RELATIONSHIP AMONG DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES AND THE PREFERENCES OF WATER PARK VISITATORS: AN IMPLICATION FROM TURKEY

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

RELATIONSHIP AMONG DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES AND THE PREFERENCES OF WATER PARK VISITATORS: AN IMPLICATION FROM TURKEY

Öz

Many scientific studies show that there is a significant relationship among demographic characteristics of individuals and leisure activities undertaken by them. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship among demographic variables and the preference of leisure activities undertaken by visitors at one of the water parks in Turkey. Twenty-six different types of leisure activities were selected by the researcher from various literatures. “Others” option also was given to the respondents to identify other leisure activities which were not given on the questionnaire. The results obtained from this study showed that demographic characteristics of individuals had some degree of impacts on the preference of leisure activities undertaken by water park visitors

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Leisure participation, demographic characteristics, impact, water parks

Kaynakça

1. Adler, P.A., & Adler, P. (1999). “Work; Leisure.” Sociological Perspectives, 42(3), 369-402.
2. Alexandris, K., & Carroll, B. (1997). Demographic Differences in the Perception of Constraints on Recreational Sport Participation: Results from a Study in Greece. Leisure Studies, 16, 107-125.
3. Altergoot, K., & McCreedy, C.C. (1993). Gender and Family Status Across the Life: Constraints of Five Types of Leisure. Loisiret Societe/Society and Leisure, 16(1), 151-180.
4. Ballo, J.D., & Harrington, M. (1991). The Leisure Experience of Women in Ontorio. Journal of Applied Recreation Research, 26, 57-74.
5. Carrington, B., Chivers, T., & Williams, T. (1987). Gender, Leisure and Sport: A Case Study of Young People of South Asian Descent. Leisure Studies, 6, 265-278.
6. Culp, R. H. (1998). Adolescent Girls and Outdoor Recreation: A Case Study Examining Constraints and Effective Programming. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(3), 356- 379.
7. Freysinger, V. J., & Ray, R. O. (1994). The Activity Involvement of Women and Men in Young and Middle Adulthood: A Panel Study. Leisure Sciences, 16, 193-217.
8. Freysinger, V.J. (1995). “The Dialectics of Leisure and Development for Women and Men in Mid-life: An Interpretive Study.” Journal of Leisure Research, 27(1), 61-84.

9. Goeldner, C.R. (1997). The 1998 travel outlook. Journal of Travel Research, 36(2), 58-62.
10. Gratton, C., & Kokolakadis, T. (1997).The leisur e r evolution. Leisure Management, 17(6), 37-39.
11. Hall, C.M., & Page, S.J. (1999). The Geography of Tourism and Recreation: Environment, Place and Space, London, and New York: Routledge.
12. Harrison, A.W., & Rainer, R.K. JR. (1992). The Influence of Individual Differences on Skill in End-User Computing, Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(1): 93-111.
13. Henderson, K. A. (1990). Anatomy is not Destiny: A Feminist Analysis of the Scholarship on Women's Leisure. Leisure Sciences, 12, 229-236.
14. Henderson, K. A. (1996). One Size Doesn't Fit All: The Meanings of Women's Leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 28(3), 139-154.
15. Henderson, K. A., & Bialeschki, M. D. (1993). Negotiating Constraints to Women's Physical Recreation. Society and Leisure, 16, 389-412.
16. Henderson, K. A., & Bialeschki, M. D. (1991). A Sense of Entitlement to Leisure as Constraint and Empowerment for Women. Leisure Sciences, 13, 51-65.
17. Henderson, K.A. (1995). Women’s Leisure: More Truth than Facts? World Leisure and Recreation, 37(1), 9-13.
18. Hochschild, A. (1989). The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home, Viking, New York.
19. Hudson, S. (2000). The Segmentation of Potential Tourists: Constraint Differences between Men and Women. Journal of Travel Research, 38(4), 363-368.
20. Hunt, K., Ford, G., & Mutrie, N. (2001). Is Sport for All? Exercise and Physical Activity Patterns in Early and Late Middle Age in the West of Scotland, Health Education, 100 (4): 151-158.
21. Jackson, E. L., & Henderson, K. A. (1995). Gender-Based Analysis of Leisure Constraints. Leisure Sciences,17, 31-51.
22. James, K. (2000). “You Can Feel Them Looking at You': The Experiences of Adolescent Girls at Swimming Poll.” Journal of Leisure Research, 32(2), 262-281.
23. Kelly, J. R., & Kelly, J. R. (1994). “Multiple Dimensions of Meaning in the Domains of Work, Family, and Leisure.” Journal of Leisure Research, 26(3), 250-274.
24. Khan, A.D. (1997). “Leisure and Recreation Among Woman of Selected Hill-Farming Families in Bangladesh.” Journal of Leisure Research, 29(1), 5-20.
25. Kroll, Karen M. (2000). The graying of the baby boomers bodes well for the leisure industry. Investment Dealers' Digest, 66(12), 14-15.
26. Larson, R., & Richards, M. H. (1994). Divergent Realities: The Emotional Lives of Mothers, Fathers, and Adolescents. New York: Basic Books.
27. Merridee, L.B., Carol, A.M. (1998). Hours Spend on Household Tasks by Business School Graduates, Women in Management Review, 13(3): 105-113.
28. Mieczkowski, Z. (1990). World Trend in Tourism and Recreation, New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
29. Moccia, F. D. (2000). Planning Time: An Emergent European Practice. European Planning Studies, 8(3), 367-375.
30. Molitor, G.T. T. (2000). The dawn of the leisure era. Association Management, 52(2), 76-81.
31. Mulvihill, C., Rivers, K., & Aggleton, P. (2000). Views of Young People Towards Physical Activity: Determinants and Barriers to Involvement, Health Education, 100 (5): 190- 1999.
32. Pohl, S. L., Borrie, W. T., & Patterson, M. E. (2000). Women, Wilderness, and
33. Everyday Life: A Documentation of the Connection between Wilderness Recreation and
34. Women's Everyday Lives. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(4), 415-434.
35. Qureshi, S., & Hoppel, C. (1995). Profiles Computer Predispositions, Journal of Professional Service Marketing, 12(1), 73-83.
36. Russell, R. V., & Frances K. S. (1996). “Leisure as Burden: Sudanese Refugee Women.” Journal of Leisure Research, 28(2), 108-121. Sağcan, M. (1986). Rekreasyon ve Turizm, Cumhuriyet Basımevi, İzmir.
37. Samdahl, D.M. (1991). “Issues in the Measurement of Leisure: A Comparison of Theoretical and Connotative Meanings.” Leisure Sciences, 13, 33-49.
38. Shaw, S. M. (1994). Gender, Leisure, and Constraint: Towards a Framework for the Analysis of Women's Leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 26 (1), 8-22.
39. Stewart, W. P. (1998). “Leisure as Multiphase Experiences: Challenging Traditions.” Journal of Leisure Research, 30(4), 391-400.
40. Straits Times. (1996). Finding Out Who Surfs the Internet is Their Business, November 12.
41. Thompson S.H. (2001). Demographic and Motivation Variables Associated with Internet Usage Activities, Internet Research Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 11(2): 125-137.
42. Weston, S. A., Commercial Recreation & Tourism, An Introduction to Business Oriented Recreation, Brown & Benchmark Publishers, London, 1996.
43. Zaffane, R., & Check, B. (1993). Profiles and Correlates of Computer Usage: A Study of the Australian Telecommunications Industry, Computers Industry, 22: 53-69.