Farklı Oranlarda Arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.) ve Buğday (Triticum aestivum L. Em Thell) Kırığı Eklenen Yem Bezelyesi (Pisum arvense L.) Silajının Besleme Değeri ve Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Silaj, kaba yemlerin yetersizliğini, kalitesizliğini ve kaba yem üretiminin maliyet etkinliğinin karşılanması açısından en etkili çözümü temsil eder. Silaj üretiminin ana amacı, yüksek besin değerine sahip taze kaba yem materyalinin minimum besin kaybıyla depolanmasıdır. Yem bezelyesi kuru-yeşil ot ve silaj üretimi için farklı oranlarda tahıllarla karışımlar halinde yetiştiriciliği yapılırken, ayrıca katkı maddeleri kullanılarak saf yem bezelyesi silajı da elde edilmektedir. Melas ve tahıl veya kırılmış tahıl taneleri, silaj materyaline karbonhidrat içeriğini artırmak amacıyla eklenebilir. Bu araştırma, yem bezelyesi silajına farklı oranlarda eklenen arpa ve buğday kırıklarının, silajın besin değerini ve kalitesine etkisini belirlemek için tesadüf parselleri deneme desenine göre dört tekrarlamalı olarak yürütülmüştür. 100 g katkısız soldurulmuş yem bezelyesi ile 100 g katkısız soldurulmuş yem bezelyesine 3 g, 6 g, 9 g ve 12 g arpa ve buğday eklenmiş yem bezelyesi örnekleri 20x26 cm plastik torbalara vakumlanmış ve karanlık bir ortamda 15 ila 28°C arasında değişen ortam sıcaklıklarında 45 gün boyunca fermantasyonun kolaylaştırılması için depolanmıştır. Saf yem bezelyesi ile arpa ve buğday kırıkları eklenmiş silajların ham protein (%), ham kül (%), kuru madde (%), sindirilebilir kuru madde (DDM, %), kuru madde tüketimi (DMI, %), ADF (%), NDF (%), P (%), K (%), Ca (%), Mg (%), toplam sindirilebilir besin elementi içeriği (TDN), Nel, NEm, Neg, pH, Fleig Skoru ve nispi yem değeri (RFV) belirlenmiştir. Sonuçlara göre, yüksek protein ve düşük karbonhidrat içeriğine sahip olan yem bezelyesinden kaliteli bir silaj elde etmek için yüksek karbonhidratlı buğday ve arpa kırıklarının eklenmesiyle silolanabileceği belirlenmiştir. Bu amaçla, yem bezelyesi silajına en az %6 buğday kırığı veya %9 arpa kırığı eklenmesi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tahıl kırığı
• Fleig skoru
• Yem bezelyesi
• Mineral içeriği
• Silaj

Evaluating the Nutritive Value and Quality of Fodder Pea (Pisum arvense L.) Silage Added with Varying Rates of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. Em Thell) Cracks

Öz

Silage represents the most effective solution for addressing the deficit in quality, abundance and cost-effectiveness of roughage. The main purpose of silage production is to store fresh herbage material with high nutritional value with minimum nutrient loss. For fodder and silage production, fodder pea is grown in mixtures with cereals in different ratios, but also for the silage from the pure fodder pea using additives. Molasses and crashed cereal grains or cereal can be added to silage material in order to increase its carbohydrate content. The research was conducted to determine nutritive value and silage quality of barley and wheat cracks added at different ratios to fodder pea silage in complete randomized split-plot design with four replications. 100 g withered fodder pea sample without additives and 100 g withered fodder pea sample with 3 g, 6 g, 9 g and 12 g cracked barley were vacuumed in to the 20x26 cm plastic bags and were stored in a dark environment for a period of 45 days to facilitate fermentation at ambient temperatures ranging from 15 to 28°C. Crude protein (%), crude ash (%), dry matter (%), digestible dry matter (DDM, %), dry matter intake (DMI, %), ADF (%), NDF (%), P (%), K (%), Ca (%), Mg (%), total digestible nutrients (TDN), Nel, NEm, Neg, pH, Fleig Score and RFV of pure fodder pea and cracked barley and wheat added silages were determined. According to results, fodder peas, which have a high protein and low carbohydrate content, be ensiled by the addition of high-carbohydrate wheat and barley cracks in order to obtain a quality silage. For this purpose, it is suggested to add at least 6% wheat cracks or 9% barley cracks to fodder pea silage.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cereal cracks
• Fleig score
• Fodder pea
• Mineral content
• Silage

Kaynakça

1. Acar, Z. and Bostan, M. (2016). The effects of some natural additives on quality of alfalfa silage. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 31(3): 433-440. https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.269998
2. Açıkgöz, N., Akbaş, M. E., Moghaddam, A. and Özcan, K. (1994). Database-Based Turkish Statistics Program for PCs: TARIST. Turkey 1st Field Crops Congress, 25-29, April, p: 264–267, İzmir, Türkiye.
3. AOAC (2019). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 21st Ed, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, USA.
4. Ates, E. (2017). Slope aspect has effects on vegetation and forage traits of anthropogenic pasture under two grazing treatments. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía de la Universidad del Zulia, 34: 236-252.
5. Ates, E., Tenikecier, H. S. and Ozkan, U. (2020). The dry matter yield, -tocopherol, -carotene and some mineral contents in fodder pea (Pisum arvense L.) varieties at different growth stages. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie Bulgare des Sciences, 73(4): 579-586. https://doi.org/ 10.7546/CRABS.2020.04.18
6. Burgu L. and Mut, H. (2023). Silage yield and some quality traits of silage maize varieties growing as second crop. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 20 (1): 12-24. https://doi.org/10.33642/jotaf.1039381
7. Canbolat, Ö., Akbay, K. C. and Kamalak, A. (2019). Possibilities of use of molasses as carbohydrate source in pea silages. Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 22(1): 122-130. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.455713
8. Er, E. and Mut, H. (2023). Determination of silage quality of mixtures of berseem clover (Trifolium resupinatum L.) and annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) under Bilecik conditions. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7(4): 730-738. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10207729

9. Geren, H. (2001). Effect of sowing dates on silage characteristics of different maize cultivars grown as second crop under Bornova conditions. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 38: 47-54.
10. Gülümser, E., Mut, H., Başaran, U. and Çopur Doğrusöz, M. (2019). Effects of molasses or crushed barley addition on the quality of cowpea and soybean silages. BSEU Journal of Science, 6: 161-167. https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.589388
11. Heuze, V., Tran, G., Edouard, N. and Lebas, F. (2017). Maize Silage. Feedipedia, a programme by INRAE, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. https://feedipedia.org/node/13883 (Accessed Date: 01.06. 2024).
12. İleri, O., Kara, E., Erkovan, Ş., Sürmen, M., Erkovan, H. İ. and Koç, A. (2022). Silage quality of corn grown at different weed densities. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science, 3(2): 36-40. https://doi.org/10.51801/turkjrfs.1092563
13. Isaac, R. A. and Johson JR, W. C. (1998). Handbook of Reference Methods for Plant Analysis. (Ed: Kalra, Y.P.). Elemental Determination by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry. CRC Press, Washington DC, USA, 165-170.
14. Jacobs, J. L., Morris, R. J. and Zorrilla-Rios, J. (1995). Effect of ensiling whole barley grain with pasture on silage quality and effluent production, and the performance of growing cattle. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 35: 731-738.
15. Jia, T., Wang, B., Yu, Z. and Wu, Z. (2021). The effects of stage of maturity and lactic acid bacteria inoculants on the ensiling characteristics, aerobic stability and in vitro digestibility of whole-crop oat silages. Grassland Science, 67: 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12285
16. Jones, D. I. H., Jones, R. and Moseley. G. (1990). Effect of incorporating rolled barley in autumn cut ryegrass silage on effluent production, silage fermentation and cattle performance. Journal of Agricultural Science, 115: 399-408.
17. Karaevli, M. E. and Baytekin, H. (2018). Investigation of the Possibilities of Using Some Winter Annual Field Crops in Silage Production in Trakya Region. COMU Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 6: 249-254. https://doi.org/10.33202/comuagri.504361
18. Kılıç, A., 1986. Silo Feed (Production, Learning and Application Recommendations) [Silo Yemi (Üretim, Öğrenim ve Uygulama Önerileri)]. Bilgehan Basımevi, İzmir, Türkiye. (In Turkish)
19. Kılıç, A., 2010. Silo Feed [Silo Yemi]. Hasad Yayıncılık, İstanbul, Türkiye. (In Turkish)
20. Önal Aşçı, Ö. and Acar, Z. (2018). Quality in Forages [Kaba Yemlerde Kalite]. TMMOB Chamber of Agricultural Engineers, Ankara, Türkiye. (In Turkish)
21. Özdemir, M. and Okumuş, O. (2021). Some silage studies made in Turkey in the last five years. Erciyes Tarım ve Hayvan Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2): 30-39.
22. Reed, J. D. and Van Soest, P. J. (1984). Estimating the nutritive value of crop residue and agro-industrial by-products by chemical methods. Proceedings of the FAO/ILCA Expert Consultation, 5–9 March, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
23. Schroeder, J. W. (1994). Interpreting Forage Analysis. Extension Dairy Specialist (NDSU), AS-1080, North Dakota State University.
24. Tekeli, A. S. and Ates, E. (2005). Yield potential and mineral composition of white clover (Trifolium repens L.)-tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) mixtures. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 6: 27-34.
25. Tenikecier, H. S. and Ates, E. (2021). Yield, some cell wall components and mineral content of fodder pea (Pisum arvense L.) forage as influenced by cultivar, growth stages and phosphorus application. Journal of Elementology, 26(2): 319-332. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2021.26.1.2118
26. Tenikecier, H. S. and Ateş, E. (2024). Effect of adding different ratios of oat (Avena sativa L.) cracks on the silage quality of fodder pea (Pisum arvense L.). ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8: 638-646.
27. Turgut, I., Duman, A., Bilgili, U. and Acikgoz, E. (2005). Alternate row spacing and plant density effects on forage and dry matter yield of corn hybrids (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 191: 146-151.
28. Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 3583–3597.
29. Virtanen, A. I. (1993). The A. I. V. method of preserving fresh fodder. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1: 143-155.
30. Yavuz, M., İptaş, S., Ayhan, V. and Karadağ, Y. (2009). Quality of Forages and Nutritional Disorders Caused by Forages [Yem bitkilerinde Kalite ve Yem bitkilerinden Kaynaklanan Beslenme Bozuklukları]. Republic of Türkiye, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ankara, Türkiye, 163-186. (In Turkish)
31. Yıldırım, B. (2015). Silage studies in Turkey: 2005-2014. Iğdır Universtiy Journal of Institiuon of Science & Technology, 5(2): 79-88.
32. Yücel, C., Avcı, M., Kılıçalp, N. and Akkaya, M. R. (2013). The silage characteristics of legume, grasses and mixtures of siled with Lactobacillus buchneri. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 10(3): 11-18.