Post-Pandemic Tourism Recovery: A Thematic Analysis of Destination Management Strategies
Öz
COVID-19 dealt modern tourism its sharpest shock on record. International arrivals fell by roughly 74 per cent in 2020 — about a quarter of what they had been — and receipts dropped by an estimated US$1.3 trillion. Recovery, when it came, was fast in aggregate but deeply uneven: by 2024 arrivals had returned to 99 per cent of pre-pandemic levels (1.4 billion trips, US$1.6 trillion in receipts), yet the trajectories behind that headline diverged widely across regions and types of destination. This paper asks what destination management organisations actually did to recover, and why some strategies worked in some places and not others. Drawing on 38 peer-reviewed articles, 17 grey-literature sources from UN Tourism, the OECD, and other international and national bodies, and 13 destination cases, it applies Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis to recovery practice documented between 2020 and 2025. Eight interrelated themes emerge: crisis governance and DMO communication; resilience operationalisation; the domestic-tourism pivot; health and safety certification regimes; digital and contactless transformation; the sustainable and regenerative reset; workforce precarity and skills shortages; and public–private partnerships and stakeholder co-creation. The pattern that runs through the evidence is not that any single measure drove recovery, but that destinations recovered by combining measures timed to the moment, and fitted to their own governance capacity, economic structure, and pre-pandemic position. The paper offers one of the first integrative syntheses of pandemic-era destination management, a practical framework for DMOs facing future shocks, and a map of where the research still falls short on questions of sustainability, equity, and labour.
Anahtar Kelimeler
- Post-Pandemic Recovery
- Destination Management
- Tourism Resilience
- Thematic Analysis
- COVID-19
- Sustainable Tourism
- DMO Strategy
- Crisis Management
Proje Numarası
Kaynakça
- Amore, A., Prayag, G., & Hall, C. M. (2018). Conceptualizing destination resilience from a multilevel perspective. Tourism Review International, 22(3–4), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.3727/154427218X15369305779010
- Arbulú, I., Razumova, M., Rey-Maquieira, J., & Sastre, F. (2021). Can domestic tourism relieve the COVID-19 tourist industry crisis? The case of Spain. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 20, Article 100568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100568
- Austrade. (2022). THRIVE 2030: The re-imagined visitor economy strategy. Australian Trade and Investment Commission. https://www.austrade.gov.au/content/dam/austrade-assets/global/wip/austrade/documents/thrive-2030-strategy.pdf
- Baum, T., Mooney, S. K. K., Robinson, R. N. S., & Solnet, D. (2020). COVID-19's impact on the hospitality workforce — new crisis or amplification of the norm? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(9), 2813–2829. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2020-0314
- Berbekova, A., Uysal, M., & Assaf, A. G. (2021). A thematic analysis of crisis management in tourism: A theoretical perspective. Tourism Management, 86, Article 104342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104342
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Turizm (Diğer)
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Eylül 2026
Gönderilme Tarihi
6 Haziran 2026
Kabul Tarihi
20 Eylül 2026
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2026 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 3