Development and Performance Evaluation of Peanut Threshing Machine

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2, 610 - 623, 16.03.2026

Abu Saad , Zia Haq , Tahir Iqbal , Muhammad Ansar , Tajwar Alam , Muhammad Adnan Islam , Ibrar Ahmad , Aksar Ali Khan

https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1669124

https://izlik.org/JA95SW84NJ

Öz

Peanut also called groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important oilseed and cash crop that is grown in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Nowadays, tractor mounted peanut threshers without grading systems are commonly used to thresh the harvested groundnut plants, which results in the mixing of standard quality groundnut pods with immature/dead pods, mud/clods, and other impurities. To address this challenge, the conventional thresher was incorporated with a grader. The modified thresher was evaluated during the threshing season of 2023-24 in district Rawalpindi, Pothwar region of Punjab, Pakistan. The performance of the newly developed groundnut thresher (TH₁) was compared with conventional thresher (TH₂) based on threshing productivity (capacity) (kg h-1), pod breakage percentage (%), cleaning efficiency (%), and threshing efficiency (%) at three different ranges of moisture contents viz. M₁ = 19-23%, M₂ = 14-17%, M₃ = 8-12%. Experimental data were collected and statistically analyzed at a 5% level of probability. The experimental results revealed that maximum cleaning efficiency in the improved (TH₁) and conventional (TH₂) threshers were 97.88% and 84.92% respectively at the minimum moisture content (8-12%) while the minimum pod damage percentage was observed 2.24% and 4.44% at higher moisture content (19-23%). The overall performance of improved groundnut thresher was more satisfactory than the conventional thresher based on cleaning efficiency and pod damage percentage while it performed equally for threshing productivity and threshing efficiency. From the experimental results, it reveals that the modified groundnut thresher performed better to clean and grade the groundnut pods in one operation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Groundnut grader , Standard-quality pod , Post-harvest technology , Cleaning efficiency , Pod-damage percentage

Etik Beyan

There is no need to obtain permission from the ethics committee for this study.

Proje Numarası

Nill

Kaynakça

• Adanu, E. O., Usman, E. D. and Maduako, J. N. (2015). Development and Performance Evaluation of an orange juice extractor. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 6: 362-370.
• Ajmal, U. B., Khan, M. U., Faheem, M., Tayyab, M., Majeed, M., Sarwar, A. and Mohamed, A. M. (2017). Modification and performance evaluation of a wheat thresher. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 65(5): 261-270.
• Ali, K. A. M., Zong, W., Md-Tahir, H., Ma, L. and Yang, L. (2021). Design, simulation and experimentation of an axial flow sunflower-threshing machine with an attached screw conveyor. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(14): 6312. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146312
• Al-Sharifi, S. K. A. (2018). Affecting on threshing machine types, grain moisture content, and cylinder speeds for maize, Cadiz variety. Agricultural Engineering International CIGR, 20(3): 233-244.
• Aluko, O. B., Sanni, L. A., Akingbade, T. O. and Oluwafemi, O. (2020). Effects of impurity on the efficiency of a legume threshing machine. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 16(12): 1700-1709.
• Alwagie, F. A. H. (2024). Design, fabrication and performance evaluation of wheat crop thresher for small-scale farmers. Humanities & Natural Sciences Journal, 5(1): 194-205. https://doi.org/10.53796/hnsj51/15
• Belay, D. and Fetene M. (2021). The Effect of Moisture Content on the Performance of Melkassa Multicrop Thresher in Some Cereal Crops. Bioprocess Engineering, 5(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.be.20210501.11
• Chilur, R., Sushilendra, V. P., Veeranouda, M., Yaranal, R. S., Hiregoudar, S. and Mareppa, N. B. (2014). Effect of operational parameters on dehusking cum-shelling efficiency and broken grain percentage of maize dehusker-cum sheller. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(8): 2277-8179.
• Dhliwayo, T. and Mushiri, T. (2018). Design of a groundnut harvester: Case for Zimbabwean farmers. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 27-29 September, P. 2518-2527, Washington D.C., U. S. A.
• Fashina, A. B., Saleh, A. and Akande, F.B. (2015). Development and Evaluation of a Groundnut In-Shell Grader. Agricultural Sciences, 6(2): 217-223. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2015.62021
• Husain, M., Haq, Z. U., Mahmood, H. S., Jahanzaib, M., Islam, M. A., Niazi, B. M. K., Ali, M. M., Saad, A., Khan, A. A., and Nawaz, Q. (2024). Performance Evaluation of Precision Groundnut Digger-Inverter. Agricultural Sciences Journal, 6(2): 17-26. https://doi.org/10.56520/asj.v6i2.413.
• Hussain, M., Ali, A., Masood, S. A., Saadia, Afzal, S., Afzal, A., Ch, A. U. R., Ali, B., and Ali, Q. (2020). Evaluation of optimum sowing dates for newly developed lines of groundnut in Rainfed areas of northern Punjab. International Journal of Botany Studies, 5(1): 58-61.
• Karthik, S. K., Satishkumar, S. and Basavaraj B. (2015). Development and performance evaluation of multi-crop thresher. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research (IJASR), 5(5): 313-322.
• Lupu, M. I., Padureanu, V. I. and Canja, C. M. (2015). The influence of speed compression on the maize grinding process. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series II: Forestry, Wood Industry, Agricultural Food Engineering, 8(57): 71-74.
• Magar, A. P., Bhutada, S. H., Suryawanshi, S. L. and Bombale, V. T. (2010). Performance evaluation of square beater bar type threshing drum on groundnut threshing. International Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2(2): 293-298.
• Makhliyo, S. and Rustam, M. (2022). Methods for ıncreasing the efficiency of cleaning the transfer device. Engineering 14(1): 54-61. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2022.141005
• Nasir, A., Haq, Z. U., Yasin, M., Iqbal, T., Ansar, M., Yaseen, G., Karim, F., Mirani, A. A., Saad, A., and Zaman, M. A. U. (2023). Testing of tractor mounted groundnut pods collector and its comparison with traditional method. Pure and Applied Biology, 12(1): 342-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2023.120036.
• Okonkwo, C. E., Olaniran, A., Ojediran, J. O., Olayanju, T. A., Ajao, F., and Alake, A.S. (2019). Design, development, and evaluation of locust bean seed dehuller. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 42: 1-8.
• Onemli, F. (2005). The correlation analyses of some climate values with flowering and earliness index in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 2(3): 273-281.
• Saad, A., Haq, Z. U, Raza, S. M., Islam M. A., Ahmad, I., Butt, S. J., Hussain, M., Sheraz, K., Khan, A.A., and Alam, T. (2024). Prospects and scope of Groundnut mechanization: A review. Journal of Agriculture and Food, 5(1): 53-68. https://doi.org/10.52587/JAF050104
• Sharifi, S. K., Aljibouri, M. A. and Taher, M. A. (2019). Effect of threshing machines, rotational speed and grain moisture on corn shelling. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 25(2): 24-255.
• Shubham, D., Harshawardhan, G., Adhapure, D. U., Bharat, K., and Shubham, J. (2015). Design and fabrication of groundnut pod separating machine. International Journal of Recent Research in Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2: 147-150.
• Tertsegha, I., Michael, I. and Imoter, T. (2021). Design, Construction and Performance Evaluation of a Motorised and Manually Operated Groundnut Sheller. Research Inventy: International Journal of Engineering and Science, 11(5): 10-17.
• Vennela, B., Ramana, C., Ramana, M. V., Reddy, S. J., Kalleemullah, S. and Kumari, K. L. (2018). Studies on Harvesting and Threshing Parameters of Available Tractor Operated Groundnut Digger-Shaker and Fresh Pod Thresher. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(11): 3517-3525. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.711.401
• Yilmaz, M., Sahin, C. B., Yildiz, R., and Isler, N. (2023). Determination of oil quality factors and fatty acid compositions of some peanut varieties. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 20(4): 755-764.