Etik Liderlik İletişimi Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Öz

Etik liderlik iletişimini ele alan bu araştırmanın amacı, Abu Bakar ve Connaughton (2023)’nin literatüre kazandırdığı Etik Liderlik İletişimi Ölçeğini Türkçeleştirmek, ulusal literatüre katkı sağlanmak, bu ölçeğin kullanılması ile katılımcıların etik liderlik iletişimi düzeylerinin belirlenmesidir. Bu kapsamda araştırma sorusu; “Etik Liderlik İletişimi ölçeğinin İngilizce formu Türkçeye uyarlanabilir mi?” şeklinde belirlenmiştir. Etik Liderlik, etik davranışın takipçileriyle iki yönlü iletişim yoluyla uygulandığını vurgulamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, etik liderlik kavramsal çerçevesinin üç kategorisine dayanarak oluşturulan etik liderlik iletişim ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması yapılmıştır. Üç kategori; liderin eylemde etik bir örnek olması, liderin takipçilerine adil davranması, liderin etik yaklaşımı aktif olarak yönetmesi olarak vurgulanmaktadır. Ölçeğin Türkçe formu İstanbul ve Ankara’daki hastanelerde görev yapmakta olan hemşireler örneklemine (n=412) uygulanmıştır. Güvenirlik değerlerini belirlemek amacıyla, Cronbach Alpha değerine bakılmış olup yeterli düzeyde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ölçeğe yönelik yapı geçerliği analizi uygulanmıştır. Bu doğrultuda verilere Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi (AFA) yapılmıştır. Yapı geçerliliği ile varyansı açıklayan tek boyutlu madde-faktör yapısı belirlenmiştir. Akabinde doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) ile model uyumu test edilmiştir. Nihai olarak Etik Liderlik İletişimi Ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun tek boyutlu ve 15 ifadeden oluşan yapısının doğrulandığı görülmüştür. Daha sonra ilgili ölçeğe yönelik başka ölçek ile uyumunun belirlenmesi amacıyla bağımsız başka bir ölçek olan Etik Liderlik Ölçeği ile korelasyon değerlerine bakılmıştır. Bu araştırma ile ilgili ölçeğin Türk örneklemindeki ilk psikometrik özellikleri oluşturularak, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları yapılmış ve araştırma sürecinde Türkçe Etik Liderlik İletişim Ölçeğinin tutarlı ve güvenilir olduğu gözlenerek ulusal literatüre katkı sağlandığı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Etik Liderlik
• Etik Liderlik İletişimi
• Güvenirlik
• Geçerlilik

Ethical Leadership Communication Scale: Validity and Reliability Study

Öz

The purpose of this study addressing ethical leadership communication is to translate the Ethical Leadership Communication Scale, which Abu Bakar and Connaughton (2023) introduced to the literature, to contribute to the national literature, and to determine the ethical leadership communication levels of the participants by using this scale. In this context, the research question was: "Can the English form of the Ethical Leadership Communication Scale be adapted to Turkish?” Ethical Leadership emphasizes that ethical behavior is implemented through two-way communication with followers. In this study, the ethical leadership communication scale, created based on the three categories of the ethical leadership conceptual framework, was adapted to Turkish. The three categories are emphasized as the leader being an ethical example in action, the leader treating his followers fairly, and the leader actively managing the ethical approach. The Turkish form of the scale was applied to a sample of nurses working in hospitals in Istanbul and Ankara (n=412). To determine the reliability values, Cronbach's Alpha value was examined and it was determined to be sufficient. Construct validity analysis was applied to the scale. In this direction, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed on the data. With the construct validity, the one-dimensional item-factor structure explaining the variance was determined. Then, the model fit was tested with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Finally, it was seen that the one-dimensional structure of the Turkish form of the Ethical Leadership Communication Scale consisting of 15 statements was confirmed. Then, to determine the fit with another scale for the relevant scale, the correlation values with another independent scale, the Ethical Leadership Scale, were examined. In this research, the first psychometric properties of the relevant scale in the Turkish sample were established, validity and reliability studies were conducted, and it is thought that the Turkish Ethical Leadership Communication Scale was consistent and reliable during the research process, and thus, it was contributed to the national literature.

Kaynakça

1. Abu Bakar, H. ve Connaughton, S. L. (2022). Ethical leadership, perceived leader–member ethical communication and organizational citizenship behavior: development and validation of a multilevel model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(1), 96-110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2021-0356
2. Abu Bakar, H. ve Connaughton, S. L. (2023). Ethical leadership communications scale: Development and validation of a measure and multi-level test. Journal of General Management, 03063070231170702. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070231170702
3. Abu Bakar, H. ve McCann, R. M. (2016). The mediating effect of leader–member dyadic communication style agreement on the relationship between servant leadership and group-level organizational citizenship behavior. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(1), 32-58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915601162
4. Abu Bakar, H. ve Omillion-Hodges, L. (2020). The mediating role of relative communicative behavior on the relationship between ethical leadership and organizational identification. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(1), 52-72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2019-0190
5. Aitamaa, E., Leino-Kilpi, H., Iltanen, S. ve Suhonen, R. (2016). Ethical problems in nursing management: The views of nurse managers. Nursing ethics, 23(6), 646-658. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733015579309
6. Albright, J. J. ve Park, H. M. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis using amos, LISREL, Mplus, SAS/STAT CALIS.
7. Alkan, D. P. (2015). Etik liderlik ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik çalışması. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(38), 109-121.
8. Amiridis, K. (2018). The shadow of Sophocles: Tragedy and the ethics of leadership. Business Ethics Quarterly, 28(1), 15-29. doi:10.1017/beq.2017.39

9. Anser, M. K., Ali, M., Usman, M., Rana, M. L. T. ve Yousaf, Z. (2021). Ethical leadership and knowledge hiding: an intervening and interactional analysis. The Service Industries Journal, 41(5-6), 307-329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2020.1739657
10. Banks, G. C., Fischer, T., Gooty, J. ve Stock, G. (2021). Ethical leadership: Mapping the terrain for concept cleanup and a future research agenda. The leadership quarterly, 32(2), 101471. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101471
11. Barbuto Jr, J. E. ve Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group & Organization Management, 31(3), 300-326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106287091
12. Bashir, M. ve Hassan, S. (2020). The need for ethical leadership in combating corruption. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(4), 673-690. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318825386
13. Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M. ve Green, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of business ethics, 139, 517-536. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2625-1
14. Beykoz, D. ve Erdem, A. T. (2016). Turgut Özal’ın liderlik tarzı: Özal’ın 1983 TRT seçim konuşmasının söylem analizi yöntemiyle incelenmesi. Abant Kültürel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(16), 95-108.
15. Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and power in social life: Routledge.
16. Brison, N., Stinglhamber, F. ve Caesens, G. (2022). Organizational dehumanization. In Oxford research encyclopedia of psychology.
17. Brown, M. E. ve Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Ethical and unethical leadership: Exploring new avenues for future research. Business ethics quarterly, 20(4), 583-616. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201020439
18. Brown, M. E. ve Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The leadership quarterly, 17(6), 595-616. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
19. Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K. ve Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 97(2), 117-134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
20. Chen, A. S.-Y. ve Hou, Y.-H. (2016). The effects of ethical leadership, voice behavior and climates for innovation on creativity: A moderated mediation examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.007
21. Ciulla, J. B. (2006). Ethics: The heart of leadership. In Responsible leadership (pp. 17-32): Routledge.
22. Cohen, L., Manion, L. ve Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education: Routledge.
23. Çıtak, G., & Kahraman, B. (2021). Yöneticilerin etik liderlik davranışları ve hemşirelerin örgütsel adalet algıları. Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi, 8(1), 31-41.
24. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (Vol. 2): Pegem akademi Ankara.
25. Craig, S. B. ve Gustafson, S. B. (1998). Perceived leader integrity scale: An instrument for assessing employee perceptions of leader integrity. The Leadership Quarterly, 9(2), 127-145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(98)90001-7
26. De Hoogh, A. H. ve Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader's social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates' optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 297-311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.002
27. Eisenbeiss, S. A. (2012). Re-thinking ethical leadership: An interdisciplinary integrative approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 791-808. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.001.
28. Eisenbeiß, S. A. ve Brodbeck, F. (2014). Ethical and unethical leadership: A cross-cultural and cross-sectoral analysis. Journal of business ethics, 122, 343-359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1740-0
29. Ejaz, T., Anjum, Z.-u.-Z., Rasheed, M., Waqas, M. ve Hameed, A. A. (2022). Impact of ethical leadership on employee well-being: the mediating role of job satisfaction and employee voice. Middle East Journal of Management, 9(3), 310-331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/MEJM.2022.122577
30. Elsayed, B. K. M., Awad, N. H. A. ve El Bialy, G. G. (2020). The relationship between nurses’ perception of ethical leadership and anti-social behavior through ethical climate as a mediating factor. Int J Nov Res Healthc Nurs, 7(2), 471-484.
31. Erdem, A. T. (2021a). Ethical leadership, service innovation and psychological capital interaction: A research in Nevşehir hotel sector. Uluslararası Anadolu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 515-532. doi:https://doi.org/10.47525/ulasbid.880952
32. Erdem, A. T. (2021b). Güçlendirici liderliğin yenilikçi iş davranışına etkisinde bilgi paylaşımının aracılık rolü: Bilişim sektöründe bir araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 30(1), 119-131. doi:https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.824655
33. Erdem, A. T. ve Alav, O. (2023). İletişim isteksizliği ölçeği: Türkçe’ye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(3), 1387-1404. doi:https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1327859
34. Fatien Diochon, P., Defiebre-Muller, R. ve Viola, F. (2018). Toward an “ethics of serendipity”: Disrupting normative ethical discourses in organizations. Human Resource Development Review, 17(4), 373-392. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318796321
35. Ferdig, M. A. (2007). Sustainability leadership: Co-creating a sustainable future. Journal of Change Management, 7(1), 25-35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010701233809
36. Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
37. Gill, C. ve Caza, A. (2018). An investigation of authentic leadership’s individual and group influences on follower responses. Journal of Management, 44(2), 530-554. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314566461
38. Graham, K. A., Ziegert, J. C. ve Capitano, J. (2015). The effect of leadership style, framing, and promotion regulatory focus on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of business ethics, 126, 423-436. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1952-3
39. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M. ve Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40, 414-433. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
40. Hameed, A. A., Anjum, Z.-u.-Z. ve Waqas, M. (2022). Does ethical leadership enhance employee green behaviour? Examining the mediating influence of employee green commitment. Middle East Journal of Management, 9(2), 127-145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/MEJM.2022.121391
41. Hameed, A. A., Rasheed, M., Khalid, I., Umar, M. ve Gill, A. N. (2021). Examining the effect of ethical leadership on green work outcomes: A moderated mediation analysis. The journal of contemporary issues in business and government, 27(6), 857-874. doi:https://doi.org/10.47750/cibg.2021.27.06.075
42. Hameed, A. A., Waqas, M., Fatima, T. ve Anjum, Z. U. Z. (2023). Ideals Versus Actual Practice of Ethical Leadership: A Case Study Analysis of Public Sector Organizations in Pakistan. Global Business Review, 09721509221149605. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221149605
43. He, H. ve Brown, A. D. (2013). Organizational identity and organizational identification: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Group & Organization Management, 38(1), 3-35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112473815
44. Hopkins, W. E. ve Scott, S. G. (2016). Values-based leadership effectiveness in culturally diverse workplaces. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-11-2014-0125
45. Hoyt, C. L. ve Price, T. L. (2015). Ethical decision making and leadership: Merging social role and self-construal perspectives. Journal of business ethics, 126, 531-539. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1974-x
46. Hwang, I.-H. (2023). The Influence of Ethical Leadership and Collaborative Communication on IS Behavior in Organizations: The Role of Trust and Person-Organization Fit. The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences, 18(3), 465-474. doi:https://doi.org/10.13067/JKIECS.2023.18.3.465
47. Islam, T., Ahmed, I. ve Ali, G. (2019). Effects of ethical leadership on bullying and voice behavior among nurses: mediating role of organizational identification, poor working condition and workload. Leadership in Health Services, 32(1), 2-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-02-2017-0006
48. Jiang, R. ve Lin, X. (2021). Trickle-down effect of moral leadership on unethical employee behavior: a cross-level moderated mediation model. Personnel Review, 51(4), 1362-1385. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2020-0257
49. Johnson, C. E. (2020). Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership: Casting light or shadow: Sage Publications.
50. Joreskog, K. ve Sorbom, D. (1993). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. NY: University Press of America.
51. Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N. ve De Hoogh, A. H. (2011). Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. The leadership quarterly, 22(1), 51-69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.007
52. Kalshoven, K., Van Dijk, H. ve Boon, C. (2016). Why and when does ethical leadership evoke unethical follower behavior? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(2), 500-515. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-10-2014-0314
53. Karsten, N. ve Jacobs, S. P. (2022). ‘Moral Person’or ‘Ethical Leader’? A Longitudinal Quantitative Analysis of Councilors’ Integrity Requirements for Dutch Mayors (2008–2019). Public Integrity, 24(3), 267-279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2021.1932145
54. Khan, M. A. S., Du, J., Hameed, A. A., Anwar, F., Waqas, M., Kayani, A. J., Attar, R. W. ve Alhazmi, A. H. (2024). Effects of ethical leadership on individual learning and unlearning: Mediation through affective commitment. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 30(3), 100258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2024.100258
55. Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications.
56. Kyambade, M. ve Namatovu, A. (2025). Exploring the role of ethical leadership and personality traits in shaping ethical behavior among Ugandan security officers. International Journal of Public Leadership, 21(1), 18-36. doi:10.1108/IJPL-09-2024-0107
57. Liu, H. (2017). The masculinisation of ethical leadership dis/embodiment. Journal of business ethics, 144, 263-278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2831-x
58. MacKenzie, S. B. ve Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of retailing, 88(4), 542-555. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.08.001
59. Makaroff, K. S., Storch, J., Pauly, B. ve Newton, L. (2014). Searching for ethical leadership in nursing. Nursing ethics, 21(6), 642-658. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733013513
60. Mariyani, D. (2024). The Influence of Ethical Leadership on the Quality of External Audits: A Business Management Perspective. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 2(2), 547-553. doi:https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v2i2.198
61. Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M. ve Salvador, R. B. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 108(1), 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.04.002
62. Mercader, V., Galván-Vela, E., Ravina-Ripoll, R. ve Popescu, C. R. G. (2021). A focus on ethical value under the vision of leadership, teamwork, effective communication and productivity. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(11), 522. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14110522
63. Merdan, E. ve Erdem, A. T. (2024a). Hizmet sabotajı ölçeği’nin geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizi. Denetişim(31), 75-85. doi:https://doi.org/10.58348/denetisim.1537181
64. Merdan, E. ve Erdem, A. T. (2024b). İleri görev bilincinin rol performansı etkisinde içsel güdülenmenin aracı rolü. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 11(2), 125-137. doi:https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.1463454
65. Mıhcı, H. ve Uzun, T. (2024). Okullarda etik liderlik ile örgütsel adalet ve örgütsel özdeşleşme arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(3), 29-39.
66. Mihelic, K. K., Lipicnik, B. ve Tekavcic, M. (2010). Ethical leadership. International Journal of Management & Information Systems (Online), 14(5).
67. Munro, I. ve Thanem, T. (2018). The ethics of affective leadership: Organizing good encounters without leaders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 28(1), 51-69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2017.34
68. Musenze, I. A. ve Mayende, T. S. (2023). Ethical leadership (EL) and innovative work behavior (IWB) in public universities: examining the moderating role of perceived organizational support (POS). Management Research Review, 46(5), 682-701. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-12-2021-0858
69. Özcan, K. ve Balyer, A. (2013). Liderlik oryantasyon ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 136-150. doi:https://doi.org/10.17860/efd.34755
70. Pohling, R., Bzdok, D., Eigenstetter, M., Stumpf, S. ve Strobel, A. (2016). What is ethical competence? The role of empathy, personal values, and the five-factor model of personality in ethical decision-making. Journal of business ethics, 137, 449-474. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2569-5
71. Qian, Y. ve Jian, G. (2020). Ethical leadership and organizational cynicism: the mediating role of leader-member exchange and organizational identification. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 25(2), 207-226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-06-2019-0069
72. Riggio, R. E., Zhu, W., Reina, C. ve Maroosis, J. A. (2010). Virtue-based measurement of ethical leadership: the leadership virtues questionnaire. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(4), 235. doi:https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0022286
73. Salehnia, M. (2012). The effect of ethical leadership on organization ethical climate. Journal of Ethics Science Technology, 7(2), 86-98.
74. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. ve Müller, H. (2003). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellerinin Uyumunun Değerlendirilmesi: Önem Testleri ve Tanımlayıcı Uyum İyiliği Ölçüleri. Çevrimiçi Psikolojik Araştırma Yöntemleri, 8(2), 23-74.
75. Sharif, M. M. ve Scandura, T. A. (2014). Do perceptions of ethical conduct matter during organizational change? Ethical leadership and employee involvement. Journal of business ethics, 124, 185-196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1869-x
76. Sharma, D. ve Sharma, M. (2024). Exploring the mediating effect of intellectual capital on the relationship between ethical leadership and innovative performance. Business Process Management Journal, 30(6), 2073-2095. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-02-2024-0093
77. Singh, A. ve Vashist, H. (2025). Ethical leadership in health-care organizations–a scoping review. Leadership in Health Services, 38(1), 136-152. doi:10.1108/LHS-04-2024-0035
78. Slavec Gomezel, A. ve Stritar, R. (2023). Does it pay to be an ethical leader in entrepreneurship? An investigation of the relationships between entrepreneurs’ regulatory focus, ethical leadership, and small firm growth. Review of Managerial Science, 17(1), 155-173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00512-6
79. Sotirova, D. (2018). Ethical leadership in cross-cultural business communication. Acta Prosperitatis(9), 51-88.
80. Suhonen, R., Stolt, M., Gustafsson, M. L., Katajisto, J. ve Charalambous, A. (2014). The associations among the ethical climate, the professional practice environment and individualized care in care settings for older people. Journal of advanced nursing, 70(6), 1356-1368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12297
81. Tang, Y. ve Li, Y. (2022). Ethicality neutralization and amplification: a multilevel study of ethical leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 37(2), 111-124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2020-0342
82. Tuna, M., Bircan, H., & Yeşiltaş, M. (2012). Etik liderlik ölçeği’nin geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalişmasi: Antalya örneği. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 26(2), 143-155.
83. Tutar, H. ve Erdem, A. T. (2022). Örnekleriyle bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri ve SPSS uygulamaları. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
84. Uğurlu, C.T. ve Sincar, M. (2010). Yönetici etik liderlik ölçeği geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. V. Ulusal Eğitim Yönetimi Kongresi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Antalya.
85. Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S. ve Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913
86. Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A. ve Misati, E. (2017). Does ethical leadership enhance group learning behavior? Examining the mediating influence of group ethical conduct, justice climate, and peer justice. Journal of Business Research, 72, 14-23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.013
87. Yağcı, B. Y. (2024). İlkokuldaki öğretmen görüşlerine göre yöneticilerin etik liderlik davranışları. Anadolu Sosyal ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(2), 1-22.
88. Yan, Z., Zhang, Z. ve Choo, W. C. (2024). A meta-analysis of antecedents and outcomes of psychological capital in hospitality and tourism. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 33(7), 993-1021. doi:10.1080/19368623.2024.2342493
89. Yılmaz, E. (2005). Etik liderlik ölçeğinin heçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi, XVI. Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi Bildirileri Kitabı, 808-814.
90. Yılmaz, N., Erdoğan, E., Kayar, Z., & Yılmaz, E. (2023). Sağlık Çalışanlarında Etik Liderlik Algısının Psikolojik Sahiplenme Üzerine Etkisi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(3), 1005-1024.
91. Yukl, G., Mahsud, R., Hassan, S. ve Prussia, G. E. (2013). An improved measure of ethical leadership. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 20(1), 38-48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051811429352