SPECULATIONS ON PANENTHEISM IN LITERATURE, SINLESS SINNERS AND DEMONIC GOOD ANGELS IN MIDNIGHT’S CHILDREN AND LORD OF THE FLIES

Öz

This study applies an interdisciplinary and comparative approach to the selected works through panentheistic philosophy to visualize the abstract expressions and perception of theology and philosophy on panentheism using concrete and representational expressions of the selected novels. In the dystopian work Lord of the Flies by William Golding, this study benefits the limitless opportunities fiction offers to unveil the problem of evil and goes beyond the boundaries of the teachings, experiences and social norms the human world. The dystopian fiction Lord of the Flies, which portrays the inner and subconscious conflict between good and evil within individuals, is scrutinized from a panentheistic perspective to question the existence of evil. Midnight’s Children by Salman Rushdie, as a genre of magic realism and historiographic metafiction, will enlighten the study to reveal the conflicts between destruction and creation to clarify the problem of evil which is ambiguous from a panenthestic view.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Panentheistic philosophy
• problem of evil
• god
• Midnight’s Children

EDEBİYATTA PANENTEIZM ÜZERİNE MÜLAHAZALAR, GECEYARISI ÇOCUKLARI VE SİNEKLERİN EFENDİSİ’NDE GÜNAHSIZ GÜNAHKÂRLAR VE ŞEYTANİ İYİ MELEKLER

Öz

Bu çalışma, panenteizmdeki din ve felsefenin soyut ifadelerini ve bakış açısını görselleştirmek amacıyla, seçilen romanları somut ve kavramsal ifadelerini kullanarak, disiplinlerarası ve karşılaştırmalı bir yaklaşımla panenteistik felsefe açısından ele alır. Bu çalışma, William Golding’in distopyası Sineklerin Efendisi romanında şeytan sorunsalını açığa çıkarmak amacıyla kurgusal anlatıların sunduğu sınırsız imkânlardan faydalanır ve insan dünyasındaki öğretilerin, deneyimlerin ve sosyal normların sınırlarını aşar. Bireylerde iyi ve kötü arasındaki bilinçdışı içsel çatışmaları sergileyen distopik kurgu Sineklerin Efendisi, bu çalışmada şeytanın varlığını sorgulamak amacıyla panenteistik bakış açısıyla irdelenir. Muğlak olan şeytan sorunsalını netleştirmek için, yok etmek ve yaratmak arasındaki çatışmaları açığa çıkarmak amacıyla, büyülü gerçekçilik ve historiyografik üstkurmaca türünde bir roman olan Salman Rushdie’nin Geceyarısı Çocukları, panentestik bakış açısıyla bu çalışmaya ışık tutar.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Panenteistik felsefe
• Şeytan sorunsalı
• Tanrı
• Geceyarısı Çocukları
• Sineklerin Efendisi
• Rus felsefesinde Panenteizm
• Lord of the Flies
• panentheism in Russian philosophy

Kaynakça

1. Attfield, Robin. (2019). Panentheisms, Creation and Evil. Open Theology, 5: 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0012
2. Baltzly, Dirk. (2010). “Is Plato’s Timaeus Panentheistic?,” Sophia 49:193–215, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010. DOI 10.1007/s11841-010-0170-z
3. Bracken, Joseph A. (2014). Panentheism: Hierarchically Ordered Systems of Existence and Activity. In The World in the Trinity: Open-Ended Systems in Science and Religion, 65-90. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, Publishers. Accessed March 27, 2020. www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9m0vjs.7
4. Bracken, Joseph A. (2015). Panentheism and the Classical God-World Relationship: A Systems-Oriented Approach. American Journal of Theology & Philosophy. 36, no. 3, 207-25. Accessed March 27, 2020. doi:10.5406/amerjtheophil.36.3.0207
5. Burns, Elizabeth D. (2018). “Patching Plantinga’s ontological argument by making the Murdoch move,” In T. Dougherty & J. Walls (Eds.), The plantinga project: Two dozen (or so) theistic arguments (pp. 123–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Burns, Elizabeth D. (2019). How to prove the existence of God: an argument for conjoined panentheism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 85: 5–21 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-018-9690-1
7. Chaadayev, P.Ja. (1991). Filosoficheskie pis'ma. Pis'mo pjatoe (Philosophical letters. Letter 5). Polnoe sobranie sochinenij i izbrannye pis'ma, v 2 T. Full collected essays and selected letters in 2 Volumes. M.: Rimis. V. 1, pp. 377- 389.
8. Cooper, John. (2006). Panentheism: The Other God of the Philosophers—From Plato to the Present. Nottingham, UK: Apollos.

9. Cranwell, Caresse. (2010). Embracing Thanatos-in-Eros: Evolutionary Ecology and Panentheism. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 SOPHIA, 49: 271–283 DOI 10.1007/s11841-010-0177-5
10. Dostoevsky, F. (1995). Demons. Trans. Pevear and Volokhonsky. New York: Vintage Classics.
11. Dostoevsky, F. (2002). The Brothers Karamazov. Transl. Pevear and Volokhonsky. (12th edition) New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
12. Frank, S. L. (1972). Ontologicheskoe dokazatel'stvo bytija Boga (Ontological Proof of God's existence). Retrieved from http://lib.ru/HRISTIAN/FRANK_S_L/bytie.txt
13. Frank, S. L. (2007). Nepostizhimoe. Ontologicheskoe vvedenie v filosofiju (Incomprehensible. Ontological introduction to philosophy). M.: AST.
14. Frank, S.L. (1998). Svet vo t'me (Light in the darkness) Retrieved from http://azbyka.ru/otechnik/
15. Golding, William. (2001). Lord of the Flies ISBN: 7865- 1669- 2 (electronic). New York: Penguin Books.
16. Hartshorne, Charles. (1948). The Divine Relativity: A Social Concept of God. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
17. Jung, Carl G. (1966). Two Essays on Analytical Psychology. The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Vol. 7, Part 1, 2nd ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, Bollingen Series XX, 1966.
18. Losskij, N. O. (2011). Istorija russkoj filosofii (History of Russian Philosophy). M. : Akademicheskij proekt: Triksta.
19. Main, Roderick. (2017). The Many Faces of Panentheism, Panentheism and the Undoing of Disenchantment. Zygon, vol. 52, no. 4 (December 2017): 1098-1122.
20. Pappas, Nickolas. (2017). Plato's Aesthetics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = .
21. Peterson, Gregory R. (2001). Whither Panentheism?. Zygon, vol. 36, no. 3; (September). ISSN 0591-2385.
22. Rushdie, Salman. (1980). Midnight’s Children. New York: Random House (electronic).
23. Schmitt, Jeff Firewalker. (2018). Natural Inclusionality, Indigenous Wisdom, and the Reality of Nature. Hu Arenas 1: 37–55 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0008-8 Received: 10 January 2018 /Revised: 25 January 2018 /Accepted: 31 January 2018 / (Springer International Publishing AG, Springer Nature 2018).
24. Shakespeare, William. (2002). The Tempest, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Edited by David Lindley. Cambridge University Press, New York.
25. Solovyov, V.S. (1988). Kritika otvlechennyh nachal (Critics of abstract beginnings). Sochinenija v 2 T. (Essays in 2 V). М.: Orthodox Library V. 1., pp. 586-590, 691-745.
26. Stenmark, Mikael (2018). Panentheism and its neighbors. online: 27 October 2018, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion (2019) 85:23–41 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-018-9687-9