Uzaktan Eğitim ile Öğrenmede Pedagojik Değişim İhtiyacı: Geleneksel Bir Üniversitede Yürütülen Uzaktan Eğitim Çalışması

Öz

Bilgi çağının bir gereksinimi olarak çalışan veya herhangi bir sebepten dolayı geleneksel eğitim kurumlarından uzak olan bireylerin ihtiyaç duyduğu güncel iletişim teknolojilerinde meydana gelen gelişmeler her ne kadar eğitimcilere fırsatlar sunmakta olsada, bu teknolojilerin öğrenme ve öğretmen faaliyetlerinde nasıl kullanılması gerektiği, uygun pedagojik yaklaşımların neler olabilieceği cevaplanması gereken bir sorun olarak beklemektedir. Bu çalışma, verilen sebeplerden dolayı, özellikle uzaktan eğitim faaliyetlerinde pedagojik dinamiklerin neler olabileceğini yetişkin öğrencilerin tecrübeleri ile incelemek üzere yürütülmüştür. Bu bağlamda, öğrencilerin uzaktan eğitimde öğrenme üzerine genel görüşlerinin yanı sıra hangi unsurların önemli olduğu tartışılmıştır. Katılımcılara göre başarılı bir uzaktan eğitim faaliyeti için pedagojik bir planlamanın ve bu planın hayata geçirilmesi ile ilgili bir takım stratejilerin dikkate alınması gerekmektedir. Bunlardan en önemlileri, öğretim öncesi iyi bir pedagojik planlama (tasarımın) yapılması, öğretim faaliyetinde bulunan öğretmen ve öğrencilerin sistem içerisinde var olduklarını hissettirmeleri, ve öğrencilerin öğrenmeleri ile ilgili bir geri beslemeye dikkat edilmesi gereği vurgulanmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Uzaktan eğitim ve pedagojik unsurlar, Yetişkinlerin çevrimiçi öğrenme tecrübesi, Çevrimiçi öğretimde temel dinamikler

The Need for Pedagogical Change in Online Adult Learning: A Distance Education Case in a Traditional University

Öz

The need for providing opportunities for those who seek for advancing his or her knowledge and skills on different subjects while they are away from campus has been a requirement of the era we live in. Thus, the diffusion of distance education concept among educators and use of related technologies in many campuses has been growing. Although different advanced technologies are available for preparing and delivering content online, the important question on how to use these technologies still remains unanswered. Literature on the subject recommends that having access to technology itself does not produce desired outcome, unless it is supported with appropriate pedagogical approaches. This study, therefore, was designed to investigate pedagogy of teaching and learning online from adult students’ perspectives. Specifically, to understand pedagogical factors that impact student understanding of the content online, how adult students in an online program assess pedagogical approaches represented by course instructors, weaknesses they have experienced and ideas what would be done in terms of pedagogical approach so that adult learners learn better in online environments. Participants stressed on the importance of pedagogical planning and implementation strategies. Among those issues, planning before teaching, social presence through interactions, and feedback mechanism are mostly indicated issues necessary for effective teaching and learning online.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Pedagogy in distance eduation, adults’ online learning experinces, dynamics of teaching online

Kaynakça

1. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPACK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168.
2. Baldwin, R. (1998, Winter). Technology’s impact on faculty life and work. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 76 , 7-21.
3. Baran, E., Chuang, H. H., & Thompson, A. (2011). TPACK: An emergent research and development tool for teacher educators. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10 (4), 370-377.
4. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press
5. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society, 13 (4), 63–73.
6. Creswell, J.W. (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
7. Cuban, L. (1998). High-tech schools and low tech teaching. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 14 (2), 6-7.
8. Cuban, L. (2002). Oversold & Underused. Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

9. Debell, M., & Chapman, C. (2003). Computer and internet use by children and adolescents in 2001 (NCES 2004-014). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
10. Franklin, T., Turner, S., Kariuki, M., & Duran, M. (2001). Mentoring overcomes barriers to technology integration. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(1), 26-31.
11. Geray, C. (2007). Distance Education in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Policies, 1(1), 33-62.
12. Gilbert, P. K., & Dabbagh, N. (2005). How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 5-18.
13. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory, Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
14. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416.
15. Isman, A. (2008). Uzaktan eğitim (3rd ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi
16. Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26
17. Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in Web- based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153-162.
18. Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy, & technology. Computers and Education, 49(3), 740-762.
19. Koh, J., Chai, C., & Tsai, C. (2010), Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore pre-service teachers with a large-scale survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26: 563–573.
20. Lin, Y., Lin, G. & Laffey, J.M. (2008). Building a social and motivational framework for understanding satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 1–27.
21. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record 108 (6), 1017-1054.
22. Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Pamuk, S. (2011), Understanding preservice teachers' technology use through TPACK framework. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00447.x
24. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ıdeas. New York, NY: Basic Books.
25. Savery, J. R. (2005). BE VOCAL: Characteristics of successful online instructors. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(2), 141152.
26. Schrum, L. (2005). A proactive approach to a research agenda for educational technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 217- 220.
27. Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., & Swan, K. (2001). Measures of learning effectiveness in the SUNY Learning Network. In J. Bourne & J. Moore (Eds.), Online education: Learning Effectiveness, Faculty Satisfaction, and Cost Effectiveness 2, 31–54. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
28. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
29. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
30. Spotts, H. T. (1999). Discriminating factors in faculty use of instructional technology in higher education. Educational Technology & Society, 2(4). Retrived December 2, 2002 from http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_4_99/spotts.html
31. Yalin, H. I. (2008). Internet temelli eğitim. Ankara: Nobel yayın Dağıtım.