Logistic Location Selection with Critic-Ahp and Vikor Integrated Approach

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 21 - 25, 15.07.2019

Çağlar Tabak , Kürşat Yıldız Mehmet Akif Yerlikaya

Öz

Transportation costs’ directly affecting national economies; increase in transportation costs depending on energy resources have directed the countries to develop combined transportation strategies to reduce transportation costs. In this study, it is aimed to provide suggestions for the location selection of the logistics centers where wil be determined the strategies for the most economic, rapid and safe transportation with the integration of the transportation types which will contribute to the reduction of the transportation costs. The Aegean Region and The Central Anatolia Region were chosen as the pilot regions in the selection of the optimum location of the logistics centers required to develop combined transportation. The information required to select location in these two regions was obtained through a questionnaire survey and the CRITIC-AHP-VIKOR integrated method was used for the optimum location selection. While the criteria weights were determined by the CRITIC-AHP method, alternative location was chosen by VIKOR method.

Anahtar Kelimeler

CRITIC, VIKOR, logistic location selection

Kaynakça

• [1] Canel, C., & Khumawala, B. M. (1996). A mixed-integer programming approach for the international facilities location problem. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(4), 49-68.
• [2] Chen, C. (2009). A Decision Model of Field Depot Location Based on the Centrobaric Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). International Journal of Business and Management, 4(7), 71-75.
• [3] Birsel, A., & Cerit, A. G. (2009). Lojistik İşletmelerinin Kuruluş Yeri Seçiminde Arazi Faktörü. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik İşletmeleri Ana Bilim Dalı, İzmir Türkiye.
• [4] Demirel, T., Demirel, N. Ç., & Kahraman, C. (2010). Multi-Criteria Warehouse Location Selection Using Choquet Integral. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 3943–3952.
• [5] Özcan, T., Çelebi, N., & Esnaf, Ş. (2011). Comparative Analysis of Multi Criteria Decision Making Methodologies and Implementation of a Warehouse Location Selection Problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 9773–9779.
• [6] Zhang, M., Huang, J., & Zhu, J. M. (2012). Reliable facility location problem considering facility failure scenarios. Kybernetes, 41(10), 1440-1461.
• [7] Srivastava, S. K., & Amula, A. Ghagare. (2016). Service facility relocation decision: a case study. Facilities, 34(9/10), 595-610.
• [8] Ghadge, A., et al. (2016). Facility location for a closed-loop distribution network: a hybrid approach. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(9), 884-902.
• [9] Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
• [10] Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770.
• [11] Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455.
• [12] Yang, J., & Lee, H. (1997). An AHP decision model for facility location selection. Facilities, 15(9/10), 241-254.
• [13] Korpela, J., & Lehmusvaara, A. (1999). A Customer Oriented Approach to Warehouse Network Evaluation and Design. International Journal of Production Economics, 59, 135-146.
• [14] Vlachopoulou, M., Silleos, G., & Manthou, V. (2001). Geographic Information Systems in Warehouse Site Selection Decisions. International Journal of Production Economics, 71(1–3), 205-212.
• [15] Colson, G., & Dorigo, F. (2004). A Public Warehouses Selection Support System. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 332-349.
• [16] Aktepe, A., & Ersöz, S. (2014). AHP-VIKOR Ve MOORA Yöntemlerinin Depo Yeri Seçim Probleminde Uygulanması. Endüstri Mühendisliği Dergisi, 25, 2-15.
• [17] Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., & Doğan, I. (2003). Fuzzy Group Decision-Making for Facility location Selection. Information Sciences, 157, 135–153.
• [18] Korpela, J., & Tuominen, M. (1996). A Decision Aid in Warehouse Site Selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 45(1–3), 169-180.
• [19] Yerlikaya, M. A., & Arıkan, F. (2016). Constructing the performance effectiveness order of SME supports programmes via Promethee and Oreste techniques. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 31, 1007-1016.
• [20] Sener, Z. (2016). Evaluating Ship Selection Criteria for Maritime Transportation. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 4(4), 325–328.
• [21] V. Tiwari, P. K. Jain, P. Tandon, "Product design concept evaluation using rough sets and VIKOR method." Advanced Engineering Informatics, 30(1), pp. 16-25, 2016.
• [22] A. A. Asthi and G. Kannan, "Green supplier development program selection using NGT and VIKOR under fuzzy environment." Computers and Industrial Engineering, 91, pp. 100-108, 2016.
• [23] İ. Peker, S. Korucuk, Ş. Ulutaş, B. S. Okatan, F. Yaşar, "Afet lojistiği kapsamında en uygun dağıtım merkez yerinin AHS-VIKOR bütünleşik yöntemi ile belirlenmesi: Erzincan ili örneği." Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(1), pp. 82-103, 2016.
• [24] P. Babashamsi, A. Golzadfar, N. Yusoff, H. Ceylan, N. Nor, "Integrated fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and VIKOR method in the prioritization of pavement maintenance activities." International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 9(2), pp. 112-120, 2016.
• [25] H. Gupta, "Evaluating service quality of airline industry using hybrid best worst method and VIKOR." Journal of Air Transport Management, pp. 1-13, 2017.