GELECEK KAYGISI VE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TÜKETİM BİLİNCİNİN MARKA TUTUMU VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ: ARÇELİK ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

Dünyada yıllarca yaşanan aşırı tüketim eğilimi, doğal çevrenin yıpranmasına sebep verdiğinden insanoğluna büyük bir tehdit oluşturmaktadır. Söz konusu tahribatın her geçen gün artıyor olmasının olumsuz sonuçları günümüzde iyice hissedilir hale gelmiştir. Covid-19 salgını, iklim krizi, vb., felaketler tüketicilerde eskiden olmadığı kadar fazla bir şekilde gelecek kaygısı yaratmaya başlamış ve buna bağlı olarak sürdürülebilirlik konusunda daha duyarlı hale gelmelerine sebep olmuştur. Tüketicilerin sürdürülebilirlik konusundaki beklentileri sadece devlet ve işletmeler ile sınırlı kalmamış, ayrıca kendi bireysel tüketimlerini ve yaşam tarzlarını da gözden geçirmelerine sebep olmuştur. Tüm bunlar dikkate alındığında gelecek kaygısının akademik çalışmalarda yeterince ele alınmamış olması şaşırtıcı bir durumdur. Gelecek kaygısının ayrıca tüketim, marka tutumu ve satın alma niyeti ile ilişkilerinin incelenmemiş olması literatürde büyük bir boşluk yaratmaktadır. Buradan hareketle çalışmanın amacı, gelecek kaygısının sürdürülebilir tüketim bilincine ve her ikisinin marka tutumu ve satın alma niyetine etkilerinin incelenmesidir. Çalışmada 414 Arçelik kullanıcısı üzerinden kolayda örnekleme yoluyla, çevrimiçi anket uygulanarak veri toplanmıştır. Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi analizi sonucuna göre gelecek kaygısının sürdürülebilir tüketim bilinci üzerinde, sürdürülebilir tüketim bilincinin marka tutumu üzerinde, marka tutumunun ise satın alma niyeti üzerinde anlamlı etkileri bulunmuş fakat gelecek kaygısı ve sürdürülebilir tüketim bilincinin satın alma niyeti üzerinde doğrudan bir etkisi saptanmamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• gelecek kaygısı
• sürdürülebilirlik
• sürdürülebilir tüketim bilinci
• marka tutumu
• satın alma niyeti

THE EFFECT OF FUTURE ANXIETY AND CONSCIOUSNESS FOR SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION ON BRAND ATTITUDE AND PURCHASE INTENTION: ARÇELİK EXAMPLE

Öz

For years excessive consumption by people has caused environmental damage which in turn has become a great threat to humankind. As the depletion of resources continue to increase year after year, its negative outcomes are becoming even more apparent in recent times. The Covid-19 pandemic, the climate crisis, etc has increased the future anxiety of people and hence has caused everyone to be more aware of the issue of sustainability. The expectations of consumers about sustainability is not only limited to the actions of the governments and firms but also leads many to evaluate their own individual consumption patterns and life styles as well. Taking all of these into consideration it is surprising that future anxiety has not received enough attention in academic studies. Moreover, its effects on consumption, brand attitude and purchase intention has not been examined causing a major gap in literature. Thus the aim of this study is to assess the effect of future anxiety on consciousness for sustainable consumption and their effects on brand attitude and purchase intention. Convenience sampling and online survey method were used and a total of 414 surveys from Arçelik users were collected. The result of Structural Equation Modelling analysis shows that future anxiety has a significant effect on consciousness for sustainable consumption, consciousness for sustainable consumption has a significant effect on brand attitude and brand attitude has a significant effect on purchase intention. However, future anxiety and consciousness for sustainable consumption do not have any direct effects on purchase intention.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• future anxiety
• sustainability
• consciousness for sustainable consumption
• brand attitude
• purchase intention

Kaynakça

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
2. Alemi, M., Meghdari, A. & Ghazisaedy, M. (2014). Employing Humanoid Robots for Teaching English Language in Iranian Junior High-Schools, International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 11(3), 1-25.
3. Algie, J. & Rossiter, J. R. (2010) Fear Patterns: A New Approach to Designing Road Safety Advertisements, Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 38(4), 264-279.
4. Arçelik A.Ş. Sürdürebilirlik Raporu (2017). https://kurumsalsurdurulebilirlik.com/raporlar/arcelik-a-s-surdurebilirlik-raporu-2017.
5. Bagozzi, R.P. & Baumgartner, H. (1994), The Evaluation of Structural Equation Models and Hypothesis Testing. İçinde Bagozzi, R.P. (Ed.). Principles of Marketing Research. Cambridge, İngiltere: Blackwell, 386–422.
6. Bagozzi, R.P. (1994) (Ed.). Principles of Marketing Research. Cambridge, İngiltere: Blackwell.
7. Bagozzi, R.P. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.
8. Balderjahn, I., Buerke, A., Kirchgeorg, M., Peyer, M., Seegebarth, B. & Wiedmann, K. P. (2013). Consciousness for Sustainable Consumption: Scale Development and New Insights in the Economic Dimension of Consumers’ Sustainability. Academy of Marketing Science, 3, 181-192.

9. Balderjahn, I., Peyer, M., Seegebarth, B., Wiedmann, K.-P. & Weber, A., (2018). The many faces of sustainability-conscious consumers: A category independent typology, Journal of Business Research, 91, 83–93.
10. Banbury, C., Stinerock, R. & Subrahmanyan, S., (2012). Sustainable consumption: Introspecting across multiple lived cultures, Journal of Business Research, 65, 497–503.
11. Barrett, P. (2007), Structural Equation Modelling: Adjudging Model Fit, Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815-24.
12. Bartikowski, B., Laroche, M. & Richard, M.-O. (2019). A content analysis of fear appeal advertising in Canada, China, and France, Journal of Business Research, 103, 232-239.
13. Bentler, P.M. (1990), Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models, Psychological Bulletin, 107 (2), 238-46.
14. Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin, Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), (November), 400-404.
15. Bentler, P. M. & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588−606.
16. Boeuf, B. (2019). The impact of mortality anxiety on attitude toward product innovation, Journal of Business Research, 104, (November),44–60.
17. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (1997). Araştırmaya Yönelik Kaygı Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi, Eğitim Yönetimi, 3(4), (Güz), 453-464.
18. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19. Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. & Hagger, M. S. (2007). Mindfulness and the Intention-Behavior Relationship Within the Theory of Planned Behavior, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), (May), 663-676.
20. Cockrill, A. & Parsonage, I. (2016). Shocking people into action: Does it still work? Journal of Advertising Research, 56(4), 401–413.
21. Daily, G. C. & Ehrlich, P. R. (1996). Socioeconomic Equity, Sustainability, and Earth's Carrying Capacity. Ecological Applications, 6(4), 991-1001.
22. Duplaga, M. & Grysztar, M. (2021). The Association Between Future Anxiety, Health Literacy and the Perception of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study, Healthcare, 9(43), 1-18.
23. Dyck, J. L. & Smither, J. A. (1994). Age differences in computer anxiety: The role of computer experience, gender, and education, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10, 239-248.
24. Feldman, J. M. & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421–435.
25. Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley.
26. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
27. Gerbing, D.W. & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and its Assessment, Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2),186–192.
28. Gürbüz, S. & Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri: Felsefe-Yöntem-Analiz, Gözden Geçirilmiş ve Güncellenmiş 5. Baskı, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
29. Hacıömeroğlu, G. (2017). Reciprocal Relationships between Mathematics Anxiety and Attitude towards Mathematics in Elementary Students. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10(3), 59-68.
30. Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T.M. & Ringle, C.M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications, Long Range Planning, 45(5/6), 320-340.
31. Hair, J. F., Celsi, M., W., Oritinau, D. J. & Bush, R. P. (2013). Essentials of Marketing Research, 3. Edition, International Edition, New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
32. Hammad, M. A. (2016). Future Anxiety and its Relationship to Students' Attitude toward Academic Specialization, Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 54-65.
33. Hansen, T., Mukherjee, A. & Thomsen, T. U. (2011). Anxiety and search during food choice: the moderating role of attitude towards nutritional claims, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28 (3), 178–186.
34. Harland, P., Staats, H. & Wilke, H. A. M. (1999). Explaining Proenvironmental Intention and Behavior by Personal Norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(12), 2505-2528.
35. Hong, H. & Chung, W. (2020). Integrating health consciousness, self-efficacy, and habituation into the attitude-intention-behavior relationship for physical activity in college students, Psychology, Health and Medicine, (September), 1-11.
36. Hovland, C., Janis, I. & Kelly, H. (1953). Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37. Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.). Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Hu, L. & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. İçinde Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling. Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76−99). London: Sage.
39. Hu, L.T. & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1), 1-55.
40. Hussain, M., Shahid, S. & Zaman, A. (2011). Anxiety and Attitude Of Secondary School Students Towards Foreign Language Learning. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 583–590.
41. Iacobucci, D. & Churchill, G. A. (2010). Marketing Research Methodological Foundations, 10. Edition, International Edition, Canada: South-Western, Cengage Learning.
42. IPBES (2019). Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Díaz, S., et. al. (ed.). IPBES Secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 56 pages.
43. IPSOS Global Advisor Raporu (2018). An exploration into diets around the World, IPSOS MORI Global Advisor Survey, (August).
44. Iwata, O. (2006). An Evaluation of Consumerism and Lifestyle As Correlates of a Voluntary Simplicity Lifestyle, Social Behavior and Personality, 34(5), 557-568.
45. Jain, S. & Khan, M. N. (2017). Measuring the impact of beliefs on luxury buying behavior in an emerging market: empirical evidence from India, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 21(3), 341-360.
46. Kaiser, F. G. & Gutcsher, H. (2003). The Proposition of a General Version of the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting Ecological Behavior, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(3), 586-603.
47. Karaca, C. (2007). Çevre, İnsan ve Etik Çerçevesinde Çevre Sorunlarına ve Çözümlerine Yönelik Yaklaşımlar, Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 1-19.
48. Karalar, R. & Kiracı, H. (2011). Çevresel Sorunlara Karşı Bir Çözüm Önerisi Olarak Sürdürülebilir Tüketim Düşüncesi, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 30, (Ağustos), 63-76.
49. Kargar, M., Tarmizi, R. A. & Bayat, S. (2010). Relationship between Mathematical Thinking, Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematics Attitudes among University Students, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 537–542.
50. Kim, Y. D., Nam, C. & LaPlaca, A. M. (2021). Marketing and Communicating Sustainability Through College Athletics: The Effects of Pro Environmental Initiatives on the Belief-Attitude Intention Hierarchy, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, (February), 1-21.
51. Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2. Edition, New York: The Guilford Press.
52. Krajnc, D. & Glavic, P. (2005). How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainabilityEcological Economics, 55, 551– 563.
53. Kurbanoglu, N., & Akin, A. (2012). The Relationships Between University Students’ Organic Chemistry Anxiety, Chemistry Attitudes, and Self-Efficacy: A Structural Equation Model. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(4), 347-356.
54. Laroche, M., Toffoli, R., Zhang, Q. & Pons, F. (2001). A cross-cultural study of the persuasive effect of fear appeal messages in cigarette advertising: China and Canada, International Journal of Advertising, 20(3), 297-317.
55. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. içinde So, J., Kuang, K. & Cho, H. (2016) Reexamining Fear Appeal Models from Cognitive Appraisal Theory and Functional Emotion Theory Perspectives, Communication Monographs, 83(1), 120-144.
56. Leonidou, C. N., Katsikeas, C. S., & Morgan, N. A. (2013). “Greening” the marketing mix: Do firms do it and does it pay off? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41, 151–170.
57. MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W., & Sugawara, H., M. (1996). Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling, Psychological Methods, 1 (2), 130-149.
58. Maclaren, V. W. (1996). Urban sustainability reporting. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(2), 184-202.
59. Matarneh, A. J. & Altrawneh, A. (2014). Constructing a scale of future anxiety for the students at public Jordanian universities, International Journal of Academic Research Part B, 6(5), 180-188.
60. Mont, O. (2004). Institutionalisation of sustainable consumption patterns based on shared use, Ecological Economics, 50(1-2), 135-153.
61. Mostafa, M. M. (2020). Neural correlates of fear appeal in advertising: An fMRI analysis, Journal of Marketing Communications, 26(1), 40-64,
62. Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 6. Edition, USA: Pearson International Edition.
63. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
64. Nurmi, J. E. (1987). Age, sex, social class, and quality of family interaction as determinants of adolescents' future orientation: A developmental task interpretation, Adolescence, 22(88), 977–991.
65. Öner, N. (1977). Durumluk-Sürekli Kaygı Envanterinin Türk Toplumunda Geçerliği, Yayımlanmamış doçentlik tezi, Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
66. Paredes, M. R., Apaolaza, V., Fernandez-Robin, C., Hartmann, P. & Yañez-Martinez, D. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on subjective mental well-being: The interplay of perceived threat, future anxiety and resilience, Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110455.
67. Pektaş, G. Ö. E. (2021). Beyaz Yakalı Çiftçiler: Gönüllü Sade Yaşam ve Doğrudan Pazarlama Hikâyeleri, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
68. Phipps, M., Ozanne, L. K., Luchs, M. G., Subrahmanyan, S., Kapitan, S., Catlin, J. R., Gau, R., Naylor, R. W., Rose, R. L., Simpson, B., & Weaver, T. (2013). Understanding the inherent complexity of sustainable consumption: A social cognitive framework. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1227–1234.
69. Ponting, C. (2008). Dünyanın Yeşil Tarihi: Çevre ve Büyük Uygarlıkların Çöküşü, Ayşe Başçı (Çev.), İstanbul: Sabancı Üniversitesi.
70. Pope, N. K., & Voges, K. E. (2000). The impact of sport sponsorship activities, corporate image, and prior use on consumer purchase intention. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 9(2), 96-102.
71. Quelch, J. A., & Jocz, K. E. (2007). Greater good: How good marketing makes for better democracy. Harvard Business Press, Boston, USA.
72. Roscoe, J.T. (1975). Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences (2. Edition). New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
73. Sagir, S. (2012). The Primary School Students' Attitude And Anxiety Towards Science. Journal of Baltic Science Educofion, 11(2), 127-140.
74. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
75. Shabahang, R., Aruguete, M. S., & Shim, H. (2021). Online News Addiction: Future Anxiety, Fear of Missing Out on News, and Interpersonal Trust Contribute to Excessive Online News Consumption, Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 11(2), 1-11.
76. Sheth, J. N., Sethia, N. K. & Srinivas, S. (2011). Mindful consumption: a customer-centric approach to sustainability”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 21-39.
77. Simiyu, G., Bonuke, R., & Komen, J., (2020). Social media and students’ behavioral intentions to enroll in postgraduate studies in Kenya: a moderated mediation model of brand personality and attitude, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 30(1), 66–86.
78. So, J., Kuang, K. & Cho, H. (2016) Reexamining Fear Appeal Models from Cognitive Appraisal Theory and Functional Emotion Theory Perspectives, Communication Monographs, 83(1), 120-144.
79. Spielberger, C. D., Gonzalez-Reigosa, F., & Martinez-Urrutia, A. (1971). Development of the Spanish edition of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 5(3–4), 145–158.
80. Stuteville, J. R. (1970). Psychic Defenses Against High Fear Appeals: A Key Marketing Variable, Journal of Marketing, 34(April), 41. içinde Wheatley, J. J. (1971). Marketing and the Use of Fear- or Anxiety-Arousing Appeals, Journal of Marketing, 35(2), (Nisan), 62-64.
81. Susulowska, M. (1985). Tres] lfków w przebieguz·ycia ludzkiego [Fear contents throughout people’s life span]. PrzeglÜd Psychologiczny [Psychological Review], 28, 1065–1085 içinde Zaleski, Z. (2005). Future Orientation and Anxiety, içinde Strathman, A. ve Joireman, V. (ed.), Understanding Behavior in the Context of Time: Theory, Research and Application, 125-141, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, New Jersey, USA.
82. Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K. & Albarracin, D. (2015). Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1178–1204.
83. Till, B.D. & Busler, M. (2000), The Match-Up Hypothesis: Physical Attractiveness, Expertise, and the Role of Fit on Brand Attitude, Purchase Intent and Brand Beliefs, Journal of Advertising, 29 (3), 1-13.
84. Uztuğ, F. (2007). Siyasal İletişim Yönetimi: Siyasette Marka Yaratmak, MediaCat Kitapları.
85. Wheatley, J. J. & Oshikawa, S. (1970). The Relationship Between Anxiety and Positive and Negative Advertising Appeals, Journal of Marketing Research, 7 (Şubat), 85-89 içinde Wheatley, J. J. (1971). Marketing and the Use of Fear- or Anxiety-Arousing Appeals, Journal of Marketing, 35 (2) (Nisan), 62-64.
86. Wheatley, J. J. (1971). Marketing and the Use of Fear- or Anxiety-Arousing Appeals, Journal of Marketing, 35(2), (Nisan), 62-64.
87. Wongpitch, S., Minakan, N., Powpaka, S. & Laohavichien, T. (2016), Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Motives on Purchase Intention Model: An Extension, Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 37, 30-37.
88. www.arcelikas.com, Erişim Tarihi: 30 Mart 2019.
89. www.ec.europa.eu, Erişim Tarihi: 19.07.2021
90. www.emarketer.com, Erişim Tarihi, 19.07.2021
91. www.levis.com.tr, Erişim Tarihi: 19.07.2021
92. www.sozluk.gov.tr, Erişim Tarihi, 25.04.2021
93. Yenilmez, K., Girginer, N. & Uzun, Ö. (2007). Mathematics Anxiety and Attitude Level of Students of the Faculty of Economics and Business Administrator; The Turkey Model, International Mathematical Forum, 2(41), 1997-2021.
94. Zaleski, Z. (1996). Future anxiety: Concept, measurement, and preliminary research. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(2), 165–174.
95. Zaleski, Z. (2005). Future Orientation and Anxiety, içinde Strathman, A. ve Joireman, V. (ed.), Understanding Behavior in the Context of Time: Theory, Research and Application, 125-141, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, New Jersey, USA.
96. Zaleski, Z., Sobol-Kwapinska, M., Przepiorka, A. & Meisner, M. (2019). Development and validation of the Dark Future scale, Time & Society, 28(1), 107–123.