TR
EN
Perceived Performance of Gastronomy Destinations: The Case of Gaziantep, Adana, Hatay, Sanlıurfa, and Mardin
Öz
The advent of gastronomy as a discipline has occurred in tandem with the emergence of gastronomic tourism as a concept. Türkiye boasts a multitude of destinations that hold significant importance and promise in this regard. Despite the existence of numerous academic studies in the field of gastronomic tourism, there remains a paucity of research addressing the issue of competitiveness among destinations. The present research was conducted with the objective of assessing the competitiveness and reputation of Gaziantep, Şanlıurfa, Mardin, Hatay, and Adana—destinations that are widely regarded as being at the forefront of gastronomy in Türkiye—in the eyes of the public. This assessment was undertaken within the framework of this gap. In this research, a multifaceted approach was employed to assess the perceptions and perspectives of tourists visiting the research destinations concerning regional culinary traditions. This approach entailed the utilization of both quantitative and qualitative data collection instruments, thereby facilitating a comprehensive evaluation of the destinations' competitiveness in the culinary tourism sector. In the quantitative section of the research, data were collected using a structured interview form. In the qualitative component of the research, an average of 200 reviews were collected from Tripadvisor for each city. In the research, the data sets were compared, and the strengths and weaknesses of the destinations were identified. The primary rationale for employing the research as a tool by regional managers and business owners involved in the economic cycle is its capacity for comparative analysis of data. Accordingly, the destinations are hereby ranked according to the scores given by potential tourists who participated in the survey. The sequence of cities traversed is as follows: Gaziantep, Adana, Hatay, Şanlıurfa, and Mardin. However, according to the opinions expressed by tourists who have traveled to these destinations and experienced the restaurants in the region, the destinations are ranked as follows: The sequence of cities traversed is Hatay, Adana, Şanlıurfa, Gaziantep, and Mardin.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Etik Beyan
Ethical Committee Approval was obtained from the Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Committee at the meeting dated 16.12.2020 with the decision number 71.
Kaynakça
- Akdağ, G. (2015). Wine tourism for local tourists following the Thracian vineyard route experiences. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 3(4), 3-11.
- Akgöl, Y. (2012). Gastronomy tourism and foreign tourists visiting Türkiye evaluation of gastronomy experiences. Mersin University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Tourism Management, Mersin.
- Akoğlu, A., Sergeant, O.. and Bayhan, I. (2017). The Michelin Star Restaurant Chefs' Moleküler Gastronomi Algı ve Eğilimleri: San. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 43, 59.
- Ballı, E. (2013). Gastronomy tourism and Adana culinary culture. 2 East Mediterranean Turizm Sempozyumu, Adana, 206-218.
- Batu, A. (2016). Konya in terms of culture and gastronomy tourism. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 4(30), 20-38.
- Björk, P. and Kauppinen-Räisänen, H. (2017). Interested in eating and drinking? How food affects travel satisfaction and the overall holiday experience. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 17(1), 9-26.
- Buhalis, D. (2000). Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tourism management, 21(1), 97-116.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Gastronomi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
15 Haziran 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi
22 Mayıs 2025
Kabul Tarihi
12 Haziran 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2025 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1
APA
Bayram, O., & Arsezen, P. (2025). Perceived Performance of Gastronomy Destinations: The Case of Gaziantep, Adana, Hatay, Sanlıurfa, and Mardin. Journal of Tourism Intelligence and Smartness, 8(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.58636/jtis.1697663
AMA
1.Bayram O, Arsezen P. Perceived Performance of Gastronomy Destinations: The Case of Gaziantep, Adana, Hatay, Sanlıurfa, and Mardin. JTIS. 2025;8(1):44-58. doi:10.58636/jtis.1697663
Chicago
Bayram, Oğulcan, ve Pelin Arsezen. 2025. “Perceived Performance of Gastronomy Destinations: The Case of Gaziantep, Adana, Hatay, Sanlıurfa, and Mardin”. Journal of Tourism Intelligence and Smartness 8 (1): 44-58. https://doi.org/10.58636/jtis.1697663.
EndNote
Bayram O, Arsezen P (01 Haziran 2025) Perceived Performance of Gastronomy Destinations: The Case of Gaziantep, Adana, Hatay, Sanlıurfa, and Mardin. Journal of Tourism Intelligence and Smartness 8 1 44–58.
IEEE
[1]O. Bayram ve P. Arsezen, “Perceived Performance of Gastronomy Destinations: The Case of Gaziantep, Adana, Hatay, Sanlıurfa, and Mardin”, JTIS, c. 8, sy 1, ss. 44–58, Haz. 2025, doi: 10.58636/jtis.1697663.
ISNAD
Bayram, Oğulcan - Arsezen, Pelin. “Perceived Performance of Gastronomy Destinations: The Case of Gaziantep, Adana, Hatay, Sanlıurfa, and Mardin”. Journal of Tourism Intelligence and Smartness 8/1 (01 Haziran 2025): 44-58. https://doi.org/10.58636/jtis.1697663.
JAMA
1.Bayram O, Arsezen P. Perceived Performance of Gastronomy Destinations: The Case of Gaziantep, Adana, Hatay, Sanlıurfa, and Mardin. JTIS. 2025;8:44–58.
MLA
Bayram, Oğulcan, ve Pelin Arsezen. “Perceived Performance of Gastronomy Destinations: The Case of Gaziantep, Adana, Hatay, Sanlıurfa, and Mardin”. Journal of Tourism Intelligence and Smartness, c. 8, sy 1, Haziran 2025, ss. 44-58, doi:10.58636/jtis.1697663.
Vancouver
1.Oğulcan Bayram, Pelin Arsezen. Perceived Performance of Gastronomy Destinations: The Case of Gaziantep, Adana, Hatay, Sanlıurfa, and Mardin. JTIS. 01 Haziran 2025;8(1):44-58. doi:10.58636/jtis.1697663