The Impact of Poverty on Recreational Participation: A Phenomenological Study in Ağrı Province

Öz

This study examines how individuals experiencing poverty perceive and experience leisure time and the factors shaping their recreational participation. Using a qualitative phenomenological approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals living in Ağrı Province, Türkiye. The data were analyzed through content analysis supported by MAXQDA 2020. The findings reveal that poverty shapes recreational experiences through interconnected economic, spatial, psychological, and social constraints. Participants experienced leisure time differently: some had little time available because of work or household responsibilities, while others had time but struggled to use it in meaningful or satisfying ways. Financial hardship was a central barrier, as essential household expenses took priority over recreational activities. Limited recreational facilities, transportation costs, and accessibility barriers further restricted participation. Consequently, recreational activities were generally limited, irregular, and concentrated on low-cost, home-based options. Participants also described frustration, feelings of inadequacy, reduced social contact, and perceived exclusion from certain social and recreational environments. These experiences indicate that recreational disadvantage involves more than limited access to activities; it also concerns restricted choices and difficulties in experiencing leisure as meaningful and socially fulfilling. The study concludes that improving recreational opportunities for socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals requires more than providing affordable activities; it also involves creating accessible recreational spaces that reflect their everyday living conditions and expanding opportunities for social participation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Poverty
• Recreational participation
• Social inequality
• Leisure constraints

Kaynakça

1. Abercrombie, L. C., Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Frank, L. D., Saelens, B. E., & Chapman, J. E. (2008). Income and racial disparities in access to public parks and private recreation facilities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.030
2. Aitchison, C. (2003). From leisure and disability to disability leisure: Developing data, definitions and discourses. Disability & Society, 18(7), 955–969. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759032000127353
3. Budak, Y. (2025). Yoksulluk algısının sosyal dışlanma ve yaşam tatmini üzerindeki etkileri: Yapısal eşitlik modeliyle bir analiz [The effects of perceived poverty on social exclusion and life satisfaction: An analysis using the structural equation model]. Eurasian Econometrics, Statistics & Empirical Economics Journal, 26, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.17740/eas.stat.2025-V25-02
4. Burchardt, T., Le Grand, J., & Piachaud, D. (2002). Degrees of exclusion: Developing a dynamic, multidimensional measure. In J. Hills, J. Le Grand, & D. Piachaud (Eds.), Understanding social exclusion (pp. 30–43). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199251070.003.0003
5. Cacioppo, J. T., & Hawkley, L. C. (2003). Social isolation and health, with an emphasis on underlying mechanisms. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 46(3), S39–S52. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2003.0049
6. Cantor, P., Polakowska, M., Proietti, A., Tran, V., Lebire, J., & Roy, L. (2022). Leisure possibilities of adults experiencing poverty: A community-based participatory study. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 89(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174211073266
7. Cerin, E., & Leslie, E. (2008). How socio-economic status contributes to participation in leisure-time physical activity. Social Science & Medicine, 66(12), 2596–2609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.012
8. Chatzitheochari, S., & Arber, S. (2012). Class, gender and time poverty: A time-use analysis of British workers’ free time resources. The British Journal of Sociology, 63(3), 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01419.x

9. Cohen, D. A., Han, B., Derose, K. P., Williamson, S., Marsh, T., Raaen, L., & McKenzie, T. L. (2016). The paradox of parks in low-income areas: Park use and perceived threats. Environment and Behavior, 48(1), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515614366
10. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
11. Crawford, D. W., Jackson, E. L., & Godbey, G. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13(4), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409109513147
12. Creswell, J. W. (2025). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni [Qualitative inquiry and research design] (8. bs.; M. Bütün ve S. B. Demir, çev. ed.). Siyasal Kitabevi.
13. Dahmann, N., Wolch, J., Joassart-Marcelli, P., Reynolds, K., & Jerrett, M. (2010). The active city? Disparities in provision of urban public recreation resources. Health & Place, 16(3), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.11.005
14. Dong, M., & Sun, X. (2025). Why do we feel so time poor? A daily diary study of time poverty and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 26, Article 110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-025-00944-x
15. Dupuis, S. L., & Smale, B. J. A. (1995). An examination of relationship between psychological well-being and depression and leisure activity participation among older adults. Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure, 18(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.1995.10715491
16. Fancourt, D., Aughterson, H., Finn, S., Walker, E., & Steptoe, A. (2021). How leisure activities affect health: A narrative review and multi-level theoretical framework of mechanisms of action. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(4), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30384-9
17. Foster, S., & Giles-Corti, B. (2008). The built environment, neighborhood crime and constrained physical activity: An exploration of inconsistent findings. Preventive Medicine, 47(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.03.017
18. Frisby, W., & Millar, S. (2002). The actualities of doing community development to promote the inclusion of low income populations in local sport and recreation. European Sport Management Quarterly, 2(3), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740208721923
19. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
20. Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLOS ONE, 15(5), Article e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076
21. Gümüş, B., & Acar, M. (2023). Türleri, nedenleri ve boyutlarıyla Türkiye’de ve dünyada yoksulluk sorunu [The problem of poverty in Türkiye and the world: Its causes, types and dimensions]. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(Özel Sayı), 92–105. https://izlik.org/JA83ZJ99SE
22. Halpin, S. N. (2024). Inter-coder agreement in qualitative coding: Considerations for its use. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 8(3), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/14887
23. Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344
24. Iwasaki, Y. (2007). Leisure and quality of life in an international and multicultural context: What are major pathways linking leisure to quality of life? Social Indicators Research, 82(2), 233–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9032-z
25. Kaczynski, A. T., Besenyi, G. M., Stanis, S. A. W., Koohsari, M. J., Oestman, K. B., Bergstrom, R., Potwarka, L. R., & Reis, R. S. (2014). Are park proximity and park features related to park use and park-based physical activity among adults? Variations by multiple socio-demographic characteristics. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11, Article 146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0146-4
26. Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2000). Social cohesion, social capital, and health. In L. F. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 174–190). Oxford University Press.
27. Kay, T. (2000). Leisure, gender and family: The influence of social policy. Leisure Studies, 19(4), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360050118823
28. Kay, T., & Jackson, G. (1991). Leisure despite constraint: The impact of leisure constraints on leisure participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 23(4), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1991.11969862
29. Kegler, M. C., Gauthreaux, N., Hermstad, A., Arriola, K. J., Mickens, A., Ditzel, K., Hernandez, C., & Haardörfer, R. (2022). Inequities in physical activity environments and leisure-time physical activity in rural communities. Preventing Chronic Disease, 19, Article E40. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd19.210417
30. Koca, C., Henderson, K. A., Asci, F. H., & Bulgu, N. (2009). Constraints to leisure-time physical activity and negotiation strategies in Turkish women. Journal of Leisure Research, 41(2), 225–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2009.11950167
31. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
32. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
33. Levitas, R., Pantazis, C., Fahmy, E., Gordon, D., Lloyd, E., & Patsios, D. (2007). The multi-dimensional analysis of social exclusion [Research report]. Department for Communities and Local Government. https://www.bristol.ac.uk/poverty/downloads/socialexclusion/multidimensional.pdf
34. Lindström, M., Hanson, B. S., & Östergren, P. O. (2001). Socioeconomic differences in leisure-time physical activity: The role of social participation and social capital in shaping health related behaviour. Social Science & Medicine, 52(3), 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00153-2
35. Lund, C., Breen, A., Flisher, A. J., Kakuma, R., Corrigall, J., Joska, J. A., Swartz, L., & Patel, V. (2010). Poverty and common mental disorders in low and middle income countries: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 71(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.027
36. Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2003). Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: The U.S. experience. Social Forces, 81(3), 999–1030. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2003.0036
37. McCormack, G. R., Rock, M., Toohey, A. M., & Hignell, D. (2010). Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health & Place, 16(4), 712–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.003
38. Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091
39. Newman, D. B., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014). Leisure and subjective well-being: A model of psychological mechanisms as mediating factors. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(3), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9435-x
40. Nguyen, K. T. N. H., Stuart, J. J., Shah, A. H., Becene, I. A., West, M. G., Berrill, J., Gelaye, B., Borba, C. P. C., & Rich-Edwards, J. W. (2023). Novel methods for leveraging large cohort studies for qualitative and mixed-methods research. American Journal of Epidemiology, 192(5), 821–829. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwad030
41. O'Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
42. Oncescu, J., & Loewen, M. (2020). Community recreation provisions that support low-income families’ access to recreation. Leisure/Loisir, 44(2), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2020.1760120
43. Oncescu, J., Green, L., & Jenkins, J. (2024). Exclusionary mechanisms of community leisure for low-income families: Programs, policies and procedures. Leisure Sciences, 46(4), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2021.1987359
44. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
45. Petersen, C. B., Bekker-Jeppesen, M., Aadahl, M., & Lau, C. J. (2021). Participation in recreational activities varies with socioeconomic position and is associated with self-rated health and well-being. Preventive Medicine Reports, 24, Article 101610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101610
46. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
47. Reutter, L. I., Stewart, M. J., Veenstra, G., Love, R., Raphael, D., & Makwarimba, E. (2009). “Who do they think we are, anyway?”: Perceptions of and responses to poverty stigma. Qualitative Health Research, 19(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308330246
48. Rigolon, A. (2016). A complex landscape of inequity in access to urban parks: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 153, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.017
49. Rigolon, A., Browning, M. H. E. M., McAnirlin, O., & Yoon, H. V. (2021). Green space and health equity: A systematic review on the potential of green space to reduce health disparities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), Article 2563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052563
50. Rodríguez-Cifuentes, F., López-Gonzalez, M. A., Rubio-Garay, F., Topa, G., Belo, P., Pocinho, R., Silva, S., & Fernández-Muñoz, J. J. (2024). Leisure attitude, self-rated health, and psychological well-being in older adults: A moderated mediation model. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 17, 1417–1431. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S453396
51. Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
52. Scott, D. (2013). The leisure class: From Veblen to Linder to MacCannell. In T. Blackshaw (Ed.), Routledge handbook of leisure studies (pp. 110–119). Routledge.
53. Scott, J., & McCarville, R. (2008). Leisure behaviors among selected women living in poverty. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 26(4), 83–104. https://js.sagamorepub.com/index.php/jpra/article/view/1306
54. Sezer, K. S., & Aki, E. (2024). “It is as if I gave a gift to myself”: A qualitative phenomenological study on working adults’ leisure meaning, experiences, and participation. Behavioral Sciences, 14(9), Article 833. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090833
55. Shaw, S. M., Bonen, A., & McCabe, J. F. (1991). Do more constraints mean less leisure? Examining the relationship between constraints and participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 23(4), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1991.11969861
56. Spaaij, R., Magee, J., & Jeanes, R. (2014). Sport and social exclusion in global society. Routledge.
57. Spinney, J., & Millward, H. (2010). Time and money: A new look at poverty and the barriers to physical activity in Canada. Social Indicators Research, 99, 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9585-8
58. Stodolska, M., & Shinew, K. J. (2010). Environmental constraints on leisure time physical activity among Latino urban residents. Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, 2(3), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/19398441.2010.517038
59. Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
60. Trussell, D. E., & Mair, H. (2010). Seeking judgment free spaces: Poverty, leisure, and social inclusion. Journal of Leisure Research, 42(4), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2010.11950216
61. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2025, December 30). Poverty and living conditions statistics, 2025 (News Bulletin No. 53994). https://veriportali.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Yoksulluk-ve-Yasam-Kosullari-Istatistikleri-2025-53994
62. Vandermeerschen, H., Van Regenmortel, T., & Scheerder, J. (2017). ‘There are alternatives, but your social life is curtailed’: Poverty and sports participation from an insider perspective. Social Indicators Research, 133(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1360-z
63. Vandermeerschen, H., Vos, S., & Scheerder, J. (2015). Who’s joining the club? Participation of socially vulnerable children and adolescents in club-organised sports. Sport, Education and Society, 20(8), 941–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2013.856293
64. Veal, A. J. (2016). Leisure, income inequality and the Veblen effect: Cross-national analysis of leisure time and sport and cultural activity. Leisure Studies, 35(2), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2015.1036104
65. Walker, I., & Smith, H. J. (2002). Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. Cambridge University Press.
66. Walker, R., Kyomuhendo, G. B., Chase, E., Choudhry, S., Gubrium, E. K., Nicola, J. Y., Lødemel, I., Mathew, L., Mwiine, A., Pellissery, S., & Ming, Y. (2013). Poverty in global perspective: Is shame a common denominator? Journal of Social Policy, 42(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279412000979
67. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences] (12. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
68. Yoon, H., Kim, E., & Kim, C. (2021). Sociodemographic characteristics and leisure participation through the perspective of leisure inequalities in later life. Sustainability, 13(16), Article 8787. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168787
69. Zavaleta, D., Samuel, K., & Mills, C. (2014). Social isolation: A conceptual and measurement proposal (OPHI Working Paper No. 67). Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative. https://doi.org/10.35648/20.500.12413/11781/ii029