Permakültür Temelli Korumanın Tarihi Kırsal Peyzajların İklim Uyumuna Etkisi: Barbaros Kırsal Yerleşimi

Öz

Küresel iklim değişikliği, tarihi yapılar ile kentsel ve kırsal çevreler için ciddi riskler oluşturmaktadır. İnsan-doğa etkileşiminin uzun süreçte şekillendirdiği ve kültürel, tarımsal, ekolojik bileşenleri kapsayan tarihi kırsal peyzajlar giderek daha kırılgan hale gelmektedir. Bu kırılganlıkların giderilmesi, potansiyel tehditlerin belirlenmesini ve iklim temelli etkileri azaltacak stratejilerin geliştirilmesini gerektirir. Bu makale, çeşitliliği, ekolojik süreçleri ve topluluk temelli örgütlenmeyi önceleyen permakültür temelli kuramsal bir bakış açısını benimsemektedir. Bu yaklaşım, kültürel ve doğal mirasın korunmasına yönelik sürdürülebilir stratejilerle uyumludur. Çalışma, literatür taraması, veri analizi ve alan çalışmalarıyla uygun bir örnek seçilerek yürütülmüştür. İzmir ili Urla ilçesindeki Barbaros Kırsal Yerleşimi, bu yaklaşımın uygulanabilirliğini gösteren örnek olarak seçilmiştir. Bulgular, tarihi yapıların iklim direncini artırmak için ekolojik rehabilitasyonun önemini, tarımsal uygulamalara yenileyici yöntemlerin entegrasyonunu ve doğal ekosistemleri sürdürmeye yönelik koruma önerilerini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İklim değişikliği
• tarihi kırsal peyzajlar
• koruma
• adaptasyon
• permakültür

The Impact of Permaculture-Based Conservation on the Climate Adaptation of Historic Rural Landscapes: Barbaros Rural Settlement

Öz

Global climate change poses serious risks to historical structures and to both urban and rural environments. Historical rural landscapes—shaped by the long-term interaction of people and nature, and encompassing cultural, agricultural, and ecological components—are increasingly vulnerable. Addressing these vulnerabilities requires identifying potential threats and formulating strategies to reduce climate-related impacts. This article adopts a theoretical perspective grounded in permaculture, which prioritizes diversity, ecological processes, and community-based organization, aligning with sustainable strategies to safeguard cultural and natural heritage. The study involved literature review, data analysis, and fieldwork to select a suitable case. Barbaros Rural Settlement in the Urla District of İzmir serves as the example, demonstrating how such an approach can be applied. Findings emphasize the ecological rehabilitation of historic structures to strengthen climate resilience, the integration of regenerative methods into agriculture, and conservation proposals to sustain natural ecosystems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Climate Change
• Historical Rural Landscape
• Conservation
• Adaptability
• Permaculture

Kaynakça

1. Aktürk, G., & Fluck, H. (2023). Vernacular heritage as a response to climate: Lessons for future climate resilience from Rize, Turkey. Land, 12(3), Article 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030456
2. Baldy, C., Bellon, S., & Diakon, N. (2018). Agroecological approaches to the management of Mediterranean cultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
3. Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2013). Permaculture as a tool for sustainable heritage management. Journal of Environmental Management, 120, 1–9.
4. Engelbrecht, F.; Willem L. (2012). A brief description of South Africa’s present-day climate in the South African Risk and Vulnerability Atlas, Department of Science and Technology, Republic of South Africa: Pretoria.
5. Eres, Z., & Güler, K. (2022). İklim krizi karşısında kırsal mirastan alınabilecek dersler. Mimarist, 75, 51–64.
6. Everett, E. (2025). The sense of hope and possibility in environmentally conscious professionals after the experience of learning about permaculture (Doctoral dissertation, Northumbria University.
7. Ferguson, R.S.; Lovell, S.T. (2014). Permaculture for agroecology: Design, movement, practice, and worldview. A review. Agronomy of Sustainable Development. 34, 251–274.
8. Ferguson, R. S., & Lovell, S. T. (2018). Permaculture—Scientific evidence of principles for the agroecological design of farming systems. Sustainability, 10(9), 3218.

9. Fowler, P. J. (2003). World Heritage Cultural Landscapes 1992-2002. World Heritage Papers 6. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
10. Gençer, C. İ. (2017). Kültürel mirasın korunmasında iklim değişikliğinin oluşturduğu tehditler. Mimarist, 58, 24–30.
11. Gencer, C.I. (2022). İklim Krizi ve Kültürel Mirasın Korunması Konusunda Uluslararası Yaklaşımlar. Mimarist Journal, 75, 36-40.
12. Güler, A.C. (2018). Gökçeada’nın Kültürel Peyzaj Değerlerinin Belirlenmesi ve Korunmasına Yönelik İlkeler, Doctoral Thesis, İstanbul Tecnical University, İstanbul.
13. Güler, A.C. (2016). Tarihi kırsal peyzaj kavramının getirdiği yeni açılımlar. Mimarist, (66), 30–35. https://www.mimarist.org/wp-content/uploads/yayinlar/mimarist/pdf/66.pdf
14. Holmgren, D. (2002). Permaculture—Principles and Pathways beyond Sustainability; Holmgren Design Services: Victoria, Australia.
15. ICOMOS TR. ICOMOS Türkiye Milli Komitesi Türkiye Mimari Mirası Koruma Bildirgesi, Istanbul, 2013.
16. ICOMOS and IFLA. Principles Concerning Rural Landscapes as Heritage, 2017.
17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, AR4 Climate Change: Synthesis Report, Valencia, Spain: 2007, 30.
18. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers 2001, 2014.
19. Kaçmaz, G. (2021). İklim değişikliği ile mücadelede doğa temelli çözümler. PEYZAJ - Eğitim, Bilim, Kültür ve Sanat Dergisi, 3(2), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.53784/peyzaj.1022369
20. Krebs, J.; Bach S. (2018). Permaculture—Scientific Evidence of Principles for the Agroecological Design of Farming System, Sustainability.
21. Mater, B. (1982). Urla Yarımadasında Arazinin Sınıflandırılması ile Kullanılışı Arasındaki İlişkiler, İstanbul: Edebiyat Matbaası.
22. Meeus, J.H.A.; Wijermans, M.P.; Vroom, M.J. (1990). Agricultural landscapes in Europe and their transformation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1990.
23. Mollison, B. Permaculture—A Designers’ Manual; Tagari Press: Stanley, Australia, 1998.
24. O’Brien, G., O’Keefe, P., Jayawickrama, J., & Jigyasu, R. (2015). Developing a model for building resilience to climate risks for cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 5(3), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2013-0021.
25. OECD. Multifunctionality: Towards an Analytical Framework; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris, France, 2001.
26. Öztekin, S., & Koşkluk Kaya, N. (2023). Küresel iklim krizine karşı tarihi kırsal peyzajların korunmasında ekolojik yaklaşımların rolü. 5th International Symposium of Art and Design Education, Başkent University Faculty of Fine Arts, Design and Architecture, Ankara, Turkey.
27. Plieninger, T.; Höchtl, F.; Spek, T. (2006). Traditional land-use and nature conservation in European rural landscapes. Environmental Science and Policy, 9, 317–321.
28. Rigyasu, J. (2019). Managing Cultural Heritage in the Face of Climate Change, Journal of International Affairs. Sarıbekiroğlu, Ş. (2017). Understanding Cultural Landscape Characteristics: The Case of Barbaros Settlement, Urla, master’s thesis, İzmir Institute of Technology.
29. Schmidt, J., & Kotsch, C. (2015). Sustainable farming practices in Germany: A permaculture case study. Journal of Ecological Agriculture, 12(3), 45-58.
30. Stockdale, A.; Barker, A. (2009). Sustainability and the multifunctional landscape: An assessment of approaches to planning and management in the Cairngorms National Park. Land Use Policy, 26, 479– 492.
31. Tanrıkulu, A., Guner, U., & Bahar, E. (2024). The assessment of precipitation and droughts in the Aegean Region using stochastic time series and standardized precipitation index. Atmosphere, 15(8), 1001. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15081001.
32. The Landworkers’ Alliance. (2020). Annual Report.
33. World Rural Landcapes: A Worldwide Intiative for Global Conservation and Management of Rural Landscapes. Available online: http://www.worldrurallandscapes.org/ (accessed on 25 August 2025). UNESCO. World Heritage Cultural Landscapes, A Handbook for Conservation and Management. World Heritage Papers, 26. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 2009.
34. UNESCO. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 2015.
35. Versus. Heritage for tomorrow. Vernacular Knowledge for Sustainable Architecture / Correia, Mariana; Dipasquale, Letizia; Mecca, Saverio. - STAMPA. - (2014), pp. 1-288.
36. Yaka, A. (2016). Ege'de Bir Köy Barbaros Monografik Araştırma, İzmir: Hürriyet Matbaası. https://whc.unesco.org/en/activities/474/
37. https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/General_Assemblies/19th_Delhi_2017/19th_GA_Outcomes/ GA2017_Resolutions_EN_20180206finalcirc.pdf
38. https://civvih.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/Future-of-Our-Pasts-Report-min.pdf
39. https://www.icomos.org/en/focus/climate-change/104837-adoption-of-the-new-triennial-scientific-plan-2021-2024-cultural-heritage-and-climate-action
40. https://www.mgm.gov.tr/FILES/iklim/iklim-degisikligi-projeksiyon2015.pdf
41. https://www.mgm.gov.tr/FILES/iklim/yillikiklim/2024/2024-Temmuz-S%C4%B1cakl%C4%B1k-ve- Ya%C4%9F%C4%B1%C5%9F-De%C4%9Ferlendirmesi.pdf
42. https://www.mgm.gov.tr/FILES/genel/makale/egekuraklik.pdf