Cultivating Digital Pedagogies in the 21st Century: A Quantitative Examination of Pre-Service Teachers’ Capabilities and Readiness

Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 260 - 272, 02.07.2025

F. Şehkar Fayda Kınık

https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1662454

Abstract

In the 21st century, the concept of digital literacy (DL) has become an essential skill set that empowers educators to harness the full potential of technology in the classroom as a crucial element for teaching 21st-century skills (T21C). This study aims to explore pre-service teachers’ level of DL and their capabilities of T21C, and whether their DL level influences their capabilities of T21C. A quantitative research design was employed using SPSS 21.0 and AMOS 21.0 to conduct descriptive statistics, reliability and validity analyses, Pearson correlation, and path analysis within a structural equation modeling framework to examine the relationships among variables at a 95% confidence level. The study was conducted on 383 pre-service teachers studying at different faculties of education in Turkiye. The results revealed that the majority of pre-service teachers exhibited a moderate level of DL, but with a smaller proportion falling into the categories of low or high DL. Pre-service teachers’ overall capabilities of T21C were detected as moderate. In contrast, the majority of pre-service teachers had a moderate level of capabilities in utility of technology (UOT), collaboration (CO), and innovation and problem-solving (IP). Still, a smaller proportion was categorized as low or high. The findings also identified a significantly substantial and positive correlation between pre-service teachers’ DL and their capabilities of T21C, which indicates that as their DL levels rose, there was a corresponding tendency towards their enhanced proficiency in T21C, including the constructs of UOT, CO, and IP.

Keywords

digital literacy , teaching 21st-century skills , teacher education , digital pedagogies , pre-service teachers

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Board of Ethics for Human Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities on 30.03.2023 with project number 346.

Project Number

346

References

• Akayoglu, S., Satar, H. M., Dikilitas, K., Cirit, N. C., & Korkmazgil, S. (2020). Digital literacy practices of Turkish pre-service EFL teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4711
• Antoniuk, L., & Zasiadivko, V. (2023). Digital literacy and technologies for education: Principles and tools. Grail of Science, (26), 249–252. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.14.04.2023.044
• Arstorp, A.-T. (2021). 25+ years of ICT in policy documents for teacher education in Norway and Denmark (1992 to 2020): A study of how digital technology is integrated into policy documents. Education Inquiry, 12(4), 365–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1972594
• Barbutiu, S. M., & Kack, A. (2016). Integrating digital literacy in teacher education - the perpetual challenge of a learning organization. In L. G. Chova, A. L. Martinez, & I. C. Torres (Eds.), EDULEARN16: 8th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 4255–4264). IATED-INT Assoc Technology Education A\& Development.
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
• Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
• Campbell, E., & Kapp, R. (2020). Developing an integrated, situated model for digital literacy in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Education (University of KwaZulu-Natal), 18–30. Retrieved January 23, 2024, from http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2520-98682020000200003&nrm=iso
• Carlgren, T. (2013). Communication, critical thinking, problem solving: A suggested course for all high school students in the 21st century. Interchange, 44(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-013-9197-8
• Christopher Blundell, K.-T. L., & Nykvist, S. (2019). Using Dual Systems theory to conceptualise challenges to routine when transforming pedagogy with digital technologies. Teachers and Teaching, 25(8), 937–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1652161
• Coker, H. (2020). Why does digital learning matter? Digital competencies, social justice, and critical pedagogy in initial teacher education. The Journal of Teaching and Learning, 14(1),133–141. https://doi.org/10.22329/JTL.V14I1.6259
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
• DiBenedetto, C. A. (2019). Twenty-First century skills. In S. McGrath, M. Mulder, J. Papier, & R. Suart (Eds.), Handbook of vocational education and training: Developments in the changing world of work (pp. 1267–1281). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94532-3_72
• Diquito, T., Anter, M., & Bulonos, N. (2022). A survey of 21st century skills acquisition among the preservice teachers of teacher education programs. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 7(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v7i2.4368
• Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. 2003 Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, Ohio State University, Columbus. Retrieved November 11, 2023, from https://hdl.handle.net/1805/344
• Gonzalez-Perez, L. I., & Ramirez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Hilliker, S. M., & Loranc, B. (2022). Development of 21st century skills through virtual exchange. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103646
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Jia, Y., Oh, Y. J., Sibuma, B., LaBanca, F., & Lorentson, M. (2016). Measuring twenty-first century skills: Development and validation of a scale for in-service and pre-service teachers. Teacher Development, 20(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1143870
• Kara, K. A., & Mede, E. (2023). Fostering digital literacy and learner autonomy readiness among pre-service teachers in online education. In D. Tafazoli & M. Picard (Eds.), Handbook of CALL teacher education and professional development: Voices from under-represented contexts (pp. 65–81). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0514-0_5
• Kennedy, T. J., & Sundberg, C. W. (2020). 21st century skills. In B. Akpan & T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory (pp. 479–496). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_32
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, M. W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
• Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2003.10782399
• Marin, V. I., & Castaneda, L. (2023). Developing digital literacy for teaching and learning. In O. Zawacki-Richter & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 1089–1108). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_64
• Meneses, A., Nussbaum, M., Veas, M. G., & Arriagada, S. (2023). Practice-based 21st-century teacher education: Design principles for adaptive expertise. Teaching and Teacher Education, 128, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104118
• Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
• Niyazova, A. Y., Chistyakov, A. A., Volosova, N. Y., Krokhina, J. A., Sokolova, N. L., & Chirkina, S. E. (2023). Evaluation of pre-service teachers’ digital skills and ICT competencies in context of the demands of the 21st century. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13355
• Ozyurt, M. (2020). Adaptation of 21st century skills teaching scale to Turkish Culture: A validity-reliability study. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 16(30), 2568–2594. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.725042
• Palacios-Hidalgo, F. J., & Huertas-Abril, C. A. (2022). Developing digital literacy in initial EFL teacher education: A study in a Spanish distance university. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2022.2157709
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills [P21]. (2019). Framework for 21st-century learning. Retrieved October 10, 2023, from http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203
• Singh, R. K., Gupta, M., & Bhandari, M. (2022). Development of 21st-century life skills among students: Teacher TPACK as guideline factor. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 13 (6-SI), 2044–2050. https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S06.267
• Starkey, L. (2020). A review of research exploring teacher preparation for the digital age. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1625867
• Umar, M. Y., & Dangwaran, T. Y. (2023). Exploring the relationship between digital literacy and electronic information resources use among undergraduate student of Gombe State University. (2023). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 7815. Retrieved January 10, 2024, from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/7815
• Usart, M., Jose-Luis Lazaro-Cantabrana, J.-L., Romeu, T., & Gisbert-Cervera, M. (2024). Digital competence profiles of first year, pre-service teachers. Analysis in the Catalan university system. Teachers and Teaching, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2313640
• Ustundag, M. T., Gunes, E., & Bahcivan, E. (2017). Turkish adaptation of digital literacy scale and investigating pre-service science teachers’ digital literacy. Journal of Education and Future, 12, 19–29. Retrieved March 10, 2023, from https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12513/1728
• Vaskov, M., Isakov, A., Bilovus, V., Bulavkin, A., & Mikhaylenko, N. (2021). Digital literacy of modern higher education teachers. E3S Web Conf., 273, 12035. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127312035
• Zhou, L. (2023). How to develop 21st century skills in students: The role of LEGO education. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 15(2), 2281–2283. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.23.co066