BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Two-Level Factor Analysis of Morphometric Characters of Honeybees Population Sampled (Apis mellifera L.) in Turkey

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 21 - 30, 01.03.2009

M. Kekeçoğlu1 G. G. Şimşek M. İ. Soysal Gürcan

https://izlik.org/JA55XN95XH

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Amssalu, B., A. Nuru, S.E. Rudolph and H.R. Hepburn, 2004. Multivariate morphometric analysis of honeybees (Apis mellifera) in the Ethiopian region. Apidologie, 35: 71-81.
  • Andere, C., C. Garcia, C. Marinelli, R. Cepeda, E.M. Rodriguez and A. Palacio, 2008. Morphometric variables of honeybees Apis mellifera used in ecotypes Ecological Modelling. (In Press). in Argentina.
  • Bentler, P.M. and E.J.C. Wu, 2002. EQS 6 for Windows user’s guide, Multivariate Software, Encino.
  • Cheung, M.W.L. and K.Au, 2005. Applications of multilevel structural equation modeling to cross- cultural research. Structural Equation Modeling. 12 (4): 598-619.
  • Bliese, P.D. and P.J. Hanges, 2004. Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though it is independent, Methods. 7, 400-417. Research
  • Dansereau, F., J.A. Alutto and F.J. Yammarino, 1984. Theory behavior: The varient approach, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. in organizational
  • Dyer, G.N., P.J. Hanges and R.J. Hall, 2005. Applying analysis techniques to the study of leadership. The leadership quarterly. 16: 149-167. factor
  • Heck, R.H.. 1999. Multilevel modeling with SEM, in Thomas S. L. and Heck R. H. (Ed.), Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Techniques. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, pp: 89-127.
  • Hofmann, D A., 1997. An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management. 23: 723-744.
  • Hox, J., 1993. Factor analysis of multilevel data: Gauging the Muthén model, in Oud J.H.L. and van Advances in longitudinal and multivariate analysis in the behavioral sciences. ITS, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, pp:141-156. (Ed.),
  • Hox, J., 2002. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Associates, Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum
  • Hox, J.J. and C.J.M Maas, 2001. The accuracy of multilevel structural equation modeling with pseudobalanced groups and small samples, Structural Equation Modeling. 8: 157-174.
  • Statistics Series, 62.
  • Muthén, B.O., 1991. Multilevel factor analysis of class and student achievement components. Journal of Educational Measurement 28(4): 338- 354.
  • Muthén, B.O., 1994. Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research 22(3): 376-398.
  • Muthén, B.O. and A. Sattora, 1989. Multilevel aspects of varying parameters in structural models, in Bock, R.D. (Ed.), Multilevel analysis of educational data. Academic, San Diego, CA, pp: 87-99.
  • Muthén, L.K. and B. O. Muthén, 2004. Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles.
  • Raudenbush, S.W. and A. S. Bryk, 2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
  • Reise, S.P, J.Ventura, K.H. Nuechterlein and K.H. Kim, 2005. An illustration of multilevel factor analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment. 84(2): 126-136.
  • Stapleton, L. M. 2006. Using multilevel structural equation modeling techniques with complex sample data, in Hancock G. R. and Mueller R. O. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: A second course. Information Age Publishing, Greenwood, CT, 345-383.

Two-Level Factor Analysis of Morphometric Characters of Honeybees Population Sampled (Apis mellifera L.) in Turkey

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 21 - 30, 01.03.2009

M. Kekeçoğlu1 G. G. Şimşek M. İ. Soysal Gürcan

https://izlik.org/JA55XN95XH

Öz

genellikle hiyerrarşik yapıdadır. Bu yapı içerisinde bal arıları farklı bölgelerde ve farklı lokasyonlarda koloniler halinde yaşarlar. Bu nedenle gözlemler arasında bağımsızlığın düşünülmesi gerçekçi değildir. Çünkü örneklenen birimler aynı bakım koşullarını ve aynı çevresel etkileri paylaşmazlar. Bu tür hiyerarşik yapıdaki verilerin analizi için çok seviyeli faktör analiz modeli önerilebilir. Bu araştırmada modeli bal arılarının morfometrik ölçüm sonuçlarına uygulayarak çok seviyeli faktör analizini basamak basamak anlatan bir model sunulmuştur. Beklenildiği gibi kanat, bacak, ve damar karakterlerinden oluşan üç factor yapısı oluşmuştur. Sonuçlar, koloniler arası ve koloni içi morfometrik faktör yapısının beklenen ile uyumlu olduğunu göstermektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Multilevel factor analysis honeybee morphometry intraclass correlation

Kaynakça

  • Amssalu, B., A. Nuru, S.E. Rudolph and H.R. Hepburn, 2004. Multivariate morphometric analysis of honeybees (Apis mellifera) in the Ethiopian region. Apidologie, 35: 71-81.
  • Andere, C., C. Garcia, C. Marinelli, R. Cepeda, E.M. Rodriguez and A. Palacio, 2008. Morphometric variables of honeybees Apis mellifera used in ecotypes Ecological Modelling. (In Press). in Argentina.
  • Bentler, P.M. and E.J.C. Wu, 2002. EQS 6 for Windows user’s guide, Multivariate Software, Encino.
  • Cheung, M.W.L. and K.Au, 2005. Applications of multilevel structural equation modeling to cross- cultural research. Structural Equation Modeling. 12 (4): 598-619.
  • Bliese, P.D. and P.J. Hanges, 2004. Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though it is independent, Methods. 7, 400-417. Research
  • Dansereau, F., J.A. Alutto and F.J. Yammarino, 1984. Theory behavior: The varient approach, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. in organizational
  • Dyer, G.N., P.J. Hanges and R.J. Hall, 2005. Applying analysis techniques to the study of leadership. The leadership quarterly. 16: 149-167. factor
  • Heck, R.H.. 1999. Multilevel modeling with SEM, in Thomas S. L. and Heck R. H. (Ed.), Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Techniques. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, pp: 89-127.
  • Hofmann, D A., 1997. An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management. 23: 723-744.
  • Hox, J., 1993. Factor analysis of multilevel data: Gauging the Muthén model, in Oud J.H.L. and van Advances in longitudinal and multivariate analysis in the behavioral sciences. ITS, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, pp:141-156. (Ed.),
  • Hox, J., 2002. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Associates, Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum
  • Hox, J.J. and C.J.M Maas, 2001. The accuracy of multilevel structural equation modeling with pseudobalanced groups and small samples, Structural Equation Modeling. 8: 157-174.
  • Statistics Series, 62.
  • Muthén, B.O., 1991. Multilevel factor analysis of class and student achievement components. Journal of Educational Measurement 28(4): 338- 354.
  • Muthén, B.O., 1994. Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research 22(3): 376-398.
  • Muthén, B.O. and A. Sattora, 1989. Multilevel aspects of varying parameters in structural models, in Bock, R.D. (Ed.), Multilevel analysis of educational data. Academic, San Diego, CA, pp: 87-99.
  • Muthén, L.K. and B. O. Muthén, 2004. Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles.
  • Raudenbush, S.W. and A. S. Bryk, 2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
  • Reise, S.P, J.Ventura, K.H. Nuechterlein and K.H. Kim, 2005. An illustration of multilevel factor analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment. 84(2): 126-136.
  • Stapleton, L. M. 2006. Using multilevel structural equation modeling techniques with complex sample data, in Hancock G. R. and Mueller R. O. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: A second course. Information Age Publishing, Greenwood, CT, 345-383.
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Yazarlar

M. Kekeçoğlu1 G. G. Şimşek M. İ. Soysal Gürcan Bu kişi benim

Gönderilme Tarihi 2 Kasım 2014
Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mart 2009
IZ https://izlik.org/JA55XN95XH
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2009 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Gürcan, M. K. G. G. Ş. M. İ. S. (2009). Two-Level Factor Analysis of Morphometric Characters of Honeybees Population Sampled (Apis mellifera L.) in Turkey. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 21-30. https://izlik.org/JA55XN95XH
AMA 1.Gürcan MKGGŞMİS. Two-Level Factor Analysis of Morphometric Characters of Honeybees Population Sampled (Apis mellifera L.) in Turkey. JOTAF. 2009;6(1):21-30. https://izlik.org/JA55XN95XH
Chicago Gürcan, M. Kekeçoğlu1 G. G. Şimşek M. İ. Soysal. 2009. “Two-Level Factor Analysis of Morphometric Characters of Honeybees Population Sampled (Apis mellifera L.) in Turkey”. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 6 (1): 21-30. https://izlik.org/JA55XN95XH.
EndNote Gürcan MKGGŞMİS (01 Mart 2009) Two-Level Factor Analysis of Morphometric Characters of Honeybees Population Sampled (Apis mellifera L.) in Turkey. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 6 1 21–30.
IEEE [1]M. K. G. G. Ş. M. İ. S. Gürcan, “Two-Level Factor Analysis of Morphometric Characters of Honeybees Population Sampled (Apis mellifera L.) in Turkey”, JOTAF, c. 6, sy 1, ss. 21–30, Mar. 2009, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA55XN95XH
ISNAD Gürcan, M. Kekeçoğlu1 G. G. Şimşek M. İ. Soysal. “Two-Level Factor Analysis of Morphometric Characters of Honeybees Population Sampled (Apis mellifera L.) in Turkey”. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 6/1 (01 Mart 2009): 21-30. https://izlik.org/JA55XN95XH.
JAMA 1.Gürcan MKGGŞMİS. Two-Level Factor Analysis of Morphometric Characters of Honeybees Population Sampled (Apis mellifera L.) in Turkey. JOTAF. 2009;6:21–30.
MLA Gürcan, M. Kekeçoğlu1 G. G. Şimşek M. İ. Soysal. “Two-Level Factor Analysis of Morphometric Characters of Honeybees Population Sampled (Apis mellifera L.) in Turkey”. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 6, sy 1, Mart 2009, ss. 21-30, https://izlik.org/JA55XN95XH.
Vancouver 1.Gürcan MKGGŞMİS. Two-Level Factor Analysis of Morphometric Characters of Honeybees Population Sampled (Apis mellifera L.) in Turkey. JOTAF [Internet]. 01 Mart 2009;6(1):21-30. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA55XN95XH