The Impact of Education on Happiness and Wellbeing in a Middle-Income Country: The Case of Turkey

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türkiye'de 1997 yılında yürürlüğe giren ve zorunlu eğitimi beş yıldan sekiz yıla çıkaran eğitim reformunu kullanarak eğitim ile mutluluk arasındaki nedensel ilişkiyi analiz etmektedir. Mevcut literatür, eğitimin iş olanakları, gelir düzeyi ve sağlık gibi alanlarda olumlu etkiler yarattığını geniş çapta desteklerken, eğitimin mutluluk üzerindeki doğrudan etkisi hâlâ tartışma konusudur. Çalışmanın temel hipotezi, eğitimin bireylerin beklentilerini yükselterek rapor edilen mutluluk üzerindeki olumlu etkilerini dengeleyebileceğidir. Araştırma, reformun bölgesel uygulanma farklılıklarını araç değişken (IV) yöntemi ile kullanarak nedensel çıkarım yapmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bulgular, eğitimin gelir ve geleceğe yönelik beklentiler üzerinde anlamlı pozitif etkiler yarattığını, ancak özellikle kadınlar için mutluluk üzerindeki doğrudan etkisinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu sonuçlar, eğitimin mutluluğa olan etkisinin doğrudan bir ilişkiyle sınırlı olmayıp ekonomik ve sosyal faktörler gibi dolaylı mekanizmalar aracılığıyla daha karmaşık bir yapıya sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Eğitim ve mutluluk arasındaki zayıf ilişkinin yalnızca içsellik ya da ara değişkenlerle açıklanamayacağı, aksine yükselen beklentiler teorisinin daha güçlü bir açıklama sunduğu belirtilmektedir. Araştırmanın sınırlılıkları arasında, mutluluk verilerinin öz-beyanlara dayanması ve analiz kapsamının reformdan etkilenen bireylerle sınırlı olması nedeniyle bulguların genelleştirilebilirliğinin kısıtlı olması yer almaktadır. Bu çalışma, eğitim politikalarının geleneksel ekonomik çıktılarla birlikte zihinsel ve öznel iyi oluşu da dikkate alacak şekilde şekillendirilmesi gerektiğine işaret ederek literatüre önemli bir katkı sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Türkiye
• Eğitim reformu
• Mutluluk
• Refah
• Fark-analizi. JEL Codes: H51; H52; I12; I26

The Impact of Education on Happiness and Wellbeing in a Middle-Income Country: The Case of Turkey

Öz

This study analyses the causal relationship between education and subjective well-being by utilizing the 1997 educational reform in Turkey, which extended compulsory schooling from five to eight years. While the existing literature widely acknowledges the positive effects of education on employment opportunities, income levels, and health outcomes, its direct impact on subjective well-being remains a subject of debate. The central hypothesis posited is that education may elevate individuals' aspirations, thereby offsetting its positive effects on reported happiness. The research employs an instrumental variable (IV) approach, leveraging regional variations in the implementation of the reform to enable robust causal inference. The findings indicate that while education has significant positive effects on income and future expectations, its direct impact on subjective well-being is not statistically significant, particularly for women. These results suggest that the relationship between education and happiness is not straightforward but is mediated through more complex mechanisms, such as economic and social factors. The study challenges the notion that the weak link between education and happiness can be attributed solely to endogeneity or mediating variables, instead supporting the theory that elevated aspirations provide a more compelling explanation. Limitations include the reliance on self-reported happiness data and the focus on individuals directly affected by the reform, potentially constraining the generalizability of the findings. This study contributes to the literature by emphasizing that educational policies should be designed with consideration for mental and subjective well-being alongside traditional economic outcomes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Turkey
• Education reform
• Happiness
• Welfare
• Difference in difference
• JEL Codes: H51; H52; I12; I26

Kaynakça

1. Angrist, J. (1991). Instrumental variables estimation of average treatment effects in econometrics and epidemiology (Working Paper No. 0115). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research website: http://www.nber.org/papers/t0115
2. Angrist, J. D. (2001). Estimation of limited dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors: Simple strategies for empirical practice. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 19(1), 2-28.
3. Angrist, J. D., Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Baltagi, B. H., Flores-Lagunes, A., Karatas, H. M. (2019). The effect of education on health: Evidence from the 1997 compulsory schooling reform in Turkey. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 77, 205-221.
5. Caporale, G. M., Georgellis, Y., Tsitsianis, N., Yin, Y. P. (2009). Income and happiness across Europe: Do reference values matter?. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(1), 42-51.
6. Clark, A. E. (2018). Four decades of the economics of happiness: Where next?. Review of Income and Wealth, 64(2), 245-269.
7. Dickson, M., Harmon, C. (2011). Economic returns to education: what we know, what we don’t know, and where we are going-some brief pointers. Economics of Education Review, 30(6), 1118-1122.
8. Duflo, E. (2001). Schooling and labor market consequences of school construction in Indonesia: Evidence from an unusual policy experiment. American Economic Review, 91(4), 795-813.

9. Dinçer, M. A., Kaushal, N., Grossman, M. (2014). Women’s education: Harbinger of another spring? evidence from a natural experiment in Turkey. World Development, 64, 243-258. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.06.010
10. Dulger, I. (2004). Case study on Turkey rapid coverage for compulsory education program. In conference on scaling up poverty reduction, Shanghai, China http://siteresources. World Bank. org/INTTURKEY/Resources/Compulsory_Education. pdf.
11. Dursun, B., Cesur, R. (2016). Transforming lives: the impact of compulsory schooling on hope and happiness. Journal of Population Economics, 29(3), 911-956.
12. Easterlin, R. (1974). “Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence.” In Paul A. David; Melvin W. Reder (eds.). Nations and Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic Press, Inc.
13. Easterlin, R. (1995). “Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 27 (1), 35-48. Güneş, P. M. (2015). The role of maternal education in child health: Evidence from a compulsory schooling law. Economics of Education Review, 47, 1-16.
14. Harmon, C., Oosterbeek, H., Walker, I. (2003). The returns to education: Microeconomics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(2), 115-156.
15. Imbens, G. W., Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951620
16. Lafortune, J. (2013). Making yourself attractive: Pre-marital investments and the returns to education in the marriage market. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(2), 151-78.
17. Özkan, Ö. (2024). Economic Impacts of the 1997 Compulsory Education Reform in Türkiye: New findings and employment analysis. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, 10(2), 407-420.
18. Özer, M., Fidrmuc, J. (2024). Education and mental health: Causal effects and intra-family spillovers. Available at SSRN 4907506.
19. Özer, M., Fidrmuc, J., Eryurt, M. A. (2018). Maternal education and childhood immunization in Türkiye. Health economics, 27(8), 1218-1229.
20. Özer, M., Fidrmuc, J., Eryurt, M. A. (2023). Education and domestic violence: Evidence from a natural experiment in Türkiye. Kyklos, 76(3), 436-460.
21. Özer, M., Fidrmuc, J., Mentzakis, E., Özkan, Ö. (2024). Does education affect religiosity? Causal evidence from a conservative emerging economy. CESifo Economic Studies, 70(1), 34-50.
22. Staiger, D., Stock, J. H. (1997). Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica, 65(3), 557-586.