Research Article

The Effect of Service Quality in Education on Brain Drain Attitude: A Study on Erasmus+ Students

Volume: 11 Number: 1 April 19, 2026
EN TR

The Effect of Service Quality in Education on Brain Drain Attitude: A Study on Erasmus+ Students

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of service quality in education (SEQ) on brain drain attitude (BDA) among undergraduate students who participated in the Erasmus+ program. A quantitative approach was adopted, and data were gathered from 127 undergraduate students at a Turkish university. The data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results revealed that students' perceptions of service quality in their educational institutions positively and significantly affect their brain drain attitudes (β=0.40, p<0.001). These findings suggest that better educational opportunities are a key determinant of students' inclination to migrate to developed countries, which can exacerbate brain drain from less developed nations. Accordingly, it is advised that developing countries invest in improving their education service quality to mitigate brain drain. This study is among the first to empirically examine the relationship between SEQ and BDA in the context of the Erasmus+ program, thereby contributing to the higher education and brain drain literature.

Keywords

Brain Drain , Service Quality in Education , Erasmus+ Program

References

  1. Abdullah, F. (2005). HEdPERF versus SERVPERF: The quest for ideal measuring instrument of service quality in higher education sector, Quality Assurance in Education, 13(4), 305-328.
  2. Abdullah, F. (2006). The development of HEdPERF: a new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 569-581.
  3. Adeyemi, R. A., Joel, A., Ebenezer, J. T., & Attah, E. Y. (2018). The effect of brain drain on the economic development of developing countries: Evidence from selected African Countries, Journal of Health and Social Issues, 7(2), 66-76.
  4. Artuner, G., Uzun, F., & Ilbars, Z. (2012). Works carried out by higher education institutions for academic evaluations and quality improvement studies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 1255–1259.
  5. Ayaz, N., & Arakaya, A. (2017). Eğitim sektöründe hizmet kalitesinin ölçülmesi: öğrenci işleri birimi örneği, Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1), 336-350.
  6. Aytaç, S., & Aydın, G. Ç. (2019). Analysis of the effects of pull and push factors on brain drain: An example of Turkey. Journal of Social Economics Research, 6(2), 74-84.
  7. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
  8. Daoud, J. I. (2017). Multicollinearity and regression analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 949, Article ID: 012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/949/1/012009
  9. Docquier, F., Lowell, B. L., & Marfouk, A. (2009). A gendered assessment of the brain drain. Population and Development Review, 35(2), 297–321.
  10. Dragut, B. M. (2011). Quality management in higher education services. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3366–3368.
APA
Ergün, B., Zorlu, Ö., & Aytekin, E. (2026). The Effect of Service Quality in Education on Brain Drain Attitude: A Study on Erasmus+ Students. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Tourism, 11(1), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.31822/jomat.2026-11-1-167