Evaluation of Outdoor Fitness Equipment in Terms of Physical Activity, Health and Ergonomic

Abstract

This study aims to identify people's experience of using outdoor fitness equipment in terms of physical activity, health and ergonomic. Within the scope of this study, individuals (94 females, 99 males, a total of 193 participants) who came to 20 parks with outdoor sports areas belonging to Ankara Çankaya Municipality, were interviewed with a face-to-face interview method consisting of 13 questions not exceeding 4 minutes. It was determined that the majority of individuals (65,28%) spent 46-60 minutes on sports. It was determined that 60,1% of the participants wanted to do sports in the company of an expert, but there was no statistically significant relationship (p> 0.05) between the state of doing sports in the company of an expert and their educational status. It was found that there is a significant difference between genders and some sports equipment used (p> 0.05). All the individuals (193 people) stated that they preferred the tools they used because they thought that certain parts of their bodies were activated. 12,4% of the participants had an injury in the outdoor sports areas they went to, and they stated that these injuries were mostly in the leg area (37,5%). However, there was no significant relationship between this disability, age, education level, and time allocated to sports (p> 0.05). When the ergonomic preference reasons for these areas are examined, it was discovered that transportation (4.53 points), location (4.36 points), and cleanliness (4.22 points) are important criteria for evaluating the outdoor sports areas used by individuals. Outdoor sports fields are preferred by users in many respects. Designing the outdoor sports areas ergonomically with exercise equipment suitable for all ages, enriching the walking paths with many alternatives, offering individuals the opportunity to exercise in these areas in the presence of experts is a cheap investment, but it is thought to be a very valuable step in terms of raising a healthy society.

Keywords

• Physical activity
• Health
• Outdoor
• Sports equipment
• Ergonomics

Dış Mekân Spor Aletlerinin Fiziksel Aktivite, Sağlık ve Ergonomik Açıdan Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Bu çalışma, insanların fiziksel aktivite, sağlık ve ergonomik açıdan dış mekân spor aletlerini kullanma deneyimlerini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışma kapsamında Ankara Çankaya Belediyesi’ne ait dış mekân spor alanı bulunan 20 parka fiziksel aktivite yapmak amacıyla gelen bireylere (94 kadın, 99 erkek toplam 193 katılımcı), 4 dakikayı geçmeyen toplam 13 sorudan oluşan yüz yüze görüşme yöntemi ile anket çalışması yapılmıştır. Bireylerin çoğunluğunun (%65,28) 46-60 dakikasını spora ayırdığı belirlenmiştir. Katılımcıların %60’nın uzman eşliğinde spor yapmak istediği, ancak uzman eşliğinde spor yapma durumu ile eğitim durumu arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişkinin bulunmadığı (p>0.05) tespit edilmiştir. Cinsiyetler ile kullanılan bazı spor aletleri arasında anlamlı bir fark olduğu görülmüştür (p<0.05). Bireylerin tamamı (193 kişi) kullandıkları aletleri vücutlarında belli bölgelerinin çalıştırdığını düşündükleri için tercih ettiklerini belirtmiştir. Katılımcıların %12,4’ü gittiği dış mekân spor alanlarında sakatlık geçirmiş olup, bu sakatlanmaların en çok bacak bölgesinde (%37,5) olduğunu belirtmişlerdir. Ancak bu sakatlık durumunun yaş, eğitim durumu ve spora ayrılan süreyle aralarında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunamamıştır (p>0.05). Bu alanların ergonomik açıdan tercih sebepleri incelendiğinde; Ulaşım (4,53 puan), konum (4,36 puan) ve temizliğin (4,22 puan) bireylerin kullandıkları dış mekân spor alanlarını değerlendirme önemli kriterler olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Dış mekân spor alanları birçok açıdan kullanıcılar tarafından tercih edilmektedir. Bu alanların her yaşa uygun egzersiz aletleri ile ergonomik açıdan uygun tasarlanması, yürüyüş yollarının birçok alternatifle zenginleştirilmesi, uzmanlar eşliğinde bireylere bu alanlarda egzersiz yapma imkânı sunulması ucuz maliyetli bir yatırım olmakla birlikte sağlıklı toplum yetiştirilmesi açısından çok değerli bir adım olacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fiziksel aktivite
• Sağlık
• Dış mekan
• Spor aletleri
• Ergonomi

Kaynakça

1. Barton, J. & Pretty, J. (2010). What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environ Sci Technol., 44, 3947–3955.
2. Bancroft, C., Joshi, S., Rundle, A., Hutson, M., Chong, C., Weiss, C.C., Genkinger, J., Neckerman, K. & Lovasi, G. (2015). Association of proximity and density of parks and objectively measured physical activity in the United States: A systematic review. Soc Sci Med., 138, 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.034
3. Burrows, E., O’Mahony, M. & Geraghty, D. (2018). How urban parks offer opportunities for physical activity in Dublin, Ireland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040815
4. Child, S. T., McKenzie, T. L., Arredondo, E.M., Elder, J. P., Martinez, S. M. & Ayala, G. X. (2014). Associations between park facilities, user demographics, and physical activity levels at san diego county parks. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 32(4), 68-81.
5. Chow, H. (2013). Outdoor fitness equipment in parks: A qualitative study from older adults’ perceptions. BMC Public Health, 13(1216), 1-9.
6. Chow, H., Mowen, A. J. & WuInt, G. (2017). Who is using outdoor fitness equipment and how? the case of xihu park. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14(448), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14040448
7. Chow, H. & Ho, C.H. (2018). Does the use of outdoor fitness equipment by older adults qualify as moderate to vigorous physical activity? PLoS ONE, 13(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196507
8. Chow, H. & Wu, D.R. (2019). Outdoor fitness equipment usage behaviors in natural settings. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16(391), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030391

9. Cohen, D., Marsh, T., Williamson, S., Golinelli, D. & McKenzie, T.L. (2012). Impact and cost-effectiveness of family fitness zones: a natural experiment in urban public parks. Health Place, 18(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.09.008
10. Cohen, D., McKenzie, T.L., Sehgal, A., Williamson, S., Golinelli, D. & Lurie, N. (2007). Contribution of public parks to physical activity. Am. J. Public Health, 97, 509–514.
11. Copeland, J. L., Currie, C., Walker, A., Mason, E., Willoughby, T. & Amson, A. (2017). Fitness equipment in public parks: Frequency of use and community perceptions in a small urban centre. Journal of Physical Activity ve Health,14(5), 344-352.
12. Cranney, L., Shawa, L. & Phongsavana, P. (2018). Are outdoor gyms located in areas of greatest need and impact? An audit in sydney, Australia. Annals of Leisure Research, 22(3), 395-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2018.1523737
13. Cunningham-Myrie, C. A., Royal-Thomas, T. Y. N., Bailey, A. E., Gustat, J., Theall, K. P., Harrison, J. E. & Reid, M. E. (2019). Use of a public park for physical activity in the Caribbean: evidence from a mixedmethods study in Jamaica. BMC Public Health, 19(894), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7247-6
14. da Silva, A.T., Fermino, R.C., Lopes, A.A.S., Alberico, C. O. & Reis, R. S. (2018). Distance to fitness zone, use of facilities and physical activity in adults. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, 24(2), 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1590/1517-869220182402180439
15. Doğru, E., Kızılcı, M.H., Çömük, B.N., Çetişli, K.N. ve Tekindal, M.A. (2015). Açık alan spor aletlerini kullanan bireylerin egzersiz bilinç ve alışkanlıklarının incelenmesi. Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation, 2(3), 102-109.
16. Douglas, J.A., Briones, M.D., Bauer, E.Z., Trujillo, M., Lopez, M. & Subica, A.M. (2018). Social and environmental determinants of physical activity in urban parks: Testing a neighborhood disorder model. Prev. Med., 109, 119–124.
17. Evenson, K. R., Jones, S. A., Holliday, K. M., Cohen, D. A. & McKenzie, T. L. (2016). Park characteristics, use, and physical activity: A review of studies using SOPARC (System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities). Prev Med., 86, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.029
18. Furber, S., Pomroy, H., Grego, S. & Tavener-Smith, K. (2014). People’s experiences of using outdoor gym equipment in parks. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 25(3), 211. https://doi.org/10.1071/HE14038
19. Giles-Corti, B., Broomhall, M.H., Knuiman, M., Collins, C., Douglas, K., Ng, K., Lange, A. & Donovanet, R. J. (2005). Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? Am J Prev Med., 28(2), 169–176.
20. Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G.A. & Leech, N.L. (2015). Uygulamada araştırma yöntemleri desen ve analizi bütünleştiren yaklaşım (S. Turan, Çev.) Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
21. Gümüş, H., Özgül, S.A. ve Karakılıç, M. (2017). Fiziksel aktivite için park ve rekreasyon alanlarına gelen kullanıcıların mekân seçimini ve fiziksel aktiviteye katılımını etkileyen faktörler. Spormetre, 15(1), 31-38.
22. Gümüş, H., Özgül, S.A. ve Karakılıç, M. (2015). Fiziksel Aktivite Mekânı Değerlendirme Ölçeği (FAMDÖ): geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 26(1), 1–8.
23. Hecke, L. V., Cauwenberg, J.V., Clarys, P., Dyck, D.V., Veitch, J. & Deforche, B. (2017). Active use of parks in Flanders (Belgium): An exploratory observational study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14(35), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14010035
24. Janssona, A. K., Lubansa, D.R., Smitha, J. J., Duncanb, M.J., Haslama, R. & Plotnikoff, R.C. (2019). A systematic review of outdoor gym use: Current evidence and future directions. Sci Med Sport, 22(12), 1335-1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2019.08.003
25. Kaczynski, A.T., Potwarka, L.R. & Saelens, B.E. (2008). Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. Am. J. Public Health, 98, 1451–1456.
26. Kaczynski, A.T., Besenyi, G. M., Stanis S.A.W., Koohsari, M. J., Oestman, K. B., Bergstrom, R., Potwarka, L.R. & Reis, R. S. (2014). Are park proximity and park features related to park use and park-based physical activity among adults? Variations by multiple socio-demographic characteristics. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11(146), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0146-4
27. Kim, D.I., Lee, D.H., Hong, S., Jo, S.W., Won, Y.S. & Jeon, J.Y. (2018). Six weeks of combined aerobic and resistance exercise using outdoor exercise machines improves fitness, insulin resistance, and chemerin in the Korean elderly: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 75, 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2017.11.006
28. Knapp, M., Gustat, J., Darensbourg, R., Myers, L. & Johnson, C. (2019). The relationships between park quality, park usage, and levels of physical activity in low-ıncome, african american neighborhoods. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16(8), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010085
29. Lee, J.L.C., Lo, T.L.T. & Ho, R.T.H. (2018). Understanding outdoor gyms in public open spaces: A systematic review and integrative synthesis of qualitative and quantitativeevidence. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 15(590), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040590
30. Muftuler, M., Yapar, A., Irez, S.G. & Ince, M. L. (2011). Examination of public parks for physical activity participation by their location, size and facilities. The Shield, 6, 14-25.
31. Mora, R. (2012). Moving bodies: Open gyms and physical activity in Santiago. Journal of Urban Design, 17(4), 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2012.706367
32. Mora, R., Weisstaub, G., Greene, M. & Herrmann, G. (2017). Outdoor gyms in Santiago: urban distribution and effects on physical activity. Scielo, 23(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-6574201700030005
33. Parra, D. C., Van Zandt, A., Wang, P., Goodman, M., Abhishek, J., Haire-Joshu, D. & Brownson, R. C. (2019). Evaluating park use and satisfaction: The case of trojan park in St. Louis Missouri. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health,16(2798), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152798
34. Rung, A.L., Mowen, A.J., Broyles, S.T. & Gustat, J. (2011). The role of park conditions and features on park visitation and physical activity. J. Phys. Act. Health, 8, 178–187.
35. Scott, A., Stride, V., Neville, L. & Hua, M. (2014). Design and promotion of an outdoor gym forolder adults: a collaborative project. Health Promot J Aust, 25(3), 212–214. https://doi.org/10.1071/HE14037
36. Stewart, O. T., Moudon, A. V., Littman, A. J., Seto, E. & Saelens, B. E. (2018). The association between park facilities and duration of physical activity during active park visits. J Urban Health, 95, 869–880.
37. Stride, V., Cranney, L., Scott, A. & Hua, M. (2017). Outdoor gyms and older adults - acceptability, enablers and barriers: A survey of park users. Health Promot J Aust, 28(3), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1071/HE16075
38. Sugiyama, T., Francis, J., Middleton, N.J., Owen, N. & Giles-Corti, B. (2010). Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size, and proximity of neighborhood open spaces. Am J Public Health, 100(9),1752–1757. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.182006
39. Ou, J.Y., Levy, J. I., Peters, J.L., Bongiovanni, R., Garcia-Soto, J., Medina, R. & Scammell, M.K. (2016). A walk in the park: The influence of urban parks and community violence on physical activity in Chelsea, MA. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 13(97), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010097
40. Veitch, J., Carver, A., Abbott, G., Giles-Corti, B., Timperio, A. & Salmon, J. (2015). How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia. BMC Public Health, 15(610), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1960-6
41. Volaklis, K.A., Halle, M. & Meisinger, C., (2015). Muscular strength as a strong predictor of mortality: a narrative review. Eur J Internal Med. 26(5), 303-310.