Karanlık Üçlü, Güç Elde Etme Motivasyonu ve Sosyal Değer Yönelimi: Türkiye'den Bir Çalışma

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amaçları, Karanlık Üçlü'nün (narsisizm, Makyavelizm ve psikopati) Güç Elde Etme Motivasyonu ve Güç Elde Etme Motivasyonunun Sosyal Değer Yönelimi üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesidir. Araştırma verileri, Türkiye'de faaliyet gösteren şirketlerdeki beyaz yakalı çalışanlardan kolayda örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak online gerçekleştirilen bir anket ile toplanmıştır. Araştırma değişkenlerini ölçmek için Kirli Düzine Karanlık Üçlü Envanteri, Güç Elde Etme Motivasyonu Envanteri ve 9 maddelik Üçlü Baskınlık Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Ölçekleri doğrulamak ve faktör yapılarını incelemek için DFA uygulanmıştır. Uyum iyiliği endeksleri kabul edilebilir bir model uyumunu göstermiştir. Karanlık üçlü kişilik özelliklerinin güç elde etme motivasyonu üzerindeki etkilerini incelemek için yol analizi yapılmıştır. Analiz sonuçları, narsisizmin güç elde etme motivasyonu üzerinde pozitif ve anlamlı, Makyavelizmin ise negatif ve anlamlı bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Öte yandan, psikopatinin güç elde etme motivasyonu üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadığı bulgulanmıştır. Güç elde etme motivasyonunun farklı sosyal değer yönelimi türlerinin ortaya çıkma olasılığını etkileyip etkilemediğini incelemek için lojistik regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Sonuçlar anlamlı bir etki bulunmadığını göstermiştir. Araştırmanın bulguları sonuç bölümünde tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Karanlık Üçlü
• Sosyal Değer Yönelimi
• narsisizm
• Makyavelizm
• psikopati

Dark Triad, Motivation to Achieve Power and Social Value Orientation: A Study from Türkiye

Öz

Purposes of this study are to examine the effects of Dark Triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy) on motivation to achieve power and motivation to achieve power on Social Value Orientation. Data is collected white collar employees of the companies operating in Turkiye with an online survey using convenience method for sampling. To measure research variables, Dirty Dozen Dark Triad Inventory, Motivation to Achieve Power Inventory and 9-item Triple Dominance Measure is used. CFA is performed to confirm the scales and examine their factor structures. The goodness of fit indices indicated an acceptable model fit. Path analysis is performed to examine the hypothesized structural model for effects of dark triad on motivation to achieve power. Results indicated narcissism has a significant and positive effect, Machiavellianism has a significant and negative effect on motivation to achieve power. On the other hand, psychopathy is found to have an insignificant effect on motivation to achieve power. Logistic regression analysis is conducted to examine if motivation to achieve power effect likelihood of occurring different types of social value orientation. Results suggested otherwise. The implications of the results are discussed and future research areas are suggested.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dark Triad
• Social Value Orientation
• narcissism
• Machiavellianism
• psychopathy

Kaynakça

1. Adamovic, M. (2023). Breaking down power distance into 5 dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 208, 112178.
2. Ali, F., Amorim, I. S., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Empathy deficits and trait emotional intelligence in psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 758–762.
3. Ames, D. (2009), Pushing up to a point: Assertiveness and effectiveness in leadership and interpersonal dynamics. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 111–133
4. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411.
5. Au, W. T., & Kwong, J. Y. Y. (2004). Measurements and effects of social-value orientation in social dilemmas: A review. In R. Suleiman, D. Budescu, I. Fischer, & D. Messick (Eds.), Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas (p.71-98). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6. Babiak, P., Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. D. (2010). Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. Behavioral sciences & the law, 28(2), 174-193.
7. Balliet, D., Parks, C., & Joireman, J. (2009). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(4), 533-547.
8. Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1090–1112. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030939.

9. Belmi, P., & Pfeffer, J. (2016). Power and death: Mortality salience increases power seeking while feeling powerful reduces death anxiety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(5), 702.
10. Bogaert, S., Boone, C., & Declerck, C. (2008). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A review and conceptual model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 453-480.
11. Brucks, W. M., & Van Lange, P. A. (2007). When prosocials act like proselfs in a commons dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 750-758.
12. Budescu, D. V., Au, W. T., & Chen, X. P. (1997). Effects of protocol of play and social orientation on behavior in sequential resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(3), 179-193.
13. Brewer, G., Parkinson, M., Pickles, A., Anson, J., & Mulinder, G. (2023). Dark Triad traits and relationship dissolution. Personality and Individual Differences, 204, 112045.
14. Cameron, L., Brown, P., & Chapman, J. (1998). Social value orientation and decisions to take proenvironmental action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 675-697.
15. Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G. D., Sedikides, C. & Elliot, A. (2000). Narcissism and comparative self-enhancement strategies. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 329-347. http://doi.org/cg9
16. Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 25(4), 413-423.
17. Corry, N., Merritt, R. D., Mrug, S., and Pamp, B. (2008). The factor structure of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(6), 593-600. doi:10.1080/00223890802388590
18. De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2002). Reactions to group success and failure as a function of identification level: A test of the goal-transformation hypothesis in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(5), 435-442.
19. De Kwaadsteniet, E. W., Van Dijk, E., Wit, A., & De Cremer, D. (2006). Social dilemmas as strong versus weak situation: Social value orientation and tacit coordination under resource size uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 509–516.
20. DeVellis, F.R. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
21. Deutsch, M. (1960). The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. Human Relations, 13 (2), 123-139.
22. Douglass, M. D., Stirrat, M., Koehn, M. A., & Vaughan, R. S. (2023). The relationship between the Dark Triad and attitudes towards feminism. Personality and Individual Differences, 200, 111889.
23. Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and personality psychology compass, 7(3), 199-216.
24. Hare, R. D. (1985). Comparison of procedures for the assessment of psychopathy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(1), 7-16. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.53.1.7
25. Eagly, A. H. (1983). Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 38(9), 971.
26. Eagly, A. H. (2013). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Psychology Press.
27. Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 108(2), 233.
28. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (2000). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. In C. Stangor (Ed.), Stereotypes and prejudice: Essential readings (pp. 142–160). Psychology Press.
29. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. The developmental social psychology of gender, 12(174), 9781410605245-12.
30. Ekizler, H., & Bolelli, M. (2020). The effects of dark triad (Machiavellianism, narcissism, Psychopathy) on the use of power sources. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(37), 27-44.
31. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and Individual Differences. New York: Plenum Press.
32. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
33. French, J. R., Raven, B., & Cartwright, D. (1959). The bases of social power. Classics of organization theory, 7(311-320), 1.
34. Goetz, C. D., & Meyer, K. B. (2018). Mate value discrepancies, the dark triad and relationship satisfaction: A euclidean distances approach. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4, 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0122-8
35. Greenbaum, R. L., Hill, A., Mawritz, M. B., and Quade, M. J. (2017). Employee Machiavellian-ism to unethical behavior: The role of abusive supervision as a trait activator. Journal of Management, 43(2), 585-609. doi:10.1177/0149206314535434
36. Grijalva, E., and Newman, D. A. (2015). Narcissism and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): Meta‐analysis and consideration of collectivist culture, Big Five personality, and narcissism's facet structure. Applied Psychology, 64(1), 93-126. doi:10.1111/apps.12025
37. Gruber, K. J., & White, J. W. (1986). Gender differences in the perceptions of self's and others' use of power strategies. Sex Roles, 15, 109-118.
38. Harms, P. D., Spain, S. M., and Hannah, S. T. (2011). Leader development and the dark side of personality. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(3), 495-509. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.04.007
39. Hilbig, B. E., Glöckner, A., & Zettler, I. (2014). Personality and prosocial behavior: Linking basic traits and social value orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036074.
40. Hiller, N. J., and Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Conceptualizing executive hubris: the role of (hyper‐) core self‐evaluations in strategic decision‐making. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4), 297-319. doi:10.1002/smj.455
41. Hogan, J., Hogan, R., and Kaiser, R.B. (2010). Management derailment. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 3 (p.555–575). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Jakobwitz,
42. S., & Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 331–339.
43. Johnson, P. (1976). Women and power: Toward a theory of effectiveness. Journal of Social issues, 32(3), 99-110.
44. Jonason, P. K., Koenig, B. L., & Tost, J. (2010). Living a fast life: The Dark Triad and life history theory. Human Nature, 21, 428–442.
45. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Buss, D. M. (2010). The costs and benefits of the Dark Triad: Implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 373–378.
46. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Teicher, E. A. (2010). Who is James Bond?: The Dark Triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8, 111–120.
47. Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The Dirty Dozen: A concise measure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 22, 420–432.
48. Joireman, J., Lasane, T. P., Bennett, J., Richards, D., & Solaimani, S. (2001). Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behaviour. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164731.
49. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., and Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality: Published for the European Association of Personality Psychology, 23(1), 5-18. doi:10.1002/per.698
50. Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological assessment, 22(2), 420.
51. Jonason, P. K., Slomski, S., & Partyka, J. (2012). The Dark Triad at work: How toxic employees get their way. Personality and individual differences, 52(3), 449-453.
52. Jones, D. N., and Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Leary and R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior (p. 93–108). New York: Guil-ford.
53. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Differentiating the Dark Triad within the interpersonal circumplex. Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions, 249-267.
54. Jones, D. N., and Paulhus, D. L. (2011). Differentiating the Dark Triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In L.M. Horowitz and S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Psychology: Theory, Research, Assessment and Therapeutic Interventions (pp. 249–268). New York: Wiley.
55. Jones, D. N., and Figueredo, A. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the Dark Triad. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 521-531. doi:10.1002/per.1893
56. Karagonlar, G., & Neves, P. (2020). No more Mr. nice guy: Social value orientation and abusive supervision. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35(2), 85-99.
57. Karkoulian, S., Messarra, L., & Sidani, M. (2009). Correlates of the bases of power and the big five personality traits: an empirical investigation. In Allied Academies International Conference. Academy of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict. Proceedings (Vol. 14, No. 1, p. 7). Jordan Whitney Enterprises, Inc.
58. Kelley, H. H. (1997). The "stimulus field" for interpersonal phenomena: The source of language and thought about interpersonal events. Personality and Social Psychology Review I, 140- 169.
59. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
60. Kessler, S. R., Bandelli, A. C., Spector, P. E., Borman, W. C., Nelson, C. E., and Penney, L. M. (2010). Re‐Examining Machiavelli: A three‐dimensional model of Machiavellianism in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(8), 1868-1896. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00643.x
61. Klapwijk, A., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2009). Why an eye for an eye? The benefits of generosity over tit-for-tat and stinginess. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 83-103.
62. Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1994). Social dilemmas. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
63. Koslowsky, M., & Schwarzwald, J. (2001), Power interaction model: Theory, methodology, and practice. In A. Lee-Chai & J. Bargh (Eds.), Use and abuse of power (pp. 195-214). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
64. Kuhlman, D. M., & Wimberley, D. L. (1976). Expectations of choice behavior held by cooperators, competitors, and individualists across four classes of experimental game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.1.69.
65. Kuhlman, D. M., Camac, C. R., & Cunha, D. A. (1986). Individual differences in social orientation. In H. A. M. Wilke, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Experimental social dilemmas. New York: Lang.
66. Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Wiltshire, J., Bourdage, J. S., Visser, B. A., & Gallucci, A. (2013). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the Dark Triad and Honesty–Humility. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 169-184.
67. Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. London: Wiley.
68. Lilienfeld, S. O., and Andrews, B. P. (1996). Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(3), 488-524. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_3
69. Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48–75.
70. McClelland, D. C. (1970). The Two Faces of Power. Journal of International Affairs, 24(1), 29–47. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24356663
71. McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American psychologist, 40(7), 812.
72. McClintock, C. G., & McNeel, S. (1966a). Cross-cultural comparison of interpersonal motives. Sociometry, 29, 406-427.
73. McClintock, C. G., & McNeel, S. (1966b). Reward and score feedback as determinants of cooperative game behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 606-613.
74. McClintock, C. G., & McNeel, S. (1966c). Societal membership, score status, and game behavior. a phenomenological analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 1, 263-279.
75. McClintock, C. G., & McNeel, S. (1967). Prior dyadic experience and monetary reward as determinants of cooperative and competitive game behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 282-294.
76. McClintock, C. G. (1978). Social values: Their definition, measurement, and development. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 121-137.
77. McClintock, C. G. (1988). Evolution, systems of interdependence, and social values. Behavioral Science, 33, 59-76.
78. McClintock, C. G., & Allison, S. T. (1989). Social value orientation and helping behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb00060.x.
79. McClintock, C. G., & Van Avermaet, E. (1982). Social values and rules of fairness: A theoretical perspective. In V. J. Derlega & J. Grzelak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior (pp. 43-71). New York, NY: Academic Press.
80. McClintock, C. G., & Allison, S. T. (1989). Social value orientation and helping behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(4), 353-362.
81. Messé, L. A., & Sivacek, J. M. (1979). Predictions of others’ responses in a mixed-motive game: Self-justification or false consensus? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 602–607. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.4.602.
82. Messick, D., & Thorngate, W. (1967). Relative gain maximization in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 85-101.
83. Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational basis of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, I-25.
84. Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Leukefeld, C. (2001). Personality disorders as extreme variants of normal personality dimensions. Can the Five Factor Model adequately represent psychopathy? Journal of Personality, 69, 253–276.
85. Miller, J. D., Dir, A., Gentile, B., Wilson, L., Pryor, L. R., and Campbell, W. K. (2010). Searching for a vulnerable dark triad: Comparing factor 2 psychopathy, vulnerable narcissism, and borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality, 78(5), 1529-1564. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00660.x
86. Moon, B., Lee, N. M. H., & Bourdage, J. S. (2022). Personalized and socialized need for power: Distinct relations to employee traits and behaviors. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 54(1), 28.
87. Murphy, R. O., & Ackermann, K. A. (2014). Social value orientation: Theoretical and measurement issues in the study of social preferences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(1), 13-41.
88. Nauta, A., De Dreu, C. K., & Van Der Vaart, T. (2002). Social value orientation, organizational goal concerns and interdepartmental problem‐solving behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(2), 199-213.
89. O'Boyle, E. H., Jr., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., and McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679
90. Offermann, L. R., & Schrier, P. E. (1985). Social influence strategies: The impact of sex, role and attitudes toward power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(3), 286-300.
91. Özsoy, E., Rauthmann, J. F., Jonason, P. K., & Ardıç, K. (2017), Reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Dark Triad Dirty Dozen (DTDD-T), Short Dark Triad (SD3-T), and Single Item Narcissism Scale (SINS-T). Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 11-14.
92. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of research in personality, 36(6), 556-563.
93. Paunonen, S. V., Lönnquvist, J.-E., Verkasalo, M., Leikas, S., & Nissinen, V. (2006), Narcissism and emergent leadership in military cadets. The Leadership Quarterly,17, 475–486.
94. Platow, M. J., McClintock, C. G., & Liebrand, W. B. (1990). Predicting intergroup fairness and ingroup bias in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(3), 221-239.
95. Pfeffer, J. (2010). Power play. Harvard Business Review, 88(7/8), 84–92.
96. Plessen, C. Y., Franken, F. R., Ster, C., Schmid, R. R., Wolfmayr, C., Mayer, A. M., ... & Tran, U. S. (2020). Humor styles and personality: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the relations between humor styles and the Big Five personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 154, 109676.
97. Pletzer, J. L., Balliet, D., Joireman, J., Kuhlman, D. M., Voelpel, S. C., & Van Lange, P. A. (2018). Social value orientation, expectations, and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta–analysis. European Journal of Personality, 32(1), 62-83.
98. Raven, B.H. (1992), A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality,7, 217–244.
99. Raven, B. H., Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1998), Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 307–332.
100. Robie, C., Brown, D. J., and Bly, P. R. (2008). Relationship between major personality traits and managerial performance: Moderating effects of derailing traits. International Journal of Management, 25(1), 131–139.
101. Roth, A. E. (1988). Laboratory experimentation in economics: A methodological overview. The Economic Journal, 98, 974-1031.
102. Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X.
103. Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M., & Agassi, V. (2001), Captains’ leadership type and police officers’ compliance to power bases. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 273–290.
104. Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M. and Ochana-Levin, T. (2004), Usage of and compliance with power tactics in routine versus non-routine work settings, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 385-402.
105. Upton, D. R. (2009). Implications of social value orientation and budget levels on group performance and performance variance. Journal of management accounting research, 21(1), 293-316.
106. Van Andel, C. E. E., Tybur, J. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2016). Donor registration, college major, and prosociality: Differences among students of economics, medicine and psychology. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.037.
107. Van Lange, P. A., De Bruin, E., Otten, W., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of personality and social psychology, 73(4), 733.
108. Van Lange, P. A. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77(2), 337.
109. Van Lange, P. A. M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner’s honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 126–141.
110. Van Lange, P. A. M., Otten, W., De Bruin, E. M. N., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733-746.
111. Van Lange, P. A. M., De Cremer, D., Van Dijk, E., & Van Vugt, M. (2007). Self-interest and beyond: Basic principles of social interaction. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 540-561). New York, NY: Guilford.
112. Van Lange, P. A. M., Schippers, M.,& Balliet, D. (2011).Who volunteers in psychology experiments? An empirical review of prosocial motivation in volunteering. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.038.
113. Van Lange, P. A. M., Bekkers, R., Chirumbolo, A., & Leone, L. (2012). Are conservatives less likely to be prosocial than liberals? From games to ideology, political preferences and voting. European Journal of Personality, 26, 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.845.
114. Vernon, P. A., Martin, R. A., Schermer, J. A., & Mackie, A. (2008). A behavioral genetic investigation of humor styles and their correlations with the Big-5 personality dimensions. Personality and individual differences, 44(5), 1116-1125.
115. Von Neuman, L, & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
116. Wai, M., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2012). The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(7), 794–799. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.008.
117. White, B. A. (2014). Who cares when nobody is watching? Psychopathic traits and empathy in prosocial behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.033
118. Wille, B., De Fruyt, F., and De Clercq, B. (2013). Expanding and reconceptualizing aberrant personality at work: Validity of five‐factor model aberrant personality tendencies to predict career outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 66(1), 173-223. doi:10.1111/peps.12016
119. Yahaya, N., Taib, M. A. B. M., Ismail, J., Shariff, Z., Yahaya, A., Boon, Y., & Hashim, S. (2011). Relationship between leadership personality types and source of power and leadership styles among managers. African Journal of Business Management, 5(22), 9635.
120. Yalçın, Ö. (2009). Ekolojik ikilemlere ilişkin tutum, toplumsal sorumluluk ve yabancılaşmanın toplumsal değer yönelimi açısından incelenmesi (Master's thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
121. Yukl, G., & Tracey, J. B. (1992). Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(4), 525.
122. Zeigler-Hill, V., & Dehaghi, A. M. B. (2023). Narcissism and psychological needs for social status, power, and belonging. Personality and Individual Differences, 210, 112231.