THE EFFECT OF BIRTH TYPE ON BREASTFEEDING SUCCESS AND INSOMNIA SEVERITY IN PUERPERANT WOMEN

Öz

Objective: This research was carried out to determine the effect of birth type on breastfeeding success and insomnia severity in puerperant women.
Method: The sample of the type of cross-sectional and comparative research, between January and February 2021, to participate in research in a public hospital located in the east of Turkey has created 314 puerperal women who accepted. The data were collected using “Personal Information Form, LATCH Breastfeeding Assessment Tool and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)”. Descriptive statistics, independent groups t test and Pearson correlation analysis were used in data analysis.
Results: It was found that women who vaginally birth (n = 227) had a total score of 8.48 ± 1.47 on the LATCH Breastfeeding Assessment Tool, and an average of 10.44 ± 5.19 on the ISI. These averages were found to be 8.00 ± 2.08 and 8.78 ± 4.46, respectively, in women who had cesarean birth (n = 87). It was determined that the LATCH Breastfeeding Assessment Tool and ISI total score averages were statistically higher in women who gave birth vaginally than those who delivered by cesarean section (p <0.05). In addition, it was observed that as the insomnia severity increased in women who had vaginal birth, breastfeeding success decreased significantly (p <0.05), while there was no statistical relationship between insomnia severity and breastfeeding success in women who gave birth by cesarean section (p ˃0.05).
Conclusion and Suggestions: In this study, it was determined that breastfeeding success and insomnia severity in women who gave vaginal birth were higher than women who gave birth by cesarean section.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Birth Types;
• Birth;
• Breastfeeding Success
• Insomnia;
• Puerperant Women.

Doğum Şeklinin Emzirme Başarısı ve Annelerdeki Uykusuzluk Şiddetine Etkisi

Öz

Amaç: Bu araştırma, doğum şeklinin emzirme başarısı ve annelerdeki uykusuzluk şiddetine etkisini belirlemek amacıyla yapıldı.
Yöntem: Kesitsel ve karşılaştırmalı tipte olan araştırmanın örneklemini, Ocak – Şubat 2021 tarihleri arasında, Türkiye’nin doğusunda bulunan bir kamu hastanesinde yatan 314 lohusa oluşturdu. Veriler, “Kişisel Tanıtım Formu, LATCH Emzirme Tanılama Ölçüm Aracı ve Uykusuzluk Şiddeti İndeksi (UŞİ)” ile toplandı. Verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistikler, bağımsız gruplarda t testi ve pearson korelasyon analizi kullanıldı.
Bulgular: Normal doğum yapan kadınların (n=227) LATCH Emzirme Tanılama Ölçeği toplam puan ortalamasının 8.48±1.47, UŞİ toplam puan ortalamasının 10.44±5.19 olduğu ve bu ortalamaların Sezaryen Doğum yapan kadınlarda (n=87) sırasıyla; 8.00±2.08 ve 8.78±4.46 olduğu saptanmıştır. LATCH Emzirme Tanılama Ölçeği ve UŞİ toplam puan ortalamalarının normal doğum yapan kadınlarda sezaryenle doğum yapanlara oranla istatistiksel açıdan daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir (p<0.05). Ayrıca, normal doğum yapan kadınlarda uykusuzluk şiddeti arttıkça emzirme başarısının anlamlı düzeyde azaldığı görülürken (p<0.05), sezaryenle doğum yapan kadınlardaki uykusuzluk şiddeti ve emzirme başarısı arasında herhangi bir istatistiksel ilişki saptanmamıştır (p ˃0.05).
Sonuçlar ve Öneriler: Bu araştırmada normal doğum yapan kadınlardaki emzirme başarısı ve uykusuzluk şiddetlerinin sezaryenle doğum yapan kadınlara oranla daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Doğum;
• Doğum Şekli;
• Emzirme Başarısı;
• Uykusuzluk;
• Lohusa.

Kaynakça

1. Referans1. Aksu, S. Varol, F.G.,& Hotun Sahin, N. (2017). Long-term postpartum health problems in Turkish women: prevalence and associations with self-rated health. Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing Profession, 53(2), 167-181.
2. Referans2. Aluş Tokat M., Serçekuş P., Yenal K., & Okumuş H. (2015) Early postpartum breastfeeding outcomes and breastfeeding self-efficacy in turkish mothers undergoing vaginal birth or cesarean birth ith different types of anesthesia. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 26 (2): 73-79.
3. Referans3. Amanak, K., & Karaçam, Z. (2018). Determination of the problems experienced by the women who gave birth by cesarean delivery during early postpartum period concerning self-care and baby care. Journal of Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, 28(1):17-22.
4. Referans4. Aydın, D., & Aba, Y. (2019). The relationship between mothers' health literacy levels and their perceptions about breastfeeding self-efficacy. Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Nursing Electronic Journal, 12 (1) , 31-39. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/deuhfed/issue/53195/705940
5. Referans5. Barger M.K., Caughey A.B., & Lee K.A. (2013) Evaluating Insomnia During Pregnancy and Postpartum. In: Attarian H., Viola-Saltzman M. (eds) Sleep Disorders in Women. Current Clinical Neurology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-324-4_15
6. Referans6. Boysan, M., Güleç, M., Beşiroğlu, L. & Kalafat, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Insomnia Severity Index in Turkish sample. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 11, 248-252.
7. Referans7. Bölükbaşı, H. (2016). The effect of postpartum depression on breastfeeding self-efficacy, breastfeeding success and nutritional status in the postnatal six-month period. Department of Nutrition and Dietetics. Master Thesis. Gazi University Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara.
8. Referans8. Brown, A., Rance, J., & Bennett, P. (2016). Understanding the relationship between breastfeeding and postnatal depression: the role of pain and physical difficulties. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(2), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12832

9. Referans9. Chien, L. Y., & Tai, C. J. (2007). Effect of delivery method and timing of breastfeeding initiation on breastfeeding outcomes in Taiwan. Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 34(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00158.x
10. Referans10. Çakmak, H., & Kuguoglu, S. (2007). Comparison of the breastfeeding patterns of mothers who delivered their babies per vagina and via cesarean section: an observational study using the LATCH breastfeeding charting system. International journal of nursing studies, 44(7), 1128–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.04.018
11. Referans11. Çapık, A., Sakar, T., Yıldırım, N., Karabacak, K.,& Korkut, M. (2016). Determining the satisfaction levels of the mothers according to their mode of birth Anatolian Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 19(2), 92-99.
12. Referans12. Drozdowicz-Jastrzębska, E., Skalski, M., Gdańska, P., Mach, A., Januszko, P., Nowak, R. J., Węgrzyn, P., Wielgoś, M., & Radziwoń-Zaleska, M. (2017). Insomnia, postpartum depression and estradiol in women after delivery. Metabolic brain disease, 32(6), 1913–1918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-017-0079-0
13. Referans13. Durmuş, A., & Can Gürkan, Ö. (2020). Evidence based traditional and complementary medicine applications in early postpartum period breast problems. Ordu University Journal of Nursing Studies, 3 (2) , 185-192 . DOI: 10.38108/ouhcd.761903
14. Referans14. Egelioglu Cetisli, N., Arkan, G., & Top, E.D. (2018). Maternal attachment and breastfeeding behaviors according to type of delivery in the immediate postpartum period. Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 64(2), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.64.02.164
15. Referans15. Elmalı Şi̇mşek, H., & Alpar Ecevi̇t, Ş. (2020). Post-cesarean section pain and nursing care. Istanbul Gelişim University Journal of Health Sciences, (11), 267-278.
16. Referans16. Er Güneri̇, S. (2015). Evidence Based Practıces In Early Postpartum Period. Gümüşhane University Journal of Health Sciences, 4(3),482-496. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gumussagbil/issue/23834/253907
17. Referans17. Exavery, A., Kanté, A. M., Hingora, A., & Phillips, J. F. (2015). Determinants of early initiation of breastfeeding in rural Tanzania. International breastfeeding journal, 10, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-015-0052-7
18. Referans18. Gölbaşı, Z., & Eğri G. (2010). Traditional practices to mother care in postpartum period. Cumhuriyet Medical Journal, 32: 276-282.
19. Referans19. Güler E.S., & Yanıkkerem, D.(2018). The views of women towards the mode of delivery and vaginal birth after caesarean. STED / Journal of Continuing Medical Education, 27(1) ,27-36 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sted/issue/36512/414205
20. Referans20. Ince T., Aktaş G., Aktepe N., & Aydın A. (2017) Evaluation of the factors affecting mothers’ breastfeeding self-efficacy and breastfeeding success. Izmir Dr. Behçet Uz Journal of Pediatrics, 7 (3): 183-190.
21. Referans21. Işık, G., Ceti̇şli̇, N., & Başkaya, V. (2018). Postpartum pain, fatigue levels and breastfeeding self-efficacy according to type of birth. Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Nursing Electronic Journal, 11 (3) , 224-232. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/deuhfed/issue/46781/586630
22. Referans22. Işık, Y., Dag, Z. O., Tulmac, O. B., & Pek, E. (2016). Early postpartum lactation effects of cesarean and vaginal birth. Ginekologia polska, 87(6), 426–430. https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.2016.0020
23. Referans23. Karakoyunlu, Ö., Ejder Apay, S., & Gürol, A. (2019). The effect of pain, stress, and cortisol during labor on breastfeeding success. Developmental psychobiology, 61(7), 979–987. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21873
24. Referans24. Kılcı H.(2014). The relationship between early postpartum breastfeeding success and late postpartum breastfeeding self-efficacy and breast problems. Department of Midwifery. Master Thesis. Adnan Menderes University Institute of Health Sciences, Aydın.
25. Referans25. Onat G. (2015). After Natural Birth, Three Components of Natural Breastfeeding: Breast Crawl, Kangaroo Mother Care, Biological Nurtuting. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing, 12 (2): 78-84.
26. Referans26. Şentürk Erenel, A , & Çiçek, S . (2018). Effect of type of birth on the health of mother and newborn. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Health Sciences, 9 (2) , 123-129 . DOI: 10.22312/sdusbed.406819
27. Referans27. Tarkka, M. T., Paunonen, M., & Laippala, P. (1998). What contributes to breastfeeding success after childbirth in a maternity ward in Finland?. Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 25(3), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536x.1998.00175.x
28. Referans28. Turan, A., & Bozkurt, G. (2020). Effects of delivery method on breastfeeding success in primiparous mothers. Archives of Health Science and Research, 7(1): 60-5.
29. Referans29. Turkey Demographic and Health Survey, Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (2019). Turkey Demographic and Health Survey Report 2018 http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/tnsa2018/rapor/TNSA2018_ana_Rapor.pdf
30. Referans30. Tülek, N. (2019). Determining the scope of postpartum health problems and care services. Department of Midwifery. Master Thesis. Adnan Menderes University Institute of Health Sciences, Aydın.
31. Referans31. Uzun, B , Dağ, E . (2019). Women's preferences relating mode of delivery the role of midwife. Health Care Academician Journal, 6(2) ,87-90 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sagakaderg/issue/46295/522819
32. Referans32. World Health Organisation. Evidence for the ten steps to successful breastfeeding 1998. https://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/evidence_ten_step_eng.pdf
33. Referans33. Yenal, K., & Okumuş, H. (2003). A study examining the reliability of the LATCH breastfeeding assessment tool. Research and Development in Nursing Journal, 5(1): 38-44.
34. Referans34. Yıldız, H., & Küçükşahin, N. (2011). Postpartum problems and care needs of mothers living in rural area. Turkish Journal of Family Practice, 15(4): 159-166.
35. Referans35. Yılmaz, A.N.(2018) Comparison of planned caesarean sections performed after labor begins with those performed before labor begins in terms of postpartum breastfeeding and maternal attachment levels. Department of Midwifery. Master Thesis. İnönü University Institute of Health Sciences, Malatya.
36. Referans36. Zanardo, V., Svegliado, G., Cavallin, F., Giustardi, A., Cosmi, E., Litta, P., & Trevisanuto, D. (2010). Elective cesarean delivery: does it have a negative effect on breastfeeding?. Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 37(4), 275–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00421.x