Irkların Korunmasında Moleküler İşaretler

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Irkların Korunmasında Moleküler İşaretler

Öz

azalmayı mo leküler işaretlerle en az düzeye indirmek mü mkündür, bu konuda simulasyon çalışmaları yapılmaktadır, ancak uygula mak için gerekli teknoloji henüz ço k pahalıdır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Irk, ko ru ma, koru mada öncelik, mo lekü ler işaretler, mikrosatelitle r, mt DNA

Kaynakça

1. Alderson, L. 1998. The chance to survive, Pilkington Press Ltd. 164 p.
2. Brufo rd, M. W., Brad ley, D.G., and Luikart, G. 2003. Co mple xity of Livestock Domestication. Nature Review Genetics 4: 900-910.
3. Brufo rd, M.W. and Towsend, S.J. 2004. Case studies domestication: sheep in: Zeder, M., Decke r-Walkers, D., Bradley, D., Smith, B.D (eds): Docu menting Do mestication: New genetic and archaeological pa radig ms, Ca lifornia University press. of animal
4. Die z-Tascon, C., Little john, R.P., Almeide, P.A.R.,Crawford, A.M. 2000. Genetic variation eithin the Merino sheep breed: analysis of closely related populations using microsatellites. Animal Genetics . 31: 243-251.
5. Ed ing, H., Crooijmans, R.P.M.A., Groenen M.A.M, Assessing the contribution of breeds to T.H.E. 2002. Resources Brochure (2)
6. Hiendleder, S., Kaupe, B., Wassmuthic, R., Janke, A. 2002. Molecula r analysis of wild and domestic sheep are derived from two ancestral maternal sources: no evidence for contributions from urial and argali sheep. Journal of Heredity. 89: 113-120.
7. Loftus, R. T., Ertugrul, O., Harba, A. H., El- Barody, M. A. A., Machugh, D. E., Park, S. D. E., Bradley, D. G. 1999. A microsatellite survey of cattle fro m a centre of origin: the Near East. Molecular Ecology 8: 2015–2022.
8. MacHugh, D.E., Lo ftus, R.T., Bradley, D.G., Sharp, P.M ., Microsatellites DNA variation within and among European cattle breeds. Procedings of Royal Society London B. 256: 25-31.

9. MacHugh, D.E., Shriver, M .D., Loftus, R.T., Cunningham, P., Brad ley, D.G. 1997. Microsatellite DNA variat ion and the evolution, phylogeography of taurin and zebu cattle (Bos taurus and Bos Indicus). Genetics 146: 1076-1086. and
10. Pritchard, J.K., Stephens, M., Donneşy, P. 2000. Inference of population structure using microsatellite genotype data. Genetics. 155: 155: 945-959.
11. Roosen, J., Fad laoui, A., Bertaglia, M. 2003. Economic evaluation and biodiversity conservation of anima l genetic resources (http://www.food-econ.uni-kiel.de).
12. Simianer, H., Marti, S.B., Gibson, J., Hanotte, O., Rege, J.E.O. 2003. An approach to the optima l a llocation of conservation funds to minimize loss of genetic diversity in
13. livestock breeds. Ecological Economics 45: 377- 392.
14. Troy, C.S., Mac Hugh, D.E., Ba lley, J.F., Magee, D.A., Lo ftus, T.R., Cunningham, P., Cha mberlain, A.T., Sykes, B.C., Bradley, D. G. 2001. Genetic evidance for Near- Eastern orig ins of European cattle. Nature. 410: 1088-1091.
15. Toro, M., Silio, L., Rodriganez J., Rodriguez, C. 1998. The use of molecular marke rs in conservation programs of live anima ls. Genetics Selection Evolution 30:585-600.
16. Wang, J and Hill, W.G. 2000. Ma rke r-Assisted Selection to Increase Effective Population Size by Reducing Mendelian Segregation Variance. Weitzman, S. 1992. On d iversity. The Quarterly Journal of Econo mics 107: 363- 405. 154: 475– 489.