Çevre İle İlgili Teknolojilerin Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Hipotezi Kapsamında Test Edilmesi : G-20 Ülkeleri

Öz

Bu çalışmada, 1990-2017 yılları arasında G-20 ülkelerinde Çevresel Kuznet Eğrisi (ÇKE) hipotezinin olası varlığı ile yenilenebilir enerji tüketimi, yenilenemeyen enerji tüketimi, küreselleşme ve çevresel teknolojilerin çevresel kirliliği temsilen alınan CO2 emisyonuna etkilerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Sonuçlara göre incelenen dönem için G-20 ülkelerinde ÇKE hipotezi geçerlidir. Yenilenebilir enerji tüketimi ve çevresel teknolojiler CO2 emisyonunu azaltırken, yenilenemeyen enerji tüketimi emisyonu arttırmaktadır. Küreselleşme sonuçları ise anlamsız olarak bulunmuştur. Son olarak Emirmahmutoğlu-Köse nedensellik testi ile değişkenler arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi incelenmiştir. Nedensellik test sonucuna göre, CO2 emisyonu ile çevresel teknolojik patent sayısı ve yenilenemeyen enerji tüketimi arasında çift yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmuştur. CO2 emisyonundan yenilenebilir enerji tüketimine doğru ise tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çevresel Kuznet Eğrisi Hipotezi
• Çevreyle ilgili Teknolojiler
• G-20 ülkeleri

Testing Environmental Technologies within the Scope of the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: G-20 Countries

Öz

This study aims to examine the possible existence of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis in G-20 countries between 1990 and 2017, as well as the effects of renewable energy consumption, non-renewable energy consumption, globalization, and environmental technologies on CO₂ emissions, which represent environmental pollution. According to the results, the EKC hypothesis is valid for G-20 countries during the examined period. While renewable energy consumption and environmental technologies reduce CO₂ emissions, non-renewable energy consumption increases emissions. The results for globalization were found to be insignificant. Finally, the Emirmahmutoğlu-Köse causality test was conducted to examine the causal relationships among the variables. The causality test results indicate a bidirectional causal relationship between CO₂ emissions and both the number of environmental technology patents and non-renewable energy consumption. Additionally, a unidirectional causal relationship was found from CO₂ emissions to renewable energy consumption.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Environment Kuznets Curve Hypothesis
• Environmental Technologies
• G-20 countries

Kaynakça

1. Abbas, Q., Nurunnabi, M., Alfakhri, Y., Khan, W., Hussain, A. Ve Iqbal, W. (2020). The Role Of Fixed Capital Formation, Renewable And Non-Renewable Energy İn Economic Growth And Carbon Emission: A Case Study Of Belt And Road Initiative Project. Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 27 (36), 45476-45486.
2. Acheampong, A. O., Adams, S. Ve Boateng, E. (2019). Do Globalization And Renewable Energy Contribute To Carbon Emissions Mitigation İn Sub-Saharan Africa?. Science Of The Total Environment, 677, 436-446.
3. Adedoyin, F. F., Alola, A. A., & Bekun, F. V. (2020). An Assessment Of Environmental Sustainability Corridor: The Role Of Economic Expansion And Research And Development İn EU Countries. Science Of The Otal Environment, 713, 136726.
4. Afshan, S., & Yaqoob, T. (2022). The Potency Of Eco-İnnovation, Natural Resource And Financial Development On Ecological Footprint: A Quantile-ARDL-Based Evidence From China. Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 29(33), 50675-50685.
5. Ahmad, M., Jiang, P., Murshed, M., Shehzad, K., Akram, R., Cui, L., & Khan, Z. (2021). Modelling The Dynamic Linkages Between Eco-İnnovation, Urbanization, Economic Growth And Ecological Footprints For G7 Countries: Does Financial Globalization Matter?. Sustainable Cities And Society, 70, 102881.
6. Al-Mulali, U., & Ozturk, I. (2016). The İnvestigation Of Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis İn The Advanced Economies: The Role Of Energy Prices. Renewable And Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 1622-1631.
7. Al-Mulali, U., Tang, C. F. Ve Ozturk, I. (2015). Estimating The Environment Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: Evidence From Latin America And The Caribbean Countries. Renewable And Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 918-924.
8. Ardakani, M. K. Ve Seyedaliakbar, S. M. (2019). Impact Of Energy Consumption And Economic Growth On

9. Emission Using Multivariate Regression. Energy Strategy Reviews, 26, 1-13.
10. Arı, A. Ve Zeren, F. (2011).
11. Emisyonu Ve Ekonomik Büyüme: Panel Veri Analizi. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (2), 37-47.
12. Bakırtaş, İ. Ve Çetin, M. A. (2016). Yenilenebilir Enerji Tüketimi İle Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: G-20 Ülkeleri. Sosyoekonomi, 24 (28), 131-145.
13. Baloch, M. A., Mahmood, N., Ve Zhang, J. W. (2019). Effect Of Natural Resources, Renewable Energy And Economic Development On
14. Emissions İn BRICS Countries. Science Of The Total Environment, 678, 632-638.
15. Balogh, J. M. Ve Jámbor, A. (2017). Determinants Of
16. . International Journal Of Energy Economics And Policy, 7 (5), 217-226.
17. Bataka, H. (2021). Globalization And Environmental Pollution İn Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal Of Economic Review, 9(1), 191-205.
18. Bayraktutan, Y., Arslan, I., Özkan, G. S., Ve Çevik, F. S. (2012). Industrial Sector Energy Consumption İn Turkey-The Relationship Between Economic Growth (1970-2010). Journal Of Economics And International Finance, 4 (2), 30-35.
19. Bilgili, F., Koçak, E. Ve Bulut, Ü. (2016). The Dynamic İmpact Of Renewable Energy Consumption On
20. Emissions: A Revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve Approach. Renewable And Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 838-845.
21. Bölük, G. Ve Mert, M. (2015). The Renewable Energy, Growth And Environmental Kuznets Curve İn Turkey: An ARDL Approach. Renewable And Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 587-595.
22. Bulut, U. (2019). Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve For The USA Under A Regime Shift: The Role Of Renewable Energy. Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 26 (14), 14562-14569.
23. Chen, Y., Zhao, J., Lai, Z., Wang, Z. Ve Xia, H. (2019). Exploring The Effects Of Economic Growth, And Renewable And Non-Renewable Energy Consumption On China’s
24. Emissions: Evidence From A Regional Panel Analysis. Renewable Energy, 140, 341-353.
25. Cheng, C., Ren, X., & Wang, Z. (2019). The İmpact Of Renewable Energy And İnnovation On Carbon Emission: An Empirical Analysis For OECD Countries. Energy Procedia, 158, 3506-3512.
26. Chien, F., Sadiq, M., Nawaz, M. A., Hussain, M. S., Tran, T. D., & Le Thanh, T. (2021). A Step Toward Reducing Air Pollution İn Top Asian Economies: The Role Of Green Energy, Eco-İnnovation, And Environmental Taxes. Journal Of Environmental Management, 297, 113420.
27. Chudik, A. Ve Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Common Correlated Effects Estimation Of Heterogeneous Dynamic Panel Data Models With Weakly Exogenous Regressors. Journal Of Econometrics, 188 (2), 393-420.
28. Churchill, S. A., Inekwe, J., Ivanovski, K. Ve Smyth, R. (2018). The Environmental Kuznets Curve İn The OECD: 1870–2014. Energy Economics, 75, 389-399.
29. Clift, R. (1995). Clean Technology—An İntroduction. Journal Of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology: International Research İn Process, Environmental And Clean Technology, 62 (4), 321-326.
30. Dauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C. N., & Salman, M. (2019). The Effects Of Economic Growth And İnnovation On CO 2 Emissions İn Different Regions. Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 26, 15028-15038.
31. De Souza, E. S., De Souza Freire, F. Ve Pires, J. (2018). Determinants Of
32. Emissions İn The MERCOSUR: The Role Of Economic Growth, And Renewable And Non-Renewable Energy. Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 25 (21), 20769-20781.
33. Destek, M. A. Ve Sinha, A. (2020). Renewable, Non-Renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Trade Openness And Ecological Footprint: Evidence From Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development Countries. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 242, 118537, 1-11.
34. Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecological Economics, 49 (4), 431-455.
35. Doğan, E. Ve Inglesi-Lotz, R. (2020). The İmpact Of Economic Structure To The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Hypothesis: Evidence From European Countries. Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 1-8.
36. Doğan, E. Ve Seker, F. (2016). Determinants Of
37. Emissions İn The European Union: The Role Of Renewable And Non-Renewable Energy. Renewable Energy, 94, 429-439.
38. Dong, K., Sun, R. Ve Dong, X. (2018).
39. Emissions, Natural Gas And Renewables, Economic Growth: Assessing The Evidence From China. Science Of The Total Environment, 640, 293-302.
40. Dong, K., Sun, R., Jiang, H. Ve Zeng, X. (2018).
41. Emissions, Economic Growth, And The Environmental Kuznets Curve İn China: What Roles Can Nuclear Energy And Renewable Energy Play?. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 196, 51-63.
42. Dong, K., Sun, R., Li, H. Ve Liao, H. (2018b). Does Natural Gas Consumption Mitigate
43. Emissions: Testing The Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis For 14 Asia-Pacific Countries. Renewable And Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94, 419-429.
44. Emirmahmutoglu, F. Ve Kose, N. (2011). Testing For Granger Causality İn Heterogeneous Mixed Panels. Economic Modelling, 28 (3), 870-876.
45. Erdoğan, S., Okumuş, I. Ve Güzel, A. E. (2020). Revisiting The Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis İn OECD Countries: The Role Of Renewable, Non-Renewable Energy, And Oil Prices. Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 1-9.
46. Erdoğan, S., Yıldırım, S., Yıldırım, D. Ç., & Gedikli, A. (2020). The Effects Of İnnovation On Sectoral Carbon Emissions: Evidence From G20 Countries. Journal Of Environmental Management, 267, 110637.
47. Eberhardt, M. Ve Bond, S. (2009). Cross-Section Dependence İn Nonstationary Panel Models: A Novel Estimator.
48. Fatima, T., Shahzad, U.Ve Cui, L. (2020). Renewable And Nonrenewable Energy Consumption, Trade And
49. Emissions İn High Emitter Countries: Does The İncome Level Matter?. Journal Of Environmental Planning And Management, 1-25.
50. Fethi, S., & Rahuma, A. (2019). The Role Of Eco-İnnovation On CO 2 Emission Reduction İn An Extended Version Of The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence From The Top 20 Refined Oil Exporting Countries. Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 26, 30145-30153.
51. Grossman, G. M. Ve Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental İmpacts Of A North American Free Trade Agreement (No. W3914). National Bureau Of Economic Research.
52. Güney, A. (2018). Genişletilmiş Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisinin Türkiye İçin Yeniden Değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 32 (3), 745-761.
53. Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R. G. Ve Stavins, R. N. (2005). A Tale Of Two Market Failures: Technology And Environmental Policy. Ecological Economics, 54 (2-3), 164-174.
54. Jebli, M. B., Youssef, S. B. Ve Ozturk, I. (2016). Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: The Role Of Renewable And Non-Renewable Energy Consumption And Trade İn OECD Countries. Ecological Indicators, 60, 824-831.
55. Jin, C., Razzaq, A., Saleem, F., & Sinha, A. (2022). Asymmetric Effects Of Eco-İnnovation And Human Capital Development İn Realizing Environmental Sustainability İn China: Evidence From Quantile ARDL Framework. Economic Research-Ekonomska İstraživanja, 35(1), 4947-4970.
56. Khoshnevis Yazdi, S. Ve Ghorchi Beygi, E. (2018). The Dynamic İmpact Of Renewable Energy Consumption And Financial Development On
57. Emissions: For Selected African Countries. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, And Policy, 13 (1), 13-20.
58. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth And İncome İnequality. The American Economic Review, 45 (1), 1-28.
59. Lam, J. C. Ve Hills, P. (2011). Promoting Technological Environmental Innovations. Green Finance And Sustainability; Luo, Z., Ed.; IGI Global: Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 56-73.
60. Lau, L. S., Choong, C. K., Ng, C. F., Liew, F. M. Ve Ching, S. L. (2019). Is Nuclear Energy Clean? Revisit Of Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis İn OECD Countries. Economic Modelling, 77, 12-20.
61. Lin, B. Ve Zhu, J. (2019). The Role Of Renewable Energy Technological İnnovation On Climate Change, S. Empirical Evidence From China. Science Of The Total Environment, 659, 1505-1512.
62. Lorente, D. B., & Alvarez-Herranz, A. (2016). An Approach To The Effect Of Energy İnnovation On Environmental Kuznets Curve: An İntroduction To İnflection Point. Bulletin Of Energy Economics, 4(3), 224-233.
63. Maczulak, A. E. (2010). Renewable Energy: Sources And Methods. Infobase Publishing.
64. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. Ve Behrens, W. W. (1972). The Limits To Growth. New York: Universe Books.
65. Menegaki, A. N. Ve Tsagarakis, K. P. (2015). Rich Enough To Go Renewable, But Too Early To Leave Fossil Energy?. Renewable And Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 1465-1477.
66. Mensah, C. N., Long, X., Boamah, K. B., Bediako, I. A., Dauda, L., & Salman, M. (2018). The Effect Of İnnovation On CO 2 Emissions Of OCED Countries From 1990 To 2014. Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 25, 29678-29698.
67. Mert, M. Ve Bölük, G. (2016). Do Foreign Direct İnvestment And Renewable Energy Consumption Affect The
68. Emissions? New Evidence From A Panel ARDL Approach To Kyoto Annex Countries. Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 23 (21), 21669-21681.
69. Moutinho, V. Ve Robaina, M. (2016). Is The Share Of Renewable Energy Sources Determining The
70. Kwh And İncome Relation İn Electricity Generation?. Renewable And Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 902-914.
71. Nasir, M., & Rehman, F. U. (2011). Environmental Kuznets Curve For Carbon Emissions İn Pakistan: An Empirical İnvestigation. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1857-1864.
72. Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical Tests And Policy Analysis Of Environmental Degradation At Different Stages Of Economic Development (No. 992927783402676). International Labour Organization.
73. Pata, U. K. (2018). Renewable Energy Consumption, Urbanization, Financial Development, İncome And
74. Emissions İn Turkey: Testing EKC Hypothesis With Structural Breaks. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 187, 770-779.
75. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests For Cross Section Dependence İn Panels (No: 1240). Discussion Paper Series.
76. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test İn The Presence Of Cross‐Section Dependence. Journal Of Applied Econometrics, 22 (2), 265-312.
77. Pesaran, M. H. Ve Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing Slope Homogeneity İn Large Panels. Journal Of Econometrics, 142 (1), 50-93.
78. Pofoura, A. K., Sun, H., Mensah, I. A., & Liu, F. (2021). How Does Eco-İnnovation Affect CO2 Emissions? Evidence From Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal Of Environmental Assessment Policy And Management, 23(03n04), 2250017.
79. Polat, B., & Çil, N. (2024). Investigating The Environmental Kuznets Curve Modified With HDI: Evidence From A Panel Of Eco-İnnovative Countries. Environment, Development And Sustainability, 1-28.
80. Raza, S. A., Shah, N. Ve Khan, K. A. (2020). Residential Energy Environmental Kuznets Curve İn Emerging Economies: The Role Of Economic Growth, Renewable Energy Consumption, And Financial Development. Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 27 (5), 5620-5629.
81. Saudi, M. H. M., Sinaga, O. Ve Jabarullah, N. H. (2019). The Role Of Renewable, Non-Renewable Energy Consumption And Technology Innovation İn Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve İn Malaysia, International Journal Of Energy Economics And Policy, 9 (1), 299-307.
82. Shafiei, S. Ve Salim, R. A. (2014). Non-Renewable And Renewable Energy Consumption And
83. Emissions İn OECD Countries: Acomparative Analysis. Energy Policy, 66, 547-556.
84. Shafik, N. Ve Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic Growth And Environmental Quality: Time-Series And Cross-Country Evidence (Vol. 904). World Bank Publications.
85. Smith, Z. A. Ve Taylor, K. D. (2008). Renewable And Alternative Energy Resources: A Reference Handbook. (First Edition). California: ABC-CLIO.
86. Ur Rahman, Z., Cai, H., Khattak, S. I., & Maruf Hasan, M. (2019). Energy Production-İncome-Carbon Emissions Nexus İn The Perspective Of NAFTA And BRIC Nations: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach. Economic Research-Ekonomska İstraživanja, 32(1), 3378-3391.
87. Vural, G. (2020). How Do Output, Trade, Renewable Energy And Non-Renewable Energy İmpact Carbon Emissions İn Selected Sub-Saharan African Countries?. Resources Policy, 69, 101840, 1-7.
88. Wang, Y., Villanthenkodath, M. A., & Haseeb, M. (2023). The Dynamic Link Between Eco-İnnovation And Ecological Footprint İn India: Does The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Hold?. Management Of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.
89. WCED, U. (1987). Our Common Future—The Brundtland Report. Report Of The World Commission On Environment And Development.
90. Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel Cointegration Tests Of The Fisher Effect. Journal Of Applied Econometrics, 23 (2), 193-233.
91. World Trade Organization. (2021). Report On G20 Trade Measures (Mıd-October 2020 To Mıd-May 2021).
92. Yao, S., Zhang, S. Ve Zhang, X. (2019). Renewable Energy, Carbon Emission And Economic Growth: A Revised Environmental Kuznets Curve Perspective. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 235, 1338-1352.
93. Yurtkuran, S. (2020). Türkiye’de Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Hipotezi’nin Testi: Temiz Enerji Tüketimi’nin Rolü. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22 (2), 570-589.
94. Zhang, S. Ve Liu, X. (2019). The Roles Of İnternational Tourism And Renewable Energy İn Environment: New Evidence From Asian Countries. Renewable Energy, 139, 385-394.
95. Zafar, M. W., Mirza, F. M., Zaidi, S. A. H. Ve Hou, F. (2019). The Nexus Of Renewable And Nonrenewable Energy Consumption, Trade Openness, And
96. Emissions İn The Framework Of EKC: Evidence From Emerging Economies. Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 26 (15), 15162-15173.
97. Zhao, W., Liu, Y., & Huang, L. (2022). Estimating Environmental Kuznets Curve İn The Presence Of Eco-İnnovation And Solar Energy: An Analysis Of G-7 Economies. Renewable Energy, 189, 304-314.
98. Zoundi, Z. (2017). CO2 Emissions, Renewable Energy And The Environmental Kuznets Curve, A Panel Cointegration Approach. Renewable And Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 1067-1075.
99. https://Www.Epa.Gov/Ghgemissions/Overview-Greenhouse-Gases