Religion and the Cold War Politics: The Election of Athenagoras as Patriarch

Öz

A critical development during the years of World War II was the change of the USSR’s policy towards the Church and its attempt to make use of the influence of the Moscow Patriarchate on the Orthodox world. This move of the USSR mobilized the United States, which assumed that the Soviet influence in the Balkan countries and the Middle East would be prevented by strengthening the Patriarchate of İstanbul. The US proposed Athenagoras, the Archbishop of North and South America, for the leadership of Phanar; a figure who was expected to be effective in the struggle with Moscow. This proposal was accepted by Turkey and Greece. However, Athenagoras’ election as patriarch was not easily achieved both because he did not have Turkish citizenship and because of the cautious attitude demonstrated by Turkey during the selection process. At the end of the election process during which the United States has taken a cautious stance with Turkey, Athenagoras was elected as the Patriarch. As soon as he started the job, with his pro-US rhetoric and close relations with the Turkish official circles, the new Patriarch showed that he was a cleric who could meet the expectations. Being the religious pillar of the Truman doctrine, as he himself stated, Athenagoras’ efforts were also welcomed by the US and Turkish authorities. At the same time, Athenagoras's pro-Turkish and pro-American stance has caused discomfort within the Greek community over time, leading to some reactions against him.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Patriarchate of İstanbul
• Athenagoras
• Athenagoras

Din ve Soğuk Savaş Politikaları: Athenagoras’ın Patrik Seçilmesi

Öz

2. Dünya Savaşı yıllarına ilişkin kritik bir gelişme, SSCB’nin Kilise’ye yönelik politikasını değiştirerek, Moskova Patrikhanesi’nin Ortodokslar üzerindeki nüfuzundan yararlanma çabası içerisine girmesi olmuştur. SSCB’nin bu hamlesi, İstanbul Patrikhanesi’nin kuvvetlendirilmesi yoluyla Balkan ülkelerindeki ve Ortadoğu’daki Sovyet etkisinin önünün alınacağını düşünen ABD’yi harekete geçirmiştir. ABD, Fener’in liderliğine, Moskova ile mücadelede etkili olabilecek bir isim olarak Kuzey ve Güney Amerika Başpiskoposu Athenagoras’ı önermiş, bu öneri Türkiye ve Yunanistan tarafından da kabul görmüştür. Bununla birlikte, Athenagoras’ın patrik seçilmesi hem Türk vatandaşı olmaması, hem de Türkiye’nin seçim süreci boyunca göstermiş olduğu ihtiyatlı tavır nedeniyle kolaylıkla gerçekleşmemiştir. Yunanistan’ın aceleci tavrına karşılık Türkiye ile birlikte ABD’nin de tedbirli bir tutum sergilediği sancılı bir sürecin neticesinde ise Athenagoras Patrik seçilmiş; yeni Patrik, ABD yanlısı söylemleri ve Türk resmi çevreleri ile kurduğu yakın ilişkilerle, göreve başlar başlamaz kendisinden beklenenleri karşılayabilecek bir din adamı olduğunu göstermiştir. Bizzat kendisinin de ifade ettiği üzere Truman doktrinin dini ayağını teşkil eden Athenagoras’ın çabaları, ABD’li ve Türk yetkililer tarafından da memnuniyetle karşılanmıştır. Athenagoras’ın Türk ve ABD yanlısı duruşu, zaman içerisinde Rum cemaati içerisinde ise rahatsızlık yaratmış, kendisine yönelik olarak bazı tepkilere yol açmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İstanbul Patrikhanesi
• Athenagoras•
• Patrik Seçimi
• Moskova Kilisesi

Kaynakça

1. National Archives and Records Administration, Records of the Department of State relating to internal affairs of Turkey, 1945-1949 (NARA; M1292):
2. Bursley to the Secretary of State, Ankara, 1 November 1947, 867.404/11-147, IAT.
3. Bursley to the Secretary of State, Ankara, 29 November 1946, 867.404/11-2946, IAT.
4. Macdonald to the Secretary of State, İstanbul, 22 April 1949, 867.404/4-2249, IAT
5. Macdonald to the Secretary of State, İstanbul, 28 March 1949, 867.404/3-2849, IAT.
6. Memorandum of Conversation, 15 April 1948, 867.404/4-1548, IAT.
7. Memorandum of Conversation, 23 December 1948, 867.404/12-2348, IAT.
8. Memorandum of Conversation, 3 July 1948, 867.404/7-348, IAT.

9. Office Memorandum, 13 December 1948, 867.404/12-1348, IAT.
10. Rankin to the Secretary of State, Athens, 20 May 1948, 867.404/5-2048, IAT.
11. Wilson to the Secretary of State, Ankara, 13 September 1946, 867.404/9-1346, IAT.
12. Wilson to the Secretary of State, Ankara, 14 June 1948, 867.404/6-1448, IAT.
13. Wilson to the Secretary of State, Ankara, 14 May 1948, 867.404/5-1448, IAT.
14. Wilson to the Secretary of State, Ankara, 19 January 1948, 867.404/1-1948, IAT.
15. Wilson to the Secretary of State, Ankara, 20 April 1948, 867.404/4-2048, IAT
16. Wilson to the Secretary of State, Ankara, 20 January 1947, 867.404/1-2047, IAT.
17. Wilson to the Secretary of State, 26 February 1946, 867.404/2-2646, IAT
18. Wilson to the Secretary of State, Ankara, 28 June 1948, 867.404/6-2848, IAT.
19. Wilson to the Secretary of State, Ankara, 8 June 1948, 867.404/6-848, IAT.
20. Kirby, D. (2003). Harry Truman’s Religious Legacy: The Holy Alliance, Containment and the Cold War. In D. Kirby (Ed.), Religion and the Cold War, 77-102, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
21. Walters, P. (1986). The Russian Orthodox Church and the Soviet State. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 483, No. 1, 135-145.
22. Şeker, N. (2013). The Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Constantinople in the Midst of Politics: The Cold War, the Cyprus Question, and the Patriarchate, 1949-1959. Journal of Church and State, Vol. 55, No. 2, 264-285.
23. Alexandris, A. (1992). The Greek Minority of Istanbul and Greek-Turkish Relations 1918-1974. Athens: Centre For Asia Minor Studies.
24. Del Pero, M. (2014). Incompatible Universalisms. The United States, the Soviet Union, and the Beginning of the Cold War. In A.M. Kalinovsky, C. Daigle (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Cold War, 27-40, New York: Routledge.
25. Cox, M. (1990). From the Truman Doctrine to the Second Superpower Detente: The Rise and Fall of the Cold War. Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 27, No. 1, 25-41. Erhan Ç. (2009). ABD ve NATO’yla İlişkiler. In B. Oran (Ed.) Türk Dış Politikası Cilt 1: 1919-1980, 522-575, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
26. Kunz, D. B. (1997). The Marshall Plan Reconsidered: A Complex of Motives. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 76, No. 3, 162-170.
27. Botsiou, K. E. (2009). New Policies, Old Politics: American Concepts of Reform in Marshall Plan Greece. Journal of Modern Greek Studies, Vol. 27, No. 2, 209-240. Macar, E. (2004). Cumhuriyet Döneminde İstanbul Rum Patrikhanesi. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
28. Psomiades, H. J. (1957). Soviet Russia and the Orthodox Church in the Middle East. Middle East Journal, Vol. 11, No. 4, 371-381.