-

Öz

The existing study deals with perception and knowledge level of social responsibility, corporate social responsibility (CSR) issues and the effect of corporate social responsibility courses on their knowledge and conscience level about CSR among the students in Turkish higher education. The study has been carried out by means of descriptive scanning method. Frequency, percentage and spearman tests have been conducted to 238 students from two public and two foundation universities in İzmir. The theoretical part of the study deals with conceptional and historical level of CSR and related with the existing Turkish studies in the field. The article mostly handles the CSR with the framework of CSR education and practices in higher education. The analysis of the study reveals the fact that CSR courses has a great effect on CSR knowledge and perception of the students in Turkish higher education

Anahtar Kelimeler

• social responsibility, corporate social responsibility, corporate social responsibility in higher education, service learning courses, students’ perception and knowledge about social responsibility

SOSYAL SORUMLULUK: KAMU VE VAKIF ÜNİVERSİTELERİ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN SOSYAL SORUMLULUĞA İLİŞKİN BİLGİ DÜZEYLERİ VE ALGILARININ ÖLÇÜLMESİ

Öz

Bu çalışma kapsamında, Türk Yükseköğretimi'ndeki öğrencilerin sosyal sorumluluk ve kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk kavramlarına ilişkin bilgi düzeyleri ve algıları ile sosyal sorumluluk derslerinin kavramsal bilgi ve bilinç düzeylerine etkisi ele alınmaktadır. Araştırmada betimsel analiz metod-ları kullanılmıştır. İzmir'de bulunan iki kamu, iki devlet üniversitesinden toplam 238 öğrenci üzerinde gerçekleştirilen frekans analizi ve spearman testleri aracılığıyla analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmanın teorik kısmında CSR konusu kavramsal ve tarihsel boyutlarıyla ele alınarak bu konuda Türkiye'de gerçekleştirilen çalışmalarla ilintilendirilmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında CSR, yükseköğ-retimde CSR eğitimi ve uygulamaları çerçevesinde ele alınmaktadır. Analiz sonuçları, Türkiye'de yükseköğretimde verilen kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk derslerinin CSR konusunda bilgi ve algı düzeyini yüksek oranda artırdığı sonucunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• sosyal sorumluluk; kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk; yükseköğretimde kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk; sosyal sorumluluk dersleri; öğrencilerin sosyal sorumluluk bilgi ve algısı

Kaynakça

1. Aktan C C (2006) Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumlu- luk, Mercek Türkiye Metal Sanayicileri Sendi- kası, Ocak 2006, 11 (41), 54-67.
2. Alakavuklar N O, Kılıçaslan S ve Öztürk B E (2009) Türkiye’de Hayırseverlikten Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluğa Geçiş: Bir Kurumsal De- ğişim Öyküsü, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9 (2), 103-143.
3. Alshuwaikhat H M ve Abubakar I (2008) An Integrated Approach to Achieving Campus Sustainability: Assessment of the Current Campus Environmental Management Practices, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (16), 1777- 1785.
4. Annette J (2002) Service Learning in An International Context, Frontiers, Winter, 83-93. Asaf S (2004) Executive Corporate Finance: The Business of Enhancing ShareholderValue, FT Press.
5. Asongu J (2007) Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility
6. Publishing Company, USA.
7. Greenview Atakan S M G ve Eker T (2007) Corporate Identity of a Socially Responsible University-A Case from the Turkish Higher Education Sector, Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 55-68. Ayvacı Ş H ve Akyıldız S (2009) Topluma Hizmet Uygulamaları Dersinin Bireye ve Top- luma Kazandırdıkları ve Toplumun Beklentile- ri, Milli Eğitim, 184, Güz, 102-118.
8. Barnard Chester I (1968) The Functions of the Executive, USA.

9. Bayraktaroğlu G, İlter B ve Tanyeri M (2009) Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk: Pazarlamada Yeni Bir Paradigmaya Doğru, Literatür Yayın- ları, İstanbul.
10. Bourner I ve Flowers S (1997) Teaching and Learning Methods in Higher Education: A Glimpse of the Future, Reflections on Higher Education, 9, 77–102.
11. Bowen H R (1953) Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, Harper & Row, NewYork.
12. Brandell M ve Hinck S (1997) Service Learning: Connecting Citizenship with the Classroom, NASSP Bulletin, 81 (591), 49-56.
13. Buğra A (2008) Kapitalizm, Yoksulluk ve Türkiye’de Sosyal Politika, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul. Cadbury
14. Responsibility, 21st Century Society, 1, 5-21. Corporate
15. Social Carroll A B (1979) A Three Dimensional Con- ceptual Model of Corporate Performance, Academy of Management Review 4 (4), 497– 505.
16. Carroll A B (1991) The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward The Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34 (4), 39-48.
17. Carroll A B (1999) Corporate Social Responsi- bility Evolution of a Definitional Construct, Business & Society, 38 (3), 268-292.
18. Carroll A B ve Buchnoltz A K (2012) Business and Society, South Western Cengage Learning, USA.
19. Chambers J D ve Lavery S (2012) Service Learning: A Valuable Component of Pre- Service Teacher Education, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37 (4), 128-137.
20. Cheney G, Roper J ve May S (2007) Overview, S. May, G. Cheney and J. Roper (eds), The Debate Over Corporate Social Responsibility, Oxford University Press, USA, pp 3-12.
21. Commission Green Paper: Promoting an European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility, 2001.
22. Corrigan R A (2011) Service Learning for Civic Engagement: Social Responsibility and Sustainability, T. McDonald (ed), Stylus Publishing, USA.
23. Çelik A (2007) Şirketlerin Sosyal Sorumluluk- ları, C. C. Aktan (ed), Kurumsal Sosyal So- rumluluk, İGİAD Yayınları, İstanbul, 61-84. Çetindamar D ve Hopkins T (2008) Enhancing Students’ Responsibility Towards Society Through
24. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 401–410.
25. Projects, Çizakça M (2000) A History of Philantrophic Foundations: The Islamic World from The Seventh Century to The Present, Boğaziçi Press, İstanbul.
26. Davis K (1960) Can Business Afford to Ignore Corporate Social Responsibilities?, California Management Review, 2, 70-76.
27. Davis K ve Blomstrom L R (1975) Business and Society: Environment and Responsibility, MacGraw Hill, New York.
28. De Jongh D ve Prinsloo P (2005) Why Teach Corporate Citizenship Differently? Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Summer, 18, 113-122. De Keizer B (2004) Corporate Social Responsibility at the University of Amsterdam, Paper Presented at the University Industry Forum, Bonn.
29. Dewey J (1916) Democracy and Education, The Free Press, New York.
30. Dinçer Ç, Ergül A, Şen M ve Çabuk B (2011) Bir Topluma Hizmet Uygulaması Örneği: Haydi Kavram Oyuncaklarıyla Oynayalım, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Ocak, 19 (1), 19- 38.
31. Elma C, Kesten A, Kıroğlu K, Uzun E M ve Dicle A N (2010) Öğretmen Adaylarının Top- luma Hizmet Uygulamaları Dersine İlişkin Algıları, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yöne- timi, 62, 231-252.
32. Epnler M A, Ironsmith M, Dingle S H ve Errickson M A (2011) Benefits of Service Learning for Freshman College Students and Elemantary School Children, Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11 (4), 102-115.
33. Erdoğan Y (2012) Sıralama Yine Çok Hareket- li,
34. çok-hareketli-haberler/2302.aspx, erişim tarihi: 24.02.2013.
35. Erkan S, Uludağ G ve Burçak F (2012) İlköğ- retim Bölümü Öğretmen Adaylarının Topluma Hizmet Uygulamaları Dersine İlişkin Algıları- nın İncelenmesi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Özel Sayı 1, 184-194.
36. Ertuna B ve Tükel A (2009) Türkiye’de KSS Uygulamaları: Geleneksel ve Küresel Arasın- da. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9 (2), 145- 172.
37. Evans K (2009) Learning, Work and Social Responsibility, Springer, UK.
38. Eyler J ve Giles D (1999) Where is the Learning in Service Learning?, Jossey Bass, San Francisco.
39. Falck O ve Heblich S (2007) Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing Well By Doing Good, Business Horizons, 50 (3), 247-254.
40. Frederick W C (2006) Corporation Be Good: The Story of Corporate Social Responsibility, Dog Ear Publishing, USA.
41. Friedman M (1970) The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits, The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 174-178. Geryk M (2011) Are Universities Socially Responsible?, EFMD Global Focus, 05 (03), 61-63.
42. Gonzalez-Perez, M A (2010) The Civically Engaged University Model in Colombia, International
43. Management and Sustainable Development, 9 (3), 161–173. of
44. Technology Gökçe O (2006) İçerik Analizi: Kuramsal ve Pratik Bilgiler, Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara.
45. Habermas J (1992) Rasyonel Bir Topluma Doğru, Ahmet Çiğdem ve Mehmet Küçük (çev), Vadi Yayınları, Ankara.
46. Hotamışlı M, Çağ A, Menteşe A ve Yörük E (2010) Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Bilinci: Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesinde Karşılaştırma- lı Bir Araştırma, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Güz, 9 (34), 280-299.
47. http://www.kurumsalsosyal.com/tr.TR/projeler/ 6.aspx?pageID=1, erişim tarihi: 20.01.2013.
48. http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_
49. gts&arama=gts&guid=TDK.GTS.51f54567c36 162.08353002, erişim tarihi: 27.01.2013.
50. http://www.wetenschapswinkels.nl/wetenschap swinkels.html, erişim tarihi: 25.03.2013. Jones
51. Responsibility - Bottom Line Issue or Public Relations Exercise?, J. Hancock (ed), Investing in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Guide to Best Practice, Business Planning and the UK’s Leading Companies, Kogan Page Ltd., GB, pp 5-13. Corporate Social Kadıbeşegil
52. MediaCat Kitapları, İstanbul. İtibar
53. Yönetimi, Kağıtçıbaşı Ç (1999) İnsan ve İnsanlar, Evrim Yayınevi, İstanbul.
54. Karabulut T ve Demir O (2006) The Rising Trend for NGO and the Private Sector Cooperation: Corporate Social Responsibility, http://www.turkishweekly.net/article/160/the
55. rising-trend-for-ngo-and-the-private-sector
56. cooperation-corporate-social-responsibility
57. html, erişim tarihi: 01.04.2013.
58. Kendrick J (1996) Outcomes of Service Learning in an Introductory Sociology Course, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 3 (1), 72-81.
59. Kerins A T (2010) Adventure in Service Learning: Developing Knowledge, Values and Responsibility, MPG Books Group, GB.
60. Kerr G, Johnston K ve Beatson A (2008) A Framework of Corporate Social Responsibility for Advertising Accountability: The Case of Australian Government Advertising Campaign, Journal of Marketing Communications, 14 (2), 155-169.
61. Kesten A (2012) Öğretmen Adaylarının ve Öğretim Elemanlarının Bakış Açısıyla Toplu- ma Hizmet Uygulamaları Dersinin Değerlendi- rilmesi, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilim- leri, 12 (3), Yaz, 2125-2148.
62. Koç Y ve Palabıyık A (2012) Üniversite Genç- liğinin Toplumsal ve Siyasal Sorunlara Bakışı: Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi ve Bitlis Eren Üni- versitesi Öğrencileri Örneği, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Kış, 11 (39), 322-346. Kolb
63. Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall, USA. Learning: Koontz
64. Management: A Systems and Contingency Analysis of Managerial Functions, McGraw Hill, USA. C
65. (1976) L’Etang J ve Pieczka M (1999) Critical Perspectives in Public Relations, International, Thomson Business Press, London.
66. Laing K G (2013) Service Learning: An Auditing
67. Education Studies, 6 (1), 174-183.
68. International Leisinger K (2010) UN Global Compact, W Wisser, D Matten, M Pohl ve N Tolhurst (eds), The A to Z of Corporate Social Responsibility, John Wiley&Sons, UK.
69. Martin G ve Hetrick S (2006) Corporate Reputations,
70. Management: A Strategic Approach to HR, Butterworth-Heinemann. and
71. People Matten D, Crane A ve Chapple W (2003) Behind The Mask: Revealing The True Face of Corporate Citizenship, Journal of Business Ethics, 45 (1-2), 109-120.
72. Matten D ve Moon J (2005) Implicit and Explicit CSR: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding CSR in Europe, Paper Presented in Research Seminar of University of London, 16 February.
73. Mesutoğlu N (2009) Üniversiteler Sosyal So- rumlu
74. isteinsan.com.tr/egitim/universiteler_sosyal_so
75. rumlu_gencler_yetistiriyor.html, erişim tarihi: 20.01.2013.
76. http://www. Moely B E, McFarland M, Miron D, Mercer S ve Ilustre V (2002) Changes in College Students’ Attitudes and Intentions for Civic Involvement as a Function of Service-Learning Experiences, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7, 18-26.
77. Mullerat R (2010) International Corporate Social International, GB. Kluwer
78. Law Nejati M, Shafaei A, Salamzadeh Y ve Daraei M (2011) Corporate Social Responsibility and Universities: A Study of Top 10 World Universities’ Web Sites, African Journal of Business Management, 5 (2), 440-447.
79. Nielsen A E ve Thomsen C (2007), “Reporting CSR – What and How To Say It?”, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12 (1), 25-40.
80. Orhaner B ve Doğan F (2010) CSR Turkey Baseline Report, http://www.csrturkey.org/dl/ CSR_baseline_Report.pdf, 29.12.2012. erişim
81. tarihi: Özdemir M S ve Tokcan H (2010) Topluma Hizmet Uygulamaları Dersinin Öğretmen Adaylarının Görüşlerine Göre Değerlendiril- mesi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 41-61.
82. Özgen E (2006) Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Projeleri, Maviağaç Yayınları, İstanbul.
83. Özüpek N M (2004) Kurum İmajında Sosyal Sorumluluk Kuramsal ve Uygulamalı Bir Ça- lışma, Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sos. Bil. Enst., Konya.
84. Phillips J M (2011) Integrating Service Learning into the Classroom: Examining the Extent to Which Students Achieve Course Objectives and a Sense of Civic Responsibility by Engaging in Service Learning, ProQuest LLC, Ed. D. Dissertation, Edgewood College, ABD.
85. Podnar K (2008) Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Marketing Communications, 14 (2) 75-81.
86. Rajendra B, Jose P D ve Malini M (2003) Corporate
87. Information and Communication Technologies Sector:
88. Review, 15 (4), 61-77. in the Discussion, IIMB
89. Management Rault V P (2008) College Leadership Programs and
90. Students to Be Agents of Social Change, Dissertation, Doctor of Philosophy.
91. Preparing Reed D (2004) Universities and the Promotion of Corporate Responsibility: Reinterpreting the Liberal Arts Tradition, Journal of Academic Ethics, 2, 3-41.
92. Saran M, Coşkun G, İnal Zorel F ve Aksoy Z (2011) Üniversitelerde Sosyal Sorumluluk Bilincinin Geliştirilmesi: Ege Üniversitesi Topluma Hizmet Uygulamaları Dersi Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Journal of Yasar University, 22 (6), 3732-3747.
93. Segerlund L (2010) Making Corporate Social Responsibility a Global Concern: Norm Construction in a Globalizing World, Ashgate Publishing Group, GBR.
94. Simons L ve Cleary B (2006) The Influence of Service Learning on Students’ Personal and Social Development, College Teaching, 54 (4), 307-319.
95. Strauss A ve Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative
96. Procedures and Techniques, Sage Publications, USA. Grounded
97. Theory Streimikiene D, Simanaviciene Z ve Kovaliov R (2009) “Corporate Social Responsibility for Implementation
98. Development in Baltic States”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13 (4), 813–824.
99. Sweeney L ve Coughlan J (2008) Do Different Industries
100. Responsibility Differently? An Investigation Through the Lens of Stakeholder Theory, Journal of Marketing Communications, 14 (2), 113-124. Corporate
101. Social Tench R ve Yeomans L (2009) Exploring Public Relations, Prentice Hall, Spain.
102. Travis T G (2007) The Essential Guide to Going Publications. Wiley &
103. Sons Tuncel G, Kop Y ve Katılmış A (2011) Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmen Adaylarının Topluma Hiz- met Uygulamaları Dersine İlişkin Görüşleri, Konferansta Sunulan Bildiri, 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, Antalya.
104. Uğurlu Z ve Kıral E (2012) Öğretmen Adayla- rının Topluma Hizmet Uygulamaları Dersinin İşleyiş Süreci ve Kazanımlarına İlişkin Görü- şülmesi, Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2 (1), 59-93.
105. van Marrewijk M (2003) Concepts and Definitions Sustainability: Between
106. Communion, Journal of Business Ethics, 44 (2- 3), 95-105. and Corporate Agency
107. and Vogel D (2006) Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility, Brooking Institution Press, UK. Watson D (2007) Managing Civic and Community Engagement, Open University Press, England.
108. Weenen V H (2000) Towards a Vision of a Sustainable University, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1 (1), 20- 34.
109. World Business Council for Sustainable Development, 2008.
110. Wulfson M (2001) The Ethics of Corporate Social
111. Ventures, Journal of Business Ethics, 29, 135- 145. and
112. Philanthropic Yıldırım A ve Şimşek H (1999) Sosyal Bilim- lerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Seçkin Ya- yınevi, Ankara.
113. Youniss J ve Yates M (1997) Community Ser- vice and Social Responsibility in Youth, The University of Chicago Press USA.