Yeni Kamu Yönetimi ve Yeni Sosyal Hareketler Teoriler Perspektifinden Türkiye’de Eğitim Yönetişimi

Öz

Yeni Kamu Yönetimi (NPM) ve Yeni Toplumsal Hareket (NSM) teorileri 1980'lerin sosyo-politik koşullarına tepki olarak ortaya çıktı. Türkiye'de de dönemin sosyo-politik ve sosyo-ekonomik dönüşümleri anlamak için, NPM ve NSM literatürüne birlikte odaklanmak gerekiyor. Daha da önemlisi, NPM ve NSM çağında, eğitimin gelişim sürecini ve önemini, Türkiye'de sosyal sermaye yaratmak için kullanılan bir araç olarak anlamak hayati önem taşımaktadır; bu sebeple bu yazı aşağıdaki soruları yanıtlamayı amaçlamaktadır: Seküler Türkiye'de eğitimde artan dindarlığı açıklamak mümkün mü? NPM, eğitim yönetişiminde fırsat alanlarını nasıl açar? NSM'ler eğitim finansmanına nasıl dahil olurlar? NSM'ler eğitim yönetişimini nasıl yeniden tanımladı? Bu makale, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin kuruluşundan bu yana eğitimin tüm hükümetler için önemini göstermeye çalışacak ve eğitimin iktidarların ideolojilerini yaygınlaştırmak için bir araç olarak kullandığına değinecektir. Çalışmada ilk olarak 1980'ler ve 2000'ler arasındaki eğitimde gerçekleşen neoliberal dönüşüme ve bu dönüşümde etkili olan NPM ve NSM teorilerine değinilecektir. Çalışma eğitim ile Yeni Kamu Yönetimi ve Yeni Toplumsal Hareketler arasındaki etkileşimi gösterecektir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eğitim Yönetişimi,Yeni Kamu Yönetimi,Dini Gruplar,Toplumsal Hareketler,Yeni Toplumsal Hareketler

Educational Governance in Turkey: From the view of New Public Management and New Social Movement Theories

Öz

New Public Management (NPM) and  New Social Movement (NSM) emerged as a response to socio-political conditions of the 1980s. In order to understand the socio-political and socio-economic transformations in Turkey, it is necessary to focus on NPM and NSM literature together. More importantly, in the age of NPM and NSM it is vital to understand the development process of education, and its importance as a tool which has been used to create social capital in Turkey, since this paper aims to answer the following questions: How is it possible to explain increasing religiosity in education in secular Turkey? How does NPM open up opportunity spaces in the governance of education? How have NSMs become involved in the resourcing of education? How have NSMs redefined educational governance? This paper will attempt to show the importance of education for all governments from the beginning of the Turkish Republic, the Turkish governments used education as a tool for spreading their political ideology. So there have been various implementations from secularist policies to Islamist militarist policies in the Turkish education system. After giving some information about educational policies, which have been shaped around secularism, militarism and Islamism, the second section will show the interaction between education and New Public Management (NPM). This paper will first discuss the neoliberal changes that happened between the 1980s and 2000s, and secondly, will indicate how NPM agendas transformed education from a social service to the private service.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Educational Governance,NPM,Religious Groups,Social Movements

Kaynakça

1. AKSOY, N., (2011), ‘Türkiye Kamu Eğitiminde Gizli Ticarileşme: Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluğun İşleyiş Biçimleri Ve Eğitimi Ticarileştirme İşlevleri’, Eğitim Bilim Toplum, Issue: 9, No: 35
2. AKTAY, Y., (1997), Body, Text, Identity: The Islamist Discourse of Authenticity in Modern Turkey, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The Middle East Technical University
3. APPLE, W.M., (2006), Educating The ‘Right’ Way: Markets, Standards, God, and Inequality, 2nd ed., New York: Routledge, 2006.
4. BALL, S.J. & Youdell, D., (2007), ‘Hidden Privatization in Public Education’, Education International 5th World Congress Preliminary Report, July, London: Institute of Education, University of London, [Electronic], [Accessed on: 25 Nov 2011], Available from: http://pages.eiie.org/quadrennialreport/2007/upload/content_trsl_images/630/Hidden_privatisation- EN.pdf
5. BARY, J., Berg, E., and Chandler J., (2006), ‘Movement and Change in the Public Sector: Bringing Social Movements into the Analysis’, Public Management Review, Vol: 8, Issue: 3, pp: 433-448, [Accessed: 26th January 2012], Available from: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/14719030600853329&magic=cr ossref
6. BERİS, Y. and Dicle, E. (2004) “Reforming Public Management and Managing Reform in Turkey,” in Turkey in Focus, Issue: 4, TUSIAD: Washington Office.
7. BERIŞ, H. E., (2008), ‘Türkiye’de 1980 Sonrası Devlet Sermaye İlişkileri ve „Parçalı Burjuvazinin Oluşumu’, (The State-Capital Relation After 1980 and The Formation of Partial Bourgeoisie in Turkey), Ekonomik Yaklaşım, Vol: 19, No: 69, 33-45.
8. BEVIR, M. and Rhodes, R. A. W., (2003), ‘Searching for Civil Society: Changing Patterns of Governance in Britain’, Public Administration, Vol: 81, No: 1, pp: 41 – 62.

9. BORATAV, K., (1995), ‘Ekonomi ve Küreselleşme,’ in Isin Kansu (eds), Küreselleşme Hikayesi, Dost Yayınları.
10. COHEN, J., and Arato, A., (1995), Civil Society and Political Theory, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, 3rd ed.
11. DELLA PORTA, D., & Diani, M., (1999), Social movements: An introduction, Oxford: Blackwell
12. DPT, (2000), 8. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, 2001-2005, İnsan Kaynaklarının Geliştirilmesi: Eğitim, [Accessed on: 10/04/2013], available from: http://www.ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/kalkinmaplanlari
13. FERLIE, E., [et. al], (1996), The New Public Management in Action, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
14. GELLNER, E., (1994), Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and Its Rivals, NewYork: Penguin Press.
15. GOK, F., (2003), ‘Eğitimin Özelleştirilmesi’ Neoliberalizmin Tahribatı : Türkiye’de Ekonomi, Toplum Ve Cinsiyet , Der: Balkan, N., Savran, S., Istanbul: Metis Yayınlari.
16. GOLE, N., (2000), ‘Snapshots of Islamic Modernities’, Daedalus, Vol: 129, No: 1, PP: 91-117
17. HOOD, C., (1991), ‘A public management for all seasons?’, Public Administration, Vol: 69, No:1, pp3-19
18. HOOD, C., (1995), ‘The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme?’ Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol; 20, No:2/3, pp:93-109
19. KESKIN, N., (2003), Eğitimde Reform Kamu Yönetimi I. Ulusal Kurultayı (18-19 Aral ı k 2003). İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya.
20. MELLUCI, A., (1996), Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
21. MUNYAR, V., (9th April, 2012), ‘Ilköğretim öğrencisi için 1500 lira özel okul desteği versek devlete yükü azalır’, Hurriyet, http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yazarlar/20302572.asp
22. MURPHY, J., (1996), The Privatization of Schooling: Problems and Possibilities, Corwin Press, Inc. USA
23. NEWMAN, J. (2001), Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society, London: Sage.
24. OECD, (2010), ‘Value for Money in Government: Public Administration after ‘New Public Management’, available from: http://www.planejamento.gov.br/secretarias/upload/Arquivos/seges/arquivos/OCDE2011/OECD_Publ ic_Management.pdf
25. OZDALGA, E., (1999), Education In The Name of ‘Order and Progress’ Reflections On The Recent Eight Year Obligatory School Reform In Turkey. The Muslim World, Vol:89, pp: 414–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-1913.1999.tb02756.x
26. SAYILAN, F., (2007), Kresellesme ve Egitimdeki Degisim, (editor: Ebru Oguz, Ayfer Yakar). Kuresellesme ve Egitim, (59-81), Ankara, Dipnot Yayinlari
27. SERIM, B., (17th April, 2012), http://www.odatv.com/n.php?n=cemaat-okullarina-devlet-destegi- 1704121200
28. SIMSEK, S., (2004), ‘New Social Movements in Turkey Since 1980’, Turkish Studies, Vol.5, No.2 , Summer , [Online] [Accessed: 30th January 2012], Available from: DOI: 10.1080/1468384042000228611
29. SOZEN, S. ve I. Shaw, (2002), ‘The International Applicability of ‘New’ Public Management: Lessons from Turkey’, The International Journal of Public Sector Management. Vol. 15 No. 6, s. 475- 486, 2002
30. TESEV (2001), From Point of the Households the Reasons and the Proposals for Prevention of Corruption in Turkey, Istanbul, Turkish
31. TOLOFARI, S., (2005), New Public Management and Education, Policy Futures in Education, Vol: 3, No: 1, pp:75-89, Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2005.3.1.11 [Accessed: 30th November 2011]
32. TURAM, B., (2004), ‘The Politics of engagement between Islam and the state: ambivalences of civil society’ British Journal of Sociology, Vol: 55, No: 2, Reprinted in Shahram Akbarzadeh (ed) 2006. Islam and Globalization. Routledge
33. TURAM, B., (2007), Between Islam and the State: The Politics of Engagement, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
34. TURAM, B., (2011), Turkiye'de Islam ve Devlet: Demokrasi, Etkilesim, Donusum, Istanbul: Bilgi Universitesi Yayinlari
35. UYSAL, A. (ed.), (2009), Siyasal İslam ve Liberalizm: Endonezya, İran, Mısır, Tunus, Türkiye, İzmir Yakın Kitabevi
36. WIKTOROWICZ, Q., (2004), Islamic Activism: A Social Movement Theory Approach. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
37. YASAMIS, F. D. (2003). State reform in Turkey: Reasons, needs and strategies. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62(4), 93-107.
38. YAVUZ, H., (2000), ‘Cleansing Islam from the Public Sphere’, Journal of International Affairs, Fall 2000, 54, No:1
39. YAVUZ, H., (2003), Islamic Political Identity in Turkey, Oxford University Press, New York
40. YAVUZ, H., (2008), Modernlesen Muslumanlar: Nurcular, Naksiler, Milli Gorus ve Ak Parti (Islamic Political Identity in Turkey), Kitap Yayinevi, Istanbul.
41. YILDIRIM, H.A., (2002), Eğitimde Toplam Kalite Yönetimi, Nobel Yayınevi, Ankara.