Evaluating the Total Factor Productivity of Smallholder Cassava Farmers based on Socio-economic Variables, Cost and Revenue in Southwest, Nigeria

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 3, 693 - 703, 29.09.2025

Oluwakemi Oduntan

https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1467800

Öz

The nation's low productivity in producing food crops is a reflection of inefficiency and the use of antiquated technology, which further impedes attempts to make sustainable progress in food production and availability. This study used a structured questionnaire to gather cross-sectional data from 360 cassava-based farmers who were randomly selected using a multi-stage sampling method. The goal of the questionnaire was to estimate the Total Factor Productivity (TFP) of productive resources used in cassava-based farms in South-West Nigeria. Descriptive and inferential statistics, the gross margin and the total factor productivity index were used to assess the data. The results showed that the majority (82.2%) of cassava farmers were male and they were within the active age group given a mean of 47.9years with a mean household size of 6 persons. About 87.2% of the farmers were married and had an average farming experience of 13years while about 58.3% of them had secondary education. The cassava farmers had an average farm size of 3.4ha and many (72.2%) of them had no access to credit. According to the summary statistics on total factor productivity, 66.9% of farmers produced at high levels, with their total factor productivity indices being above the optimal range. It was discovered that a number of factors significantly influenced the productivity of cassava-based farmers, including age, gender, marital status, farming experience, farm size, access to financing, availability of extension agents, membership in a cooperative association, and total household income. It was also found that cassava-based production was a profitable enterprise and that the total variable cost, total cost, gross margin, profitability ratio, efficiency ratio, income expenditure ratio and return on investment were significant in determining the level of productivity of farmers. There was a significant difference between the socio-economic characteristics of farmers who had low productivity and farmers who had high productivity. As a result, the report advises that the government give farmers with subsidized inputs such as agrochemicals and fertilizer, as well as loan facilities, to help farmers raise their scale of output and productivity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cassava-based , Factor-productivity , Profitability , Small-holder farmers , Southwest

Etik Beyan

There is no need to obtain permission from the ethics committee for this study.

Destekleyen Kurum

Barcelona School of Economics and Federal University of Technology, Akure

Teşekkür

I would like to thank the Women for Africa Foundation in Spain for giving financial support for this project. I would also like to thank Prof Teresa Garcia-Mila, Director of the Barcelona School of Economics and Professor Gianmarco Leon Ciliotta for their assistance in the execution of this work. JEL codes: B21, B23, C01, E23, Q12.

Kaynakça

• Adebayo, A., Ayodeji, K., Akeem, T., Adeolu, A., Felicia, A., Victoria, T., Ayodeji, O. and Temitope, O. (2023). Impact of membership in agricultural cooperatives on yield of smallholder tomato farmers in Nigeria. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 20(2023): 1-9.
• Adebayo, O., Opeyemi, O., Jacob, A., Mayokun, O., Mistura, R. and Omotayo, A. O. (2020). Resource-Use efficiency and production constraints among cassava farmers in Nigeria: Insight, linkage and pathway. The Journal of Developing Areas, 54(4): 48-60.
• Adebayo, W. G. (2023). Cassava production in africa: A panel analysis of the drivers and trends. Heliyon, 9(9): e19939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19939.
• Adeolu, A. (2019). Climate change and population dynamics in Southwest Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology, 13(5): 39-50. https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-1305023950
• Ajayi, C. O. and Olutumise, A. I. (2018). Determinants of food security and technical efficiency of cassava farmers in Ondo State, Nigeria. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 21(7): 915–928.
• Akhilomen, G. M., Bivan, S. A., Rahman, S. A. and Sanni, E. (2015). Economic efficiency analysis of pineapple production in Edo State, Nigeria: A Stochastic Frontier Production Approach. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 5(3): 267-280. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEA/2015/13488
• Audu, S. I., Otitolaiye, J. O. and Ibitoye, S. J. (2013). A stochastic frontier approach to measurement of cost efficiency in small-scale cassava production in Kogi State, Nigeria. European Science Journal, 9 (9): 114-122. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2013.v9n9p%25p
• Bradshaw, T. K. (2006). Theories of poverty and anti-poverty programs in community development. Community Development, 38(1): 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330709490182
• Eze, A. V. and Nwibo, S. U. (2014). Economic and technical efficiency of cassava production in Ika North East Local Government Area of Delta State, Nigeria. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 6(10): 429-436.
• Falola, A., Mukaila, R., Abdulhamid, K. O. (2022). Informal finance: its drivers and contributions to farm investment among rural farmers in Northcentral Nigeria. Agricultural Finance Review, 82(5): 942-959.
• FAO (2018). Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. Save and Grow: Cassava, A guide to sustainable production and intensification. Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/3/ca2320en/CA2320EN.pdf. (Accessed Date: 14.02.2024)
• FAOSTAT (2019). Food and Agriculture Data. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/. (Accessed Date: 25.01.2024)
• Gbigbi, T. M. (2021). Technical efficiency and profitability of cassava production in Delta State: A stochastic frontier production function analysis. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty. 18(1): 21-31. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.693249
• HarvestPlus (2016). Households Reached. Nigeria data-base 2015. www.harvestplusng/data Ikuemonisan, E. S., Mafimisebi, T. E., Ajibefun, I. and Adenegan, K. (2020). Cassava production in Nigeria: trends, instability and decomposition analysis (1970–2018). Heliyon, 6(10): e05089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05089.
• Ionescu, R. V., Zlati, M. L., Antohi, V. M., Fortea, C., Petrea, S. M. and Cristea, D. S. (2022). Analysis of the dynamics of productive performance of organic farming in the European Union. Agronomy, 12(5): 1052. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12051052
• Jimi, N. A., Nikolov, P. V., Malek, M. A. and Kumbhakar, S. (2019). The effects of access to credit on productivity: separating technological changes from changes in technical efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 52(1): 37–55.
• Katz, S. H. and Weaver, W. W. (2020). Cassava Encyclopedia of Food and Culture, Schribner, New York, U.S.A. Kintché, K., Hauserb, S., Mahungua, N. M., Ndondaa, A., Lukomboa, S., Nhamoc, N., Uzokwed, V. N. E., Yomenie, M., Ngamitsharaf, J., Ekokog, B., Mbalaf, M., Akemb, C., Pypersh, P., Matungulua, K. P., Kehbilaa, A. and Vanlauwe, B. (2017). Cassava yield loss in farmer fields was mainly caused by low soil fertility and suboptimal management practices in two provinces of the Democratic Republic of Congo. European Journal of Agronomy, 89: 107–123.
• Lawal, A. L., Adekunle, V. A. J. and Onokpise, O. U. (2016). Biosystematics, morphological variability and status of the Genus Khaya in South West Nigeria. Applied Tropical Agriculture, 21(1): 159-166.
• Mukaila, R., Obetta, A. E. and Ogbu, M. C. (2022). Profitability of melon processing among women in Enugu State, Nigeria. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 19(3): 621-631. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1049260
• Nirere, M. (2022). Do social protection cash transfers reduce poverty in Rwanda? Evidence from an econometric analysis of Vision Umurenge Program Direct Support, African Development Review, 34(1): 114-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12618
• Ogbuene, E., Nwobodo, T., Aloh, O., Emeka, A., Ogbuka, J., Ozorme, V., Oroke, A., Okolo, O., Obianuju, A. and Enemuo, A. (2024). Application of predictive model for efficient cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) yield in the face of climate variability in Enugu State, Nigeria. American Journal of Climate Change, 13(2): 361-389. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2024.132017
• Okebiorun, E. O., Maikasuwa, M. A., Ala, A. L. and Atiku, A. (2018). Resource-use efficiency among cassava farmers in Ilesa West Local Government Area of Osun State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 25(4): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJAEES/2018/40578
• Okorie, O. J., Okon, U. E., and Enete, A. A. (2021). Profit efficiency analysis of cassava production in Enugu State, Nigeria. Journal for the Advancement of Developing Economies, 10(1): 37-51.
• Oladeebo, J. O. and Oluwaranti, A. S. (2014). Profit efficiency among cassava producers: Empirical evidence from Southwestern Nigeria. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 19 (12): 1566-1572. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2014.19.12.11428
• Olagunju, O. O. (2022). Socio-economic determinants of climate variability adaptation strategies among farmers in Akoko southwest local government of Ondo State, Nigeria. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 22(4): 487-495.
• Olarinde, L. O., Abass, A. B., Abdoulaye, T., Adepoju, A. A., Adio, M. O., Fanifosi, E. G. and Awoyale, W. (2020). The influence of social networking on food security status of cassava farming households in Nigeria. Sustainability, 12(13): 5420. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135420
• Olujumoke, A. O., Folorunso, M. A., Valerie, G. and Christian, B. (2016). Descriptive analysis of rainfall and temperature trends over Akure, Nigeria. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 9(11): 195-202. https://doi.org/10.5897/JGRP2016.0583
• Oluwafemi, Z. O., Omonona, B. T., Adepoju, A. O. and Sowunmi, F. A. (2019). Cassava productivity growth in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry, 4 (2): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajraf/2019/v4i230059
• Oluwatayo, I. B. and Taiwo, A. A. (2019). Comparative analysis of technical efficiency of catfish farms using different technologies in Lagos State, Nigeria: A data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Agriculture and Food Security, 8: 1–9.
• Oluwatoba, J., Omotilewa, T. S., Jayne, M. M., Adebayo, B., Aromolaran, L. S. O. and Liverpool-Tasie, T. A. (2021). A revisit of farm size and productivity: Empirical evidence from a wide range of farm sizes in Nigeria, World Development, 146: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105592
• Osun, T., Ogundijo, S. D. and Bolarinwa, K. O. (2014). Technical efficiency analysis of cassava production in Nigeria: Implication for increased productivity and competitiveness. Research Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Management, 3(11): 569-576.
• Oyetunde-Usman, Z. and Olagunju, K. O. (2019). Determinants of food security and technical efficiency among agricultural households in Nigeria. Economies, 7(4):103. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies7040103
• Pilo, M. (2019). Dynamics of agricultural productivity and technical efficiency in Togo: The Role of TechnologicalChange. African Development Review, 31 (4): 462-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12403
• Sadiq, M. S., Singh, I. P., Ahmad, M. M. and Lawal, M. (2019). Total factor productivity of productive resources used in homestead poultry broiler farms in Niger State of Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 64(1): 101-119. https://doi.org/10.2298/JAS1901101S
• Sanusi, R. O., Lordbanjou, D., Ibrahim, A. O., Abubakar, M. B. and Oke, O. O. (2022). Cassava Production Enterprise in The Tropics. In: Muhammad Khan (Ed.), Tropical Plant Species. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.104677.
• Thakur, B. R., Sharma, D. D. and Mohan, P. (2014). Dynamics of agricultural production in Himachal Pradesh, India. In: R.B. Singh and R. Hietala (Eds) livelihood security in Northwestern Himalayas: Case studies from changing socio-economic environments in Himachal Pradesh, India. Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Tokyo, Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54868-3_6 Pp 67-82.