Genome-Wide Analysis of the Cation ATPase Gene Family in Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)

Öz

Musca domestica L. is a significant pest threatening human and animal health by transmitting pathogens and causing substantial economic losses. Widespread resistance to traditional insecticides necessitates the discovery of novel molecular targets for vector control. The Cation ATPase gene family, essential for fundamental physiological processes such as cellular homeostasis, nerve impulse transmission, and osmoregulation, represents a promising target. This study presents a comprehensive genome-wide analysis identifying 36 Cation ATPase genes across the genomes of M. domestica, Aedes albopictus, and Drosophila melanogaster. Gene structures, conserved motifs, and physicochemical properties were thoroughly characterized. Comparative phylogenetic analyses elucidated their evolutionary history and structural divergence. Furthermore, 3D structural modeling, protein-protein interaction networks, and Gene Ontology enrichment analyses were utilized to evaluate their functional properties. In silico annotations indicate that this family plays critical roles in calcium and metal ion homeostasis, alongside the transmembrane transport of inorganic cations. Domain analyses confirmed the presence of P-type ATPase domains, strongly indicating their active participation in processes such as cytosolic calcium regulation. Providing the first comprehensive analysis of the Cation ATPase family in M. domestica, this research establishes a baseline framework for developing innovative and sustainable vector control strategies targeting these genes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Musca domestica
• Cation ATPase
• Gene family
• Bioinformatic tools.

KATYON ATPaz GEN AİLESİNİN Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)’DA GENOM ÇAPINDA ANALİZİ

Öz

Musca domestica L., patojenleri taşıyarak insan ve hayvan sağlığını tehdit eden ve önemli ekonomik kayıplara neden olan önemli bir zararlıdır. Geleneksel insektisitlere karşı yaygın direnç gelişimi, vektör kontrolü için yeni moleküler hedeflerin keşfedilmesini gerekli kılmaktadır. Hücresel homeostaz, sinir impuls iletimi ve osmoregülasyon gibi temel fizyolojik süreçlerde kritik rol oynayan Katyon ATPaz gen ailesi, umut verici bir hedef olarak öne çıkmaktadır.Bu çalışmada, M. domestica, Aedes albopictus ve Drosophila melanogaster genomlarında toplam 36 Katyon ATPaz geninin tanımlandığı kapsamlı bir genom çapında analiz sunulmaktadır. Gen yapıları, korunmuş motifler ve fizikokimyasal özellikler ayrıntılı olarak karakterize edilmiştir. Karşılaştırmalı filogenetik analizler, bu genlerin evrimsel geçmişini ve yapısal farklılaşmasını ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, 3 boyutlu yapısal modelleme, protein-protein etkileşim ağları ve Gen Ontolojisi zenginleştirme analizleri kullanılarak fonksiyonel özellikleri değerlendirilmiştir.In silico anotasyonlar, bu gen ailesinin kalsiyum ve metal iyon homeostazında, ayrıca inorganik katyonların transmembran taşınmasında kritik roller üstlendiğini göstermektedir. Domain analizleri, P-tipi ATPaz domainlerinin varlığını doğrulayarak bu proteinlerin sitozolik kalsiyum düzenlenmesi gibi süreçlerde aktif rol aldığını güçlü şekilde ortaya koymaktadır.M. domestica’da Katyon ATPaz gen ailesine yönelik ilk kapsamlı analizi sunan bu çalışma, bu genleri hedef alan yenilikçi ve sürdürülebilir vektör kontrol stratejilerinin geliştirilmesi için temel bir çerçeve oluşturmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Musca domestica
• Katyon ATPaz
• Gen ailesi
• Biyoinformatik araçlar

Kaynakça

1. [1] Khamesipour, F., Bagheri Lankarani, K., Honarvar, B., & Kwenti, T. E. (2018). A systematic review of human pathogens carried by the housefly (Musca domestica L.). BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1049. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5934- 3
2. [2] Shehata, A., El-Waseif, A., Waheeb, H. O., Emam, D. E. M., D.E. (2024). Abundance and molecular identification of house fly Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) with study to associated pathogenic bacteria. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences. https://doi.org/10.55251/ jmbfs.10580
3. [3] Geden, C. J., Nayduch, D., Scott, J. G., Burgess, E. R., Gerry, A. C., Kaufman, P. E., Thomson, J., Pickens, V., & Machtinger, E. T. (2021). House Fly (Diptera: Muscidae): Biology, pest status, current management prospects, and research needs. Journal of Integrated Pest Management, 12(1), 39. https://doi. org/10.1093/jipm/pmaa021
4. [4] Hafez, A. M., & Abbas, N. (2023). Biological fitness cost, demographic growth characteristics, and resistance mechanism in alpha-cypermethrin-resistant Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Biology, 12(7), 1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ biology12071021
5. [5] Li, M., Feng, X., Reid, W. R., Tang, F., & Liu, N. (2023). Multiple-P450 gene co-up-regulation in the development of permethrin resistance in the house fly, Musca domestica. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(4), 3170. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043170
6. [6] Abbas, N., & Hafez, A. M. (2021). Resistance to insect growth regulators and age-stage, two-sex life table in Musca domestica from different dairy facilities. PLoS ONE, 16(4), e0248693. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248693
7. [7] Wang, W., Tang, W., Wang, X., Liu, W., & Zhu, F. (2022). Genes from Carboxypeptidase A, glutathione S-transferase, and cytochrome b families were found involved in lead transport in insect Musca domestica. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 230, 113113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecoenv.2021.113113
8. [8] Corzo-Gómez, J. C., Espinosa-Juárez, J. V., Ovando- Zambrano, J. C., Briones-Aranda, A., Cruz-Salomón, A., & Esquinca-Avilés, H. A. (2024). A review of botanical extracts with repellent and insecticidal activity and their suitability for managing mosquito-borne disease risk in Mexico. Pathogens, 13(9), 737. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13090737

9. [9] Guo, Z.-b., Ma, Z.-q., Feng, J.-t., & Zhang, X. (2009) Inhibition of Na+,K+-ATPase in housefly (Musca domestica L.) by terpinen-4-ol and its ester derivatives. Agricultural Sciences in China, 8(12), 1492–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1671- 2927(08)60363-6
10. [10] Nisar, M. S., Ismail, M. A., Ramzan, H., Maqbool, M. M., Ahmad, T., Ghramh, H. A., Khalofah, A., Kmet, J., Horvát, M., & Farooq, S. (2021). The impact of different plant extracts on biological parameters of housefly [Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae)]: Implications for management. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28(7), 3880–3885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sjbs.2021.03.070
11. [11] Blum, M., Andreeva, A., Florentino, L. C., Chuguransky, S. R., Grego, T., Hobbs, E., Pinto, B. L., Orr, A., Paysan-Lafosse, T., Ponamareva, I., Salazar, G. A., Bordin, N., Bork, P., Bridge, A., Colwell, L., Gough, J., Haft, D. H., Letunic, I., Llinares- López, F., Marchler-Bauer, A., Meng-Papaxanthos, L., Mi, H., Natale, D. A., Orengo, C. A., Pandurangan, A. P., Piovesan, D., Rivoire, C., Sigrist, C. J. A., Thanki, N., Thibaud-Nissen, F., Thomas, P. D., Tosatto, S. C. E., Wu, C. H., & Bateman, A. (2025). InterPro: The protein sequence classification resource in 2025. Nucleic Acids Research, 53(D1), D444–D456. https://doi. org/10.1093/nar/gkae1082
12. [12] Chen, X. G., Jiang, X., Gu, J., Xu, M., Wu, Y., Deng, Y., ... & James, A. A. (2015). Genome sequence of the Asian Tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus, reveals insights into its biology, genetics, and evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(44), E5907–E5915. https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1516410112
13. [13] Scott, J. G., Warren, W. C., Beukeboom, L. W., Bopp, D., Clark, A. G., Giers, S. D., ... & Liu, N. (2014). Genome of the house fly, Musca domestica L., a global vector of diseases with adaptations to a septic environment. Genome Biology, 15(10), 466. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0466-3
14. [14] Adams, M. D., Celniker, S. E., Holt, R. A., Evans, C. A., Gocayne, J. D., Amanatides, P. G., Scherer, S. E., Li, P. W., Hoskins, R. A., Galle, R. F., George, R. A., Lewis, S. E., Richards, S., Ashburner, M., Henderson, S. N., Sutton, G. G., Wortman, J. R., Yandell, M. D., Zhang, Q., ... Venter, J. C. (2000). The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science, 287(5461), 2185–2195. https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.287.5461.2185
15. [15] Yang, M., Dong, J., Tang, S., Chen, X., Chen, H., Duanmu, H., Cong, Y., Chen, M., Ye, X., Zhou, H., He, K., & Li, F. (2022). InsectBase 2.0: A comprehensive gene resource for insects. Nucleic Acids Research, 50(D1), D1040–D1045. https://doi. org/10.1093/nar/gkab1090
16. [16] Letunic, I., Khedkar, S., & Bork, P. (2021). SMART: Recent updates, new developments and status in 2020. Nucleic Acids Research, 49(D1), D458-D460. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/ gkaa937
17. [17] Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994). CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positionspecific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22(22), 4673–4680. https://doi.org/10.1093/ nar/22.22.4673
18. [18] Letunic, I., & Bork, P. (2024). Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: Recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Research, 52(W1), W78–W82. https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKAE268
19. [19] Wilkins, M. R., Gasteiger, E., Bairoch, A., Sanchez, J. C., Williams, K. L., Appel, R. D., & Hochstrasser, D. F. (1999). Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server. Methods in Molecular Biology, 112, 531–552. https://doi. org/10.1385/1-59259-584-7:531
20. [20] Hu, B., Jin, J., Guo, A. Y., Zhang, H., Luo, J., & Gao, G. (2015). GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics, 31(8), 1296–1297. https://doi.org/10.1093/ BIOINFORMATICS/BTU817
21. [21] Turan, M. (2023). Genome-wide analysis and characterization of HSP gene families (HSP20, HSP40, HSP60, HSP70, HSP90) in the yellow fever mosquito (Aedes aegypti) (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Insect Science, 23(6), 27. https:// doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iead114
22. [22] Bailey, T. L., Johnson, J., Grant, C. E., & Noble, W. S. (2015). The MEME Suite. Nucleic Acids Research, 43(W1), W39–W49. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv416
23. [23] Powell, H. R., Islam, S. A., David, A., & Sternberg, M. J. E. (2025). Phyre2.2: A community resource for templatebased protein structure prediction. Journal of Molecular Biology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jmb.2025.168960
24. [24] Szklarczyk, D., Kirsch, R., Koutrouli, M., Nastou, K., Mehryary, F., Hachilif, R., Gable, A. L., Fang, T., Doncheva, N. T., Pyysalo, S., Bork, P., Jensen, L. J., & von Mering, C. (2023). The STRING database in 2023: Protein–protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Research, 51(D1), D638– D646. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1000
25. [25] Axelsen, K. B., & Palmgren, M. G. (1998). Evolution of substrate specificities in the P-type ATPase superfamily. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 46(1), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/ PL00006286
26. [26] Palmgren, M. G., & Nissen, P. (2011). P-type ATPases. Annual Review of Biophysics, 40,243–266. https://doi. org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.093008.131331
27. [27] Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000). The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science, 290(5494), 1151–1155. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5494.1151
28. [28] Ohno, S. (1970). Evolution by gene duplication. Springer- Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86659-3
29. [29] Koonin, E. V., Wolf, Y. I., & Karev, G. P. (2002). The structure of the protein universe and genome evolution. Nature, 420(6912), 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01256
30. [30] Ikai, A. (1980). Thermostability and aliphatic index of globular proteins. Journal of Biochemistry, 88(6), 1895–1898. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a133168
31. [31] Patthy, L. (1999). Genome evolution and the evolution of exon-shuffling: A review. Gene, 238(1), 103–114. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00228-0
32. [32] Roy, S. W., & Gilbert, W. (2006). The evolution of spliceosomal introns: Patterns, puzzles and progress. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7(3), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nrg1807
33. [33] Kondrashov, F. A. (2012). Gene duplication as a mechanism of genomic adaptation to a changing environment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1749), 5048– 5057.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.1108
34. [34] Szklarczyk, D., Gable, A. L., Lyon, D., Junge, A., Wyder, S., Huerta-Cepas, J., … Morris, J. H. (2019). STRING v11: Protein–protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Research, 47(D1), D607–D613. https:// doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1131
35. [35] Chan, H., Babayan, V., Blyumin, E., Gandhi, C., Hak, K., Harake, D., Kumar, K., Lee, P., Li, T. T., Liu, H. Y., Lo, T. C. T., Meyer, C. J., Stanford, S., Zamora, K. S., & Saier, M. H., Jr. (2010). The P-type ATPase superfamily. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, 19(1–2), 5–104.https://doi. org/10.1159/000319588
36. [36] Brini, M., & Carafoli, E. (2009). Calcium pumps in health and disease. Physiological Reviews, 89(4), 1341-1378.https:// doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00032.2008
37. [37] Guerini, D., Coletto, L., & Carafoli, E. (2005). Exporting calcium from cells. Cell Calcium, 38(3-4), 281-289.https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ceca.2005.06.032
38. [38] Davies, T. G. E., Field, L. M., Usherwood, P. N. R., & Williamson, M. S. (2007). DDT, pyrethrins, pyrethroids and insect sodium channels. IUBMB Life, 59(3), 151-162. https:// doi.org/10.1080/15216540701352042
39. [39] Toyoshima, C., & Nomura, H. (2002). Structural changes in the calcium pump accompanying the dissociation of calcium. Nature, 418(6898), 605-611.
40. [40] Bublitz, M., Morth, J. P., & Nissen, P. (2011). P-type ATPases at a glance. Journal of Cell Science, 124(15), 2515- 2519.https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.088716
41. [41] Sanyal, S., Consoulas, C., Kuromi, H., Basole, A., Mukai, L., Kidokoro, Y., Krishnan, K. S., & Ramaswami, M. (2005). Analysis of conditional paralytic mutants in Drosophila sarco-endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase reveals novel mechanisms for regulating membrane excitability. Genetics, 169(2), 737–750. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.031930