Publication Policies

PUBLICATION POLICLES


  1. Journal of Scientific Perspectives has begun publication in July 2017. It is an internationally peer-reviewed and periodical journal published regularly in four issues per year in January, April, July and October, in the fields of basic sciences, engineering, natural sciences and health sciences. All articles submitted for publication are evaluated by the editor in chief, field editor, editorial board and referees.
  2. Journal only accepts the studies written in English. Original research papers, technical notes, letters to the editor, discussions, case reports and compilations are published in our journal.
  3. Only the original scientific researches are included. It is essential that the information created in scientific study needs to be new, suggest new method or give a new dimension to an existing information
  4. Journal of Scientific Perspectives is an open access electronic journal. All articles published in the journal are assigned the DOI number. Researchers worldwide will have full access to all the articles published online and can download them with zero subscription fees. In addition, because of the influence of your research, you will quickly become an Open Access (OA) author, because an OA article has more chances to be used and the plods through the subscription barriers of traditional publishing models.
  5. The editor-in-chief and the relevant field editor have the authority not to publish the articles, to make regulations based on the format or to give back to the author for correction that do not comply with the conditions of publication within the knowledge of the editorial board. All studies submitted to Journal of Scientific Perspectives are sent to at least two referees after the initial review of the editor in chief, relevant field editor and editors related to the study issue with respect to formatting and content. After having positive feedbacks from both of the referees, the manuscripts are published. In case of having one positive and one negative feedback from the referees, the manuscript is sent to a third referee. Identities of authors are kept in the posts to be sent to the referees (Double-blind peer review). In addition, the authors are not informed about the referee
  6. It is general essential that studies which aren’t seemed enough need to be changed in accordance with suggests of referees. Studies which aren’t reached intended level or aren’t seemed enough in terms of scientific are refused with unexplained reason. The works are published with the condition to be taken in order
  7. The referee process is carried out by the editor in chief. A study that the chief editor does not find suitable or does not accept is not included in the journal. In this regard, authors can not create a liability for the journal and other boards of the journal.
  8. After the field editor has been appointed by the editor in chief, 7 days are given to him/her for the appointment of the referee. While he/she appoints the referees, he takes the views of the other editors related to the study issue. The studies sent to the referees for evaluation are expected to be answered within 30 days. In case this is overcome, the editor makes a new referee appointment and withdraws the request from the former referee.
  9. Required changes must be made by the author within 15 days after the decision of "Correction required" given in article acceptance decision.
  10. The studies submitted for publication in the journal must have not been published elsewhere or have not been sent another journal to be published. The studies or their summaries which were presented in a conference or published can be accepted if it is indicated in the study. In addition, if the work is supported by an institution or is produced from a dissertation, this should be indicated by a footnote to the title of the work. Those who want to withdraw their publications for publication for some reason must apply to the journal management with a letter. The editorial board assumes that the article owners agree to abide by these terms.
  11. All responsibility of the studies belong to the authors. Studies should be prepared in accordance with international scientific ethics rules. Where necessary, a copy of the ethics committee report must be added.
  12. The articles submitted to the Journal of Scientific Perspectives are sent to the referees after they have been checked with the "iThenticate" plagiarism scanning program to see if they are partially or completely copied (plagiarism) from another study. Regulation is demanded from the author for the articles which are high in the plagiarism result (30% and over). If the required regulation is not made within 60 days, the study is rejected.
  13. Copyright of all published studies belongs to the Journal of Scientific Perspectives.
  14. No copyright payment is made.
  15. For the studies accepted for publication in our journal, copyright transfer form signed must be added to the system or mail to
  16. No study has differentiation or superiority from another study. Each author and study has the same rights and equality. No privileges are recognized.
  17. Studies submitted for publication in our journal must be prepared according to the rules of spelling of journal. Spelling and template are included in are included in the "Author Guidelines" heading
  18. Articles submitted for evaluation must not exceed 25 pages after they are prepared according to the specified template. Article summary should not exceed 300 words and minimum 3 and maximum 7 keywords should be written.