A Foucauldian Reading of Timberlake Wertenbaker’s Our Country’s Good in a Socio-Political Context

Öz

One of the pioneering women dramatists of British literature, Timberlake Wertenbaker provides both a criticism of post-war Britain and propaganda of the ameliorating function of theatre in her play Our Country’s Good (1988). As a play based on the novel The Playmaker (1987) by Thomas Keneally, Our Country’s Good builds upon the issue of redemptive effects of theatre by portraying a group of convicts on a ship that takes them to Australia in the eighteenth century. Our Country’s Good portrays different authority figures consisting of those who believe in traditional means of punishment and who suggest the possibility of redemption through theatre as an alternative to severe punishment. It is possible to analyse the conflicting views of officers concerning the appropriate punishment methods of the convicts from a Foucauldian perspective. This reading draws on Foucault’s proposal of a penal reform that requires the use of carceral transformation through work and exercise resulting in the correction of delinquents’ behaviour. This paper focuses on the social function of punishment and analyses the representation of the conflation between theatre and punishment in Wertenbaker’s play in light of the dominant ideology concerning these issues in Britain in the Thatcher years.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Timberlake Wertenbaker
• Our Country’s Good
• Foucault
• Thatcher

Timberlake Wertenbaker’ın Our Country’s Good [Ülkemizin İyiliği] Adlı Oyununun Sosyopolitik Çerçevede Foucault’cu Okuması

Öz

İngiliz edebiyatının önde gelen kadın oyun yazarlarından biri olan Timberlake Wertenbaker, Our Country’s Good (1988) [Ülkemizin İyiliği] adlı oyununda hem savaş sonrası İngiltere’ye yönelik bir eleştiri hem de tiyatronun iyileştirici işlevi hakkında bir propaganda sunar. Thomas Keneally'nin The Playmaker (1987) adlı romanından esinlenilen bir oyun olan Our Country’s Good, on sekizinci yüzyılda Avustralya'ya götüren bir gemide bir grup mahkûmun yaşadıklarını canlandırarak tiyatronun iyileştirici etkilerini konu edinir. Our Country’s Good, geleneksel cezalandırma yöntemlerine inanan ve ağır cezaya alternatif olarak tiyatro yoluyla kurtuluş olasılığını öne sürenlerden oluşan farklı otorite figürlerini ele alır. Hükümlülere uygun cezalandırma yöntemleri konusunda görevlilerin çelişkili görüşlerini Foucault’cu bir bakış açısıyla incelemek mümkündür. Bu okuma, Foucault'nun, iş ve egzersiz yoluyla suçluların davranışlarının düzeltilmesi anlamına gelen ceza reformu önerisine dayanmaktadır. Bu makale, ceza kavramının toplumsal işlevine odaklanmakta ve Thatcher yıllarında İngiltere'de bu konulara ilişkin egemen ideolojinin ışığında Wertenbaker'in oyununda tiyatro ve ceza arasındaki ilişkinin temsilini analiz etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Timberlake Wertenbaker
• Our Country’s Good
• Foucault
• Thatcher

Kaynakça

1. Baker-White, R. (1999). The text in play: representations of rehearsal in modern drama. Lewisburg, NJ: Bucknell UP.
2. Carlson, S. (2000). Language and identity in Timberlake Wertenbaker’s plays. In Elaine Aston, and Janelle G. Reinelt (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to modern British women playwrights, 134-151: Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
3. Crow, B. (2002). African metatheater: criticizing society, celebrating the stage. Research in African Literatures, 33 (1), 133-143. Project MUSE. Web. 27 Dec. 2012.
4. Farrall, S. (n.d.). Making sense of Thatcherism and crime. Review 31. Retrieved 09 Sep. 2021 from http://review31.co.uk/essay/view/19/making-sense-of-thatcherism-and-crime
5. Farrall, S. (2006). ‘Rolling back the state’: Mrs. Thatcher's criminological legacy. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 34 (4), 256-277. Science Direct. Web. 05 Sep. 2021.
6. Feldman, A. (2013). Dramas of the past on the twentieth-century stage: in history’s wings. New York and London: Routledge.
7. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. A. Sheridan, Trans. New York: Vintage.
8. Garside, R. (2020). Prisons and politics. Retrieved 09 Sep. 2021 from https://medium.com/@richardgarside/prisons-and-politics-4c397f72f05a

9. Godiwala, D. (2007). Our Country’s Good. In Gabrielle H. Cody and Evert Sprinchorn (Eds.), The Columbia encyclopedia of modern drama: M-Z. New York: Columbia UP.
10. Gritten, D. (1990). Post Thatcher, the arts and the BBC may gain funding: theater and dance groups have withstood years of neglect, but Major is expected to be more sympathetic in subsidizing the arts. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 08 Sep. 2021 from https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-12-31-ca-5619-story.html
11. Naismith, B. (1995). Commentary. Our Country's Good, vii-xlv. London: Methuen.
12. Shapiro, S. (2002). Michel Foucault’s discipline & punish: the birth of the prison reader/workbook. Retrieved 10 Sep. 2021 from https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/english/currentstudents/undergraduate/modules/fulllist/second/en229/marxfctintros_/foucault_reader.pdf
13. Stephenson, H., & N. Langridge. (1997). Rage and Reason: Women Playwrights on Playwriting. London: Methuen Drama.
14. Stewart, G. (2013). Bang! a history of Britain in the 1980s. London: Atlantic.
15. Sullivan, E. B. (1993). Hailing ideology, acting in the horizon, and reading between plays by Timberlake Wertenbaker. Theatre Journal, 45 (2), 139-54. Jstor. Web. 27 Dec. 2012.
16. Wertenbaker, T. (1995). Our Country’s Good. London: Methuen.
17. Wertenbaker, T. (1997). Timberlake Wertenbaker. Interview by H. Stephenson and N. Langridge (Eds.) Rage and Reason, 137-45. London: Methuen Drama.
18. White, J. (Apr. 1989). Letter to Timberlake Wertenbaker. Our Country's Good. London: Methuen.