Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Dental implant treatment from the patient's perspective: a descriptive, survey-based cohort study

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 124 - 130, 23.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1640146

Öz

Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the participants' general knowledge and awareness about dental implants.
Methods: 550 voluntary participants over 18 years of age with or without missing teeth were applied to our clinic in 2024. The questionnaire was designed as multiple-choice.
Results: 550 volunteers, 282 females (51.19%) and 268 males (48.81%), participated in the study. 428 participants reported having missing teeth, while 120 participants reported having no missing teeth. Most participants (84.9%) thought missing teeth should be treated, while 14.2% thought missing teeth should not be treated. While 23.1% of the participants thought they had sufficient information about dental implants, 70.9% knew dental implants were a treatment alternative for missing teeth. While 41.6% of the participants stated that they obtained their current knowledge about dental implants from dentists, the rate of obtaining information from friends and relatives was 26.7%. 53.3% of the participants stated they feared dental implant treatment. Participants noted that the most positive factor affecting their decision to have dental implant treatment was better chewing, with 26.6%. Participants noted that the biggest challenge in choosing dental implant treatment was the high cost, 44%. 60% of the participants said oral, dental, and maxillofacial surgeons were the most qualified for dental implant treatment.
Conclusion: The study's results show that the level of awareness about dental implant treatment has increased but is still insufficient. Therefore, dentists should inform patients more about dental implant treatment to increase awareness further

Etik Beyan

The study was approved by the Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University (Project No.: 23-KAEK-318 Number: 83116987-795).

Destekleyen Kurum

Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

Kaynakça

  • Brånemark PI, Breine U, Adell R, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson Å. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses: i. experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81-100. doi:10.3109/ 02844316909036699
  • Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):7-21. doi:10.1111/prd.12185
  • de Baat C. Success of dental implants in elderly people-a literature review. Gerodontology. 2000;17(1):45-48. doi:10.1111/j.1741-2358.2000.00045.x
  • Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, Belser UC. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(6):707-714. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01307.x
  • Kutkut A, Knudsen H, Bush H, Studts J. Comparison of implant-retained overdenture and conventional complete denture: a survey study to measure patients’ satisfaction and quality of life in dental school clinics. J Oral Implantol. 2024;50(3):266-276. doi:10.1563/aaid-joi-D-22-00096
  • Almudarris BA, Poonia PS, Mansuri AH, et al. Assessment of patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life following full mouth rehabilitation with implant-supported prostheses. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 3):S2143-S2145. doi:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_119_24
  • Kaptein MLA, Hoogstraten J, De Putter C, De Lange GL, Blijdorp PA. Dental implants in the atrophic maxilla: measurements of patients’ satisfaction and treatment experience. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9(5): 321-326. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090505.x
  • Prabhu A, Mundathaje M. Knowledge, attitude, and awareness of patients regarding dental implants: a cross-sectional study. J Int Oral Health. 2018;10(6):278. doi:10.4103/jioh.jioh_165_18
  • Al-Johany S, Al Zoman HA, Al Juhaini M, Al Refeai M. Dental patients’ awareness and knowledge in using dental implants as an option in replacing missing teeth: a survey in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J. 2010;22(4):183-188. doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.07.006
  • Siddique E, Bhat P, Kulkarni S, Trasad V, Thakur S. Public awareness, knowledge, attitude and acceptance of dental implants as a treatment modality among patients visiting SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019;23(1):58. doi:10.4103/jisp.jisp_281_18
  • Alajlan A, Alhoumaidan A, Ettesh A, Doumani M. Assessing knowledge and attitude of dental patients regarding the use of dental implants: a survey-based research. Int J Dent. 2019;2019:5792072. doi:10.1155/2019/ 5792072
  • Ho K, Bahammam S, Chen CY, et al. A cross-sectional survey of patient’s perception and knowledge of dental implants in Japan. Int J Implant Dent. 2022;8(1):14. doi:10.1186/s40729-022-00410-w
  • Yerliyurt K, Karadayi Yüzükcü AE, Balel Y, Demir O. Evaluation of knowledge levels of individuals in Tokat City about dental implant treatments: a survey study. J Contemporary Med. 2022;12(1):76-80. doi: 10.16899/jcm.1000073
  • Özcan Küçük A, Keskinrüzgar A, Şimşek HO. Hastaların dental implantlara bakış açısının değerlendirilmesi. Mersin Univ Saglık Bilim Derg. 2021;14(2):232-241. doi:10.26559/mersinsbd.897845
  • Özkan Şen D, Uçan Yarkaç F, Taştan Eroğlu Z, Seyfioğlu HG. Diş hekimliği fakültesine başvuran hastaların dental implant farkındalıkların değerlendirilmesi. NEU Dent J. 2022:4(3):107-114. doi: 10.51122/neudentj.2022.50
  • Ünal Erzurumlu Z, Kara ZS. Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi’ne başvuran hastaların dental implant farkındalıklarının değerlendirilmesi. Selcuk Dent J. 2018;5(3):212-217. doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.381766
  • Menziletoğlu D, Kılınç A, Işık BK, Akın C. Assesment of dental implant awareness and knowledge levels of patients. Yeditepe Dent J. 2020;16(3): 209-212. doi:10.5505/yeditepe.2020.75983
  • Memiş S. Patients’ knowledge and awareness of dental implants in the Western Black Sea Region of Turkey. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dent Sci. 2020; 26(3):323-330. doi:10.5336/dentalsci.2019-72025
  • Alharbi A, Aloufi A, Almutairi J, Alharbi T, Alharbi T. Patient acceptance, awareness, and perceived cost of dental implants as a treatment modality for replacement of missing teeth: a survey in Riyadh. Int J Med Developing Countries. 2020;4(December 2019):448-453. doi:10.24911/IJMDC.51-1577137308
  • Khosya B, CG2 D. Awareness of dental implants as a treatment modality among people visiting Mahatma Gandhi Dental College & Hospital, Jaipur. Nat J Med Res. 2015;29:25-34.
  • Berge TI. Public awareness, information sources and evaluation of oral implant treatment in Norway. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11(5):401-408. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005401.x
  • Tomruk CÖ, Özkurt-Kayahan Z, Şençift K. Patients’ knowledge and awareness of dental implants in a Turkish subpopulation. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6(2):133. doi:10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.133
  • Chaudhary S, Gowda TM, Kumar TAB, Mehta DS. Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of undergraduate dental students toward dental implants--an all India survey. Implant Dent. 2015;24(2):160-165. doi:10.1097/ID.0000000000000184
  • Kohli S, Bhatia S, Kaur A, Rathakrishnan T. Patients awareness and attitude towards dental implants. Indian J Dent. 2015;6(4):167. doi:10. /0975-962x.168518
  • Al-Johany SS, Al Amri MD, Alsaeed S, Alalola B. Dental implant length and diameter: a proposed classification scheme. J Prosthodontics. 2017; 26(3):252-260. doi:10.1111/JOPR.12517
  • Sghaireen MG. Effect of verbal and visual information on the level of anxiety among dental implant patients. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020; 21(8):846-851. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2842
  • Pommer B, Zechner W, Watzak G, Ulm C, Watzek G, Tepper G. Progress and trends in patients’ mindset on dental implants. I: level of information, sources of information and need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(2):223-229. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010. 02035.x
  • Hof M, Tepper G, Semo B, Arnhart C, Watzek G, Pommer B. Patients’ perspectives on dental implant and bone graft surgery: questionnaire-based interview survey. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(1):42-45. doi:10. 1111/clr.12061
  • Alanazi SA, Alduaiji KTA, Al-enazi AS, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and awareness regarding dental implants among young patients visiting Al-Farabi Hospital. Oral Health Dental Management. 2017;16(6):1-6.
  • Deeb G, Wheeler B, Jones M, Carrico C, Laskin D, Deeb JG. Public and patient knowledge about dental implants. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2017;75(7):1387-1391. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2017.03.024

Hasta perspektifinden dental implant tedavisi: tanımlayıcı, ankete dayalı bir kohort çalışması

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 124 - 130, 23.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1640146

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, katılımcıların dental implantlar hakkındaki genel bilgi ve farkındalıklarını değerlendirmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: 2024 yılında kliniğimize 18 yaş üstü eksik dişi olan veya olmayan 550 gönüllü katılımcı başvurmuştur. Anket, çoktan seçmeli olarak tasarlanmıştır.
Sonuçlar Çalışmaya 282 kadın (%51,19) ve 268 erkek (%48,81) olmak üzere 550 gönüllü katıldı. Katılımcıların 428'i eksik dişi olduğunu, 120'si ise eksik dişi olmadığını bildirmiştir. Katılımcıların çoğu (%84,9) eksik dişlerin tedavi edilmesi gerektiğini düşünürken, %14,2'si eksik dişlerin tedavi edilmemesi gerektiğini düşünmektedir. Katılımcıların %23,1'i dental implantlar hakkında yeterli bilgiye sahip olduğunu düşünürken, %70,9'u dental implantların eksik dişler için bir tedavi alternatifi olduğunu biliyordu. Katılımcıların %41,6'sı dental implantlar hakkındaki mevcut bilgilerini diş hekimlerinden edindiklerini belirtirken, arkadaş ve akrabalardan bilgi edinme oranı %26,7'dir. Katılımcıların %53,3'ü dental implant tedavisinden korktuğunu belirtmiştir. Katılımcılar dental implant tedavisi yaptırma kararlarını etkileyen en olumlu faktörün %26,6 ile daha iyi çiğneme olduğunu belirtmiştir. Katılımcıların %44'ü dental implant tedavisini seçmelerindeki en büyük zorluğun yüksek maliyet olduğunu belirtmiştir. Katılımcıların %60'ı dental implant tedavisi için en nitelikli kişilerin ağız, diş ve çene cerrahları olduğunu belirtmiştir.
Sonuç: Çalışmanın sonuçları dental implant tedavisi hakkındaki farkındalık düzeyinin arttığını ancak hala yetersiz olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu nedenle, diş hekimleri farkındalığı daha da artırmak için hastaları dental implant tedavisi hakkında daha fazla bilgilendirmelidir.

Kaynakça

  • Brånemark PI, Breine U, Adell R, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson Å. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses: i. experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81-100. doi:10.3109/ 02844316909036699
  • Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):7-21. doi:10.1111/prd.12185
  • de Baat C. Success of dental implants in elderly people-a literature review. Gerodontology. 2000;17(1):45-48. doi:10.1111/j.1741-2358.2000.00045.x
  • Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, Belser UC. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(6):707-714. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01307.x
  • Kutkut A, Knudsen H, Bush H, Studts J. Comparison of implant-retained overdenture and conventional complete denture: a survey study to measure patients’ satisfaction and quality of life in dental school clinics. J Oral Implantol. 2024;50(3):266-276. doi:10.1563/aaid-joi-D-22-00096
  • Almudarris BA, Poonia PS, Mansuri AH, et al. Assessment of patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life following full mouth rehabilitation with implant-supported prostheses. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 3):S2143-S2145. doi:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_119_24
  • Kaptein MLA, Hoogstraten J, De Putter C, De Lange GL, Blijdorp PA. Dental implants in the atrophic maxilla: measurements of patients’ satisfaction and treatment experience. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9(5): 321-326. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090505.x
  • Prabhu A, Mundathaje M. Knowledge, attitude, and awareness of patients regarding dental implants: a cross-sectional study. J Int Oral Health. 2018;10(6):278. doi:10.4103/jioh.jioh_165_18
  • Al-Johany S, Al Zoman HA, Al Juhaini M, Al Refeai M. Dental patients’ awareness and knowledge in using dental implants as an option in replacing missing teeth: a survey in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J. 2010;22(4):183-188. doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.07.006
  • Siddique E, Bhat P, Kulkarni S, Trasad V, Thakur S. Public awareness, knowledge, attitude and acceptance of dental implants as a treatment modality among patients visiting SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019;23(1):58. doi:10.4103/jisp.jisp_281_18
  • Alajlan A, Alhoumaidan A, Ettesh A, Doumani M. Assessing knowledge and attitude of dental patients regarding the use of dental implants: a survey-based research. Int J Dent. 2019;2019:5792072. doi:10.1155/2019/ 5792072
  • Ho K, Bahammam S, Chen CY, et al. A cross-sectional survey of patient’s perception and knowledge of dental implants in Japan. Int J Implant Dent. 2022;8(1):14. doi:10.1186/s40729-022-00410-w
  • Yerliyurt K, Karadayi Yüzükcü AE, Balel Y, Demir O. Evaluation of knowledge levels of individuals in Tokat City about dental implant treatments: a survey study. J Contemporary Med. 2022;12(1):76-80. doi: 10.16899/jcm.1000073
  • Özcan Küçük A, Keskinrüzgar A, Şimşek HO. Hastaların dental implantlara bakış açısının değerlendirilmesi. Mersin Univ Saglık Bilim Derg. 2021;14(2):232-241. doi:10.26559/mersinsbd.897845
  • Özkan Şen D, Uçan Yarkaç F, Taştan Eroğlu Z, Seyfioğlu HG. Diş hekimliği fakültesine başvuran hastaların dental implant farkındalıkların değerlendirilmesi. NEU Dent J. 2022:4(3):107-114. doi: 10.51122/neudentj.2022.50
  • Ünal Erzurumlu Z, Kara ZS. Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi’ne başvuran hastaların dental implant farkındalıklarının değerlendirilmesi. Selcuk Dent J. 2018;5(3):212-217. doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.381766
  • Menziletoğlu D, Kılınç A, Işık BK, Akın C. Assesment of dental implant awareness and knowledge levels of patients. Yeditepe Dent J. 2020;16(3): 209-212. doi:10.5505/yeditepe.2020.75983
  • Memiş S. Patients’ knowledge and awareness of dental implants in the Western Black Sea Region of Turkey. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dent Sci. 2020; 26(3):323-330. doi:10.5336/dentalsci.2019-72025
  • Alharbi A, Aloufi A, Almutairi J, Alharbi T, Alharbi T. Patient acceptance, awareness, and perceived cost of dental implants as a treatment modality for replacement of missing teeth: a survey in Riyadh. Int J Med Developing Countries. 2020;4(December 2019):448-453. doi:10.24911/IJMDC.51-1577137308
  • Khosya B, CG2 D. Awareness of dental implants as a treatment modality among people visiting Mahatma Gandhi Dental College & Hospital, Jaipur. Nat J Med Res. 2015;29:25-34.
  • Berge TI. Public awareness, information sources and evaluation of oral implant treatment in Norway. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11(5):401-408. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005401.x
  • Tomruk CÖ, Özkurt-Kayahan Z, Şençift K. Patients’ knowledge and awareness of dental implants in a Turkish subpopulation. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6(2):133. doi:10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.133
  • Chaudhary S, Gowda TM, Kumar TAB, Mehta DS. Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of undergraduate dental students toward dental implants--an all India survey. Implant Dent. 2015;24(2):160-165. doi:10.1097/ID.0000000000000184
  • Kohli S, Bhatia S, Kaur A, Rathakrishnan T. Patients awareness and attitude towards dental implants. Indian J Dent. 2015;6(4):167. doi:10. /0975-962x.168518
  • Al-Johany SS, Al Amri MD, Alsaeed S, Alalola B. Dental implant length and diameter: a proposed classification scheme. J Prosthodontics. 2017; 26(3):252-260. doi:10.1111/JOPR.12517
  • Sghaireen MG. Effect of verbal and visual information on the level of anxiety among dental implant patients. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020; 21(8):846-851. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2842
  • Pommer B, Zechner W, Watzak G, Ulm C, Watzek G, Tepper G. Progress and trends in patients’ mindset on dental implants. I: level of information, sources of information and need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(2):223-229. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010. 02035.x
  • Hof M, Tepper G, Semo B, Arnhart C, Watzek G, Pommer B. Patients’ perspectives on dental implant and bone graft surgery: questionnaire-based interview survey. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(1):42-45. doi:10. 1111/clr.12061
  • Alanazi SA, Alduaiji KTA, Al-enazi AS, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and awareness regarding dental implants among young patients visiting Al-Farabi Hospital. Oral Health Dental Management. 2017;16(6):1-6.
  • Deeb G, Wheeler B, Jones M, Carrico C, Laskin D, Deeb JG. Public and patient knowledge about dental implants. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2017;75(7):1387-1391. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2017.03.024
Toplam 30 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ağız ve Çene Cerrahisi
Bölüm Research Articles [en] Araştırma Makaleleri [tr]
Yazarlar

Esengül Şen 0000-0001-9273-0235

Tolgahan Kara 0000-0002-7252-2444

Aslı Başal Bu kişi benim 0009-0008-5140-4482

Yayımlanma Tarihi 23 Mart 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 14 Şubat 2025
Kabul Tarihi 17 Mart 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

AMA Şen E, Kara T, Başal A. Dental implant treatment from the patient’s perspective: a descriptive, survey-based cohort study. J Med Palliat Care / JOMPAC / Jompac. Mart 2025;6(2):124-130. doi:10.47582/jompac.1640146

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRrI_RWgGRe7JRpz3PAnkt2YEFD2l6WEmgHMzuM2w9b&s

f9ab67f.png     

7yziemq.png




COPE.jpg

icmje_1_orig.png

cc.logo.large.png

ncbi.png

ORCID_logo.png

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQk2AsOdjP67NBkYAqd8FHwCmh0_3dkMrXh3mFtfPKXwIai7h0lIds8QYM9YjKMhZw8iP0&usqp=CAU

logo_world_of_journals_no_margin.png1280px-WorldCat_logo.svg.png                             images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRrI_RWgGRe7JRpz3PAnkt2YEFD2l6WEmgHMzuM2w9b&s


Dergimiz; TR-Dizin ULAKBİM, ICI World of  Journal's, Index Copernicus, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, Google Scholar, Researchgate, WorldCat (OCLC), CrossRef (DOI), ROAD, ASOS İndeks, Türk Medline İndeks, Eurasian Scientific Journal Index (ESJI) ve Türkiye Atıf Dizini'nde indekslenmektedir.

EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI, ProQuest dizinlerine müracaat yapılmış olup, değerlendirme aşamasındadır.

Makaleler "Çift-Kör Hakem Değerlendirmesi”nden geçmektedir.

Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği: Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN].

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser.  About predatory/questionable journals and journal charge policy

Not: Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q  sınıflamasına dahil değildir.
Yağmacı/şüpheli dergilerle ilgili Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kararları ve yazar açıklama metni ile dergi ücret politikası: Yağmacı/Şaibeli Dergiler ve Dergi Ücret Politikası