Bir Ülke Neden Başka Bir Ülkeye Yardım Eder? Kalkınma Yardımlarının Ortaya Çıkışı, Gelişimi ve Donörlerin Motivasyonları

Öz

Donör konumunda olup, kalkınma yardımı sunan ülkeler; benimsedikleri kalkınma anlayışlarının yanı sıra, muhatap oldukları faydalanıcı ülkeye göre, içinde bulundukları küresel konjonktüre ve tercih ettikleri yöntemlere göre farklı yönelimlere sahip olabilmektedirler. Bahse konu faktörler ve daha birçok başka etken donör ülkelerin yardım sunma motivasyonlarını oluşturmaktadır. Bu noktada; ulusal stratejik önceliklerine göre hareket eden donörler, küresel ekonomik düzende sahip oldukları konuma göre pozisyon alan donörler, muhatap oldukları faydalanıcı ülkeye göre farklılık arz eden tutumlar sergileyen donörler ve kalkınma yardımlarını uluslararası ilişkiler bağlamında değerlendiren donörlerin her biri farklı farklı motivasyonlara sahiptirler. Kalkınma yardımları kavramı bu çalışmada öncelikle kavramsal olarak ele alınmış ve üzerine inşa edildiği teorik temeller açıklanmıştır. Sonrasında da tarihsel olarak yaşanan değişim ve dönüşümler ele alınmıştır. Çalışmanın asıl odağını oluşturan donör ülkelerin yardım sunma motivasyonları ise kendi arasında ortak karakteristik özelliklere sahip olan ülkelerin kategorize edilmiş hali üzerinden incelenmiştir. Bu bağlamda Türkiye için özel olarak bir başlık açılmış ve Türkiye’nin kalkınma yardımı geçmişine de yer verilmiştir. Ayrıca bu alanın en önemli aktörleri arasında yer alan uluslararası kuruluşların yardım sunumu noktasında oynadıkları rol de ayrı bir başlık altında ele alınmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kalkınma yardımları
• Geleneksel donörler
• Yükselen donörler
• Yardım sunma motivasyonları

Why Does a Country Assist Another?The Origins and Evolution of Development Assistance, as well as Donor Motivations

Öz

In addition to the development approaches they adopt, countries that are in the position of donor and provide development assistance may have different orientations according to the beneficiary country they are dealing with, the global conjuncture they are in, and the methods they prefer. These factors and many other factors constitute the motivation of donor countries to offer assistance. Herein, donors acting according to their national strategic priorities, donors taking positions according to their position in the global economic order, donors which display different attitudes according to the beneficiary country they deal with, and donors which evaluate development assistance in the context of international relations have different motivations. In the study, primarily, the concept of development assistance was conceptually discussed, and the theoretical foundations on which it is built were explained. Afterward, historical changes and transformations were discussed. The donor countries' motivation to offer assistance, which is the main focus of the study, was examined through the categorization of countries that have common characteristics among themselves. In this context, a heading was specifically opened for Turkey, and Turkey's history of development assistance was included as well. Moreover, the role played by international organizations, which are among the most important actors in this field, in the provision of assistance was also discussed under a separate heading.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Development assistance
• Traditional donors
• Emerging donors
• Motivation to provide assistance

Kaynakça

1. Abegaz, B. (2005). Multilateral Development Aid for Africa. Economic Systems, 29(4), 433-454.
2. Akçay, E. (2012). Bir Dış Politika Enstrümanı Olarak Türk Dış Yardımları, Turgut Özal Üniversitesi Yayınları, Ankara.
3. Alesina, A. & Dollar, D. (2000). Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?, Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 33-63.
4. Alesina, A. & Weder, B. (2002). Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid? American Economic Review, 92(4), 1126-1137.
5. Bauhr, M., Charron, N., & Nasiritousi, N. (2013). Does Corruption Cause aid Fatigue? Public Opinion and the Aid-Corruption Paradox. International Studies Quarterly, 57(3), 568-579.
6. Cali, M. & Te Velde D.W. (2011). Does Aid-for-Trade Really Improve Trade Performance? World Development, 39(5).
7. Chin, G. & Quadir, F. (2012). Introduction: Rising States, Rising Donors and the Global Aid Regime. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25(4), 493-506.
8. Clay, E., Geddes, M. & Natali, L. (2009). Untying Aid: Is it working? An Evaluation of the Implementation of the Paris Declaration and of the 2001 DAC Recommendation of Untying ODA to the LDC’s, Danish Institute for International Studies, Copenhagen.

9. Dietrich, S. (2011). Foreign Aid Delivery, Donor Selectivity, and Poverty, Niehaus Center for Globalization and Governance, 10-29.
10. Easterly, W. & Pfutze, T. (2008). Where Does the Money Go? Best and Worst Practices in Foreign Aid, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 29-52.
11. Erguvan, E. (2010). The Instruments of Soft Power within Turkish Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War Era: Turkish International Cooperation and Development Agency (TIKA). As a case of Turkye’s Soft Power Application, Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara, 91-94.
12. Fı̇dan, H. ve Nurdun, R. (2008). Turkey’s Role in the Global Development Assistance Community: The Case of TIKA, Jurnal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 10(1), 93-111.
13. Güvenç, S. & Özel, S. (2012). NATO and Turkey in the Post-Cold War World: Between Abandonment and Entrapment. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 12(4), 533-553.
14. Hjertholm, P. & White, H. (2000). Survey of Foreign Aid: History, Trends and Allocation.
15. Kharas, H. (2007). Trends and Issues in Development Aid. Wolfensohn Center for Development Working Paper.
16. Kharas, H. J. & Fengler, W. (2010). Delivering Aid Differently: Lessons from the Field, Brooking Institution Press, Washington D.C., 3-14.
17. Kostrzewa, W. J., Nunnenkamp, P., & Schmieding, H. (1989). A Marshall Plan for Middle and Eastern Europe?, Kiel Working Paper, No. 403, Kiel Institute of World Economics (IfW), Kiel
18. Kulaklıkaya, M. ve Nurdun, R. (2010). Turkey as a New Player in Development Cooperation, Insight Turkey, 12(4), 131-145.
19. Lancester C. (2007) Foreign Aid: Diplomacy, Development Domestic Politics, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 30-91.
20. Little, I.M.D. & Clifford, J.M. (2009). International Aid: The Flow of Public Resources form Rich to Poor Countries, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey, USA, 31.
21. Lundsgaarde, E. (2012). The Future of European Development Aid. Futures, 44(7), 704-710.
22. Manning, R. (2006). Will Emerging Donors Change the Face of International Cooperation?. Development Policy Review, 24(4), 371- 385.
23. Mawdsley, E. (2014). From Recipients to Donors: Emerging Powers and the Changing Development Landscape, Zed Books, London, 48-68.
24. McMichael, P. (2012). Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective, Sage, Los Angeles, 61-63.
25. Miles, W. F. (2012). Deploying Development to Counter Terrorism: Post-9/11 Transformation of US Foreign Aid to Africa. African Studies Review, 27-60.
26. Milner, H. V. & Tingley, D. (2012). The Choice for Multilateralism: Foreign Aid and American Foreign Policy”. The Review of International Organizations, 8(3).
27. Moyo, D. (2009). Dead Aid: Why Aid is not Working and How There is a Better Way for Africa, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 12-40.
28. OECD (2015). Official Development Assistance: Definition and Coverage, http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/officialdevelopmentassistancedefinitionandcoverage.htm 11.10.2020.
29. OECD-Stat (2020) https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?datasetcode=CRS1#, 13.10.2020.
30. OECD, (2020). Official Development Assistance (ODA), Indicators, Country Programmable Aid (CPA), https://data.oecd.org/oda/country-programmable-aid-cpa.htm#indicator-chart 15.10.2020.
31. Peet, R. & Hartwick, E. (2009). Theories of Development: Contentions, Arguments, Alternatives, The Guilford Press, 127, 3-23.
32. Pettinger, T. (2017) Washington Consensus: Definition and Criticism, http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/7387/economics/washington-consensus-definition-and-criticism/ 11.10.2020.
33. Quadir, F. (2013). Rising Donors and the New Narrative of South-South Cooperation: What Prospects for Changing the Landscape of Development Assistance Programmes?. Third World Quarterly, 34(2), 321-338.
34. Sato, J., Shiga, H., Kobayashi, T., & Kondoh, H. (2010). How Do “Emerging” Donors Differ from “Traditional” Donors?. JICA-RI Working Paper, (2).
35. Stiglitz, J. E., Fitoussi, J. P. & Sen, A. (2010). Why GDP Doesn’t Add Up: The Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance, New Press, New York.
36. TİKA (2019). Türk İşbirliği ve Koordinasyon Ajansı 2019 Faaliyet Raporu.
37. Türkiye Bursları (2020). https://turkiyeburslari.gov.tr/tr/sayfa/hakkimizda/turkiye-burslari 16.10.2020.
38. UNDP (2019). About Human Development, United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report, http://hdr.undp.org/en/humandev 11.10.2020.
39. Walz, J. & Ramachandran, V. (2011). Ideas to Action: Independent Research for Global Prosperity.
40. Zimmermann, F. & Smıth, K. (2011). More Actors, More Money, More Ideas for International Development Cooperation, Jurnal for International Development, 23(5), 722-738.