Future-Oriented Reflections of Pre-Service Physical Education Teachers: Professional Preparation Prior to Practicum

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 149 - 164, 28.02.2026

Yağmur Güler

https://doi.org/10.25307/jssr.1790005

https://izlik.org/JA43FT42DW

Öz

This study examines how pre-service physical education teachers, before entering practicum, shape their early professional preparation through reflective writings that draw on peer narratives and school-based observations. Grounded in Heideggerian interpretive phenomenology, the study positions reflection not only as a retrospective practice but also as a future-oriented process that enables candidates to anticipate challenges and envision their professional identities before entering the classroom. Participants were 14 second-year pre-service teachers (seven women, seven men) enrolled in a physical education teacher education program. Each participant was paired with a fourth-year peer completing practicum in one of four application schools, allowing them to learn from interviews and classroom observations. Data were collected in three stagessemi-structured interviews, lesson observations, and written reflections—and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis. Findings revealed three main themes: (1) Personal Goals and Learning Objectives, reflecting candidates’ intentions to develop communication, empathy, patience, professional distance, and awareness of student diversity; (2) Awareness of the Practicum Context, highlighting sensitivity to mentor relationships, crowded classrooms, limited resources, and safety concerns, alongside expectations for both autonomy and constructive feedback; and (3) Pedagogical Preparation Strategies, including lesson planning, time management, classroom management, and creative instructional design solutions. Together, these themes show that candidates construct professional preparation around personal values, contextual awareness, and strategic pedagogical thinking prior to direct teaching experience.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Reflection , Professional identity , Teaching practice , Teacher education

Kaynakça

• Allas, R., Leijen, Ä., & Toom, A. (2020). Guided reflection procedure as a method to facilitate student teachers’ perception of their teaching to support the construction of practical knowledge. Teachers and Teaching, 26(2), 166-192. [CrossRef]
• Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2010). Reflecting on an ideal: Student teachers envision a future identity. Reflective Practice, 11(5), 631-643. [CrossRef]
• Black, G. L. (2015). Developing teacher candidates' self-efficacy through reflection and supervising teacher support. in Education, 21(1), 78-98. [CrossRef]
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [CrossRef]
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage Publications.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research ın Sport, Exercise And Health, 11 (4), 589-597. [CrossRef]
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications
• Boud, D. (2001). Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(90), 9-18. [CrossRef]
• Conway, P. F. (2001). Anticipatory reflection while learning to teach: From a temporally truncated to a temporally distributed model of reflection in teacher education. Teaching and teacher education, 17(1), 89-106. [CrossRef]
• Ercan, A. M. (2020). Pre-service math teachers' professional identity development through online anticipatory reflections: An intervention study [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Middle East Technical University.
• Glaister, C., & Gold, J. (2022). Bridging the gap between reflective learning and reflective practice through anticipatory reflection. Education Training, 64 (8/9), 1060-1073. [CrossRef]
• Güler, Y., & Tuncel, S. (2025). Professional identity of pre-service physical education and sports teachers and the role of mentor teachers. Sport, Education and Society. [CrossRef]
• Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re‐imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 15(2), 273-289. [CrossRef]
• Heidegger, M. (1988). The basic problems of phenomenology. (A. Hofstadter, Trans., Rev. ed.). Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1927)
• Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and time (J. Stambaugh, Trans.; D. J. Schmidt, Rev. ed. & Foreword). State University of New York Press. (Original work published 1927)
• Hobson, A. J., & Malderez, A. (2013). Judgementoring and other threats to realizing the potential of school‐based mentoring in teacher education. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 2(2), 89-108. [CrossRef]
• Husu, J., Toom, A., & Patrikainen, S. (2008). Guided reflection as a means to demonstrate and develop student teachers’ reflective competencies. Reflective Practice, 9(1), 37-51. [CrossRef]
• Korthagen, F. A. (2010). How teacher education can make a difference. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(4), 407-423. [CrossRef]
• Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753-1760. [CrossRef]
• McEntyre, K., & Richards, K. A. R. (2023). Implementing lessons learned through occupational socialization theory to influence preservice teachers’ subjective theories. Sport, Education and Society, 28(2), 213-225. [CrossRef]
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
• Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). 1-13. [CrossRef]
• Patton, M. Q. (2018). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Çev. Eds). Pegem Akademi.
• Richards, K. A. R., Templin, T. J., & Gaudreault, K. L. (2013). Understanding the realities of school life: Recommendations for the preparation of physical education teachers. Quest, 65(4), 442-457. [CrossRef]
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
• Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), 1-23. [CrossRef]
• Standal, Ø. F., Moen, K. M., & Moe, V. F. (2014). Theory and practice in the context of practicum: The perspectives of Norwegian physical education student teachers. European Physical Education Review, 20 (2), 165-178. [CrossRef]
• Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic Analysis. In C. Willig, & W. S. Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (pp. 17-36). SAGE Publications. [CrossRef]
• Tiainen, O., Lutovac, S., & Korkeamäki, R. L. (2024). Rethinking approaches to reflection in initial teacher education. Educational Research, 66(3), 245-262. [CrossRef]
• Titu, P. (2019). Understanding teacher professional identity development: An exploration of secondary science teacher beliefs and practices through reflective practice [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Minnesota.
• Van Manen, M. (1991). Reflectivity and the pedagogical moment: The normativity of pedagogical thinking and acting. J. Curriculum Studies, 23(6), 507-536. [CrossRef]
• Wilson, J. P. (2008). Reflecting‐on‐the‐future: A chronological consideration of reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 9(2), 177-184. [CrossRef]