Robots Saying "Hello, How Are You?": Humanoid Interaction in Customer Service

Öz

This study investigates consumer perceptions and expectations regarding service robots. It aims to address participants' technology adoption status, their thoughts about service robots, anthropomorphism, robot design, their attitudes towards service failures, word-of-mouth marketing, and satisfaction in service robot interaction. Conducted with a qualitative approach, interviewing 45 participants, the study reveals that participants have a positive relationship with technology and believe in the potential benefits of service robots. However, they also express concerns about unemployment and safety. Participants exhibit diverse preferences for humanoid versus machine-like appearances in robot design. In cases of service failures, their expectations for compensation include apologies and corrections. Customer satisfaction is deemed critical, and word-of-mouth marketing is effective for dissemination. Based on these findings, recommendations are provided for businesses and academics concerning factors to consider in the development and integration of service robots into service sectors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• robot
• antropomorphisim
• design
• humanoid
• word of mouth marketing
• satisfaction
• service failure

Kaynakça

1. Aaker, Jennifer L. “Dimensions of Brand Personality.” Journal of Marketing Research 34, no. 3 (1997): 347–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379703400304.
2. Abdi, Elahe, Dewi Tojib, Alexander Kenwa Seong, Yamika Pamarthi, and George Millington-Palmer. “A Study on the Influence of Service Robots’ Level of Anthropomorphism on the Willingness of Users to Follow Their Recommendations.” Scientific Reports 12, no. 1 (September 10, 2022): 15266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19501-0.
3. Abotdatabase.info. “Collection | the ABOT Database,” 2019. https://www.abotdatabase.info/collection. Allied Market Research. “Hospitality Robots Market Size, Share | Industry Report by 2030,” n.d. https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/hospitality-robots-market-A13078.
4. Barnett, Willy, Adrienne Foos, Thorsten Gruber, Debbie Keeling, Kathleen Keeling, and Linda Nasr. “Customer Perceptions of Interactive Service Robots: A Value-Dominant Logic Perspective.” The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, August 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/roman.2014.6926404.
5. Bartneck, Christoph, Dana Kulić, Elizabeth Croft, and Susana Zoghbi. “Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots.” International Journal of Social Robotics 1, no. 1 (November 20, 2009): 71–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3.
6. Başer, Sanem Hazel, & Bakırtaş, Hülya. (2023). “Hizmet sektöründe insansı robot kullanımı üzerine bir literatür incelemesi”. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 207-223.
7. Belanche, Daniel, Luis V. Casaló, Carlos Flavián, and Jeroen Schepers. “Service Robot Implementation: A Theoretical Framework and Research Agenda.” The Service Industries Journal 40, no. 3–4 (October 3, 2020): 203–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2019.1672666.
8. Bleeker, Maaike, and Marco Rozendaal. “2 Dramaturgy For Devices: Theatre As Perspective On The Design Of Smart Objects.” Bloomsbury, 2021.

9. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/420284/Designing_Smart_Objects_in_Everyday_Life_Intellige..._2_Dramaturgy_for_Devices_Theatre_as_Perspective_on_the_Design_of_Smart..._.pdf?sequence=1.
10. Brady, Michael K., and J. Joseph Cronin. “Some New Thoughts on Conceptualizing Perceived Service Quality: A Hierarchical Approach.” Journal of Marketing 65, no. 3 (2001): 34–49.
11. Breazeal, Cynthia. “Emotion and Sociable Humanoid Robots.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59, no. 1–2 (July 2003): 119–55.
12. Breazeal, Cynthia, Jesse Gray, and Matt Berlin. “An Embodied Cognition Approach to Mindreading Skills for Socially Intelligent Robots.” The International Journal of Robotics Research 28, no. 5 (May 2009): 656–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364909102796.
13. Chandler, Jesse, and Norbert Schwarz. “Use Does Not Wear Ragged the Fabric of Friendship: Thinking of Objects as Alive Makes People Less Willing to Replace Them.” Journal of Customer Psychology 20, no. 2 (April 2010): 138–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.12.008.
14. Chang, Ying, Chubing Zhang, Tiange Li, and Yina Li. “Social Cognition of Humanoid Robots on Customer Tolerance of Service Failure.” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 36, no. 7 (October 24, 2023). doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-02-2023-0250.
15. Choi, Youngjoon, Miju Choi, Munhyang (Moon) Oh, and Seongseop (Sam) Kim. “Service Robots in Hotels: Understanding the Service Quality Perceptions of Human-Robot Interaction.” Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management 29, no. 6 (December 25, 2019): 1–23.
16. Choi, Youngjoon, Munhyang (Moon) Oh, Miju Choi, and Seongseop (Sam) Kim. “Exploring the Influence of Culture on Tourist Experiences with Robots in Service Delivery Environment.” Current Issues in Tourism 24, no. 5 (March 4, 2020): 1–17.
17. Collins, Galen R. “Improving Human–Robot Interactions in Hospitality Settings.” International Hospitality Review 34, no. 1 (April 18, 2020): 61–79.
18. Creswell, Jhon. “Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches.” Sage, 2013 Cusick, William J. “All Customers Are Irrational: Understanding What They Think, What They Feel, and What Keeps Them Coming Back.” AMACOM, 2009.
19. Çetin, Ensar. “Public Perceptions and Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Humanoid Bots/Robots: Evidence from Turkey.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 208 (November 2024): 123678. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123678.
20. Daston, Lorraine, and Gregg Mitman. “Introduction: The How and Why of Thinking with Animals. In Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism.” Columbia Univ. Press., 2005, 1–14.
21. Davis, Fred D. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13, no. 3 (September 1989): 319–40.
22. Dennett, Daniel C. “True Believers: The Intentional Strategy and Why It Works Philosophy of Mind, Contemporary Readings.” Routledge, London, 2003. .
23. Disalvo, Carl, Francine Gemperle, and Jodi Forlizzi. “Imitating the Human Form: Four Kinds of Anthropomorphic Form.” Unpublished manuscript, 2005. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~kiesler/anthropomorphism-org/pdf/Imitating.pdf.
24. Doğan Erdinç, Ece, and Ayda Uzunçarşılı Soydaş. “Tekinsiz Vadi Teorisi Bağlamında Yapay Zeka Etkileyicileri.” Selçuk Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi 17, no. 1 (March 19, 2024): 1–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.1390778.
25. Du. , Y. “An Analysis of the Uncanny Valley Effect.” Social Sciences in Yunnan 235, no. 3 (2020): 37–44. Duffy, Brian R. “Anthropomorphism and the Social Robot.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, no. 3–4 (March 2003): 177–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00374-3.
26. Epley, Nicholas, Adam Waytz, and John T. Cacioppo. “On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism.” Psychological Review 114, no. 4 (2007): 864–86.
27. Fan, Alei, Luorong (Laurie) Wu, Li Miao, and Anna S. Mattila. “When Does Technology Anthropomorphism Help Alleviate Customer Dissatisfaction after a Service Failure? – the Moderating Role of Customer Technology Self-Efficacy and Interdependent Self-Construal.” Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management 29, no. 3 (July 19, 2019): 1–22.
28. Fernandes, Teresa, and Elisabete Oliveira. “Understanding Customers’ Acceptance of Automated Technologies in Service Encounters: Drivers of Digital Voice Assistants Adoption.” Journal of Business Research 122 (January 2021): 180–91.
29. Ferro, Francesco, and Luca Marchionni. “REEM: A Humanoid Service Robot.” Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, January 1, 2014, 521–25.
30. Fiske, Susan T, Amy, Peter Glick, and Jun Xu. “A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content.” Routledge EBooks, January 29, 2018, 162–214.
31. Foner, Leonard N. “Entertaining Agents a Sociological Case Study.” In AGENTS ’97: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 122–29. Association for Computing Machinery New York NY United States, 1997. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/267658.267684.
32. Fox, Jesse, and Andrew Gambino. “Relationship Development with Humanoid Social Robots: Applying Interpersonal Theories to Human/Robot Interaction.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 24, no. 5 (January 11, 2021). doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0181.
33. Gan, Yan, Yingrui Ji, Shuo Jiang, Xinxiong Liu, Zhipeng Feng, Yao Li, and Yuan Liu. “Integrating Aesthetic and Emotional Preferences in Social Robot Design: An Affective Design Approach with Kansei Engineering and Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 83 (May 1, 2021): 103128.
34. Geller, Tom. “Overcoming the Uncanny Valley.” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 28, no. 4 (July 2008): 11–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/mcg.2008.79.
35. Ghazali, Ezlika M., Dilip S. Mutum, Michele Hui-Jing Pua, and T. Ramayah. “Status-Quo Satisfaction and Smartwatch Adoption: A Multi-Group Analysis.” Industrial Management & Data Systems 120, no. 12 (July 30, 2020): 2319–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-10-2019-0576.
36. Goodrich, Michael A., and Alan C. Schultz. “Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey.” Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction 1, no. 3 (2007): 203–75.
37. Grazzini, Laura, Giampaolo Viglia, and Daniel Nunan. “Dashed Expectations in Service Experiences. Effects of Robots Human-Likeness on Customers’ Responses.” European Journal of Marketing 57, no. 4 (March 6, 2023). doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-03-2021-0220.
38. Grohmann, Bianca. “Gender Dimensions of Brand Personality.” Journal of Marketing Research 46, no. 1 (February 2009): 105–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.1.105.
39. Guthrie, Stewart E. “Anthropomorphism: A Definition and a Theory.” In Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals, edited by Robert W. Mitchell, Nicholas S. Thompson, and H. Lyn Miles, 50–58. New York: SUNY Press, 1997.
40. Hart, John, Jonathan Gratch, and Stacy Marsella. How Virtual Reality Training Can Win Friends and Influence People. Fundamental Issues in Defense Training and Simulation, 2017.
41. Hegel, Frank. “Effects of a Robot’s Aesthetic Design on the Attribution of Social Capabilities.” In IEEE Xplore, 469–75, 2012. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343796.
42. Hess, Alexandra Claudia, and Valentyna Melnyk. “Pink or Blue? The Impact of Gender Cues on Brand Perceptions.” European Journal of Marketing 50, no. 9/10 (September 12, 2016): 1550–74.
43. Hoffman, Guy , and Wendy Ju. “Designing Robots with Movement in Mind,” February 28, 2014. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5898/jhri.3.1.hoffman.
44. Kahraman, Cengiz, Muhammet Deveci, Eda Boltürk, and Seda Türk. “Fuzzy Controlled Humanoid Robots: A Literature Review.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 134 (December 2020): 103643. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2020.103643.
45. Kassarjian, Harold B. “Presidential Address, 1977: Anthropomorphism and Parsimony.” Advances in Customer Research 5, no. 1 (1978).
46. Kharub, Isha, Michael Lwin, Aila Khan, and Omar Mubin. “Perceived Service Quality in HRI: Applying the SERVBOT Framework.” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8 (November 3, 2021).
47. Kiesler, Sara, Aaron Powers, Susan R. Fussell, and Cristen Torrey. “Anthropomorphic Interactions with a Robot and Robot–like Agent.” Social Cognition 26, no. 2 (April 2008): 169–81.
48. Kitzinger, Jenny. “Qualitative Research: Introducing Focus Groups.” BMJ 311, no. 7000 (July 29, 1995): 299–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299.
49. Kosuge, Kazuhiro, and Yasuhisa Hirata. “Human-Robot Interaction.” IEEE Xplore. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, August 1, 2004.
50. Kvale, Steinar . An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publications, 1994.
51. Kwak, Sonya S. “The Impact of the Robot Appearance Types on Social Interaction with a Robot and Service Evaluation of a Robot.” Archives of Design Research 27, no. 2 (May 31, 2014): 81–93.
52. Landwehr, Jan R., Ann L. McGill, and Andreas Herrmann. “It’s Got the Look: The Effect of Friendly and Aggressive ‘Facial’ Expressions on Product Liking and Sales.” Journal of Marketing 75, no. 3 (May 2011): 132–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.3.132.
53. Le, Laszlo Sajtos, Werner H Kunz, and Karen V Fernandez. “The Future of Work: Understanding the Effectiveness of Collaboration between Human and Digital Employees in Service.” Journal of Service Research 28, no. 1 (January 23, 2024): 186205.
54. Lee, Hyunmin, Nazli Cila, Klaas Koerten, Maaike Bleeker, and Marco Rozendaal. “The Human-Robot Ensemble: Designing Expressive Movements for Restaurant Service Robots.” In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 312–20. 2025 20th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2025.
55. Leite, Iolanda, André Pereira, Samuel Mascarenhas, Carlos Martinho, Rui Prada, and Ana Paiva. “The Influence of Empathy in Human–Robot Relations.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 71, no. 3 (March 2013): 250–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.09.005.
56. Leminen, Seppo, Mika Westerlund, and Mervi Rajahonka. “INNOVATING with SERVICE ROBOTS in HEALTH and WELFARE LIVING LABS.” International Journal of Innovation Management 21, no. 08 (December 2017): 1740013. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919617400138.
57. Lieven, Theo, Bianca Grohmann, Andreas Herrmann, Jan R. Landwehr, and Miriam van Tilburg. “The Effect of Brand Design on Brand Gender Perceptions and Brand Preference.” European Journal of Marketing 49, no. 1/2 (February 9, 2015): 146–69.
58. Lim, Xin-Jean, Jun-Hwa Cheah, Siew Imm Ng, Norazlyn Kamal Basha, and Yide Liu. “Are Men from Mars, Women from Venus? Examining Gender Differences towards Continuous Use Intention of Branded Apps.” Journal of Retailing and Customer Services 60, no. 2021 (May 2021): 102422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102422.
59. Lin, Patrick, Keith Abney, and George Bekey. “Robot Ethics: Mapping the Issues for a Mechanized World.” Artificial Intelligence 175, no. 5–6 (April 2011): 942–49.
60. Liu, Xing (Stella), Xiao (Shannon) Yi, and Lisa C. Wan. “Friendly or Competent? The Effects of Perception of Robot Appearance and Service Context on Usage Intention.” Annals of Tourism Research 92 (January 1, 2022): 103324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103324.
61. Lv, Xingyang, Yue Liu, Jingjing Luo, Yuqing Liu, and Chunxiao Li. “Does a Cute Artificial Intelligence Assistant Soften the Blow? The Impact of Cuteness on Customer Tolerance of Assistant Service Failure.” Annals of Tourism Research 87 (March 2021): 103114.
62. Machado, Joana César, Leonor Vacas-de-Carvalho, Salim L. Azar, Ana Raquel André, and Barbara Pires dos Santos. “Brand Gender and Customer-Based Brand Equity on Facebook: The Mediating Role of Customer-Brand Engagement and Brand Love.” Journal of Business Research 96, no. 96 (March 2019): 376–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.016.
63. Mason, Mark. “Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 11, no. 3 (September 2010).
64. Mende, Martin, Maura L. Scott, Jenny van Doorn, Dhruv Grewal, and Ilana Shanks. “Service Robots Rising: How Humanoid Robots Influence Service Experiences and Elicit Compensatory Customer Responses.” Journal of Marketing Research 56, no. 4 (April 22, 2019): 535–56.
65. Mobed , Dean Aaron, Andrew Wodehouse, and Anja Maier. “The Aesthetics of Robot Design: Towards a Classification of Morphologies.” Proceedings of the Design Society 4, no. 2024 (May 1, 2024): 2413–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2024.244.
66. Mori, M. “Bukimi No Tani [the Uncanny Valley].” Energy 7, no. 2 (1970): 98–100. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1370013168736887425.
67. Mori, Masahiro, Karl MacDorman, and Norri Kageki. “The Uncanny Valley [from the Field].” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 19, no. 2 (June 2012): 98–100.
68. Murphy, Jamie, Ulrike Gretzel, and Charles Hofacker. “Service Robots in Hospitality and Tourism: Investigating Anthropomorphism.” In 15th APacCHRIE Conference, Vol. 31, 2017. https://heli.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/APacCHRIE2017_Service-Robots_paper-200.pdf.
69. Murphy, Jamie, Ulrike Gretzel, and Juho Pesonen. “Marketing Robot Services in Hospitality and Tourism: The Role of Anthropomorphism.” Routledge EBooks, May 19, 2021, 16–27.
70. Myers, Michael D. Qualitative Research in Business and Management. Qualitative Research in Business and Management, 2019.
71. Nakanishi, Junya, Itaru Kuramoto, Jun Baba, Ogawa Kohei, Yuichiro Yoshikawa, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. “Can a Humanoid Robot Engage in Heartwarming Interaction Service at a Hotel?” In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, 2018.
72. Newton, Joshua D., Jimmy Wong, and Riza Casidy. “Deck the Halls with Boughs of Holly to Soften Evaluations of Service Failure.” Journal of Service Research 21, no. 4 (February 25, 2018): 389–404. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670518755316.
73. Nowell, Lorelli S., Jill M. Norris, Deborah E. White, and Nancy J. Moules. “Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16, no. 1 (October 2, 2017): 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.
74. Osakwe, Christian Nedu, David Říha, Islam Mahmoud Yousef Elgammal, and T Ramayah. “Understanding Gen Z Shoppers’ Interaction with Customer-Service Robots: A Cognitive-Affective-Normative Perspective.” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 52, no. 13 (August 1, 2024): 103–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-09-2023-0552.
75. Özden, Aybike Tuba . “1.0’dan 5.0’a Dünya: Web, Pazarlama, Endüstri ve Toplum.” Dijital Cagda Isletmecilik Dergisi 5, no. 1 (May 11, 2022): 29–44.
76. Parasuraman, A., Leonard Berry, and Valarie Zeitbaml. “Understanding Customer Expectations of Service.” MIT Sloan Management Review, April 15, 1991. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/understanding-customer-expectations-of-service/.
77. Pijls, R., B. H. Groen, and W. A. Termaat. “Hospitable Non-Verbal Staff Behaviour as a Means to Create Value to Customers.” Journal of Creating Value 7, no. 1 (May 2021): 60–73.
78. Qin, Huanyu, Zhipeng Xie, Chen Ding, Jingyuan Wang, and Yi Xu. “Healing or Hesitation? The Impact of Anthropomorphism on Customers’ Repair Intentions for Products.” Journal of Retailing and Customer Services 79, no. 2024 (July 1, 2024): 103805–5.
79. Rahimian, Elahe, Soheil Zabihi, Seyed Farokh Atashzar, Amir Asif, and Arash Mohammadi. “Surface EMG-Based Hand Gesture Recognition via Hybrid and Dilated Deep Neural Network Architectures for Neurorobotic Prostheses.” Journal of Medical Robotics Research 5, no. n01n02 (January 31, 2020). doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/s2424905x20410019.
80. Randall, Natasha, and Selma Šabanović. “Designing Robots for Marketplace Success: A Case Study with Technology for Behavior and Habit Change.” International Journal of Social Robotics 16 (January 19, 2024): 461–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01093-y.
81. Randall, Natasha, and Selma Šabanović. “Do You Want Me?: Exploring Differences in Customer Home Robot Preferences, Perceptions, and Purchase Intent.” ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 14, no. 3 (January 24, 2025): 1–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3714476.
82. IFR. “Reviews Definitions and Classifications of Industrial Robots and Service Robots ,” 2020. https://ifr.org/img/worldrobotics/WR_Industrial_Robots_2020_Chapter_1.pdf.
83. Risman, Barbara J. “Gender as a Social Structure.” In Handbook of the Sociology of Gender, edited by Barbara J. Risman, Carissa M. Froyum, and William J. Scarborough, 19–43. Springer Nature Link, 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_2.
84. Rogers, Everett M. , Arvind Singhal, and Margeret M. Quinlan. “Diffusion of Innovations.” In an Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research, edited by Don W. Stacks and Michael B. Salwen. New York, Ny Routledge, 2009. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203887011-36/diffusion-innovations-everett-rogers-arvind-singhal-margaret-quinlan.
85. Root-Bernstein, M., L. Douglas, A. Smith, and D. Veríssimo. “Anthropomorphized Species as Tools for Conservation: Utility beyond Prosocial, Intelligent and Suffering Species.” Biodiversity and Conservation 22, no. 8 (May 25, 2013): 1577–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0494-4.
86. Saç, Halil. “İnsansı Robotlara Yönelik Negatif Algı ve Tekinsiz Vadi Etkisi: YouTube Kullanıcı Yorumları Üzerine Bir İnceleme.” Beykoz Akademi Dergisi Sınırsız Dünya Yapmak & Ötesi (January 22, 2024): 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.14514/beykozad.1365281.
87. Severinson-Eklundh, Kerstin, Anders Green, and Helge Hüttenrauch. “Social and Collaborative Aspects of Interaction with a Service Robot.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, no. 3–4 (March 2003): 223–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00377-9.
88. Shum, Cass, Hyun Jeong Kim, Jennifer R Calhoun, and Eka Diraksa Putra. “‘I Was so Scared I Quit’: Uncanny Valley Effects of Robots’ Human-Likeness on Employee Fear and Industry Turnover Intentions.” International Journal of Hospitality Management 120 (July 1, 2024): 103762–62.
89. Simon, Olga, Barbara Neuhofer, and Roman Egger. “Human-Robot Interaction: Conceptualising Trust in Frontline Teams through LEGO® Serious Play®.” Tourism Management Perspectives 35 (July 2020): 100692. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100692.
90. Smith, Jonathan A. “Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.” In Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, edited by Jonathan A. Smith. SAGE, 2015.
91. Song, Xiaoxiao, Yunpeng Li, Xi Yu Leung, and Dong Mei. “Service Robots and Hotel Guests’ Perceptions: Anthropomorphism and Stereotypes.” Tourism Review 79, no. 2 (November 20, 2023): 505–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-04-2023-0265.
92. Stroessner, Steven J., and Jonathan Benitez. “The Social Perception of Humanoid and Non-Humanoid Robots: Effects of Gendered and Machinelike Features.” International Journal of Social Robotics 11, no. 2 (November 8, 2018): 305–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0502-7.
93. Sun, Cong, Yuechun Ding, Xinyi Wang, and Xing Meng. “Anthropomorphic Design in Mortality Salience Situations: Exploring Emotional and Non-Emotional Mechanisms Enhancing Customer Purchase Intentions.” Behavioral Sciences 14, no. 11 (November 5, 2024): 1041.
94. Teng, Chih-Ching. “Commercial Hospitality in Restaurants and Tourist Accommodation: Perspectives from International Customer Experience in Scotland.” International Journal of Hospitality Management 30, no. 4 (December 2011): 866–74.
95. Tuomi, Aarni, Iis P. Tussyadiah, and Jason Stienmetz. “Applications and Implications of Service Robots in Hospitality.” Cornell Hospitality Quarterly 62, no. 2 (May 25, 2020): 232–227.
96. Uyar, Esra, and Vural Akar. “Hizmet İşletmelerinde Hizmet Hatası ve Telafisi.” In Güncel İşletmecilik Araştırmaları - 4, edited by Aydın Kayabaşı, 133–44. Eğitim Yayınevi, 2024.
97. Van Doorn, Jenny, Martin Mende, Stephanie M. Noble, John Hulland, Amy L. Ostrom, Dhruv Grewal, and J. Andrew Petersen. “Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto: Emergence of Automated Social Presence in Organizational Frontlines and Customers’ Service Experiences.” Journal of Service Research 20, no. 1 (November 28, 2017): 43–58.
98. Van Tilburg, Miriam, Theo Lieven, Andreas Herrmann, and Claudia Townsend. “Beyond ‘Pink It and Shrink It’ Perceived Product Gender, Aesthetics, and Product Evaluation.” Psychology & Marketing 32, no. 4 (March 10, 2015): 422–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20789.
99. Vatan, Ahmet, and Seden Dogan. “What Do Hotel Employees Think about Service Robots? A Qualitative Study in Turkey.” Tourism Management Perspectives 37 (January 2021): 100775.
100. Venkatesh, Viswanath, and Fred D. Davis. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.” Management Science 46, no. 2 (February 2000): 186–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
101. Wan, Xiaoyu, and Haodi Chen. “A Research on the Influence Mechanism of Humanization Degree of Service Robots on User Misbehavior.” Management Decision, April 17, 2024.
102. Waytz, Adam, Joy Heafner, and Nicholas Epley. “The Mind in the Machine: Anthropomorphism Increases Trust in an Autonomous Vehicle.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 52 (May 2014): 113–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005.
103. Willis, Gordon B. Analysis of the Cognitive Interview in Questionnaire Design. Oxford University Press, 2015. Wünderlich, Nancy V, Markus Blut, and Christian Brock. “Enhancing Corporate Brands through Service Robots: The Impact of Anthropomorphic Design Metaphors on Corporate Brand Perceptions.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 41 (February 24, 2024): 1022–46.
104. Yi, Zhang, and Wang Yonggui. “A Research on the Influence Mechanism of Anthropomorphic Service Robots on Customer Usage Intention: The Moderating Effect of Social Class.” Foreign Economics & Management 44, no. 03 (March 20, 2022): 3–18.
105. Yijin, Zhou, Shiman, Mao and Xiaoyan Chen. “Status Compensation: The Effect of Brand Anthropomorphism ‘Brand as a Servant’ on the Purchase Intention” 42, no. 02 (February 1, 2020): 43–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20191112.001.
106. Yoganathan, Vignesh, Victoria-Sophie Osburg, Werner H. Kunz, and Waldemar Toporowski. “Check-in at the Robo-Desk: Effects of Automated Social Presence on Social Cognition and Service Implications.” Tourism Management 85 (August 2021): 104309.
107. Zhang, Yaqiong, and Shifu Wang. “The Influence of Anthropomorphic Appearance of Artificial Intelligence Products on Customer Behavior and Brand Evaluation under Different Product Types.” Journal of Retailing and Customer Services 74 (September 1, 2023): 103432.