The Role of Social Media in Journalism: An Examination on Turkish News Organizations

Öz

This study, seeks to understand the role of social media in journalistic routines by examining Turkish news organizations, and asks: How do Turkish news organizations use social media as a newsgathering tool? Do they consider social media as a trusted source? Which social media platforms are being used most by news organisations? Do they integrate user-generated content into their news? How do they struggle with fake news? How do they evaluate the future of journalism? To answer these questions, we conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with media professionals working for newspapers, television, news agencies and the web. We carried out the interviews in Istanbul and Ankara between February and March 2017. The total length of all interviews is more than 600 minutes. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed conducting a qualitative content analysis. The current findings illustrate that the impact of social media on journalistic routines is limited. It can be contended that professional journalistic norm and practices continue their importance in Turkish news organizations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Social media,Journalism,User-generated content,Verification,News sources

Sosyal Medyanın Gazetecilikteki Rolü: Türkiye’deki Haber Kuruluşları Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Öz

Bu çalışma, sosyal medyanın gündelik haber rutinlerindeki rolünü, Türkiye’deki haber kuruluşlarında gerçekleştirilen uygulamaları inceleyerek anlamayı-anlamlandırmayı hedeflemektedir. Çalışmanın bu amaçla yanıtını aradığı sorulardan bazıları şunlardır: Haberciler, gündelik haber rutinlerinde, sosyal ağ sitelerinden nasıl yaralanmaktadırlar? Bunları, güvenilir birer kaynak olarak görmekte midirler? Habercilik söz konusu olduğunda, en çok hangi platformlar öne çıkmaktadır? Sıradan kullanıcıların ürettikleri içerikler, habercilik açısından ne anlama gelmektedir? Haber kuruluşları, gerçek dışı haberlerle nasıl mücadele etmektedirler? Gazeteciliğin gelecekte alacağı biçim ne olacaktır? Bu ve benzeri sorulara yanıt oluşturmak üzere on iki medya profesyoneliyle yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Görüşmeler 2017 yılının Şubat ve Mart aylarında Ankara ve İstanbul’da yapılmıştır. Toplam uzunluğu 600 dakikayı aşan görüşmeler, kayıt altına alınmış ve deşifre edilerek niteliksel içerik analizi yöntemiyle çözümlenmiştir. Bulgular, ‘şimdilik kaydıyla’, sosyal medyanın profesyonel gazetecilik üzerindeki etkisinin sınırlı olduğunu; buna karşın işi habercilik yapmak olan kuruluşlar açısından profesyonel gazeteciliğin geleneksel norm ve pratiklerinin önemini koruduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyal medya,Gazetecilik,Kullanıcı içerikleri,Doğrulama,Haber kaynakları

Kaynakça

1. Alejandro, J. (2010). Journalism in the age of social media. Reuters Institute Fellowship Paper. Oxford: University of Oxford. Erişim tarihi: 15 Nisan 2017, http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/research/files/Journalism%2520in%2520the%2520Age%2520of%2520Social%2520Media.pdf.
2. Ali, S. R. & Fahmy, S. (2013). Gatekeeping and citizen journalism: The use of social media during the recent uprisings in Iran, Egypt, and Libya. Media, War & Conflict, 6(1), 55–69. doi:10.1177/1750635212469906
3. Artwick, C. G. (2013). Reporters on Twitter: Product or service?. Digital Journalism, 1(2), 212–228. doi:10.1080/21670811.2012.744555
4. Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14. doi:10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
5. Brandtzaeg, P. B., Lüders, M., Jochen Spangenberg, Rath-Wiggins, L. & Følstad, A. (2016). Emerging journalistic verification practices concerning social media. Journalism Practice, 10(3), 323–342. doi:10.1080/17512786.2015.1020331
6. Broersma, M. & Graham, T. (2013). Twitter as news source: How Dutch and British newspa-pers used tweets in their news coverage, 2007-2011. Journalism Practice, 7(4), 446–464. doi:10.1080/17512786.2013.802481
7. Bruns, A. (2003). Gatewatching, not gatekeeping: Collaborative online news. Media Interna-tional Australia, 107, 31–44.
8. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity.

9. Fortunelords (2017). YouTube facts, figures and statistics–2017. Erişim tarihi: 16 Aralık 2017, https://fortunelords.com/youtube-statistics/.
10. Goode, L, (2009). Social news, citizen journalism and democracy. New Media & Society, 11(8), 1287–1305. doi:10.1177/1461444809341393
11. Goodman, E. (5 Temmuz 2009). Journalism needed in twitter era. Columbia Daily Tribune. Erişim tarihi: 16 Aralık 2017, http://www.columbiatribune.com/9409a1ef-48d2-57f4-935b-fd51e95f6cf2.html.
12. Gunter, B. (2000). Media Research Methods. London: Sage Publications.
13. Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke J. & Roberts, B. (1978). Policing the Crisis: Mug-ging, the State, and Law and Order. London: Macmillan.
14. Hamilton, C. (29 Mayıs 2012). Houla massacre picture mistake. BBC. Erişim tarihi: 25 Ocak 2017, http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2012/05/houla_massacre_picture_mistake.html.
15. Harrison, J. (2010). User-generated content and gatekeeping at the BBC hub. Journalism Studies, 11(2), 243–256. doi:10.1080/14616700903290593
16. Hermida, A. (2010). Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism Practice, 4(3), 297–308. doi:10.1080/17512781003640703
17. Hermida, A. (2012). Tweets and truth: Journalism as a discipline of collaborative verification. Journalism Practice, 6(5-6), 659–668. doi:10.1080/17512786.2012.667269
18. Herrman, J. (17 Nisan 2016). Media websites battle faltering ad revenue and traffic. The New York Times. Erişim tarihi: 17 Haziran 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/18/business/media-websites-battle-falteringad-revenue-and-traffic.html.
19. Internet Live Stats (2017). Internet usage & social media statistics. Erişim tarihi: 16 Aralık 2017, http://www.internetlivestats.com/.
20. Jesse, H., Gross, K. & Mitchell, A. (2011). How Mainstream Media Outlets Use Twitter. Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism. Erişim tarihi: 12 Eylül 2016, http://www.journalism.org/2011/11/14/how-mainstream-media-outlets-use-twitter/
21. Johnston, L. (2016). Social news = Journalism evolution? How the integration of UGC into newswork helps and hinders the role of the journalist. Digital Journalism, 4(7), 899-909. doi:10.1080/21670811.2016.1168709
22. Knight, M. (2012). Journalism as usual: The use of social media as a newsgathering tool in the coverage of the Iranian elections in 2009. Journal of Media Practice, 13(1), 61–74.
23. Kurt, H. (2014). Gazetecilik pratiği ve sosyal medya. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Science, 13(4), 821–835.
24. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H. & Moon, S. (2010).What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, 591–600. Erişim tarihi: 23 Temmuz 2017, http://www.ambuehler.ethz.ch/CDstore/www2010/www/p591.pdf
25. Lasorsa, D. L., Lewis, S. C. & Holton, A. E. (2012). Normalizing Twitter: Journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies, 13(1), 19–36. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2011.571825
26. Lecheler, S. & Kruikemeier, S. (2016). Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: A review of research on the use of online sources. New Media & Society, 18(1), 156–171. doi:10.1177/1461444815600412
27. Lewis, S. C., Kaufhold, K. & Lasorsa, D. L. (2010). Thinking about citizen journalism: The philosophical and practical challenges of user-generated content for community newspapers. Journalism Practice, 4(2), 163-179. doi:10.1080/14616700903156919
28. Manosevitch, I. (2011). User generated content in the Israeli online journalism landscape. Is-rael Affairs, 17(3), 422–444. DOİ:10.1080/13537121.2011.584670
29. Messner, M., Linke, M. & Esford, A. (2012). Shoveling tweets: An analysis of the microblog-ging engagement of traditional news organizations. #ISOJ The Journal of the International Symposium on Online Journalism, 2(1), 74-87. Erişim tarihi: 30 Ekim 2017, https://isoj.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/ISOJ_Journal_V2_N1_2012_Spring.pdf
30. Neuberger, C., vom Hofe, H. J. & Nuernbergk, C. (2016). The use of Twitter by professional journalists: Results of a newsroom survey in Germany. K.
31. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt & C. Puschmann (Ed.), Twitter and society (385–398). New York: Peter Lang.
32. Newman, N. (2009). The Rise of Social Media and Its Impact on Mainstream Journalism. Reu-ters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Oxford: University of Oxford. Erişim tarihi: 18 Mayıs 2017, http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/fileadmin/documents/Publications/
33. Newman, N., Dutton, W. H. & Blank, G. (2012). Social media in the changing ecology of news: The fourth and fifth estates in Britain. International Journal of Internet Science, 7(1), 6–22.
34. Omnicore (2017). Instagram by the numbers. Erişim tarihi: 16 Aralık 2017, https://www.omnicoreagency.com/instagram-statistics/.
35. Oriella PR Network (2012). The Influence Game: How News is Sourced and Managed To-day. Erişim tarihi: 10 Eylül 2017, http://journalismdegree.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Oriella-Digital-Journalism-Study-2012-Final-US-copy.pdf
36. Piscina, T. R., Zabalondo, B., Aiestaran, A. & Agirre, A. (2016). The future of journalism–Who to believe? Different perceptions among European professionals and internet users. Journalism Practice, 10(1), 71–92. doi:10.1080/17512786.2015.1006932
37. Schifferes, S. & Newman, N. (2013). Verifying News on the Social Web: Challenges and Pro-spects. Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web companion, 875–878. Erişim tarihi: 21 Nisan 2017, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.402.250&rep=rep1&type=pdf
38. Schifferes, S., Newman, N., Thurman, N., Corney, D., Göker, A. & Martin, C. (2014). Identi-fying and verifying news through social media: Developing a user-centred tool for profession-al journalists. Digital Journalism, 2(3), 406–418. doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.892747
39. Schudson, M. (1989). The sociology of news production. Media, Culture & Society, 11(3), 263–282.
40. Sütçü, C. S. & Bayrakçı, S. (2014). Sosyal medya gazeteleri nasıl etkiliyor? Haberleri Twit-ter’da yayılması üzerine bir araştırma. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Commu-nication, 4(2), 40–52.
41. Tong, T. (2015). Chinese journalists' views of user-generated content producers and journal-ism: a case study of the boundary work of journalism. Asian Journal of Communication, 25(6), 600-616. doi:10.1080/01292986.2015.1019526
42. Vis, F. (2013). Twitter as a reporting tool for breaking news: Journalists tweeting the 2011 UK riots. Digital Journalism, 1(1), 27–47. doi:10.1080/21670811.2012.741316
43. Weaver, D. H. & Willnat, L. (2016). Changes in U.S. journalism: How do journalists think about social media?. Journalism Practice, 10(7), 844–855. doi:10.1080/17512786.2016.1171162
44. Weiss, S. A. (2015). The digital and social media journalist: A comparative analysis of journal-ists in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. The International Communication Ga-zette, 77(1), 74–101. doi:10.1177/1748048514556985
45. Whitbourn, M. (26 Nisan 2015). SBS presenter Scott McIntyre sacked over 'inappropriate' An-zac Day tweets. Sydney Morning Herald. Erişim tarihi: 15 Ağustos 2017, http://www.smh.com.au/national/ww1/sbs-presenter-scott-mcintyre-sacked-over-inappropriate-anzac-day-tweets-20150426-1mtbx8.html.
46. White, D. M. (1950). The ‘Gatekeeper’. A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27, 383–390.
47. Zephoria (2017). The top 20 valuable Facebook statistics. Erişim tarihi: 16 Aralık 2017, https://zephoria.com/top-15-valuable-facebook-statistics/.