Analysis of the Effect of Supplier Quality Management on Performance by Structural Equation Model

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1, 413 - 439, 22.01.2019

Bülent Yıldız , Mehmet Aytekin

https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.415001

Cited By: 1

Öz

In this study it is investigated the relations
between supplier quality management, product design, process management,
quality data and reporting. In addition, the effects of these factors on
product and process innovation performance are examined. For this purpose, the Istanbul
Chamber of Industry declared 1000 as Turkey's first industrial company in 2015
has been identified as the universe of research. The data obtained by the
questionnaire method from 203 firms were analyzed by the structural equation
model. As a result of the analysis, it was found that suppliers' quality
management significantly affected the process management, product design,
quality data and reporting positively. Product design and quality data and
reporting have been found to significantly influence product innovation
performance in the positive direction. The result is that process management
significantly impacts process innovation performance. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Qualty management, Innovation performance, Firm performance

Tedarikçi Kalite Yönetiminin Performans Üzerindeki Etkisinin Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli İle Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışmada tedarikçi kalite
yönetimi, ürün dizaynı, proses yönetimi ile kalite verisi ve raporlamanın
birbirleri arasındaki ilişkiler araştırılmıştır. Ayrıca bu faktörlerin ürün ve
proses inovasyon performansı üzerindeki etkisi incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla
İstanbul Sanayi Odası’nın 2015 yılında ilan ettiği Türkiye’nin ilk 1000 sanayi
firması araştırmanın ana kütlesi olarak belirlenmiştir. 203 firmadan anket
yöntemi ile elde edilen veriler yapısal eşitlik modeli ile analiz edilmiştir.
Analiz neticesinde tedarikçi kalite yönetiminin proses yönetimi, ürün dizaynı
ile kalite verisi ve raporlamayı pozitif yönde anlamlı olarak etkilediği
bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Ürün dizaynı ile kalite verisi ve raporlamanın ürün
inovasyon performansını pozitif yönde anlamlı olarak etkilediği tespit
edilmiştir. Proses yönetiminin proses inovasyon performansını anlamlı olarak
etkilediği sonucu elde edilmiştir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kalite yönetimi, İnovasyon performansı, Firma performansı

Kaynakça

• Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R. ve Chiva, R. (2006). A measurement scale for product innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(4), 333–346.
• Baer, M. ve Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of organizational behavior, 24(1), 45–68.
• Baird, K., Jia Hu, K. ve Reeve, R. (2011). The relationships between organizational culture, total quality management practices and operational performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(7), 789–814.
• Camisón, C. ve Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of business research, 67(1), 2891–2902.
• Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Nevo, S., Benitez-Amado, J. ve Kou, G. (2015). IT capabilities and product innovation performance: The roles of corporate entrepreneurship and competitive intensity. Information & Management, 52(6), 643–657.
• Chong, V. K. ve Rundus, M. J. (2004). Total quality management, market competition and organizational performance. The British accounting review, 36(2), 155–172.
• De Guimarães, J. C. F., Severo, E. A., Dorion, E. C. H., Coallier, F. ve Olea, P. M. (2016). The use of organisational resources for product innovation and organisational performance: a survey of the Brazilian furniture industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 180, 135–147.
• Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for advanced engineering study, Cambridge, MA, 510.
• Enginoğlu, D. (2015). İnovasyon yönetimi ve AR-GE (1. bs.). Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Ersoy, M. S. ve Ersoy, A. (2015). Kalite Yönetimi, Toplam Kalite Yönetimi ve Kalite Denetimi (2. bs.). Ankara: İmaj Yayınevi.
• Fernandes, A. A. C. M., Lourenço, L. A. N. ve Silva, M. J. A. M. (2014). Influence of quality management on the innovative performance. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 16(53), 575–593.
• Fernandes, A. C., Sampaio, P., Sameiro, M. ve Truong, H. Q. (2017). Supply chain management and quality management integration: A conceptual model proposal. International Journal of quality & reliability management, 34(1), 53–67.
• Ferreira, V. H. ve Cardoso, R. (2014). The relation between quality management and innovation performance in the textile sector in Portugal. Journal of global business and technology, 10(2), 13.
• Forza, C. ve Filippini, R. (1998). TQM impact on quality conformance and customer satisfaction: a causal model. International journal of production economics, 55(1), 1–20.
• Fynes, B., Voss, C. ve de Búrca, S. (2005). The impact of supply chain relationship quality on quality performance. International journal of production economics, 96(3), 339–354.
• Gotzamani, K. D. ve Tsiotras, G. D. (2001). An empirical study of the ISO 9000 standards’ contribution towards total quality management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(10), 1326–1342.
• Honarpour, A., Jusoh, A. ve Md Nor, K. (2016). Total quality management, knowledge management, and innovation: an empirical study in R&D units. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1–19.
• Hoonsopon, D. ve Ruenrom, G. (2012). The impact of organizational capabilities on the development of radical and incremental product innovation and product innovation performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 250–276.
• Hwang, D., Yang, M. G. M. ve Hong, P. (2015). Mediating effect of IT-enabled capabilities on competitive performance outcomes: An empirical investigation of ERP implementation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 36, 1–23.
• Ilori, A. B., Lawal, A. ve Simeon-Oke, O. O. (2017). Innovations and innovation capability in palm kernel processing industry in southwestern Nigeria. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(1), 102–114.
• Ise, M. (1995). Entrepreneurial Innovation: Beyond Schumpeter. Creativity and Innovation Management, 4(1), 40–44.
• Işığıçok, E. (2005). Toplam Kalite Yönetimi Bakış Açısıyla İstatistiksel Kalite Kontrol (1. bs.). Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
• Ivanov, C.-I. ve Avasilcăi, S. (2014). Performance measurement models: an analysis for measuring innovation processes performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 397–404.
• Jones, J.S.L. ve Linderman, K. (2014). Process management, innovation and efficiency performance: The moderating effect of competitive intensity. Business Process Management Journal, 20(2), 335–358.
• Kafetzopoulos, D., Gotzamani, K. ve Psomas, E. (2013). Quality systems and competitive performance of food companies. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 20(4), 463–483.
• Kafetzopoulos, D., Gotzamani, K. ve Gkana, V. (2015). Relationship between quality management, innovation and competitiveness. Evidence from Greek companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(8), 1177–1200.
• Kaynak, H. (2003). The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. Journal of operations management, 21(4), 405–435.
• Kaynak, H. ve Hartley, J. L. (2008). A replication and extension of quality management into the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 26(4), 468–489.
• Kılıç, S. (2013). İnovasyon ve İnovasyon Yönetimi (1. bs.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Kiernan, M. J. (1996). Get innovative or get dead. Business Quarterly, 61(1), 51–58.
• Kim, D. Y. (2010). The Impact of Quality Management Practices on Innovation. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Carleton University.
• Köhler, C., Sofka, W. ve Grimpe, C. (2012). Selective search, sectoral patterns, and the impact on product innovation performance. Research Policy, 41(8), 1344–1356.
• Liu, P. L. ve Tsai, C.-H. (2009). Research on the influences of new product design and new product development process management on new product development performance in Taiwan’s industries. Asian Journal on Quality, 10(1), 89–106.
• Madhikermi, M., Kubler, S., Robert, J., Buda, A. ve Främling, K. (2016). Data Quality Assessment of Maintenance Reporting Procedures. Expert Systems with Applications, 63, 145–164.
• Madu, C. N. (1998). Handbook of Total Quality Management (1. bs.). USA: Springer Science Business Media B.V.
• Mojtahedzadeh, R. (2014). The Effect of Quality Culture and Organisational Performance in Iran Car Manufacturing Companies. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Multimedia University Malaysia.
• Ou, C. S., Liu, F. C., Hung, Y. C. ve Yen, D. C. (2010). A structural model of supply chain management on firm performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(5), 526–545.
• Öztürk, A. (2013). Kalite Yönetimi ve Planlaması (1. bs.). Bursa: Ekin Yayınevi.
• Patyal, V. S. ve Koilakuntla, M. (2017). The impact of quality management practices on performance: An empirical study. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(2), 511–535.
• Pekar, J. P. (1995). Total quality management: Guiding principles for application. American Society for Testing and Materials.
• Perez-Arostegui, M. N., Sousa, R. ve Montes, F. (2013). Quality Management practices, absorptive capacity and innovation performance.
• Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B. ve Ragatz, G. L. (2003). A model of supplier integration into new product development. Journal of product innovation management, 20(4), 284–299.
• Prajogo, D. I. ve Sohal, A. S. (2003). The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance: An empirical examination. International journal of quality & reliability management, 20(8), 901–918.
• Prajogo, D. I. ve Sohal, A. S. (2006). The relationship between organization strategy, total quality management (TQM), and organization performance—-the mediating role of TQM. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(1), 35–50.
• Prajogo, D. I. ve Sohal, A. S. (2006). The integration of TQM and technology/R&D management in determining quality and innovation performance. Omega, 34(3), 296–312.
• Rainey, D. L. (2008). Product innovation: leading change through integrated product development. Cambridge University Press.
• Rashid, K. ve Haris Aslam, M. M. (2012). Business excellence through total supply chain quality management. Asian Journal on Quality, 13(3), 309–324.
• Robinson, C. J. ve Malhotra, M. K. (2005). Defining the concept of supply chain quality management and its relevance to academic and industrial practice. International Journal of Production Economics, 96(3), 315–337.
• Salomo, S., Weise, J. ve Gemünden, H. G. (2007). NPD planning activities and innovation performance: the mediating role of process management and the moderating effect of product innovativeness. Journal of product innovation management, 24(4), 285–302.
• Shan, A. W., Ahmad, M. F. ve Nor, N. H. M. (2016). The Mediating Effect of Innovation between Total Quality Management (TQM) and Business Performance. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (C. 160, s. 012011). IOP Publishing.
• Sila, I., Ebrahimpour, M. ve Birkholz, C. (2006). Quality in Supply Chains: An Empirical Analysis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(6), 491–502.
• Singh, P. J. ve Smith, A. J. (2004). Relationship between TQM and innovation: an empirical study. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(5), 394–401.
• Tari, J. J., Molina, J. F. ve Castejon, J. L. (2007). The relationship between quality management practices and their effects on quality outcomes. European journal of operational research, 183(2), 483–501.
• Woodside, A. R. (2005). Managing Product Inoovation (C. 13). Advances in Business Marketing and Pruchaising.
• Yılmaz, H. (2015). Stratejik İnovasyon Yönetimi (1. bs.). İstanbul: Beta Basım.
• Zehir, C., Ertosun, Ö. G., Zehir, S. ve Müceldilli, B. (2012). Total quality management practices’ effects on quality performance and innovative performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 273–280.
• Zu, X. ve Kaynak, H. (2012). An agency theory perspective on supply chain quality management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(4), 423–446.