Sustainability of External Debts: BRICST Countries

Öz

This study investigates the sustainability of external debt in BRICST countries, a group that holds a strategic position in the global economy. For this purpose, three widely used indicators, namely Total External Debt Stock/GNI, Total External Debt Stock/Exports and Debt Service Ratio, of debt sustainability are analysed using annual data covering the period 1994–2020. The analysis employs second-generation panel unit root tests that allow for structural breaks and cross-sectional dependence, namely Carrion-i-Silvestre, Pesaran CADF, and Becker Fourier KPSS tests. The findings suggest that external debt is not sustainable in India, China, South Africa and Turkey, while it remains sustainable in Brazil and Russia.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Global risk
• Business activity
• Global challenges
• COVID-19

Dış Borçların Sürdürülebilirliği: BRICST Ülkeleri

Öz

Bu çalışma, küresel ekonomide giderek daha fazla önem kazanan BRICST ülkelerinde dış borçların sürdürülebilirliğini incelemektedir. Bu amaçla, borç sürdürülebilirliğine ilişkin üç temel gösterge olan Toplam Dış Borç Stoku/Milli Gelir, Toplam Dış Borç Stoku/İhracat ve Borç Servis Oranı 1994–2020 dönemi için analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada yapısal kırılmaları ve yatay kesit bağımlılığını dikkate alan ikinci nesil panel birim kök testleri (Carrion-i-Silvestre, Pesaran CADF ve Becker Fourier KPSS) kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, Hindistan, Çin, Güney Afrika ve Türkiye’de dış borcun sürdürülemez olduğunu, buna karşın Brezilya ve Rusya’da sürdürülebilir olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Küresel risk
• İş aktivitesi
• Küresel zorluklar
• COVID-19

Kaynakça

1. Akın, T., & Güneş, S. (2022). Dış Borçların Sürdürülebilirliği: Kırılgan Beşli Ülkeleri Panel Eşbütünleşme Analizi. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 9(3), 1605-1629. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.913340
2. Arnone, M., Bandiera, L. & Presbitero, A. F. (2005). External Debt Sustainability: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Catholic University of Piacenza Economics Working Paper, 33, 1–47.
3. Aydın, M. & Yılancı, V. (2016). Fiscal Sustainability Test: The Case of Turkey. Global Journal on Humanites & Social Sciences, 04, 212-215.
4. Becker, R., Enders, W. & Lee, J. (2006). A Stationarity Test in the Presence of An Unknown Number of Smooth Breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis. 27(3), 381-409.
5. Bilici, N. (2016). Borç Krizleri veya Borç Kerizleri (!). International Journal of Public Finance, 1(1), 109-121.
6. Blanchard, O. & Das, M. (2017). A New Index of External Debt Sustainability. SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.3070980.
7. Bohn, H. (1998). The Behavior of U.S. Public Debt and Deficits, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 949-963,  https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555793
8. Bozoklu, Ş. & Yilanci, V. (2014). Current Account Sustainability in Emerging Markets: An Analysis with Linear and Nonlinear Panel Unit Root Tests. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28, 251 - 264.

9. Breusch, T. S. & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
10. Carrion-i-Silvestre, J. L., Barrio-Castro, T. D. & Opez-Bazo, E. (2005). Breaking the Panels: An Application to the GDP per Capita. Econometrics Journal, 8, 159-175.
11. Chandia K. E., Riaz, S., Javid A. Y., Iqbal, M.B., Azam, M. & Gul, I. (2019). Assessment of Public and External Debt Sustainability Using Debt Dynamics Equation Approach: A Comparative Study of Pakistan and India. Millennial Asia, 10(1), 25-55.
12. Çınar, S. & Özçalık, M. (2014). Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Mali Sürdürülebilirlik: Panel Veri Analizi. Journal of Yasar University, 9(33), 5597-5622.
13. Cline, W. R. (2021). Debt Sustainability in Emerging Market Economies After the COVID-19 Shock. https://iepecdg.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/EIIWP21-02R.pdf, (Access: 14.05.2022).
14. Cuddington, J. T. (1997). Analyzing the Sustainability of Fiscal Deficits in Developing Countries. Available at SSRN 597231.
15. Czerkawski, C. (1991). Theoretical and Policy-Oriented Aspects of The External Debt. Economics, Springer.
16. Dallı, T. (2022). Dış Borçların Sürdürülebilirliği: Türkiye Üzerine Ampirik Bir Analiz. Uşak Üniversitesi Uygulamalı Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 1-11.
17. Dibo, M. (2009). Dış Borçlanma ve Finansal Kriz İlişkisi Bağlamında Türkiye’deki Krizlerin Analizi (1994-2001). Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
18. Eren, E. (2018). Bilim(ler) ve İktisat. Yıldız Social Science Review, 4(2), 93-110.
19. Evgin, T. (2000). Dünden Bugüne Dış Borçlarımız. Başbakanlık Hazine Müsteşarlığı Araştırma ve İnceleme Dizisi, 26, 35- 36.
20. Fendoğlu, E. & Canpolat Gökçe, E. (2019). Türkiye’nin Turizm Geliri Serisinin Durağanlığı: Fourier KPSS Durağanlık Testi. Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 31, 17-28.
21. George, M., & Shanmugam, K. R. (2023). Public Debt and External Debt Sustainability among BRICS Countries. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 16(3-4), 231-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/09738010231154772 (Original work published 2022)
22. Göçer, İ. (2021). Sustainability of External Debt, Current Account Balance and Budget Balance in Developing Countries: A Cross Country Analysis. Journal of Management and Economic Studies, 3(2), 35-53.
23. Göktaş, Ö. & Hepsağ, A. (2015). The Analysis of External Debt Sustainability by Periodic Unit Root Test with Structural Break: The Case of Turkey. Research in Applied Economics, 7(4), 1-15.
24. Gümüş, N. (2022). Türkiye’nin Dış Borçlarının Sürdürülebilirliği. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(4), 228-245.
25. Gümüş, N. (2025). Evaluation Of Brics Countries And Turkey’s Foreign Debt According To Ratios And Multicriteria Decision-making Methods. Journal For Basic Science, 25(8). doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16965935
26. İnce, M. (2001). Devlet Borçları ve Türkiye. Ankara: Başak Ofset.
27. International Monetary Fund (IMF), Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) & World Bank (1988). External Debt: Definition, Statistical Coverage and Methodology (English). Washington, D.C.
28. Issler, J. & Lima, L. (2000). Public Debt Sustainability and Endogenous Seigniorage in Brazil: Time-Series Evidence From 1947-92. Journal of Development Economics, 62, 131–147.
29. Jayme Junior, F. G. (2001). External Debt Sustainability: Empirical Evidence in Brazil. Textos Para Discussão Cedeplar-Ufmg td154, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
30. Jha, R. & Sharma, A. (2004). Structural Breaks, Unit Roots, and Cointegration: A Further Test of the Sustainability of the Indian Fiscal Deficit. Public Finance Review, 32(2), 196-219.
31. Joy, J. & Panda, P. K. (2020). An Empirical Analysis of Sustainability of Public Debt Among BRICS Nations. Journal of Public Affairs, e2170.
32. Kaya, A., Demirgil, B., & Yeter, F. (2025). Dış Borçların Sürdürülebilirliği: Türkiye İçin Ekonometrik Bir Analiz. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(1), 92-109.
33. Kılcı, E. N. (2019). A Study on Debt Sustainability in Fragile Five: Brazil, Turkey, India, Indonesia, and South Africa; Analysis with Fourier Approach. Interdisciplinary Public Finance Business and Economics Studies, 121-134.
34. Kıran, B. (2012). The Sustainability of Turkish External Debt: Evidence from Fractionally Integrated Approach Under Structural Breaks. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 25(1), 18–29.
35. Krugman, P. (1988). Financing vs. Forgiving A Debt Overhang. NBER Working Paper, No. 2486.
36. Lau, E. & Lee, A. S-Y. (2016). Determinants of External Debt in Thailand and the Philippines. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(4), 1973-1980.
37. Lau, E., Baharumshah, A. Z. & Soon, S. V. (2013). The Behavior of External Debt in Asian Countries: Evidence Based on Panel Unit Root Tests. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 14(1), 377–394.
38. Mendoza, E. G. &. Ostry, J. D. (2008). International evidence on fiscal solvency: Is fiscal policy “responsible”?. Journal of Monetary Economics, 55(6), 1081-1093, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2008.06.003.
39. Muhanji, S. & Ojah, K. (2011). Management and Sustainability of External Debt: A Focus on the Emerging Economies of Africa. Review of Development Finance, 1(3), 184-206.
40. Olcar, A. (2013). Türkiye’nin Dış Borç Sorunu ve Kriz Etkileri. Hitit Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
41. Önel, G., & Utkulu, U. (2006). Modeling the Long-Run Sustainability of Turkish External Debt with Structural Changes. Economic Modelling, 23(4), 669–682.
42. Oskay, C. (2024). Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Dış Borç Sorunu: Türkiye ile BRICS Ülkelerinin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Değerlendirmesi. Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(1), 1-21.
43. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
44. Şahin, M. & Şen, B. (2021). Mala Karşı İşlenen Suç Oranları ile Gelir İlişkisi: Türkiye Üzerine Nedensellik ve Uzun Dönem Analizi. İstatistik Araştırma Dergisi, 11(1), 49-62.
45. Sawada, Y. (1994). Are the Heavily Indebted Countries Solvent? Tests of Intertemporal Borrowing Constraints. Journal of Development Economics, 45, 325-337.
46. Shankar, S., & Trivedi, P. (2023). Evaluating the Long-run Sustainability of India’s Fiscal Management with Structural Change. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 16(3-4), 367-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/09738010231157457 (Original work published 2022)
47. Söyler, İ. (2001). Türkiye’nin Dış Borçlarının Ekonomik Açıdan Değerlendirilmesi (Rasyo Analizleri). Maliye Dergisi, 137, 16-23.
48. Sun, L. (2018). The Structure and Sustainability of China’s Debt. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(3), 695-715.
49. Togan, A. & Togan, S. (2025). Reforming external debt governance in Turkey to reach external debt sustainability. Journal of Asian Economics, Article 102020, 10.1016/j.asieco.2025.102020
50. Trehan, B., & Walsh, C. E. (1991). Testing Intertemporal Budget Constraints: Theory and Applications to U. S. Federal Budget and Current Account Deficits. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 23(2), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/1992777
51. Walras, L. (1954) [1874]. Elements of Pure Economics, translated by W. Jaffé from the Edition Définitive (1926), reprinted in 1977, London: Augustus M. Kelley.
52. Wilson, D. & Purushothaman, R. (2003). Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050. Global Economics Paper No: 99.
53. Yalçınkaya, Ö. (2019). Sustainability Analysis of External Debts in Selected Emerging Market Economies: Evidence from Fourier Unit Root Tests. Perspectives on Applied Economics and Politics: Cases from Turkey, 13.
54. Yavuz, A., Şataf, C. & Kır, S. G. (2013). Avrupa’da Borç Krizi ve Çözüm Arayışları. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, XV(II), 131-154.
55. Yılancı, V. & Özcan, B. (2008). External Debt Sustainability of Turkey: A Nonlinear Approach. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 20, 91-98.
56. Yılancı, V. & Pata, U. K. (2020). Are Shocks to Ecological Balance Permanent or Temporary? Evidence from LM Unit Root Tests. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276(10), 1-10.
57. Yılancı, V., Ulucak, R. & Özgur, Ö. (2021). Insights for a Sustainable Environment: Analysing the Persistence of Policy shocks to Ecological Footprints of Mediterranean Countries. Spatial Economic Analysis, 7(1), 47-66.