The Effort To Reduce Negative Externality In Post Covid-19 Period In Turkish Economy: Example Of Transportation Sector

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 19 Sayı: COVID-19 Special Issue, 702 - 727, 31.10.2020

İlkay Güler

https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.755475

Cited By: 2

Öz

Every production element creates negative externality. In this study, the negative externality created by the transportation sector is investigated by extended environmental input-output analysis. In the WIOD input-output table, the transportation sector consists of three sectors as land transportation, air transportation and water transportation. As a result of the analysis carried out in this context, normalized total backward CO2 linkages coefficients are 0,4500 kt CO2 equivalent in land transportation, 0,8929 kt CO2 equivalent in air transportation, and 0,3619 kt CO2 equivalent in water transportation respectively. Normalized total forward CO2 linkages coefficients were found as 1.1895 kt CO2 equivalent in land transportation, 0.77840 kt CO2 equivalent in air transportation and 0.3234 kt CO2 equivalent in water transportation. The Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated to determine whether the transportation sectors' inter-period production chain changed structurally. It was concluded that the input components used in production did not differ significantly. It is predicted that the obtained results will increase even more in the post-covid-19 period and it is recommended to take measures and determine policies for a transportation system in which emission production is limited and renewable and sustainable environmentally friendly fuel types are preferred.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Transport Sector, Covid-19, Environmentally Extended Input-Output Analysis, Negative Externality, Ecological Economy

The Effort To Reduce Negative Externality In Post Covid-19 Period In Turkish Economy: Example Of Transportation Sector

Öz

Every production element creates negative externality. In this study, the negative externality created by the transportation sector is investigated by extended environmental input-output analysis. In the WIOD input-output table, the transportation sector consists of three sectors as land transportation, air transportation and water transportation. As a result of the analysis carried out in this context, normalized total backward CO2 linkages coefficients are 0,4500 kt CO2 equivalent in land transportation, 0,8929 kt CO2 equivalent in air transportation, and 0,3619 kt CO2 equivalent in water transportation respectively. Normalized total forward CO2 linkages coefficients were found as 1.1895 kt CO2 equivalent in land transportation, 0.77840 kt CO2 equivalent in air transportation and 0.3234 kt CO2 equivalent in water transportation. The Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated to determine whether the transportation sectors' inter-period production chain changed structurally. It was concluded that the input components used in production did not differ significantly. It is predicted that the obtained results will increase even more in the post-covid-19 period and it is recommended to take measures and determine policies for a transportation system in which emission production is limited and renewable and sustainable environmentally friendly fuel types are preferred.

Kaynakça

• Alcántara, V. & Padilla, E. (2006). An input-Output Analysis of the" key" Sectors in CO2 Emissions From a Production Perspectiv0e: An Application to the Spanish Economy. Bellaterra: Departament d'Economia Aplicada University of Barcelona.
• Alcántara, V. & Padilla, E. (2009). Input–output subsystems and pollution: An application to the service sector and CO2 emissions in Spain. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 905-914.
• Andrei, J., Mieila, M., Popescu, G.H., Nica, E. & Cristina, M. (2016). The impact and determinants of environmental taxation on economic growth communities in Romania. Energies, 9(11), 902.
• Arto, I., Rueda-Cantuche, J.M. & Peters, G.P. (2014). Comparing the GTAP-MRIO and WIOD databases for carbon footprint analysis. Economic Systems Research, 26(3), 327-353.
• Arto, O.I., Genty, A., Rueda-Cantuche, J. Villanueva, K.A. & Andreoni, V. (2012). Global Resources Use and Pollution: Vol. I, Production, Consumption and Trade (1995-2008). EUR 25462. Luxembourg: European Commission Joint Research.
• Baker, S. (2006). Sustainable development. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
• Baumert, N., Kander, A., Jiborn, M., Kulionis, V. & Nielsen, T. (2019). Global outsourcing of carbon emissions 1995–2009: A reassessment. Environmental Science & Policy, 92, 228-236.
• Benli, Y. & Peker, S.C (2018). Elektirik tüketimi, CO2 emisyonu ve kişi başı gayrisafi yurtiçi hasıla arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yalçın, A. (Ed.) Amprik bir çalışma. Bilimsel Araştırmalar Kitabı, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler içinde (287-294). (1. Cilt). Ankara:Akademisyen Kitabevi.
• Bennett, J. (2019). Book review: Biodiversity and Ecological Economics: Participation, values and resource management. Pacific Economic Bulletin, 16(1), 1-12.
• Bocutoğlu, E. (2016). İktisadi düşünceler tarihi. (3.Baskı). Ankara: Ekin Yayınevi.
• Cadarso, M. Á., López, L. A., Gómez, N. & Tobarra, M. Á. (2010). CO2 emissions of international freight transport and offshoring: Measurement and allocation. Ecological Economics, 69(8), 1682-1694.
• Cahen-Fourot, L., Campiglio, E., Dawkins, E., Godin, A. & Kemp-Benedict, E. (2020). Looking for the inverted pyramid: An application using input-output networks. Ecological Economics, 169, 106554.
• Cansino, J.M., Sánchez-Braza, A. & Rodríguez-Arévalo, M.L. (2015). Driving forces of Spain׳ s CO2 emissions: Almdı decomposition approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 48, 749-759.
• Cella, G. (1984). The input‐output measurement of interindustry linkages. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 46(1), 73-84.
• Chatellier, D.L. & Sheinbaum-Pardo, C. (2017). Assessing the ımpacts of final demand on CO2-eq emissions in the Mexican Economy: An ınput-output Analysis. Energy and Power Engineering, 9(1), 40-54.
• Chenery, H. & Watanabe, B. (1958). Tsunehiko; “ınternational comparison of the structure of production”. Econometrica, 26(4), 487-521.
• Chung, W., Zhou, G. & Yeung, I. M. (2013). A study of energy efficiency of transport sector in China from 2003 to 2009. Applied Energy, 112, 1066-1077.
• Corsatea, T. D., Lindner, S., Arto, I., Roman, M. V., Rueda-Cantuche, J. M., Afonso, A. V. & Neuwahl, F. (2019). World Input-Output Database Environmental Accounts. (No. JRC116234). Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
• Dağdemir, Ö. (2003). Çevre sorunlarına ekonomik yaklaşımlar ve optimal politika arayışları. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
• Dietzenbacher, E. & Los, B. (2000). Structural decomposition analyses with dependent determinants. Economic System Research, 12(4), 497-514.
• Eamen, L., Brouwer, R. & Razavi, S. (2020). The economic impacts of water supply restrictions due to climate and policy change: A transboundary river basin supply-side input-output analysis. Ecological Economics, 106532.
• EU SCIENCE HUB (2019). WIOD Environmental Accounts (2019). Retrieved 5 January 2020 from: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/research-topic/economic-environmental-and-social-effects-of-globalisation.
• Genty, A., Arto, I. & Neuwahl, F. (2012). Final database of environmental satellite accounts: Technical report on their compilation. WIOD Deliverable, 4(6).
• Güler, İ. (2019). İktisadi kalkınma temelinde gayrimenkul ekonomisi. (1. Baskı). Ankara:Gazi Kitabevi.
• Hadjikakou, M. (2016). Trimming the excess: Environmental impacts of discretionary food consumption in Australia. Australia: Ecological Economics, 131(2017), 119–128.
• Hazari, B. R. (1970). Empirical ıdentification of key sectors in the Indian economy. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 52(3), 301-305.
• Hickel, J. (2020). The sustainable development index: Measuring the ecological efficiency of human development in the anthropocene. Ecological Economics, 167, 106331.
• Hirschman, A. O. (1978). The strategy of economic development. ( 1958 edition of the book could not be reached). New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Hotelling, H. (1931). The economics of exhaustible resources. Journal of Political Economy, 39, 2.
• IEA-International Energy Agency, (2020). Türkiye’de 1990-2018 yılları arasında CO2 üretiminin sektörel dağılımı, Türkiye raporu. Retrieved 2 March 2020 from: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics?country=TURKEY&fuel=CO2%20emissions&indicator=CO2%20emissions%20by%20sector.
• KENTGES, (2010). Bütünleşik Kentsel Gelişme Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı 2010-2023. Ankara.
• Korum, U. (1963). Input-output analizi. (Yayın No. 164-146). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları.
• Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and ıncome ınequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28.
• Küçükkiremitçi, O. & Güler, İ. (2020). Ticaret savaşları ekseninde türkiye’de üretimin ithalata bağımlılık düzeyinin dönemler arası benzerlik analizi. Çetinkaya, M. & Muratoğlu, G. (Ed.) Ticaret ve kur savaşları-küresel ekonomik politiğe yansımaları küresel ekonomik politiğe yansımaları içinde (119-156). (1. Baskı).Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
• Küçükkiremitçi, O. (2011). Türkiye sanayi strateji belgesi temelinde imalat sanayinin yapısal analizi. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim Dergisi, 15, 53-94.
• Küçükkiremitçi, O. (2013). Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği Üyesi ülkelerin üretim yapılarının girdi-çıktı analizi ve benzeşme testleri yöntemiyle karşılaştırılması. Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Leontief, W. (1936). Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States. The Review of Economic Statistics, 105-125.
• Leontief, W. (1946). Exports, imports, domestic output, and employment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 171-193.
• Leontief, W. (1949). Structural matrices of national economies. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 273-282.
• Leontief, W. (1953a). Domestic production and foreign trade; the American capital position re-examined. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 97(4), 332-349.
• Leontief, W. (1953b). Studies in the Structure of the American Economy (pp. 116-181). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Leontief, W. (1970). Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: An input-output approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 262-271.
• Leontief, W. (1986). Input-output economics. Oxford University Press on Demand.
• Litman, T. (2016). Well measured developing ındicators for sustainable and livable transport planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
• Liu, H. & Fan, X. (2017). Value-added-based accounting of CO2 emissions: a multi-regional input-output approach. Sustainability, 9(12), 2220.
• Mach, R., Weinzettel, J. & Ščasný, M. (2018). Environmental Impact of consumption by czech households: Hybrid input–output analysis linked to household consumption data. Ecological Economics, 149, 62-73.
• Machado, G., Schaeffer, R. & Worrell, E. (2001). Energy and carbon embodied in the ınternational trade of Brazil: An ınput–output approach. USA: Ecological Economics, 39, 409–424.
• Mankiw, G. (1997). Principles Of microeconomics. The Dryden Press, Harvard University: United States of America.
• Miller, R. E. & Blair, D. P. (2009). Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Nabernegg, S., Bednar-Friedl, B., Muñoz, P., Titz, M. & Vogel, J. (2019). National policies for global emission reductions: Effectiveness of carbon emission reductions in international supply chains. Ecological Economics, 158, 146-157.
• NASA (2020), How the Coronavirus Is (and Is Not) Affecting the Environment. Retrieved 31 March 2020 from: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/blogs/earthmatters/2020/03/05/how-the-coronavirus-is-and-is-not-affecting-the-environment/.
• Newton, P., Prasad, D., Sproul, A. & White S. (2019). Decorbonising the built environment charting the transation. Australia: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Önder, H. G. & Kaplan, H. (2017). Ankara’da park et-devam et sisteminin modellenmesi ile yolculuk değişimine bağlı emisyon azaltımının ölçülmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C: Tasarım ve Teknoloji, 5(1), 139-152.
• Önder, H. G. (2017). Principles and goals of sustainable transportation. Koleva I., Yüksel, Ü. D. & Benaabıdate, L. (Ed.) Ecology, planning and desıgn içinde (Chapter 21: 218-225). Sofia:St. Kliment Ohridski University Press.
• Önder, H. G. (2020). Kadın duyarlı ulaşım önceliklerinin belirlenmesi ve politika üretimi: Ankara örneği. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(23), 1-1.
• Önder, H.G. & Akdemir, F. (2019). Türkiye’deki kentiçi raylı toplu taşıma sistemlerinin ulaşım ana planları bağlamında değerlendirilmesi. Demiryolu Mühendisliği, 10, 23-37.
• Özeş, R. & Çağatay, S. (2013). Ulaştırma sektörü ve hanehalkı enerji tüketiminde alternatif enerji kullanımının çevresel ve ekonomik etkileri. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3, 158-180.
• Peker, H. S. (2015). Energy supply security of turkey and measuring: An application on Turkey's energy supply security. Çankırı Karatekin University Journal of the Faculty of Economcs et Admimistrative Sciences, 5(2), 763.
• Proops, J., Faber, M. & Wagenhals, G. (2012). Reducing CO2 emissions: A comparative ınput-output-study for Germany and the UK. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
• Quesnay, F. (1758). Tableau economique. Kuczynski, M. & Meek, R. L. (Eds.)., In: Quesnay's Tableau Economique. Macmillan, London.
• Rasmussen, P.N. (1956). Studies in ıntersectorel relations. Amsterdam: Nourth-Holland.
• Renner, S. (2017). Poverty and distributional effects of a carbon tax in Mexico. (No. 223). Courant Research Centre: Poverty, Equity and Growth-Discussion Papers.
• Reynolds, C. J., Piantadosi, J., Buckley, J. D., Weinstein, P. & Boland, J. (2015). Evaluation of the environmental impact of weekly food consumption in different socio-economic households in Australia using environmentally extended input–output analysis. Ecological Economics, 111, 58-64.
• Schultz, S. (1977). Approaches to identifying key sectors empirically by means of input‐output analysis. The Journal of Development Studies, 14(1), 77-96.
• Soleymani, S. (2019). CO2 emissions patterns in 7 top carbon emitter economies: The case of transport sector. Energy, 168, 989-1001.
• Sun, C., Chen, L. & Huang, G. (2020). Decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in the ınternational trade of Russia. Sustainability, 12(1), 323.
• T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı, (2019). On Birinci Kalkınma Planı 2019-2023. Ankara.
• T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, (2010). Ulusal İklim Değişikliği Stratejisi 2010-2023. Ankara.
• T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, (2011). İklim Değişikliği Eylem Planı 2011-2023. Ankara.
• T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, (2019a). Ulusal Akıllı Şehirler Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı. Ankara.
• T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, (2019b). Akıllı Şehirler Beyaz Bülten. Ankara.
• T.C. Enerji ve Tabi Kaynaklar Bakanlığı, (2012). Enerji Verimliliği Strateji Belgesi, 2012-2023. Ankara.
• T.C. Enerji ve Tabi Kaynaklar Bakanlığı, (2017). Ulusal Enerji Verimliliği Eylem Planı 2017-2023. Ankara.
• T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı, (2013). Bölgesel Gelişme Ulusal Stratejisi 2014-2023. Ankara.
• T.C. Ulaştırma Denizcilik ve Haberleşme Bakanlığı, (2011). Hedef 2023 Türkiye Ulaşım ve İletişim Stratejisi 2011. Ankara.
• T.C. Ulaştırma Denizcilik ve Haberleşme Bakanlığı, (2014). Akıllı Ulaşım Sistemleri Strateji Belgesi 2014-2023 ve Eki Eylem Planı 2014-2016. Ankara.
• Taşdoğan, C. & Taşdoğan, B. (2014). Türkiye’deki üretken sektörlerin göreli önemi ve emisyon sorumluluğu: 2002-2011 emissions responsibility and relative ımportance of the productive sectors in Turkey: 2002-2011. (Bildiri No:1095).Üsküp: Avrasya Ekonomileri Uluslararası Konferansı Online Bildiri Kitabı.
• Timmer, M.P., Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R. & De Vries, G. J. (2015). An illustrated user guide to the world input–output database: The case of global automotive production. Review of International Economics, 23(3), 575-605.
• Tokito, S. (2018). Environmentally-targeted sectors and linkages in the global supply-chain complexity of transport equipment. Ecological Economics, 150, 177-183.
• Tukker, A., Wood, R. & Schmidt, S. (2020). Towards accepted procedures for calculating international consumption-based carbon accounts. Climate Policy, 1-17.
• Tunç, İ., Türüt, S. & Akbostancı, E. (2006). CO2 emissions vs. CO2 responsibility: An ınput-output approach for the Turkish economy. ERC Working Papers in Economics 06/04, Ankara: METU.
• Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, (2020). Girdi-çıktı tabloları, metaveri, analitik çerçeve, kapsam, tanımlar ve sınıflamalar, Retrieved 1 February 2020 from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1021.
• Ulucak, R. (2018). İktisatta çevreci dönüşüm: Ekolojik makro iktisat. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (51), 127-149.
• Ulvi, H., Uysal, M., Öktem, M. K. & Önder, H. G. (2019). The comparative analysis of urban transport in ankara by gender and age groups. Megaron Journal, 14(4).
• UNFCCC-Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, (2019). UNFCCC fourth biennial report of turkey, prepared by united nations development programme country office Turkey, Ankara.
• Van Den Bergh, J. C. (2001). Ecological economics: Themes, approaches, and differences with environmental economics. Regional Environmental Change, 2(1), 13-23. Van Dender, K. (2009). Energy policy in transport and transport policy. Energy Policy, 37(10), 3854-3862.
• Vita, G., Lundström, J. R., Hertwich, E. G., Quist, J., Ivanova, D., Stadler, K. & Wood, R. (2019). The environmental ımpact of green consumption and sufficiency lifestyles scenarios in europe: Connecting local sustainability visions to global consequences. Ecological Economics, 164, 106322.
• Walras, L. (1954). Elements of pure economics, or the theory of social wealth. (W. Jaffé, Çev.). (Eserin orijinali 1874‟te yayımlandı). Homewood:Ill.:R.D. Irwin.
• Wang, Y., Li, J., Lee, L.C., Wang, M. & Du, H. (2019). A review of input–output model application hot spots in the energy and environment fields based on co-words network analysis. Environmental Reviews, 27(4), 567-574.
• World Bank (2020). East Asia and pacific in the time of COVID-19. Washington: World Bank East Asia and Pacific Economic Update April 2020.
• World Input-Output Database, (2016). National ınput-output tables Retrieved 5 February 2020 from: http://www.wiod.org/database/niots16.
• Zhao, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, S., Zhang, Y. & Liu, Y. (2015). Linkage analysis of sectoral CO2 emissions based on the hypothetical extraction method in South Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 916-924.