Analyzing The Sense Of Belonging From A Bourdieusian Perspective: Women From Türkiye In North London

Abstract

Analyzing the sense of belonging from a Bourdieusian perspective: Turkish women in North London Abstract The Cambridge Dictionary defines belonging as the feeling of safety and comfort in a given place. For migrants, defining belonging is complicated as it also means establishing good relations with other members of society. A sense of belonging encompasses being included in the family, the country in which one lives, and the group to which one belongs. This study sought to answer the question “How is the sense of belonging established in a diaspora?” It also poses the question “Does the sense of belonging differ between generations in a diaspora? This study was conducted in North London between 2017–2019. In-depth interviews were conducted with 8 first-generation women, 10 second-generation women and 7-third generation young women. Interviews were conducted at the North London Alevi Association. Although the first step of this study was to identify a sense of belonging and how it is established, also generational differences regarding belonging were examined. The analysis was conducted within the framework of Bourdieu’s concepts of habitus, field, and capital. Generally, it is observed that first-generation womens’ sense of belonging is still concentrated in the home country they left, whereas for the younger generation it is related to the country in which they were born or went there when they were children.

Keywords

• belonging
• habitus
• capital
• field
• north london

Aidiyet Duygusunu Bourdieu Perspektifinden İncelemek: Kuzey Londra'da Türkiye'den Kadınlar

Öz

The Cambridge Dictionary defines belonging as the feeling of safety and comfort in a given place. For migrants, defining belonging is complicated as it also means establishing good relations with other members of society. A sense of belonging encompasses being included in the family, the country in which one lives, and the group to which one belongs. This study sought to answer the question “How is the sense of belonging established in a diaspora?” It also poses the question “Does the sense of belonging differ between generations in a diaspora? This study was conducted in North London between 2017–2019. In-depth interviews were managed with 8 first-generation women, 10 second-generation women, and 7-third generation young women. Interviews were organized at the North London Alevi Association. Although the first step of this study was to identify a sense of belonging and how it is established, also generational differences regarding belonging were examined. For this reason, Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, field, and capital were used to analyze the data. Generally, it is observed that first-generation women’s sense of belonging is still concentrated in the home country they left, in contrast, for the younger generation it is related to the country in which they were born or went there when they were children.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• belonging
• habitus
• capital
• field
• north london

Kaynakça

1. Bilecen, T. & Araz, M. (2015). Londra’da Yaşayan Türkiyeli Göçmenlerin Etnik ve Mezhepsel Aidiyetlerinin Siyasal Tutum ve Davranışlarına Etkisi. Göç Dergisi, 2(2), 189-207.
2. Bourdieu, P. (1986). “The Forms of Capital”, Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education”, edited by J. G. Richardson. New York: Greenwood Press. 15–29.
3. Bourdieu,P. (2020).“The Field of Power and the Division of the Labour” Method series, Methodological Prospects in the Social Sciences, Handwritten Notes for the 1985–1986 Collège de France lectures Volume 16, eds: Francois Denord, Mikael Palme, Bertrand Reau, Springer, 0pen eBook. 33-44.
4. Bourdieu,P. (2023). Kültür Üretimi, Sembolik Ürünler, Sembolik Sermaye, (Çev: Sibel Yardımcı, Elçin Gen), İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
5. Bourdieu,P. (2004). The peasant and his body, Ethnography, December 2004, Vol. 5, No. 4, Special Issue: Pierre Bourdieu in the Field, Sage publication. 579-599.
6. Celik, C.(2014). “Pierre Bourdie, Sosyal sermaye, Ebevyn ağları ve Okul Başarısı,” Cogito, (265-290), sayı 76/ Bahar 2014, YKY.
7. Glaesser, J. & Cooper, B. (2012). Using Rational Action Theory and Bourdieu’s Habitus TheoryTogether to Account for educational Decision-Making in England and Germany, Sociology, 48(3), 463-481.
8. Hannafin, S. (2016) ‘Place and belonging: The experience of return migration for the second generation Irish from Britain’. Irish Geography, 49(1), 29-46, Doi: 10.2014/igj.v49i1.644

9. Levett-Jones and others. (2007). Belongingness: a critique of the concept and implications for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 27, 210-218. Doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2006.05.001
10. Noltemeyer, A. and others. (2012). The relationship among deficiency needs and growth needs: An empirical investigation of Maslow’s theory. Children and Youth Services Review, 34 (2012), 1862-1867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.05.021
11. Oliver, C. & O’ Reilly, K. A. (2010). Bourdieusian Analysis of Class and Migration. Sociology, 44(1), 49-66. Doi 10.1177/0038038509351627
12. Revis, M. (2020). Exploring the ‘Languaging Habitus’ of a Diasporic Community: Columbians in New Zealand. Lingua, 263 (2), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102941
13. Swartz, D. (2018). Kültür ve İktidar, Pierre Bourdieu’nün Sosyolojisi. (çev: Elçin Gün). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
14. Waite, C., Walsh, L., Black, R. (2023). Negotiating senses of belonging and identity across education spaces. The Australian Educational Researcher, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00633-9.
15. Wessendorf, S., (2019). Migrant belonging, social location and the neighbourhood: Recent migrants in East London and Birmingham, Urban Studies, Vol.56(1) 131-146. Doi: 10.1177/0042098017730300