Precision Feeding in Laying Hens by Sound Technology

Öz

In this study, a sound algorithm was used to define the pecking sounds of laying hens. Furthermore, the relation between pecking sounds and feed intake of chickens was investigated to assess environmental impacts of precision feeding. The pecking sounds of 24 laying hens (Lohmann Brown) were recorded during 15 minutes by a microphone. Simultaneously, feed uptake quantity was automatically recorded using a weighing scale. The results demonstrate that 94% of the pecking sounds were correctly identified by the developed sound analysis method, whereas 6% of the identification results were false positives. Furthermore, a linear regression test was applied to define the coefficient of determination between the number of peckings and feed uptake and the number of peckings and feed intake of the birds, which respectively resulted in (R² = 0.993 and 0.991). Additionally, 91% of feed intake was correctly monitored using the proposed sound detection system. Furthermore, the results of the proposed system were compared to the results of reference method in this case a weighing system measurements. Since strong correlations (R² = 0.991) were found between the number of peckings and feed intake of laying hens on the one hand and between the results of algorithm and reference methods on the other hand, the results showed that the proposed system has a big potential to be used to monitor the feed intake and feed wastage of laying hens. 

Kaynakça

1. Aydin, A., C. Bahr, S. Viazzi, V. Exadaktylos, D. Berckmans, 2014. A novel method to automatically measure the feed intake of broiler chickens by sound technology. Comput Electron Agr, 101, 17-23.
2. Capper, F. 2011. Myths Misperceptions Relating to Livestock’s Environmental Impact. In: Agricultural Decision-Making with a Water and Climate Change Perspective Lincoln City, NE, pp. 4–7.
3. Carter, S. D., H. J. Kim, 2013. Technologies to reduce environmental impact of animal wastes associated with feeding for maximum productivity. Anim Front, 3: 3: 42-47.
4. Exadaktylos V, M. Silva, J. M. Aerts, C. J. Taylor, D. Berckmans, 2008. Real-time recognition of sick pig cough sounds. Comput Electron Agr, 63 207–214.
5. FAO, 2009. The state of food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.
6. FAO, 2011. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. World Livestock.
7. Gates, R. S., L. W. Turner, H. Chi, J. Usry, 1995. Automated weighing of group-housed growing–finishing swine. T ASAE, 38 (5), 1479–1486.
8. Gates, R. S. and H. Xin, 2001. Comparative analysis of measurement techniques of feeding and drinking behaviour of individual poultry subjected to warm environmental condition. ASAE International Meeting, Sacramento.

9. Gates, R. S. and H. Xin, 2008. Extracting poultry behaviour from time-series weigh scale records. Comput Electron Agr, 62 (1), 8–14.
10. Hulsey, M.G. and R. J. Martin, 1991. A system for automated recording and analysis of feeding behavior. Physiol Behav, 50 (2), 403–408.
11. Kutlu, H. R. and J. M. Forbes, 2000. Effects of environmental temperature and dietary ascorbic acid on the diurnal feeding pattern of broilers. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 24 (5), 479-491.
12. Leroy, T., E. Vranken, E. Struelens, F. Tuyttens, B. Sonck, M. Cox, K. De Baere, J. Zoons, J. Buyse, D. Berckmans, 2005. Computer vision based recognition of behaviour phenotypes of laying hens. ASAE Annual meeting. Florida, 17-20 July 2005.
13. Persyn, K. E., H. Xin, D. Nettleton, A. Ikeguchi, R. S. Gates, 2004. Feeding behaviour of laying hens with or without beak trimming. T ASAE, 47 (2), 591–596.
14. Puma, M. C., H. Xin, R. S. Gates, D. J. Burnham, 2001. An instrumentation system for studying feeding and drinking behaviour of individual poultry. Appl Eng Agric, 17 (3), 365–374.
15. Savory, C.J. and J. S. Mann, 1999. Stereotyped pecking after feeding by restricted-fed fowls is influenced by meal size. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, 62 (2–3), 209–217.
16. Xin, H., I. L. Berry, T. L. Barton, G. T. Tabler, 1993. Feeding and drinking patterns of broilers subjected to different feeding and lighting programs. Appl. Poultry Res, 2 (4), 365–372.
17. Xuyong, T., D. Shuxin, L. Tang, X. Hongwei, B. Wood, 2011. A real-time automated system for monitoring individual feed intake and body weight of group housed turkeys. Comput Electron Agr, 75 313–320.
18. Yo, T., M. Vilarino, J. M. Faure, M. Picard, 1997. Feeding pecking in young chickens: new techniques of evaluation. Physiol Behav, 61 (6), 803–810.