The Effects of Augmented Reality in the Technical Drawing Course on Engineering Students' Spatial Ability and Academic Achievement
Abstract
Keywords
Augmented Reality, Spatial Ability, Virtual environments, Technical drawing
References
- Ada´nez, G. P., & Velasco, A. D. (2002). Predicting academic success of engineering students in technical drawing from visualization test scores. Journal of Geometry and Graphics. 6(1): 99–109. Retrieved from http://www.heldermann-verlag.de/jgg/jgg06/jgg0608.pdf.
- Akkuş, İ., & Özhan, U. (2017). Matematik ve geometri eğitiminde artırılmış gerçeklik uygulamaları. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(8), 19-33.
- Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11.
- Arth, C., & Schmalstieg, D. (2011). Challenges of large-scale augmented reality on smartphones. Graz University of Technology, Graz, 1-4. doi: 10.1.1.420.2414
- Aydın, M. (2005). Educational Leadership, Ankara: Hatipoğlu Publications.
- Azuma, R. T. (1999). The challenge of making augmented reality work outdoors. Mixed reality: Merging real and virtual worlds, 379-390.
- Azuma, R. T. (2001). Augmented reality: Approaches and technical challenges. Fundamentals of wearable computers and augmented reality, 27-63.
- Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility!. Computers & Education, 166, 104159.
- Basham, K. L., & Kotrlik, J. W. (2008). The effects of 3-dimensional CADD modeling on the development of the spatial ability of technology education students. Journal of technology education, 20(1), 32-47.
- Bennett, G., & Seashore, H. (1973). Differential aptitude tests, forms S and T: The Psychological Corporation, New York.