Aims: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a growing global health concern associated with chronic liver damage and metabolic comorbidities. Traditional anthropometric measures—such as body-mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC), have known limitations. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of novel obesity indices, including a body shape index (ABSI) and body roundness index (BRI), with conventional parameters in predicting NAFLD.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with 430 Turkish adults (aged 18–74) undergoing FibroScan assessments. Anthropometric data (body weight, height, WC) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) values were collected. NAFLD was defined as CAP ≥257 dB/m. Predictive capabilities of BMI, WC, ABSI, BRI, waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), and body weight were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Pairwise area under-the-curve (AUC) comparisons were performed using the DeLong test, with significance set at p<0.05.
Results: Body weight displayed the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) for NAFLD diagnosis (AUC=0.766; 95% CI: 0.716 0.816). BMI (AUC=0.695; 95% CI: 0.637–0.753) and WC (AUC=0.693; 95% CI: 0.636–0.750) had comparable performance. BRI and WHtR demonstrated lower AUC values (AUC=0.621), while ABSI had insufficient discriminatory ability (AUC=0.485). NAFLD prevalence was significantly higher in males (71% vs. 50%, p<0.001), aligning with prior epidemiological reports.
Conclusion: Among Turkish patients diagnosed via FibroScan, body weight emerged as the strongest predictor of NAFLD, with BMI and WC remaining reliable alternatives. Novel indices such as BRI and ABSI showed limited utility for clinical diagnosis. These findings highlight the continued relevance of simple and traditional measurements for identifying NAFLD risk.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) anthropometric indices a body shape index (ABSI) body roundness index (BRI) FibroScan
Bursa Şehir Hastanesi Bilimsel Araştırmalar Etik Kurulu Karar Formu: Karar no: 2025-2/15
ABSTRACT
Background/Aim: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a growing global health concern associated with chronic liver damage and metabolic comorbidities. Traditional anthropometric measures—such as body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC)—have known limitations. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of novel obesity indices, including A Body Shape Index (ABSI) and Body Roundness Index (BRI), with conventional parameters in predicting NAFLD.
Methods: In this retrospective study, 430 Turkish adults (aged 18–74 years) who underwent FibroScan examinations were evaluated. Anthropometric data (body weight, height, WC) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) values were collected. NAFLD was defined as CAP ≥257 dB/m. Predictive capabilities of each anthropometric index (BMI, WC, ABSI, BRI, waist-to-height ratio [WHtR], and body weight) were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses.
Results: Body weight displayed the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) for diagnosing NAFLD, followed by BMI and WC with comparable performance. In contrast, BRI and WHtR demonstrated lower AUC values, whereas ABSI showed insufficient discriminatory ability. Males were more commonly affected by NAFLD, which is consistent with previous literature.
Conclusion: Among Turkish patients diagnosed via FibroScan, body weight emerged as the strongest predictor of NAFLD, with BMI and WC remaining reliable alternatives. Novel indices such as BRI and ABSI showed limited utility for clinical diagnosis. These findings highlight the continued relevance of simple and traditional measurements for identifying NAFLD risk.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) Anthropometric indices A Body Shape Index (ABSI) Body Roundness Index (BRI) FibroScan
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Konular | Gastroenteroloji ve Hepatoloji |
Bölüm | Research Articles [en] Araştırma Makaleleri [tr] |
Yazarlar | |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 23 Mart 2025 |
Gönderilme Tarihi | 24 Ocak 2025 |
Kabul Tarihi | 21 Şubat 2025 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2025 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2 |
Dergimiz; TR-Dizin ULAKBİM, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, Google Scholar, Researchgate, WorldCat (OCLC), CrossRef (DOI), ROAD, ASOS İndeks, Türk Medline İndeks, Eurasian Scientific Journal Index (ESJI) ve Türkiye Atıf Dizini'nde indekslenmektedir.
EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI, ProQuest dizinlerine müracaat yapılmış olup, değerlendirme aşamasındadır.
Makaleler "Çift-Kör Hakem Değerlendirmesi”nden geçmektedir.
Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği: Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN].
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. About predatory/questionable journals and journal charge policy
Not: Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q sınıflamasına dahil değildir.
Yağmacı/şüpheli dergilerle ilgili Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kararları ve yazar açıklama metni ile dergi ücret politikası: Yağmacı/Şaibeli Dergiler ve Dergi Ücret Politikası