 53–80.
45. King, Charles. “The Ghost of Freedom: A History of the Caucasus.” The Ghost of Freedom: A History of the Caucasus, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195177756.001.0001.
46. Kuzio, Taras. “History, Memory and Nation Building in the Post-Soviet Colonial Space.” Nationalities Papers, vol. 30, no. 2, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1080/00905990220140649.
47. Lyrintzis, Christos. Comparison and Interpretation. The Course and Perspectives in Modern Political Analysis. Nisos, 2001.
48. Manning, Patrick, et al. “World-Systems Analysis: Theory and Methodology.” African Economic History, no. 13, 1984, https://doi.org/10.2307/3601496.
49. Martinez-Vela, Carlos A. World Systems Theory. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.
50. Mayerchyk, Maya, and Olga Plakhotnik. “Ukrainian Feminism at the Crossroad of National, Postcolonial, and (Post)Soviet: Theorizing the Maidan Events 2013-2014.” “The Europe of Women” International Conference, Radboud University Nijmegen, 2015.
51. Minakov, Mikhail. “On the Extreme Periphery. The Status of Post-Soviet Non-Recognised States in the World-System.” Ideology and Politics Journal, no. 1–12, 2019.
52. Mishra, Vijay, and Bob Hodge. “What Is Post (–) Colonialism?” Textual Practice, vol. 5, no. 3, 1991, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502369108582124.
53. Musteaţă, Sergiu, et al. Two Decades of Development in Post-Soviet States: Successes and Failures. Edited by Sergiu Musteata et al., Colecția Academica. European Institute.
54. Nesvetailov, Gennady. “Center-Periphery Relations and Transformation of Post-Soviet Science.” Knowledge and Policy, vol. 8, no. 2, 1995, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02825968.
55. Nisnevich, Yuliy, and Andrey Ryabov. “Post-Soviet Authoritarianism.” Russian Social Science Review, vol. 61, no. 6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/10611428.2020.1852042.
56. Nodia, Ghia. “Putting the State Back Together in the Post-Soviet Georgia.” Beyond State Crisis: Postcolonial Africa and Post-Soviet Eurasia in Comparative Perspective, edited by Mark R. Beissinger and Crawford Young, Woodrow Wilson Center Press: 2002, pp. 413–43.
57. Pankhurst, Jerry. “Religious Culture: Faith in Soviet and Post Soviet Russia.” Russian Culture at the Crossroads: Paradoxes of Postcommunist Consciousness, edited by Dmitri N. Shalin, Boulder, 2012, pp. 127–56.
58. Reno, William. “The Politics of Insurgency in Collapsing States.” Development and Change, vol. 33, no. 5, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.t01-1-00251.
59. Robertson, Roland, and Frank Lechner. “Modernization, Globalization and the Problem of Culture in World-Systems Theory.” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 2, no. 3, 1985, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276485002003009.
60. Rubin, Barnett R., and Jack Snyder. “Post-Soviet Political Order: Conflict and State Building.” The European Legacy, vol. 6, no. 3, 1998.
61. Said, Edward W. Culture and Imperialism. Vintage Books, 1994.
62. Sartori, Giovanni. “Comparing and Miscomparing.” Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 3, no. 3, 1991, https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692891003003001.
63. Sartre, Jean-Paul. Colonialism and Neocollonialism. 1st ed., Routledge, 2001.
64. Serpa, Sandro, and Carlos Miguel Ferreira. “Micro, Meso and Macro Levels of Social Analysis.” International Journal of Social Science Studies, vol. 7, no. 3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v7i3.4223.
65. Sharikadze, Nana. “Georgian Musical Criticism of the Soviet and Post-Soviet Eras.” Lietuvos Muzikologija, no. 20, 2019.
66. Shishkov, Andrey, and Aleksander Kyrlezhev. Postsecularism in Post-Atheist Russia. 2011.
67. Snyder, Jack. “Nationalism and the Crisis of the Post-Soviet State.” Survival, vol. 35, no. 1, 1993, https://doi.org/10.1080/00396339308442671.
68. Solchanyk, Roman. “The Politics of State Building: Centre—Periphery Relations in Post-Soviet Ukraine.” Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 46, no. 1, 1994, https://doi.org/10.1080/09668139408412149.
69. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason. Harvard University Press, 1999, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjsf541.
70. ---. “Are We Postcolonial? Post-Soviet Space.” PMLA, vol. 121, no. 3, 2006, pp. 828–36.
71. Stenning, Alison, and Kathrin Hörschelmann. “History, Geography and Difference in the Post-Socialist World: Or, Do We Still Need Post-Socialism?” Antipode, vol. 40, no. 2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00593.x.
72. Stoner-Weiss, Kathryn. “The Russian Central State in Crisis: Center and Periphery in the Post-Soviet Era.” Russian Politics: Challenges of Democratization, edited by Zoltan Barany and Robert G. Moser, Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 103–34.
73. Thiong’o, Ngugi wa. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Publisher James Currey Ltd / Heinemann, 1986.
74. Tiffin, Helen. “3. Post-Colonialism, Post-Modernism and the Rehabilitation of Post-Colonial History.” The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, vol. 23, no. 1, 1988, https://doi.org/10.1177/002198948802300116.
75. Tlostanova, Madina. “Postsocialist ≠ Postcolonial? On Post-Soviet Imaginary and Global Coloniality.” Journal of Postcolonial Writing, vol. 48, no. 2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2012.658244.
76. van der Hoek, M. Peter. “Post-Soviet Globalisation.” South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, vol. 4, no. 3, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v4i3.2654.
77. Wakamiya, Lisa Ryoko. “Post-Soviet Contexts and Trauma Studies.” Slavonica, vol. 17, no. 2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1179/136174211x13122749974285.
78. Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. “World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction / Edition 1.” Barnes & Noble, 2004.
79. Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. The Capitalist World-Economy: Essays. Cambridge University Press, 1979.
80. White, Stephen, et al. Developments in Russian and Post-Soviet Politics. Edited by Stephen White et al., 3rd ed., Macmillan Education UK, 1994, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23461-5.
81. Zviadadze, Sophio. “The Way of Georgian-Orthodox Church in Past and in Present Day in the Context of Political and Societal Changes.” Religion and Freedom in Germany and Georgia, edited by Tamar Tsopurashvili, 2017, p. 101-127.