Communication Technologies and Social Movements: A Systematic Review of Literature

Öz

Communication technologies have become pervasive tools in social movements in recent years. These uses have met with growing researcher’s attention around the world. This is why the role of communication technologies in social movements is currently a hot topic in academic circles. Using the qualitative and quantitative content analysis, this study presents the result of a systematic literature review of 53 studies that deal with the use of communication technologies in social movements. The literature review was carried out under five categories. In the first and second categories, the emphasis was given to which social movements and communication tools these studies analyze; in the third and fourth categories, their methodologies and data collection techniques were examined; and in the fifth category, the relationship they establish between social movements and media was explored. According to the results, mostly the Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street protests were examined in these studies and Twitter was analyzed the most. The results also showed that quantitative and qualitative content analysis techniques were used the most in these studies and computational-based data collection techniques were utilized at the highest level. Finally, the results proved a positive relationship between media and social movements in the examined studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Communication technologies,Social movements,Twitter,Facebook,Arab Spring

İletişim Teknolojileri ve Toplumsal Hareketler: Sistematik Bir Literatür İncelemesi

Öz

Günümüzde iletişim teknolojileri toplumsal hareketlerde yoğun olarak kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Bu durum, dünya genelinde araştırmacıların artan ilgisiyle karşılaşmıştır. Literatürde iletişim teknolojilerinin toplumsal hareketlerdeki rolü üzerine hararetli bir tartışmanın olması bu açıdan şaşırtıcı değildir. Bu çalışma, niteliksel ve niceliksel içerik analiz yöntemlerini kullanarak, toplumsal hareketleri iletişim ekseninde ele alan 53 makalenin sistematik literatür incelemesine ilişkin sonuçları sunmaktadır. Söz konusu çalışmalar beş kategori altında incelenmiştir. Birinci ve ikinci kategorilerde bu çalışmaların hangi toplumsal hareketleri ve hangi iletişim araçlarını analiz ettikleri üzerinde durulmuştur. Üçüncü ve dördüncü kategorilerde bu çalışmaların hangi metodolojiyi ve hangi veri toplama tekniklerini kullandıkları incelenmiştir. Beşinci kategoride ise bu çalışmaların toplumsal hareketler ve medya arasında nasıl bir ilişki kurduklarına bakılmıştır. Birinci ve ikinci kategoriler altında yapılan sorgulama en fazla Arap Baharı ve Occupy Wall Street protestolarının incelendiğini ve en fazla Twitter’ın analiz edildiğini göstermiştir. Üçüncü ve dördüncü kategoriler altında yapılan araştırma en fazla niceliksel ve niteliksel içerik analiz tekniklerinin kullanıldığını ve en çok sayısal-tabanlı veri toplama tekniklerinin tercih edildiğini ortaya koymuştur. Beşinci ve son kategori altında yapılan inceleme ise medya ve toplumsal hareketler arasında olumlu bir ilişki kurulduğunu göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İletişim teknolojileri,Toplumsal hareketler,Twitter,Facebook,Arap Baharı

Kaynakça

1. Adi, A. (2015). Occupy PR: An analysis of online media communications of Occupy Wall Street and Occupy London. Public Relations Review, 41 (4), 508- 514. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.06.001
2. Ahy, M. H. (2016). Networked Communication and the Arab Spring: Linking broadcast and social media. New Media & Society, 18(1), 99-116. doi:10.1177/1461444814538634
3. Aouragh, M. & Alexander, A. (2011). The Egyptian experience: Sense and nonsense of the Internet Revolution. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1344-1358
4. Bellei, C., Cabalin, C. & Orellana, V. (2014). The 2011 Chilean student movement against neoliberal educational policies. Studies in Higher Education, 39(3), 426-440. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.896179
5. Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14. doi:10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
6. Bennett, W. L. & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connectıve action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
7. Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A. & Walker, S. (2014). Organization in the crowd: Peer production in large-scale networked protests. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 232-260. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.870379
8. Bode, L. & Dalrymple, K. E. (2016). Politics in 140 characters or less: Campaign communication, network interaction, and political participation on Twitter. Journal of Political Marketing, 15(4), 311-332. doi: 10.1080/15377857.2014.959686

9. Borge-Holthoefer J, Rivero A, García I, Cauhé E, Ferrer A, Ferrer D, vd. (2011). Structural and dynamical patterns on online social networks: The Spanish May 15th Movement as a case study. PLoS ONE, 6(8), 1-8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023883
10. Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta- analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524-538. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
11. Boyle, M. P. & Schmierbach, M. (2009). Media use and protest: The role of mainstream and alternative media use in predicting traditional and protest participation. Communication Quarterly, 57(1), 1-17. doi:10.1080/01463370802662424
12. Calderaro, A. (2010). Empirical analysis of political spaces on the internet: The role of e-mailing lists in the organization of alter-globalization movements. International Journal of E-Politics, 1(1), 73–87. doi:10.4018/jep.2010102205
13. Carty, V. (2015). Wired and mobilizing: Social movements, new technology, and electoral politics. New York: Routledge.
14. Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Power.
15. Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge: Polity.
16. Chen, H. T., Ping, S. & Chen, G. (2015). Far from reach but near at hand: The role of social media for cross-national mobilization. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 443-451. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.052
17. Chrona, S. & Bee, C. (2017). Right to public space and right to democracy: The role of social media in Gezi Park. Research and Policy on Turkey, (2)1, 49-61, doi:10.1080/23760818.2016.1272267
18. Comunello, F. & Anzera, G. (2012). Will the revolution be tweeted? A conceptual framework for understanding the social media and the Arab Spring. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 23(4), 453-70. doi:10.1080/09596410.2012.712435
19. Costanza-Chock, S. (2012). Mic Check! Media cultures and the Occupy movement. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 375–385. doi:10.1080/14742837.2012.710746
20. Diamond, L. (2016). In search of democracy. New York: Routledge.
21. Earl, J., Hurwitz, H. M., Mesinas, A. M., Tolan, M. & Arlotti, A. (2013). This protest will be tweeted. Information, Communication & Society, 16(4), 459-478. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.777756
22. Edwards, G. (2014). Social movements and protests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Eltantawy, N. & Wiest, J. B. (2011). Social media in the Egyptian revolution: Reconsidering resource mobilization theory. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1207-1224
24. Fahmi, W. S. (2009). Bloggers’ street movement and the right to the city. (Re)claiming Cairo’s real and virtual “spaces of freedom.” Environment and Urbanization, 21(1), 89–107. doi: 10.1177/0956247809103006
25. Felt, M. (2016). Social media and the social sciences: How researchers employ big data analytics. Big Data & Society, 1, 1-15. doi: 10.1177/2053951716645828
26. Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London: Pluto.
27. Giglou, R. I., d’Haenens, L. & Ogan, C. (2016). Turkish diasporic responses to the Taksim Square protests: Legacy media and social media uses in Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 548-559, doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.09.012
28. Gladwell, M. (2010). Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker 4, 42-49.
29. González-Bailón, S. & Wang, N. (2015). Networked discontent: The anatomy of protest campaigns in social media. Social Networks, 44, 95-104. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2015.07.003
30. González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J. & Moreno, Y. (2013). Broadcasters and hidden influentials in online protest diffusion. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 943-965. doi:10.1177/0002764213479371
31. Harlow, S. (2011). Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline. New Media & Society, 14(2), 225-243. doi:10.1177/1461444811410408
32. Harlow, S., Salaverria, R., Kilgo, D. K. & Garcia-Perdomo, V. (2017). Protest paradigm in multimedia: Social media sharing of coverage about the crime of Ayotzinapa, Mexico. Journal of communication, 67, 328-349. doi:10.1111/jcom.12296
33. Hensby, A. (2017). Open networks and secret Facebook groups: Exploring cycle effects on activists’ social media use in the 2010/11 UK student protests. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 466-478. doi:10.1080/14742837.2016.1201421
34. Hermida, H. & Hernández-Santaolalla, V. (2018). Twitter and video activism as tools for counter-surveillance: the case of social protests in Spain, Information. Communication & Society, 21(3), 416-433. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1284880
35. Hopkins, J. (2014). Cybertroopers and tea parties: Government use of the internet in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Communication, 24(1), 5-24. doi:10.1080/01292986.2013.851721
36. Jaafar, R. & Stephan, M. J. (2009). Lebanon’s independence intifada: How an unarmed insurrection expelled Syrian forces. M. J. Stephan (Ed.), Civilian jihad nonviolent struggle, democratization, and governance in the Middle East (169-182). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
37. Janetzko, D. (2017). The role of APIs in data sampling from social media. L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase (Ed.), The Sage handbook of social media research methods (146-160). UK: Sage Publications.
38. Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72-91. doi:10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
39. Kavada, A. (2015). Creating the collective: Social media, the Occupy Movement and its constitution as a collective actor. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 872-886, doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043318
40. Ketabchia, K., Asadpourab, M. & Tabatabaeia, S. A. (2013). Mutual influence of Twitter and postelection events of Iranian presidential election. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 100, 40-56. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.698
41. Kharroub, T. & Bas, O. (2016). Social media and protests: An examination of Twitter images of the 2011 Egyptian revolution. New Media & Society, 18(9) 1973-1992 doi:10.1177/1461444815571914
42. Kidd, D. & McIntosh, K. (2016). Social media and social movements. Sociology Compass, 10(9), 785-794. doi:10.1111/soc4.12399
43. Kyriakidou, M., & Osuna, O. J. J. (2017). The Indignados protests in the Spanish and Greek press: Moving beyond the ‘protest paradigm’? European Journal of Communication, 32(5), 457–472. doi:10.1177/0267323117720342
44. Lee, F. L. F. (2018). Internet alternative media, movement experience, and radicalism: The case of post-Umbrella Movement Hong Kong. Social Movement Studies, 17(2), 219-233. doi:10.1080/14742837.2017.1404448
45. Lee, P. S. N., So, C. Y. K. & Leung, L. (2015). Social media and Umbrella Movement: Insurgent public sphere in formation. Chinese Journal of Communication, 8(4), 356-375. doi:10.1080/17544750.2015.1088874
46. Lim, M. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 231-248. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01628.x
47. Liu, Y. (2015). Tweeting, re-tweeting, and commenting: Microblogging and social movements in China. Asian Journal of Communication, 25(6), 567-583. doi:10.1080/01292986.2015.1013971
48. Lotan, G., Graeff, E., Ananny, M., Gaffney, D., Pearce, I. & boyd, d. (2011). The revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1375-1405
49. Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: How not to liberate the World. London: Penguin.
50. Mosca, L. (2010). From the streets to the net? The political use of the internet by social movements. International Journal of E-Politics, 1(1), 1-21. doi:10.4018/jep.2010102201
51. Nefes, T. S. (2017). The impacts of the Turkish government ’s conspiratorial framing of the Gezi Park protests. Social Movement Studies, 16(5), 610-622. doi:10.1080/14742837.2017.1319269
52. Neumayer, C. & Rossi, L. (2018). Images of protest in social media: Struggle over visibility and visual narratives. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4293-4310. doi:10.1177/1461444818770602
53. Olorunnisola, A. A. & Martin, B. L. (2013). Influences of media on social movements: Problematizing hyperbolic inferences about impacts. Telematics & Informatics, 30, 275-288. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2012.02.005
54. Oz, M. (2016). Mainstream media’s coverage of the Gezi protests and protesters’ perception of mainstream media. Global Media and Communication, 12(2), 177–192. doi:10.1177/1742766516653164
55. Park, S. J., Lim, Y. S. & Park, H. W. (2015). Comparing Twitter and YouTube networks in information diffusion: The case of the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ movement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 95(1), 208-217. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.003
56. Price, S. & Sabido, R. S. (ed) (2015). Contemporary protest and the legacy of dissent. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
57. Procter, R., Vis, F. & Voss, A. (2013). Reading the riots on Twitter: Methodological innovation for the analysis of big data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(3), 197-214, doi:10.1080/13645579.2013.774172
58. Rane, H. & Salem, S. (2012). Social media, social movements and the diffusion of ideas in the Arab uprisings. Journal of International Communication, 18(1), 97-111. doi:10.1080/13216597.2012.662168
59. Sandoval-Almazan, R. Gil-Garcia, J.R. (2014). Towards cyberactivism 2.0? Understanding the use of social media and other information technologies for political activism and social movements. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 365-378. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.016
60. Scherman, A., Arriagada, A. & Valenzuela, S. (2015). Student and environmental protests in Chile: The role of social media. Politics, 35(2), 151-171. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12072
61. Segesten, A. D. & Bossetta, M. (2017). A typology of political participation online: How citizens used Twitter to mobilize during the 2015 British general elections. Information, Communication & Society, 20(11), 1625-1643. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1252413
62. Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs, 90(1), 28-41.
63. Smith, B. G., Men, R. L. & Al-Sinan, R. (2015). Tweeting Taksim:Communication power and social media advocacy in the Taksim Square protests. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 499-507. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.012
64. Spiro, E. S. & Monroy-Hernández, A. (2016). Shifting stakes: Understanding the dynamic roles of individuals and organizations in social media protests. PLoS ONE, 11(10), 1-16. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165387
65. Steinert-Threlkeld, Z. C., Mocanu, D., Vespignani, A. & Fowler, J. (2015). Online social networks and offline protest. EPJ Data Science, 4(1), 1-9. doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-015-0056-y
66. Suh, C. S., Vasi, I. B. & Chang, P. Y. (2017). How social media matter: Repression and the diffusion of the Occupy Wall Street Movement. Social Science Research, 65, 282-293
67. Theocharis, Y. & Lowe, W. (2016). Does Facebook increase political participation? Evidence from a field experiment. Information, Communication & Society, 19(10), 1465-1486. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1119871
68. Theocharis, Y. (2013). The wealth of (Occupation) networks? Communication patterns and information distribution in a Twitter protest network. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10(1), 35-56, doi:10.1080/19331681.2012.701106
69. Theocharis, Y., T., Lowe, W., van Deth, J. W. & García-Albacete, G. (2015). Using Twitter to mobilize protest action: online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi movements. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 202-220. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.948035
70. Thorson, K., Driscoll, K., Ekdale, B., Edgerly, S., Thompson, L. G., Schrock, A., Swartz, L., Vraga, E. K. & Wells, C. (2013). YouTube, Twitter and the Occupy Movement: Connecting content and circulation practies. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 421-451. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.756051
71. Tremayne, M. (2014). Anatomy of protest in the digital era: A network analysis of Twitter and Occupy Wall Street. Social Movement Studies, 13(1), 110-126. doi:10.1080/14742837.2013.830969
72. Tudoroiu, T. (2014). Social media and revolutionary waves: The case of the Arab Spring. New Political Science, 36(3), 346-365, doi:10.1080/07393148.2014.913841
73. Vatikiotis, P. & Yörük, Z. F. (2016). Gezi movement and the networked public sphere: A comparative analysis in global context. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 1–12. doi:10.1177/2056305116662184
74. We Are Social (2018). Digital in 2018: Global overview. Erişim tarihi: 19 Ocak 2018, https://wearesocial.com/special-reports/digital-in-2017-global-overview
75. Wolfsfeld, G., Segev, E. & Sheafer, T. (2013). Social media and the Arab Spring: Politics comes first. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 115-137. doi:10.1177/1940161212471716